A Song That Will, Once And For All, Put A Rest To The Liberal's Claims Of Global Warning

Submitted by: 5cats 1 month ago Science


Not everyone thinks global warming is a bad thing you know! Heck, a lot of places would greatly benefit with a little more warmth.

And for those who don't know what a "Muskie" is, give yourself a few seconds to read up on them here. They're a freshwater fish from the dinosaur age that were too tough to be killed by glaciers. They grow to six feet in length.
There are 17 comments:
Male 118
Well, this might have been amusingly tongue-in-cheek, but it got too political right out of the gate.  The original title was fine as it was, I think.  There was no need to change it, fancy.
0
Reply
Male 37,248
skeeter01 Thanks skeeter01, I thought it was both funny and made some points too, but that even pro-AGW people could have a laugh about it. Palm trees in Minnesota? Gators?? Lolz! No need for gators, they got Muskies already...
0
Reply
Male 37,248
Well, that wasn't my title by a long ways...
I just found an amusing video and thought I'd share it, not taking pot-shots at others in the headline. :-/

And yes, Muskies would slaughter the gaiters, lolz! At least those small enough to swallow, 2 feet long or so.

My Title: M4GW: If We Had Some Global Warming Song
Ok?
0
Reply
Male 16
Reality is unconcerned with your inability to seek and process available information.  Reality does not care about the color of your arbitrary team you incessantly spew wherever you can.  Reality will not bend, regardless of how many ridiculous fringe sites you use as a soothing echo chamber.  Reality will always reveal you to be the fool you really are.  Riddle me this: why does there seem to be an inverse correlation between willful ignorance and loudness/persistence of their demonstrations of such?
0
Reply
Male 128
ANullBob Riddle me this: why does there seem to be an inverse correlation between willful ignorance and loudness/persistence of their demonstrations of such?         Only the wisest realize just how little we know and only the completely ignorant can be completely confidant. 
-1
Reply
Male 37,248
taxidriver And that is exactly why "the science is settled!" and why "no further research is required" and "those who deny AGW should be sent to prison".

Funny how one side (the alleged skeptics) accepts new developments, and the other denies it has anything to do with their precious AGW dogma theory...
0
Reply
Male 37,248
ANullBob I know right! How those AGW fanatics cling to their error-filled fake theories which have never once been correct is beyond my understanding, eh? It's like a religion to them, you cannot question their dogma (or examine their data!) or they will put you in prison (at least they want to, luckily there's still 'due process' in some places).
-1
Reply
Male 208
because global warming = more heat and this has absolutely no consequence other than one's comfort?
0
Reply
Male 37,248
m3dm3d Pretty much, yeah. That and massive increase in plant growth and health (and thus food for everyone) due to increased CO2...

Since it is natural? We'd better get used to it, eh? Not like humans can stop naturally-caused world-wide climate change, any more than we can stop a single tornado...

It has been colder before, all life suffered. It has been warmer before, all life flourished. Seems like an easy choice to me.
-3
Reply
Male 246
5cats Genuine question, why would the scientific community lie about global warming?
1
Reply
Male 37,248
mrteatime They aren't. Only a small % of the "scientific community" push hard-line AGW. Most of the supporters are afraid for their careers is they speak against it.

Most scientists are actually "skeptics" in that they believe AGW is NOT 100% human-caused. But if they even suggest that? They get crucified. This has been shown hundreds of times where even strong AGW supporters get vilified and attacked for saying natural causes exist, or that predicted calamities have simply not happened (re: hurricanes).
0
Reply
Male 1,405
That and massive increase in some plant growth and a few healthy people (and thus food for everyone) due to increased CO2...


FTFY.

Some plants will grow better, an enormous number (mostly in the oceans) will die because, while they can breathe better, they won't be able to survive the heat or the extreme temperature shifts. Same with animals. Most will die, a few will survive. Substantially decreasing the variety of plant and animal life will have a lot of catastrophic consequences.

Increasing the temperature of a place that's -20°F by 20 degrees is pleasant for the few people who live in places that are -20°F is kind of nice for those few people. When that also results in increasing the temperature of a place that's normally 120°F near the equator, where a vast majority of people live, well...that's going to be a bit of an issue.

But since a few plants and animals will probably survive, everything is AOK! Let's thin out the herd so that we can make more $$$! Yay!!!
3
Reply
Male 37,248
bliznik Where on Earth is the average temperature 100F? And exactly how many humans live there? 
Seriously you do know it isn't linear, right? That there's dozens of factors involved in where warming or cooling occur and how much...

Humans live in a temperature range of about 40C and the predicted AGW increase of +2C over a century will barely even be noticed by most of the human race, even less so by the animal kingdom.
-1
Reply
Male 37,248
bliznik ALL plants benefit from increased CO2, perhaps some very exotic (non-food) ones don't? But since CO2 is what they live and thrive on? And it has been measured world-wide that ALL plants are growing better, faster and healthier since CO2 started rising? You are just plain wrong.

How many plants live exclusively along the ocean coasts? And why can they not adapt when the coasts move a few feet per century? Like they have for the past 10,000 years? 

In NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM will the Earth's temperature increase by +20 degrees, not even using Fahrenheit... sheesh man. I appreciate you've tried to be reasonable (and were kind of polite, maybe) but seriously? 

A 'few' plants will survive? A 'few' animals? Shake your head, then hide your face in shame for saying some things that stupid.
-2
Reply
Male 1,405
5cats 

The song you posted talked about global warming raising the temp by 20 degrees in an area that is 20 degrees below zero. You posted a song that used hyperbole to prove a point, I fired the same hyperbole back at ya to prove the counterpoint.

Same with the 100 degree bit.

If we're talking actual scientific data, then we can't use hyperbole. In that situation then you are correct that humans that won't be hit by the intensified droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, and cyclones...since global warming intensifies natural disasters connected with warmer weather (yes, even only +2°C). Fewer storms, but more intense storms, more water evaporation, higher humidity...all of that good stuff.

You know that plants need (1) appropriate humidity levels, (2) appropriate levels of CO2, (3) appropriate water levels, and (4) appropriate levels of sunlight in order to survive, right? Increasing the level of CO2 benefits almost all plants, but a lot of plants don't do so well with increased humidity levels, decreased consistent rainfall, and increased levels of sunlight. Just talk to any botanist. Also, the ocean has a *lot* of plantlife that has already been killed by the increased ocean temperatures, which has also killed a lot of ocean life. Since the ocean has absorbed more heat than the air has. Just ask any Marine Biologist.
2
Reply
Male 37,248
bliznik THE SONG IS COMEDY! It is not a fucking PHD Thesis paper! ZOMG you really think I believe that it's +20F because I POSTED a PARODY which I did not write? 

They said it wouldn't have to be -20 below... not that the temperature would rise 20 degrees, holy fuck are you that retarded you cannot even understand English?

The rest of your comment is NOTHING BUT hyperbole and fantasy. Just stop while you're behind, you look like a total idiot already.
NO increased droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, and other storms in the past 20 years of "AGW disaster increases" none. Not number, not intensity, even though skeptics too say the temperature will rise and those things MIGHT happen? They simply have NOT. Facts > your bullshit.
0
Reply