Here Are The 6 Crimes Hillary Clinton Should've Been Charged With

Submitted by: lalapancakes 1 year ago in News & Politics
crimes-clinton

The article I'm paraphrasing is a fucking snoozer. Boring as hell and terribly written, but they do talk about half a dozen laws that are now effectively going to be tougher to enforce since Hillary Clinton was exonerated of wrong doing for doing wrong. Even Representative Trey Gowdy called it by telling FBI Director James Comey his decision to ignore Clinton's offenses undermines the law. Here are the six laws Clinton broke:

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure 18 U.S. Code § 1512 — Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant 18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy 18 U.S. Code § 2071 — Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally 18 U.S. Code § 641 — Public money, property or records (embezzlement etc) 18 U.S. Code § 793 — Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

There are 28 comments:
Male 8,063
Here's the only thing that matters. No chargers were brought. A Lifelong Republican recommended no charges. This is why rule of law by mob mentality is wrong. We've seen throughout history might doesn't make right. Look at the GOP convention last night. It was the salem witch trials. I find what she did to be reprehensible. It's sad that there are no laws to cover what she did because she did put America's interests behind her own. With that said none of it is "illegal".
0
Reply
Male 1,252
if a bus driver killed some kids and used the 'I didnt know how to drive' excuse it doesnt exonerate him.... whether or not she knew what the hell she was doing, it is her job to KNOW exactly what she is doing.. not being charged is one thing...but for christ sakes she still gets her potus nomination? ^.- wtf lol.
0
Reply
Female 4,592
MAYBE this will shed a more pointed look at what this skag really did PURPOSELY? http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4609787/clinton-email
0
Reply
Male 40,247
Yeah....another thread with people arguing over everything they argued about yesterday.....and the day before..... etc ad naseum.
1
Reply
Male 41,116
Remember Hillary supporters: ALL those documents illegally on her PRIVATE servers were under Court Subpoena: there was NO legality in destroying even one of the e-mails, personal or otherwise. That is in addition to the rest of the investigations, on top of it all! And yes, she destroyed work documents, around 1,000 of them, minimum. She never should have had them in the first place, ALL work documents HAD TO BE archived by the Gov't. But she simply refused to do so, despite signing documents saying she had! That's perjury right there. >>> And she had 1,200+ classified documents, minimum. And many were "Top Secret" and were "born classified" without doubt. It was her JOB to know which were classified and should have been taken secure measures to protect, but she ordered her aids to strip markings (that's a felony btw, both telling others and doing it) so she could "get around" security measures designed to protect them. >>> Even if her server wasn't hacked? She sent thousands of intelligence documents to UNCLEARED people who WERE hacked without a doubt. It goes on and on...
0
Reply
Male 2,669
Well, when you're defending a bloated manatee like Donald Trump, you don't have many facts or rational arguments to work with....
0
Reply
Male 41,116
BF: You have a list of Trump's crimes? Bring it! Or shut the fuck up. This is 6 from ONE of her dozens of scandals. There's plenty more!
0
Reply
Male 4,253
What is not mentioned is her totally obvious lying under oath to a congressional committee, unless of course the FBI director is lying but again, laws are for little people.
0
Reply
Male 4,253
Wow, I think Chelsea is posting on IAB under a fictitious name.
0
Reply
Male 41,116
Trimble: it's a fact: Chelsea DID e-mail her Mom using an account with a fake name well as ones under her own name too... And Hillary sent her Classified Materials, it's right there in the documents she turned over... imagine what was in the deleted ones!!!
0
Reply
Male 2,669
If so, let's get her and 5Cats in the same room. Ought to be fun!
0
Reply
Male 2,669
But she swears it was in self-defense...
0
Reply
Male 2,669
Didn't she also kill Robin, destroy the planet Krypton, shoot Old Yeller, and murder prostitutes in London under the name 'Jack the Ripper?'
0
Reply
Male 1,253
LOL. I got it BF. High five.
0
Reply
Male 525
and shot the sheriff
0
Reply
Male 2,675
...But she didn't shoot no deputy.
0
Reply
Male 2,703
BF go for laugh....no get.
0
Reply
Male 41,116
Quite correct DromEd, BF is one of the least funny people around, but he imagines he's a comedic genius... now the two comments below this one (if this comment goes where it should) are pretty darn funny! :-)
0
Reply
Male 4,253
To be fair, the laws were not overlooked per se, it's just that laws are for little people.
0
Reply
Male 8,063
@Trimble Do you disagree with how the laws have been enforced thusfar? Because there's quite a history here of Supreme court decisions.
0
Reply
Male 4,253
Indeed I do, but what does that matter? Bernie should never have bowed to the Queen and fought for the nomination at the convention, instead we have this and your nightmare of a Trump presidency may well come true.
0
Reply