Weiner Has Been Found On Hillary Clinton's Email Servers

Submitted by: fancylad 1 year ago in Funny
Anthony Weiner Visits His Campaign Headquarters

The New York Times is reporting that a new batch of emails were found by the FBI related to its closed investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. Who were the emails from? The one and only Anthony Weiner and his wife Huma Abedin. Dick pics? One could only hope, but it sounds like they're more about Weiner's text to a 15-year-old girl -- the same texts that sent Abedin over the edge and pushed her to set a divorce on motion.

An excerpt from the New York Times:

The F.B.I. is investigating illicit text messages that Mr. Weiner sent to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina. The bureau told Congress on Friday that it had uncovered new emails related to the Clinton case — one federal official said they numbered in the thousands — potentially reigniting an issue that has weighed on the presidential campaign and offering a lifeline to Donald J. Trump less than two weeks before the election.

There are 58 comments:
Male 27
I also think there is a high probability that 5cats and Umbobo are the same person but there is an equally high probability that I am just Holygod's other account.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
haha! Many have been accused of being my 'sock puppet' before, but it's just another lie/personal attack used by those cowards who have no other argument. No, there's only one of me here! But several hate-spammers have used 'puppets' before (over the years) & either admitted it or got caught. Shameless, eh?
0
Reply
Male 27
When I'm rich (and I mean Elon Musk rich) I'm going to organise an I-A-B face-to-face where I pay all the protagonists in the 5cats hate/love argument to come to England and we'll all go out for a pint. I might even make a documentary about it. I have friends who have diametrically opposing political beliefs to me and we just get over it by going out for a pint and putting the world to rights over a few beers. I'd love to see how that would go down with yous lot. No offense meant but I bet you'd all get on better than you think you would.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
That sounds like fun, except for the actual stalker, I have zero interest in any interaction with him whatsoever. The hate-spamming trolls? For a free trip 'over the pond' I'd endure their bullshit. I doubt they'd have 1 ball between them all, and would be far more polite than they are here (protected by the anonymity of the interwebs, eh?). I do like to discuss various topics, but their constant hate is very boring: same shit, same personal attacks, same lies every single time. :-| It would be terrific to meet the nice folks!! And there are plenty of those here :-) So hurry up and get rich, ok?
0
Reply
Male 1,824
MarkusT123 You're adorable, thinking you know more than so many other legal minds in the U.S. And you keep placing your faith in a man who is trying to cover his tracks for failing to follow common sense and the law. And just to day Clintons number one person Huma Abedin when asked about the 10.000' that's TEN THOUSAND emails on her husbands computer said "I DONT KNOW" how they got there. And this does not scream mishandling of emails. Oh that's right Hillary was just sending private emails to a pervert that's not her husband. Oh yay she was just trying to archive them as per the law, but just sent them to the wrong government archive.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Lolz, those 'double comments' come once in a while. You hit 'submit' but the comment doesn't show up? Try f5 (refresh) to check if it's actually there, eh? That's why I copy before sending, sometimes they really do vanish entirely! But usually they show up after a refresh.
0
Reply
Male 1,824
oops sorry about the copies the button didn't seam to work so pushed it a couple of times extra and then it started working again and again, I'm shore that my satellite internet didn't help either
0
Reply
Male 1,824
oops sorry about the copies the button didn't seam to work so pushed it a couple of times extra and then it started working again and again, I'm shore that my satellite internet didn't help either
0
Reply
Male 1,824
MarkusT123, you use a letter from the very man that's trying to cover his tracks for not prosecuting or at least sending the case to Grand Jury, please come up with a better cover story. Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send or store classified information on personal email. she did both.Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration “Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.” She did not preserve any records properly. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act, When told and issued a subpoena she destroyed emails supposedly because they were not pertinent to the subpoena, not her call. And she never received permission to have and use a out side email address for work as the Secretary of State. So please don't tell me this should have at least gone to a Grand Jury. And there are other laws she violated I'm just not going to list them all.
0
Reply
Male 1,824
MarkusT123, you use a letter from the very man that's trying to cover his tracks for not prosecuting or at least sending the case to Grand Jury, please come up with a better cover story. Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send or store classified information on personal email. she did both.Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration “Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.” She did not preserve any records properly. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act, When told and issued a subpoena she destroyed emails supposedly because they were not pertinent to the subpoena, not her call. And she never received permission to have and use a out side email address for work as the Secretary of State. So please don't tell me this should have at least gone to a Grand Jury. And there are other laws she violated I'm just not going to list them all.
0
Reply
Male 1,824
MarkusT123, you use a letter from the very man that's trying to cover his tracks for not prosecuting or at least sending the case to Grand Jury, please come up with a better cover story. Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send or store classified information on personal email. she did both.Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration “Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.” She did not preserve any records properly. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act, When told and issued a subpoena she destroyed emails supposedly because they were not pertinent to the subpoena, not her call. And she never received permission to have and use a out side email address for work as the Secretary of State. So please don't tell me this should have at least gone to a Grand Jury. And there are other laws she violated I'm just not going to list them all.
0
Reply
Male 5,307
You're adorable, thinking you know more than the Director of the FBI.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
He's more honest than Comey, obviously. Why do you defend Hillary? She has a long history of graft, crime and corruption. ALL of the e-mail charges are proven beyond doubt in her very own e-mails, or in her own words (on record, often under oath). She tells one lie to cover another, but both simply cannot be true! She's guilty of perjury OR she's guilty of knowingly destroying classified documents. It HAS TO BE one or the other, ok? And that's just one of the dozens of crimes she's suspected of, any one of which disqualifies her from holding ANY public office in America. Facts.
0
Reply
Male 5,307
You're adorable too, thinking you know more than the Director of the FBI.
0
Reply
Male 1,824
MarkusT123 You seam to miss the point that intent to send classified info the way she did is not necessary The laws that she was being investigated for clearly state that all you have to do is send it no intent is necessary. Hillary claimed not to have had classified info on her system but clearly there was. She destroyed, and failed to archive her Emails, all against the law. The DOJ and FBI failed to send it to a Grand Jury, now many inside the FBI are outraged that it was not prosecuted. The Head of the DOJ meet in a secret air port meeting with her closest confidant (Billy boy)only days before the decision to not prosecute is announced and you don't think this was political. What constitutes political, and cover up to you?
0
Reply
Male 5,307
"At the end of the day, the case itself was not a cliff-hanger; despite all the chest-beating by people no longer in government, there really wasn't a prosecutable case." James Comey's 9/8 memo to FBI employees Link
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Especially when the deleted or uncovered e-mails TALK ABOUT how to hide their crimes. If they weren't crimes, why are they talking about them as if they were? Why go to such incredible lengths to HIDE them? Why block and stonewall at every opportunity to tell the truth? It's amazing how the IAB Liberals can swallow that line, like Lewinsky did... down the throat and ask for more :-<
0
Reply
Male 5,307
"This is the one that is going to take Hillary down." How many times have we heard that desperate cry, only to have the most recent accusation of the day fall flat. Unless there is an email in this batch where Hillary admits that she knew she was forwarding confidential material, there is nothing, again. And if there was such an email it would have been immediately leaked. So, yeah, there's nothing, again. Her detractors are setting themselves up for a major disappointment on November 8th. Hillary starts the election with 272 electoral votes. She starts with a win. That is not going to change in eleven days. She will be our next president. What is funny is her detractors worked sooooooo hard to take Hillary down all these years and then nominate a buffoon to challenge her. That's a special kind of stupid.
0
Reply
Male 6,259
The facts are neither one is fit to be president
0
Reply
Male 942
That I agree with.
0
Reply
Male 8,175
This is all you need to know "Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work. I believe it is important to update your committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony" This release was well to do about nothing right now. So what he said in this letter is we may have found something but we aren't sure and we haven't investigated it yet. If you follow politics closely this is unprecedented. The FBI never tells committees stuff like this. He did this for one reason, because the GOP was angry at him for not recommending charges before, to appease his colleagues he broke rank with what every other FBI director and what the FBI normally does. Comey is a straight shooter and will most likely be gone when President Obama's term ends. This isn't a big deal one way or another.
0
Reply
Male 942
This is a perfect example of why you and the other anti-5cats liberals on this board are completely wrong on nearly everything that goes on in your heads in regards to politics. Look at what you said... you started off explaining that what Comey did was basically politically motivated, that it was because the GOP was angry with him. Then you followed that up by saying Comey is a "Straight shooter". I think the problem is that you don't even understand what corruption is. He is clearly not a straight shooter for not recommending charges before, and not a straight shooter for doing this now. He is as corrupt as them all and is motivated by his own need to save face or save his job. How in the hell can you say he's a straight shooter? And this is exactly how you stand by and ignore Clinton's corruption--a corruption far worse than Comey's, and probably worse than just about anyone who has held power in Washington. You cannot see through these liberal blinders that make think everything that is anti-liberal is some kind of great evil, while ignoring the obvious evil on your own "team". Corruption is everywhere, man, on both sides of the aisle. If you can't see that, then you are either inadvertently part of an agenda or are willingly blind to the truth.
0
Reply
Male 8,175
You are blind Umbobo if you don't think this was partly politically motivated. I didn't' want to say it was politically motivated because it was and wasn't. I understand corruption, I think what you and other like minded individuals do is conflate smoke with fire. You think the insinuation of guilt with no proof is fine when it comes to Government, but when it comes to indviduals you cry about your rights. how come they don't apply to Hillary here? All there is, is speculation. Fucking charge her with a crime if you have evidence. If you don't, guess what? You are innocent until proven otherwise. I'm sick of people like you who ignore reality when it suits you but when it comes to dealing with facts you can simply explain them away and twist them into the fiction that exist purely in your own head. @Umbobo and @5cats seem to share this mental illness. Get help.
0
Reply
Male 942
What the hell are you talking about? Of course it is politically motivated, to some degree anyway--like you said, it is and it isn't. My point was that Comey is not a straight shooter as you said, as is evidenced by the things YOU said in your post! Maybe I misundrstood, but it really seems that you and I define being a Straight-Shooter in an entirely different way. And exactly what rights have I "cried about? What am I not applying to Hillary Clinton? See, you're missing the point of what the complaint is. The problem with the whole situation is that there was very clearly evidence that Clinton broke the law. You can go back and watch the videos of her lies. Watch Comey's interview. There was absolutely clear violation of the law, clear guilt, but you have to be open to seeing it because of the way the liberal media loves to twist it. The problem is that there WAS clear evidence and they did NOT charge her. I am not ignoring reality, I am being open to all of it and not being selective just because I have a political preference. See, I don't judge things because of my beliefs--rather my beliefs are formed by what I see with an open mind. So please tell me exactly what reality is it that you think I am ignoring. What facts am I explaining away or twisting? As far as 5cats goes... I don't agree with everything he says. I think he's further to the right than I am. I agree with much of it, but certainly not all. What I do see, however is that you and others like you are so infused with your liberalism that you just automatically assume that every word he speaks is wrong. You don't give any thought to anything he says because you are so enshrouded with your bullshit liberalism. You, sir, are every bit as close-minded as you think 5cats and "people like me" are. And I know this is true because in your post which I am replying to, you have made so many assumptions about me that you absolutely have no reason to. You have grouped me with someone whom I share some opinions with, and assumed me to be exactly the same. You have not seen enough from me, to make such assumptions. I however have been seeing your posts for some time and can be pretty confident in your inability to think and act with open minded reason.
0
Reply
Male 8,175
Sorry but not sorry, You have me confused with someone else. Calling you out on your bullshit isn't the same as wanting to silence you. Since when have I supported banning you?
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Hi Umbobo: this person (nf2) is another hate-spammer who I have to ignore. He loves to attack me for being disabled, and supports those who also do that. And supports those who want me banned or prevented from posting topics. He beats the same dead horses every time, it is not only rude, but boring. I've given him dozens of 'chances' and he flat-out refuses to be polite or recant his hate-spamming. Oh well! I'm much better off skipping over his shit :-) it really is the same shit EVERY time! And worse: he claims to not be a 'Hillary-bot' ! Simply astounding how self-deluded he is...
0
Reply
Male 8,175
I'm not going to play this mental gymnastics game you want to play. "This is a perfect example of why you and the other anti-5cats liberals on this board are completely wrong on nearly everything that goes on in your heads in regards to politics. Look at what you said... you started off explaining that what Comey did was basically politically motivated, that it was because the GOP was angry with him. Then you followed that up by saying Comey is a "Straight shooter". I think the problem is that you don't even understand what corruption is." How does this relate to not understanding Corruption? Most of the time Comey is a straight shooter and has been. I don't know the man all I can base it on is what I hear from those around him. Evidently he's well liked among his peers so unless there is any evidence to the contrary I'm going with that. "See, you're missing the point of what the complaint is. The problem with the whole situation is that there was very clearly evidence that Clinton broke the law. You can go back and watch the videos of her lies. Watch Comey's interview. There was absolutely clear violation of the law, clear guilt, but you have to be open to seeing it because of the way the liberal media loves to twist it. The problem is that there WAS clear evidence and they did NOT charge her. I am not ignoring reality, I am being open to all of it and not being selective just because I have a political preference. See, I don't judge things because of my beliefs--rather my beliefs are formed by what I see with an open mind. So please tell me exactly what reality is it that you think I am ignoring. What facts am I explaining away or twisting?" How am I missing the point on what the complaint is? This is what I mean, It's your lack of understanding of the law and how it's interpreted. The law in question is under the espionage act. There is precedent here. A lot of it. Technically speaking, that conclusion could have put Clinton in legal jeopardy. The laws regarding handling of classified information don’t authorize punishing government officials for carelessness, but they are written so broadly they come close. In practice, however, law enforcement officials have set a high bar for prosecuting violations of those laws, looking for clear criminal intent, which Comey said was absent in the Clinton case. Because the government is awash in secrets, they are regularly mishandled unintentionally. In 2013, according to the National Archives, which tracks classification, executive branch agencies created more than 77 million documents with secrets in them, including 46,800 with newly created secrets. The FBI receives dozens of referrals of leaked classified information every year, according to Justice Department declarations to Congress. These are the facts. Like them or not. Because your premise for criticizing me is wrong I'm not going to respond to the rest of the crap. You have a chance here to do what 5cats never does. Admit you were ignorant and now you are educated.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Did Hillary have some Weiner on her servers? She should have cleaned them, you know, with a cloth! :-) If indeed Weiner had classified information on HIS files? That would be yet another level of crime. I don't think the immunity deals give protection against ANY future criminal charges eh? Weiner got them from somewhere, and whoever they came from committed a Federal Felony...
0
Reply
Male 6,125
I think that, if Hillary had Weiner on her servers, the FBI better wash their hands really, really well.
0
Reply
Male 6,581
apparently she's quite scared and just released a report with body language of such.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Is there a hope this enormous crime & cover-up can finally be brought to justice? NAW! The fix was in from the start. The FBI can't do anything before the election, the House and Senate have no balls or spines, and Obama will just give her a 'blanket pardon' like Bill got when he left office. All we can hope for is that some of Hillary's co-criminals get 'thrown under the bus' and get some jail time...
0
Reply
Male 10,306
@5Cats what was the "enormous crime" again? I like to occasionally get an idea in how things work in your sphere of batshit crazy.
0
Reply
Male 402
Well, she broke the law in regards to her email server and how classified emails were handled, plus the deletion of evidence after a subpoena.  Etc. etc.  Comey even said she lied under oath and that he had found that she had broken laws but that they were not going to prosecute because she didn't show "intent".  However, the laws aren't written that you have to show "intent".  She broke the law. Period.
0
Reply
Male 10,306
She did. Absolutely. I break the law every single day. I speed. I jaywalk. I'm sure I break another dozen laws. The question is does what she did qualify as an "enormous crime"?
0
Reply
Male 6,259
5's mentioned enormous crimes. Could such crimes be fraud, fraud by deception, fraud by misrepresentation, possible tax fraud, possible embezzlement, sexual assault and possible treason ... oh wait were we talking about the Trump or Clinton's email?
0
Reply
Male 6,259
5's spoke of enormous crimes, could such crimes be fraud, fraud by deception, money launderibng fraud by misrepresentation, sexual assult, and possibly treason? Oh wait that's the Trump.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Bullshit. Trump's ALLEGED crimes have NOT ONE THING to do with Hilalry. Do you honestly believe that they do? Wow. Hillary can commit any crimes she pleases if Trump is ACCUSED of trivial things? Really? >>> Hit 'refresh' if it seems like your post didn't show up, eh? Usually it has but you don't see it until then :-)
0
Reply
Male 942
If you don't know what the serious crime is, then you really need to get educated before commenting, because you obviously don't understand it or you are willfully ignorant.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Hey! Thanks for the support Umbobo! You know he's said in the past 'not one IAB person thinks I stalk you' even though several HAVE objected to his methods. You've flat-out said it, thanks! >>> I literally don't care if he 'admits the truth' or not, I just want him to stop stalking me, period. Stop with the hate-spamming (which is supposed to be against IAB's few rules) stop with the endless personal attacks. I've asked him this many times: he refuses to stop. I do my best to ignore him, but he BEGS for attention using the @ all the time. I keep telling him I don't read his shit, nor do I want to, I simply don't care what his hate-filled heart pisses out every day. >>>How sad his life must be that THIS is the best thing he can think of to do: hate-stalk complete strangers over the internet. Oh well!
0
Reply
Male 10,306
@Umbobo if I were to take a guess, based purely off your posts, I'd say you are a white, middle-aged man with a low income, living in a fly over state who has never really acheived anything of distinction. You are dissatisfied with your lot in life so you found an outlet for your anger in right wing blogs and talk radio which allow you to place all the blame for your problems on evil liberals who are stupid and lazy puppets brainwashed by the liberal main stream media. Am I close?
0
Reply
Male 10,306
@Umbobo I think it's cute that you think we were having an intelligent conversation and I shit on it. You haven't said one articulate or intelligent thing. You came in with insults and that is all there has been. All you've said is you are smart and I'm stupid. Being liberal or conservative does not automatically make you smart or stupid. I know idiots and geniuses from both categories. We clearly have a difference of opinion. I'm curious to hear by which metric you view yourself as smarter than me? I've often asked @5Cats the same question. Is there anything in your life that shows you are particularly smart other than your own personal perception? Do you have an advanced education? Are you a member of a high iq society? Have you acheived success in business? Invented anything? Where does your arrogance come from? Had it ever occurred to you that maybe you are actually stupid but you're too stupid to realize it?
0
Reply
Male 942
Apparently it is the only language he understands. He has shown himself through a multitude of posts incapable of have a real conversation. So, assuming I will speak to someone at all, I will attempt to speak to them on their level, you know, so they will comprehend. Any further questions?
0
Reply
Male 2,717
"..you really need to get educated before commenting, because you obviously don't understand it or you are willfully ignorant..You make some of the most ignorant political posts..You are brainwashed by the liberal media and don't have a fucking clue what's going on. You're either just the worst kind of troll or the most idiotic fuck on the entire internet.." -> Is this your definition of acting civilized?
0
Reply
Male 942
Well, it is pretty evident to anyone who can open their eyes and look. Of course ignoring things they don't want to see is what these extreeme liberal man-babies do best. Best thing is just to ignore it, as you already know. I certainly will be, considering that all he can really do is throw insults because he's not smart enough to have a real discussion. But I will say one final thing to him, here: I will lurk if I choose; I will post if I choose. And I'm sure you will continuing to choose to be a depraved, sick minded, bully incapable of acting like a civilized human being.
0
Reply
Male 10,306
@5Cats yep. This changes things. Now ONE person says I'm stalking you compared to the dozens who have flat out said I'm not. Congratulations. I'm sure you and @Umbobo will be quite happy together in your delusion. Keep pretending you don't read my comments. LOL.
0
Reply
Male 10,306
She used the wrong email account? That's seriously what you guys have your panties in a twist about? You're acting like she sold nuclear codes to Iran for fucks sake. Get a grip.
0
Reply
Male 10,306
@Umbobo Lol. Go back to lurking. Last thing we needed on this site is another crotchety old right wing fucktard.
0
Reply
Male 942
Wow... like I said, willfully ignorant. And you know, I don't post much here. But I have been lurking for years. I hold my tongue a lot. But you are the prize winner today. You do in fact constantly 'Stalk' 5cats, as if you have some personal issue with him. You insult him for no reason other than trying to be a fucking bully. You make some of the most ignorant political posts and are always on the far far liberal side of things just be be the biggest douche you possibly can be. You are brainwashed by the liberal media and don't have a fucking clue what's going on. You're either just the worst kind of troll or the most idiotic fuck on the entire internet. Or more likely, both. You, and some of your liberal buddies post just to harass a certain person, making a point to do so just to be complete dicks. Look, you don't have to agree with 5cats You can think what you want of anyone you want, but bullying someone instead of just ignoring what you don't like just makes you a fucking prick. Grow up, get educated on the real issues, and then you can try being an adult again.
0
Reply
Male 2,389
actually, sexting an underage person would be a serious crime, or at least it has been. Who knows now? it's all so confusing.
0
Reply
Male 10,306
Ummmmm. I think we're having a disconnect. @5Cats was talking about Hillary''s enormous crime.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
onoffon: correct! By her own words she did NOT follow the law. She has conjured up various excuses, such as: "they weren't marked as classified WHEN I SENT/GOT THEM..." but of course they were still Classified! And it was HER JOB to know that. IF Someone stripped the markings off (illegally), her own e-mails show her TELLING OTHERS to do this: that ALONE is a crime! >>> Ignorance of the rules is NOT a valid excuse, Comey pulled that one out of his ass in desperation! She took the course to learn the rules... OR she perjured herself by swearing she did so, either way: a crime! And there's literally dozens more! And those are just the ones we know of! :-/ Who knows what stuff was redacted or held back, and who knows how many crimes she succeeded in destroying the evidence of? The Weiner files show just how wide-spread the effects of her crimes were: EVERYONE had copies of classified documents she was REQUIRED BY LAW to keep secure!
0
Reply
Male 6,125
It was something inappropriate done by a Democrat. As such, an "enormous crime". But you knew that.
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Um, broiz, you are aware of just how many charges could have been brought against Hillary and her co-conspirators, right? And how serious her crimes were? The Felony Perjury alone! And how no one has found her 'innocent' but in fact we all know FROM HER OWN WORDS she's guilty as hell. And how many YEARS in prison those charges would have brought them? And how many people were convicted for FAR less and spent time in jail... but ignore reality! Obey Hillary! It Is All Part Of A Vast Right-wing Conspiracy! (repeat as necessary)
0
Reply
Male 6,125
Actually, you're partially correct. He WAS, according to Wikipedia (and who knows if they're actually correct) a registered Republican for most of his voting life but recently gave up all party affiliations. Aside from that, he still felt there was no point in bringing charges. If he really felt that there was enough to really make a case stick with an expectation of punishment, do you think he would have dropped it? Now, "He SAID she was guilty as hell". No, he didn't. Read this: https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
0
Reply
Male 41,551
Um, NO! that is (get this!) a LIE spread by Hillary-bots! He SAID there were MANY CRIMES and obvious ones to boot. But for SOME strange reason he 'declined' to press for charges even though HE SAID she was as guilty as hell. And no, he's NOT a 'Republican' he was appointed by Bush and RE-affirmed by Obama... he has also worked FOR the Clinton Team in the past, so he's hardly neutral, that should be obvious! There is an 'iron-clad' case to be made against Hillary & her henchpersons. Whether it 'sticks to Hillary' or not is IMMATERIAL the charges absolutely should have been forwarded. Let Lynch and Obama take the fall to save Hillary's skank. Deplorable! Jesus broiz, you could at least learn the BASIC FACTS before saying such stupid shit...
0
Reply
Male 6,125
And you're aware that Comey, a Republican, decided that nothing he found was worth bringing charges, right? ... Hillary is horrible! Liberals are horrible! MSM is horrible! (repeat as necessary...oh, wait, never mind, you already do that!)
0
Reply
Male 3,801
brigade?
0
Reply
Male 1,518
No No No stop back up. CLAM has been found on Hilary's server. Weiner never touches those lips. Just ask Monica.
0
Reply