When Liberals Shoot Guns For The First Time

Submitted by: SweepOfDeath 1 year ago in

A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways, thinking guns are terrible, no matter the situation, shoot guns.
There are 54 comments:
Female 51
Acquire the latest deals on luxury items from jewelry to baby wipes. Check out our blogs or website at

DailyDiscounts
0
Reply
Male 2,413
Open minded Liberals? Not surprised.

Wondered if there was a video for "Conservatives smoke weed for the first time"...couldn`t find one.

I`d still rather hang out with a hippie than a gun nut.
0
Reply
Male 535
I don`t need a gun. I have a working penis.
0
Reply
Male 6,710
@McGrendle How exactly is the Republican Party representing bigots and Crazy Evangelicals a talking point? Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Mitch Mconnell, etc. Nearly all the teabaggers are crazy christian hypocrites. How is that inaccurate in any way shape or form?
0
Reply
Male 48
The brunette girl in the white shirt with palm trees on it is going to wind up being some sort of closet gun nut. Anti gun rallies in the day, Thousands of rounds at night.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
This link was good, it shows that you can indeed have fun with guns, even if you hate them. You liberals need to stop crying so much, and lighten up. I suggest a warm bath, and here is some shampoo:




I use these products on my infant, I highly recommend them.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
Liberals are more racist than they want to let the public know:

example 1

example 2

example 3 (bonus Obama administration!)
0
Reply
Male 7,758
Sleepyhallow-[quote]But I firmly believe that only people who can pass an IQ test with a least a triple digit score should be allowed to possess one. [/quote]
That`s one I can get behind. Can we have the same requirement for voting?

CreamK-[quote]Right wing bullying at it`s finest in the comment section..[/quote]
Exaplain to me exactly how one can `bully` in a comment section? Are you dumb enough to mail them your milk-money if they `threaten` to say harsh words at you? Or are you just generally scared of `big meanies`?
0
Reply
Male 4,594
Cute chick with the black hair gave me wood.
0
Reply
Male 14,334
[quote]Right wing bullying at it`s finest in the comment section..[/quote]

People own thing I don`t like and have fun with them WHAAAA it`s not fair I`m telling MUMMY!!
0
Reply
Male 1,983
I`m a Liberal and I own guns.... quite a few of them.
But I firmly believe that only people who can pass an IQ test with a least a triple digit score should be allowed to possess one.

I`m tired of stupid gun owners making ALL gun owners look stupid.
0
Reply
Male 7,758
normalfreak2-[quote]Now the GOP is full of bigotry and the crazy evangelical wing.[/quote]
Way to get your lib talking points in! Expect to see something extra in your public assistance.

normalfreak2-[quote]All the wackos unfortunately are in the GOP [/quote]
Joe `a three-letter word: J-O-B-S` Biden.
Nancy `500 million Americans lose their jobs every month` Pelosi.
Hank `Guam will tip over` Johnson
Sheila `Can we see the flag Armstong put on Mars `Jackson Lee (also claimed the Constitution was 400 years old,
The list is vast.
0
Reply
Male 689
NOTHING AT ALL.
0
Reply
Male 689
its one thing to shoot for fun at a range but to take it on the street and expect to save the day is stupid. guns are just a crutch for the weak to feel powerful. that power leads to overconfidence, which then leads to them thinking they can do something they cant.

im under the idea that all we should allow, gun wise, is lever/pump action and revolvers. no more semi-auto. this would allow for sport shooting, hunting and even home security but it would make mass killings a lot harder to pull off. yeah they might get off 6-9 shoots but then they have to spend the next min or so reloading.

i know, this is impossible to pull off but what about just better regulations on who gets guns/ammo. make all guns get registered(give like a year to do this before punishments kick in), then make sales outside registered dealers illegal. no more sales on facebook/flea markets.

going on a rant here so ill sum it up. there is so much we COULD DO yet we fell the need to do AB
0
Reply
Female 1,537
Firing guns is fun :) Stress relief, keeps animal population down, definitely an adrenaline rush...especially when you can shoot well and hit the bullseye! I have been hunting with my father numerous times and he taught me gun safety as well as the hunters safety course I took. I still carry the card in my wallet. Only non-nice individuals will use the gun inappropriately and all of us know there are PLENTY of non-nice individuals out there.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]BTW, the first part of the 2nd amendment, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," is a nonrestrictive gerund phrase. It is called nonrestrictive because it does not restrict in any way the meaning of what follows [..] The founders well understood the rules of grammar. They said what they meant, and they meant what they said.[/quote]

It went through several rewrites, was always intended to be a formal legal ruling and was debated by numerous people including many who were well educated in English. I think you`re right regarding what they meant, especially since the first draft had the phrases the other way round and started by bluntly stating "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". The rest of it was clumsy, hence the rewording, but there`s no evidence that the intended meaning changed with the rewording.
0
Reply
Male 14,835
When I learned to shoot, there was one purpose and that was to be good at killing people at range. If they were armoured, we were taught to use MILAN. There was no joking about, no entertainment value, no fantasy. If you had to use it, there was a reasonable chance someone would be trying to kill you.
0
Reply
Male 1,421
Right wing bullying at it`s finest in the comment section..
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Almost everyone is in favour of interpreting restrictions into the 2nd amendment, even gung-ho advocates who never go anywhere without at least 3 guns and think everyone should be required by law to carry at least 1 gun at all times.

For example, who`s OK with everyone, absolutely everyone regardless of age, prior acts, etc, being allowed to carry missile launchers and suchlike around town, to school, etc? The 2nd amendment as stated makes it illegal to restrict any people (or, at most, any USA citizens) in any way from any weapon or at most, taken at its most literal, from any weapon they can carry. So portable missile launchers are definitely OK - they are arms than a person can bear.

The argument isn`t about whether or not there should be restrictions. It`s about the details of what the restrictions should be. The 2nd amendment is being interpreted to fit and used as an appeal to authority.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
[quote]mentally challenged, convicted violent felons, and 6 year olds[/quote]
None of these traits by themselves indicate any elevated capacity for violence. The first two could indeed have legit reasons due to the societal stigma that comes from being in the demographic.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
@Tiredofnicks [quote]Guns do not belong in the hands of Average Joe...[/quote]
"Guns do not belong in the hands of Average Jew..."

There, I fixed it. That`s was what you really meant to say, wasn`t it?
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]Now the GOP is full of bigotry and the crazy evangelical wing. [/quote]
Either that or the Democrat party is based entirely on lies and slander because their ideology has proven to be a complete and miserable failure. I know that I can provide more than enough evidence to prove the latter to anyone who hasn`t already drunk the Kool-Aid.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
@Runemang The two questions you need to ask are, how many "violent, blood-thirsty gun nuts" are currently serving in the congress, and how many are there who think "guns are terrible, no matter the situation?"

I can think of several from the latter group, but not a single one from the former.

BTW, the first part of the 2nd amendment, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," is a nonrestrictive gerund phrase. It is called nonrestrictive because it does not restrict in any way the meaning of what follows, "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The founders well understood the rules of grammar. They said what they meant, and they meant what they said.

They used to teach grammar in grammar school. Now, most graduate-level English majors have never even heard of a nonrestrictive gerund phrase, and they certainly couldn`t explain it.
0
Reply
Male 6,710
Groups and ideaologies change parties. They aren`t always the same. If this was the 50`s and 60`s I wouldn`t have been a Democrat, I would have been supporting Republican ideals. Problem is, they`ve switched places. Now the GOP is full of bigotry and the crazy evangelical wing. In 20 years heck maybe I can support more Republicans again. All the wackos unfortunately are in the GOP or teabaggers.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
HG: "Absolutely. Their rights can be infringed. That`s all I`m saying."

Ollie replied to your comments rather well and as I would`ve.

Except for this, It`s a well known fact that the democrats created the "disenfranchised" with Jim Crow and segregation. They didn`t support civil rights until JFK ran for office, and then it was only to get votes. Thus the LBJ quote becomes apropo.
0
Reply
Male 2,675
This is what`s wrong with the issue: there`s violent, blood-thirstay gun nuts and there`s "A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways, thinking guns are terrible, no matter the situation," ...

Can`t solve anything when you`ve supposedly got nothing but the extremes.
0
Reply
Male 7,758
drworm2002-[quote]want to have regulations as stated in the second amendment[/quote]
Do us a favor: Please research what the term `well regulated` means in the context of the Second Amendment.

`Well regulated` has nothing to do with `regulations.` It has everything to do with a `well run` militia.

HolyGod-[quote] Once the democrats become the party of the disenfranchised and started working on civil rights[/quote]
Civil Rights Act of 1964: Passed by 80% of Republican in the House, but only 61% of the Democrats. Passed in the Senate with 82% Republican support, but only 66% Democrat.

The facts do not back up your claim.

HolyGod-[quote]the racists fled to the republican party[/quote]
The left attempts to deflect their history by repeatedly claiming this. It fools no one, except other liberals.
0
Reply
Male 675
The Constitution does not grant anyone any rights, it merely guarantees the protection of our natural (or inalienable) rights referred to in the US Declaration of Independence. Our Forefathers did not pretend to have the power to grant us rights, instead, they merely sought to protect them.

Please read the US Declaration of Independence again. Our Constitution was predicated upon it.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
HG It wasn`t the Republicans who until 4 years ago had a former Klan leader as president pro tem of the senate.

It isn`t the Republicans who are funding abortion clinics in black neighborhoods.

It isn`t the Republicans who are disarming blacks in high-crime neighborhoods (WITHOUT due process, I might add) leaving them defenseless and insuring that more of them will be murdered.

Finally, it wasn`t a Republican who said, "I`ll have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years." Granted, that was 51 years ago, but I think it illustrates the utter contempt that many white liberals have for blacks.

I think you`re having a problem distinguishing between Democrat slander and facts.

P.S.: I think you need to look up the definition of infringe.
0
Reply
Male 820
@Magickrat
So IAB posts are only worth reading if they spout left wing and atheist talking points? Such a close minded, narrow view.
0
Reply
Male 8,132
OldOllie

"People can have their constitutional rights taken away through DUE PROCESS."

Absolutely. Their rights can be infringed. That`s all I`m saying.

"BTW, the guy in the KKK robe is a Democrat."

COME ON

You can`t possibly believe this, yet you bring it up pretty frequently. In the 1800s and up until the 50s and 60s that may have been true. Not anymore. Once the democrats become the party of the disenfranchised and started working on civil rights the racists fled to the republican party.
0
Reply
Male 10
After the bombing of Pearl Harbor 12/07/1941 the Emperor of Japan ordered Admiral Hirohito to plan an invasion of the west coast of the United States. Hirohito said that America could not be invaded because their would be a gun behind every blade of grass. That simple fact of legal gun ownership in the USA stopped an invasion by Japan.
0
Reply
Male 738
Saying pro-gun vs anti-gun is as loaded as saying pro-life vs pro-death, I don`t think anyone`s goal is to abolish all guns from the face of the earth, but let`s just make sure that we make sure guns are falling into the wrong hands, and have a reasonable arsenal through more legislation.

I`ve been to a gun range it was cool but, personally I don`t see why people feel the need to walk around with unconcealed rifles to places like Wendy`s, even mobsters say no guns when discussing business. To me it`s an unnecessary escalation. It`s like your doctor having the room prepped for full surgery when you go in for a check-up.
0
Reply
Male 10,339
It`s already been established that the wording of the 2nd means that the people have a right to bear arms BECAUSE the well regulated militia also has arms.

They are for personal defense against all threats, including our own government.
0
Reply
Male 10
The genie is out of the bottle. There will always be firearms and criminals will always find a way to acquire them. There is no logical reason to deign a law abiding citizen the right to own a firearm. There are about 90 million Americans who legally own a firearm who didn`t shoot anyone today or yesterday. Constitutional rights are like muscles, the more you exercise them the stronger they get. Guns are just a tool an object and in and of themselves can not harm anyone. More Americans are killed by knives and hammers and baseball bats then firearms.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
@evilminded1 According to your definition, the framers of the constitution were also "narrow minded."
0
Reply
Male 535
When did IAB become FoxNews?

Ignorant hyperbole & FoxBot lyrics does not a decent post make...
0
Reply
Male 15,832
@HG [quote]So that means the mentally challenged, convicted violent felons, and 6 year olds should all be able to own guns in your mind right? Since anything saying they can`t would be an infringement on their rights.[/quote]
C`mon, HG, I know you`re not that stupid. People can have their constitutional rights taken away through DUE PROCESS. They cannot have their rights taken away through legislative fiat. Please don`t claim that you`re incapable of making this distinction.

BTW, the guy in the KKK robe is a Democrat.
0
Reply
Female 22
Guns or no guns, doesn`t really bother me. What bothers me is someone who is clearly about guns, calling the other side narrow minded. How is one side that is anti-guns any different than one side that is pro-guns? They`re not. Both sides are narrow minded. End of story.
0
Reply
Male 995
"A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways"

Nope, not going there. Too easy.
0
Reply
Male 8,132
Crakr

"What part of .. "..Shall not be infringed.." do you not understand?"

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!!!!!!!!

So that means the mentally challenged, convicted violent felons, and 6 year olds should all be able to own guns in your mind right? Since anything saying they can`t would be an infringement on their rights.
0
Reply
Male 8,132
These are charicatures of liberals. These are the liberaliest people I have ever seen.

It would be like saying you had 5 conservatives and then one was dressed in a KKK robe, one was wearing nothing but overalls, one was wearing full hunting camo, one was dressed head to toe in nascar gear, and one was 350 pounds riding a rascal wearing an american flag tshirt.
0
Reply
Male 620
cringed every time they swept the range master while keeping their finger on the trigger.

I don`t think they know what gun control is.
0
Reply
Male 8,132
Crakr

"LEAVE THE 2nd AMENDMENT ALONE. DO NOT TOUCH!"

You cherry pick amendments just like you cherry pick the bible.

Can you name all 27 ammendments? Honestly?

Why is it that 2 is infallible and perfect and must not be touched, but you don`t give a s.hit about the others.

Are you STRONGLY vested in your god given right to a jury trial in civil matters over $20 as the 7th lays out? Or is it ok that one changes?
0
Reply
Male 14,334
No matter how many time you show them....

[quote]A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.[/quote]

Now notice it says people not militia even courts accepted that why can`t you?
0
Reply
Male 196
@CrkrJak

Which part of "...WELL REGULATED militia..." you don`t understand?
0
Reply
Male 5,094
Guns are fun. Guns makes it too easy to kill things, accidentially or purposefully. Guns do not belong in the hands of Average Joe because of the two previous statements.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
"It is you and other right wings that are narrow-minded and set in your ways."

What part of .. "..Shall not be infringed.." do you not understand?

It`s like telling a kid not to touch a hot stove and they start to stick their hands toward it, then they get upset when their hand is slapped away.

LEAVE THE 2nd AMENDMENT ALONE. DO NOT TOUCH!
0
Reply
Male 3,909
That`s pretty much what it looks like when anyone shoots for the first time.
0
Reply
Male 662
I am an army vet and a liberal. I don`t think guns are terrible, just don`t belong in the hands of everyone in the united states. Most left wings want to have regulations as stated in the second amendment. It is you and other right wings that are narrow-minded and set in your ways.y
0
Reply
Male 1,253
Oh God, SoD. Did you really have to?
0
Reply
Male 1,380
I`m looking forward to the amendment that requires all citizens to carry a gun everywhere they go.
0
Reply
Male 2,168
As a Self described "Liberal" I`ve owned guns my whole life. They are usefull when people want the stuff you have.
0
Reply
Male 938
Link: When Liberals Shoot Guns For The First Time [Rate Link] - A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways, thinking guns are terrible, no matter the situation, shoot guns.
0
Reply