New Benghazi Papers Reveal That Obama's People Knew Exactly What Happened By Sept. 12

Submitted by: 5cats 6 months ago in News & Politics

There is no end to the Benghazi scandal, it just gets worse every time more facts are revealed.

Hillary's own e-mails showed she knew that very night: there was no "spontaneous protest," but in fact a heavily armed terror attack. 

Now further evidence shows that other officials knew as well. That there were NO protesters AT ALL outside the compound. There was a demonstration against a video hundreds of miles away in a different nation entirely, but those were entirely unconnected. That the attack was planned and coordinated by a terrorist group: the Obama Administration knew this on Sept. 12, but pushed the lie for days after. And kept repeating some of them for months.

That Hillary and Obama sat there and did nothing for 13 hours? While the attacks continued and Americans died? The most shameful of all of their scandals, and that's not easy to do.

There are 37 comments:
Male 2,738
http://www.judicialwatch.org/  just check it out
0
Reply
Male 1,534
rumham   have no idea what your point is here
0
Reply
Male 2,738
casaledana yes i know. sorry delicate butterfly for confusing you
0
Reply
Male 2,738
so this isnt fake news? like everything else trump tells us is fake news?
0
Reply
Male 1,534
rumham  No this is real and factual. You never read about the Benghazi attack and the death of American citizens? You should read up on it. If you look at the hole story it tells a fascinating tail of a failed American Secretary of State and how she screwed the pooch.
0
Reply
Male 1,534
What is important in this case is that the President and the Secretary of State, did not protect our embassy, when they had been warned of growing threats, a lack of ability to protect the embassy property properly. They had time to send help but allowed conflicting orders to holt the help. Then made up a story to cover that they should have been better prepared. What sounds better a demonstration got out of hand, or we ignored threats to our embassy. And then screwed up the rescue. It made no difference why the new ambassador was there, if a successful rescue had been carried out they could have said anything if no one was killed and help had been sent in time, even not in time but timely help. But they screwed the pooch and tried to cover it up with a lie. Then when confronted with absolute truth they stuck to the lie.    
1
Reply
Male 39,784
casaledana Exactly! They knew the truth, all the facts, but chose to lie to America's face... and will get away with it because of the lap-dog MSM.
0
Reply
Male 3,989
Why does everyone act as if they have some "right" to the truth? The government doesn't have to tell you anything and it's up to them to decide whether it's a case of National Security. Hilary had every right to lie about it at the time. 
-3
Reply
Male 245
dm2754 Government as established in America is meant to be accountable to the people. That means we demand the truth from those we place in authority.
0
Reply
Male 7,587
What a lot of us fail to realize is this was most likely exposed a failed OP.  The CIA was trying to arm anti Ghadafi forces and other anti extremists Muslim groups.  At least that's what the "hearsay" is saying.  Also the reason why no one is prosecuting anyone for this.  It may expose our under dealings with groups in the middle east.  
0
Reply
Male 39,784
normalfreak2 What in the Blue Blazes are you blathering about now???
Failed OP? What is that? Obama invaded the freaking country, overthrew the Dictator and placed a coalition of terrorist sympathisers in charge...

The point is: they lied about a protest over a video for days and weeks after they knew, for a fact and without doubt, that this was untrue. Can you stay on topic for once? Is that too much to ask for? 
-2
Reply
Male 7,587
5cats If they were to admit they knew anything or why the Ambassador was even there in the first place they'd have to explain this CIA OP of selling arms to Syrian rebels.  IE they don't and didn't want to explain this.
0
Reply
Male 39,784
normalfreak2 So you are changing the subject and also making up bullshit excuses? Right from the DNC playbook, as usual.

Or are you claiming that the consulate was shipping arms and was therefor a valid target for attack? That would be a new low for you...
0
Reply
Male 7,587
5cats How is this changing the subject?  I'm giving you CONTEXT.  Because it matters and it needs to be considered.  I'm not saying the attack was justified.  I'm saying it was a confluence of bad timing.  Because of the CIA weapons selling isn't exactly legal.  They can't come out and say everything in this case because of the optics and the legality of it.
0
Reply
Male 1,614
old news
1
Reply
Female 3,919
of course they knew.  Most of the more intelligent/folks paying attention didn't fall for the 'video tape of hate" bullshit for long if at all.
-2
Reply
Male 39,784
melcervini But Obama, Rice and Hillary kept repeating it, and the lapdog media did too.

That specific compound had been begging for resources since December, when major upgrades were recommended. Hillary personally shot them down (it's in her e-mails) and only a few were carried out.
There was even a 'practice run'  a few weeks before, a bluff attack to test the defences... still nothing was done.

And those 13 hours, 2 of the men who died would still be alive if Hillary OR Obama had actually done something, ANYTHING to help. But they did nothing, and Americans died because of that. And Hillary tried to blame the CIA... deplorable eh?

Remember: if it wasn't for Obama's ILLEGAL INVASION of Libya? None of this would have happened.
-2
Reply
Male 237
"The most shameful of all of their scandals, and that's not easy to do."

?????

Hang on, pal. It's going to be bumpy ride for the next 4 (?) years.
1
Reply
Male 39,784
mikesex What 'scandal' has ricked the Trump Administration thus far? 
One guy wasn't 100% accurate in his job interview and had to resign... no laws broken, no crimes, no one died. 
And? What else? 
The only reason it will be "bumpy" is because the MSM will attack without thought, fact or reason for the next 8 solid years. Look at the shit they've fabricated in such a short time! They are just warming up the DNC propaganda machine...
-1
Reply
Male 2,738
5cats 5cats sees putin in his fantasies
-1
Reply
Male 237
5cats It's what's coming down the pike. Mnuchin, Sessions, Pruitt, Ross, DeVos; nothing good there for the heartland. 
It's not his opponents he has to worry about, it's the supporters he is going to disappoint.
Benghazi is yesterdays news. Russia? Now there's another story! I remember how long Watergate took to mature; the narrative is just developing.
2
Reply
Male 381
mikesex "Benghazi is yesterday's news." That's a worn out tactic: denying something is even an issue for several years, then claiming it's invalid because it's a few years old. But you're willing to give the Russian issue plenty of time to develop.   
1
Reply
Male 237
DerryNH Hardly a 'tactic". All those investigations and what was the result? It's over.
Russia on the other hand, still going right now, with more to come. 

0
Reply
Male 264
5cats Here's a scandal for you: 45 Has doubled his mar-a-Lago club membership fees since his election.  He's now being paid $200K for each member.  Since he will not provide proof that he has separated himself from his businesses, his claims that he has done so are dubious at best.  

Now, consider this:  He has been at that resort almost every weekend since his election.  Recently, a tape came out showing him talking to his club members, calling them the "special people" and openly soliciting input from them on cabinet positions. Now THIS is the quintessential definition of "pay to play," is it not?  Pay $200k, you get to hobnob with the POTUS almost every weekend and even get to bend his ear on who you want in his cabinet to help your particular business interests.   

I'm eager to hear your response to this one.
2
Reply
Male 7,587
skeeter01 He didn't seperate himself from his business.  It's a revokable Trust that does shit all.  ALl he did was what he always does.  he put on a show and idiots who never question what they see on T.V. went "AWESOME HE DID IT" even though he really didn't do squat.  Just like his Executive Orders.  All bullshit that plays well on T.V. nothing really was done.  He's going to have to start getting Congress involved and actually start passing laws.
2
Reply
Male 1,142
skeeter01 Golf fees? Really? That's the best you can do? For 200k, you are NOT going to be playing with POTUS, and not like that either. You might see his Secret Service guys and gals  but for 200k, you ain't getting near him.
-1
Reply
Male 264
scheckydamon I never said he's playing golf with members.  I'm saying his club members have access to him by simply paying their 200K fee.  Don't believe me?  Here's a link to the tape and the story about it (see how it's done 5cats?). 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-leaked-audio-clubs-guests-235161

There are two versions of the tape on this site.  The one at the top is an edited version (4-ish minutes).  So you can't claim it's chopped up and taken out of context, the version of the tape further down the page is the full version (13-ish mins).

It's all right there - He invites club members to join him in his cabinet interviews, asks for recommendations, etc.   

And to counter your main point - Club members are trying to downplay the contents of the tape by saying that 45 was "... just being the man he always has been with them - available." 
1
Reply
Male 7,587
scheckydamon You can't claim the Clinton Foundation was a money funnel to the "Access" if you accept that Trump's business fees don't funnel money for "access".  They are almost the same thing.  
1
Reply
Male 39,784
normalfreak2 Almost... lolz! No not even close.
-3
Reply
Male 7,587
5cats Explain how it isn't.  Go ahead.
1
Reply
Male 39,784
normalfreak2 Fundraising = Legal
Pay for Play using a (for example) Charitable Foundation = Illegal.
Fuck you're dumb lately.
0
Reply
Male 7,587
5cats LOL yea raising his fees at Mar-a-lago A BUSINESS and a CLUB is "fundraising" not "influence buying" But Clinton Foundation which is a CHARITY is "influence buying" and not fundraising.  You are seriously have no morals do you?  If anything personally profiting from being the President while being President is even worse!
0
Reply
Male 39,784
normalfreak2 Increased demand = increased prices. Simple economics, a subject you seem to have no grasp of whatsoever...
And prove Trump ordered this price increase. Prove it. You think Obama's books didn't sell better after he got elected? That he didn't make piles of money off them, each time a new printing came out? Do you believe that to be a fact? ha!
0
Reply
Male 7,587
5cats What does what a President does after election matter?  Every modern President has cashed out after being President.  I don't have a problem with that necessarily.  I do have a problem when the President in OFFICE CURRENTLY is using the office to better himself financially.  
0
Reply
Male 31
skeeter01 is diversion a response?
1
Reply
Male 264
pancake414 I'm thinking the proof is so strong here, 5cats is going to hide like the little troll coward that he is.  I'd be shocked if we heard from him again on this thread.
1
Reply