The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 30    Average: 3.3/5]
54 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 4813
Rating: 3.3
Category:
Date: 08/19/15 12:30 PM

54 Responses to When Liberals Shoot Guns For The First Time

  1. Profile photo of SweepOfDeath
    SweepOfDeath Male 18-29
    938 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 8:19 am
    Link: When Liberals Shoot Guns For The First Time - A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways, thinking guns are terrible, no matter the situation, shoot guns.
  2. Profile photo of Zeegrr60
    Zeegrr60 Male 40-49
    2106 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 12:44 pm
    As a Self described "Liberal" I`ve owned guns my whole life. They are usefull when people want the stuff you have.
  3. Profile photo of pazerlenis
    pazerlenis Male 40-49
    1380 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 12:50 pm
    I`m looking forward to the amendment that requires all citizens to carry a gun everywhere they go.
  4. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1217 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 12:51 pm
    Oh God, SoD. Did you really have to?
  5. Profile photo of drworm2002
    drworm2002 Male 30-39
    662 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 12:53 pm
    I am an army vet and a liberal. I don`t think guns are terrible, just don`t belong in the hands of everyone in the united states. Most left wings want to have regulations as stated in the second amendment. It is you and other right wings that are narrow-minded and set in your ways.y
  6. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3909 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:03 pm
    That`s pretty much what it looks like when anyone shoots for the first time.
  7. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:04 pm
    "It is you and other right wings that are narrow-minded and set in your ways."

    What part of .. "..Shall not be infringed.." do you not understand?

    It`s like telling a kid not to touch a hot stove and they start to stick their hands toward it, then they get upset when their hand is slapped away.

    LEAVE THE 2nd AMENDMENT ALONE. DO NOT TOUCH!
  8. Profile photo of Tiredofnicks
    Tiredofnicks Male 30-39
    5097 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:06 pm
    Guns are fun. Guns makes it too easy to kill things, accidentially or purposefully. Guns do not belong in the hands of Average Joe because of the two previous statements.
  9. Profile photo of srximus
    srximus Male 30-39
    188 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:18 pm
    @CrkrJak

    Which part of "...WELL REGULATED militia..." you don`t understand?
  10. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:21 pm
    No matter how many time you show them....

    A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

    Now notice it says people not militia even courts accepted that why can`t you?
  11. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6913 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:36 pm
    Crakr

    "LEAVE THE 2nd AMENDMENT ALONE. DO NOT TOUCH!"

    You cherry pick amendments just like you cherry pick the bible.

    Can you name all 27 ammendments? Honestly?

    Why is it that 2 is infallible and perfect and must not be touched, but you don`t give a s.hit about the others.

    Are you STRONGLY vested in your god given right to a jury trial in civil matters over $20 as the 7th lays out? Or is it ok that one changes?
  12. Profile photo of Tacos4Brkfst
    Tacos4Brkfst Male 18-29
    620 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:37 pm
    cringed every time they swept the range master while keeping their finger on the trigger.

    I don`t think they know what gun control is.
  13. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6913 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:39 pm
    These are charicatures of liberals. These are the liberaliest people I have ever seen.

    It would be like saying you had 5 conservatives and then one was dressed in a KKK robe, one was wearing nothing but overalls, one was wearing full hunting camo, one was dressed head to toe in nascar gear, and one was 350 pounds riding a rascal wearing an american flag tshirt.
  14. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6913 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:42 pm
    Crakr

    "What part of .. "..Shall not be infringed.." do you not understand?"

    SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!!!!!!!!

    So that means the mentally challenged, convicted violent felons, and 6 year olds should all be able to own guns in your mind right? Since anything saying they can`t would be an infringement on their rights.
  15. Profile photo of AGit
    AGit Male 30-39
    995 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 1:58 pm
    "A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways"

    Nope, not going there. Too easy.
  16. Profile photo of evilminded1
    evilminded1 Female 30-39
    20 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:08 pm
    Guns or no guns, doesn`t really bother me. What bothers me is someone who is clearly about guns, calling the other side narrow minded. How is one side that is anti-guns any different than one side that is pro-guns? They`re not. Both sides are narrow minded. End of story.
  17. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:09 pm
    @HG So that means the mentally challenged, convicted violent felons, and 6 year olds should all be able to own guns in your mind right? Since anything saying they can`t would be an infringement on their rights.
    C`mon, HG, I know you`re not that stupid. People can have their constitutional rights taken away through DUE PROCESS. They cannot have their rights taken away through legislative fiat. Please don`t claim that you`re incapable of making this distinction.

    BTW, the guy in the KKK robe is a Democrat.
  18. Profile photo of Magickrat
    Magickrat Male 40-49
    535 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:11 pm
    When did IAB become FoxNews?

    Ignorant hyperbole & FoxBot lyrics does not a decent post make...
  19. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:12 pm
    @evilminded1 According to your definition, the framers of the constitution were also "narrow minded."
  20. Profile photo of CONAN121
    CONAN121 Male 40-49
    10 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:24 pm
    The genie is out of the bottle. There will always be firearms and criminals will always find a way to acquire them. There is no logical reason to deign a law abiding citizen the right to own a firearm. There are about 90 million Americans who legally own a firearm who didn`t shoot anyone today or yesterday. Constitutional rights are like muscles, the more you exercise them the stronger they get. Guns are just a tool an object and in and of themselves can not harm anyone. More Americans are killed by knives and hammers and baseball bats then firearms.
  21. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm
    It`s already been established that the wording of the 2nd means that the people have a right to bear arms BECAUSE the well regulated militia also has arms.

    They are for personal defense against all threats, including our own government.
  22. Profile photo of mischeif954
    mischeif954 Male 18-29
    616 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm
    Saying pro-gun vs anti-gun is as loaded as saying pro-life vs pro-death, I don`t think anyone`s goal is to abolish all guns from the face of the earth, but let`s just make sure that we make sure guns are falling into the wrong hands, and have a reasonable arsenal through more legislation.

    I`ve been to a gun range it was cool but, personally I don`t see why people feel the need to walk around with unconcealed rifles to places like Wendy`s, even mobsters say no guns when discussing business. To me it`s an unnecessary escalation. It`s like your doctor having the room prepped for full surgery when you go in for a check-up.
  23. Profile photo of CONAN121
    CONAN121 Male 40-49
    10 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:30 pm
    After the bombing of Pearl Harbor 12/07/1941 the Emperor of Japan ordered Admiral Hirohito to plan an invasion of the west coast of the United States. Hirohito said that America could not be invaded because their would be a gun behind every blade of grass. That simple fact of legal gun ownership in the USA stopped an invasion by Japan.
  24. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6913 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 2:31 pm
    OldOllie

    "People can have their constitutional rights taken away through DUE PROCESS."

    Absolutely. Their rights can be infringed. That`s all I`m saying.

    "BTW, the guy in the KKK robe is a Democrat."

    COME ON

    You can`t possibly believe this, yet you bring it up pretty frequently. In the 1800s and up until the 50s and 60s that may have been true. Not anymore. Once the democrats become the party of the disenfranchised and started working on civil rights the racists fled to the republican party.
  25. Profile photo of Denogginizer
    Denogginizer Male 30-39
    821 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 4:12 pm
    @Magickrat
    So IAB posts are only worth reading if they spout left wing and atheist talking points? Such a close minded, narrow view.
  26. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 4:59 pm
    HG It wasn`t the Republicans who until 4 years ago had a former Klan leader as president pro tem of the senate.

    It isn`t the Republicans who are funding abortion clinics in black neighborhoods.

    It isn`t the Republicans who are disarming blacks in high-crime neighborhoods (WITHOUT due process, I might add) leaving them defenseless and insuring that more of them will be murdered.

    Finally, it wasn`t a Republican who said, "I`ll have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years." Granted, that was 51 years ago, but I think it illustrates the utter contempt that many white liberals have for blacks.

    I think you`re having a problem distinguishing between Democrat slander and facts.

    P.S.: I think you need to look up the definition of infringe.
  27. Profile photo of piratefish
    piratefish Male 40-49
    675 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 5:23 pm
    The Constitution does not grant anyone any rights, it merely guarantees the protection of our natural (or inalienable) rights referred to in the US Declaration of Independence. Our Forefathers did not pretend to have the power to grant us rights, instead, they merely sought to protect them.

    Please read the US Declaration of Independence again. Our Constitution was predicated upon it.
  28. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 5:23 pm
    drworm2002-want to have regulations as stated in the second amendment
    Do us a favor: Please research what the term `well regulated` means in the context of the Second Amendment.

    `Well regulated` has nothing to do with `regulations.` It has everything to do with a `well run` militia.

    HolyGod- Once the democrats become the party of the disenfranchised and started working on civil rights
    Civil Rights Act of 1964: Passed by 80% of Republican in the House, but only 61% of the Democrats. Passed in the Senate with 82% Republican support, but only 66% Democrat.

    The facts do not back up your claim.

    HolyGod-the racists fled to the republican party
    The left attempts to deflect their history by repeatedly claiming this. It fools no one, except other liberals.
  29. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 6:24 pm
    This is what`s wrong with the issue: there`s violent, blood-thirstay gun nuts and there`s "A bunch of narrow-minded people set in their ways, thinking guns are terrible, no matter the situation," ...

    Can`t solve anything when you`ve supposedly got nothing but the extremes.
  30. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 6:31 pm
    HG: "Absolutely. Their rights can be infringed. That`s all I`m saying."

    Ollie replied to your comments rather well and as I would`ve.

    Except for this, It`s a well known fact that the democrats created the "disenfranchised" with Jim Crow and segregation. They didn`t support civil rights until JFK ran for office, and then it was only to get votes. Thus the LBJ quote becomes apropo.
  31. Profile photo of normalfreak2
    normalfreak2 Male 18-29
    4085 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 6:42 pm
    Groups and ideaologies change parties. They aren`t always the same. If this was the 50`s and 60`s I wouldn`t have been a Democrat, I would have been supporting Republican ideals. Problem is, they`ve switched places. Now the GOP is full of bigotry and the crazy evangelical wing. In 20 years heck maybe I can support more Republicans again. All the wackos unfortunately are in the GOP or teabaggers.
  32. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 6:53 pm
    @Runemang The two questions you need to ask are, how many "violent, blood-thirsty gun nuts" are currently serving in the congress, and how many are there who think "guns are terrible, no matter the situation?"

    I can think of several from the latter group, but not a single one from the former.

    BTW, the first part of the 2nd amendment, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," is a nonrestrictive gerund phrase. It is called nonrestrictive because it does not restrict in any way the meaning of what follows, "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The founders well understood the rules of grammar. They said what they meant, and they meant what they said.

    They used to teach grammar in grammar school. Now, most graduate-level English majors have never even heard of a nonrestrictive gerund phrase, and they certainly couldn`t explain it.
  33. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 6:59 pm
    Now the GOP is full of bigotry and the crazy evangelical wing.
    Either that or the Democrat party is based entirely on lies and slander because their ideology has proven to be a complete and miserable failure. I know that I can provide more than enough evidence to prove the latter to anyone who hasn`t already drunk the Kool-Aid.
  34. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 7:04 pm
    @Tiredofnicks Guns do not belong in the hands of Average Joe...
    "Guns do not belong in the hands of Average Jew..."

    There, I fixed it. That`s was what you really meant to say, wasn`t it?
  35. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 7:09 pm
    mentally challenged, convicted violent felons, and 6 year olds
    None of these traits by themselves indicate any elevated capacity for violence. The first two could indeed have legit reasons due to the societal stigma that comes from being in the demographic.
  36. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 7:37 pm
    Almost everyone is in favour of interpreting restrictions into the 2nd amendment, even gung-ho advocates who never go anywhere without at least 3 guns and think everyone should be required by law to carry at least 1 gun at all times.

    For example, who`s OK with everyone, absolutely everyone regardless of age, prior acts, etc, being allowed to carry missile launchers and suchlike around town, to school, etc? The 2nd amendment as stated makes it illegal to restrict any people (or, at most, any USA citizens) in any way from any weapon or at most, taken at its most literal, from any weapon they can carry. So portable missile launchers are definitely OK - they are arms than a person can bear.

    The argument isn`t about whether or not there should be restrictions. It`s about the details of what the restrictions should be. The 2nd amendment is being interpreted to fit and used as an appeal to authority.
  37. Profile photo of CreamK
    CreamK Male 40-49
    1423 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 8:01 pm
    Right wing bullying at it`s finest in the comment section..
  38. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14654 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 8:05 pm
    When I learned to shoot, there was one purpose and that was to be good at killing people at range. If they were armoured, we were taught to use MILAN. There was no joking about, no entertainment value, no fantasy. If you had to use it, there was a reasonable chance someone would be trying to kill you.
  39. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 8:05 pm
    BTW, the first part of the 2nd amendment, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," is a nonrestrictive gerund phrase. It is called nonrestrictive because it does not restrict in any way the meaning of what follows The founders well understood the rules of grammar. They said what they meant, and they meant what they said.

    It went through several rewrites, was always intended to be a formal legal ruling and was debated by numerous people including many who were well educated in English. I think you`re right regarding what they meant, especially since the first draft had the phrases the other way round and started by bluntly stating "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". The rest of it was clumsy, hence the rewording, but there`s no evidence that the intended meaning changed with the rewording.
  40. Profile photo of Naz14
    Naz14 Female 18-29
    1520 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 9:31 pm
    Firing guns is fun :) Stress relief, keeps animal population down, definitely an adrenaline rush...especially when you can shoot well and hit the bullseye! I have been hunting with my father numerous times and he taught me gun safety as well as the hunters safety course I took. I still carry the card in my wallet. Only non-nice individuals will use the gun inappropriately and all of us know there are PLENTY of non-nice individuals out there.
  41. Profile photo of jops360
    jops360 Male 30-39
    689 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 9:47 pm
    its one thing to shoot for fun at a range but to take it on the street and expect to save the day is stupid. guns are just a crutch for the weak to feel powerful. that power leads to overconfidence, which then leads to them thinking they can do something they cant.

    im under the idea that all we should allow, gun wise, is lever/pump action and revolvers. no more semi-auto. this would allow for sport shooting, hunting and even home security but it would make mass killings a lot harder to pull off. yeah they might get off 6-9 shoots but then they have to spend the next min or so reloading.

    i know, this is impossible to pull off but what about just better regulations on who gets guns/ammo. make all guns get registered(give like a year to do this before punishments kick in), then make sales outside registered dealers illegal. no more sales on facebook/flea markets.

    going on a rant here so ill sum it up. there is so much we COULD DO yet we fell the need to do AB
  42. Profile photo of jops360
    jops360 Male 30-39
    689 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 9:48 pm
    NOTHING AT ALL.
  43. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    August 19, 2014 at 10:13 pm
    normalfreak2-Now the GOP is full of bigotry and the crazy evangelical wing.
    Way to get your lib talking points in! Expect to see something extra in your public assistance.

    normalfreak2-All the wackos unfortunately are in the GOP
    Joe `a three-letter word: J-O-B-S` Biden.
    Nancy `500 million Americans lose their jobs every month` Pelosi.
    Hank `Guam will tip over` Johnson
    Sheila `Can we see the flag Armstong put on Mars `Jackson Lee (also claimed the Constitution was 400 years old,
    The list is vast.
  44. Profile photo of Sleepyhallow
    Sleepyhallow Male 50-59
    1983 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 3:01 am
    I`m a Liberal and I own guns.... quite a few of them.
    But I firmly believe that only people who can pass an IQ test with a least a triple digit score should be allowed to possess one.

    I`m tired of stupid gun owners making ALL gun owners look stupid.
  45. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 5:19 am
    Right wing bullying at it`s finest in the comment section..

    People own thing I don`t like and have fun with them WHAAAA it`s not fair I`m telling MUMMY!!
  46. Profile photo of pmarren
    pmarren Male 40-49
    4575 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 5:30 am
    Cute chick with the black hair gave me wood.
  47. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 7:00 am
    Sleepyhallow-But I firmly believe that only people who can pass an IQ test with a least a triple digit score should be allowed to possess one.
    That`s one I can get behind. Can we have the same requirement for voting?

    CreamK-Right wing bullying at it`s finest in the comment section..
    Exaplain to me exactly how one can `bully` in a comment section? Are you dumb enough to mail them your milk-money if they `threaten` to say harsh words at you? Or are you just generally scared of `big meanies`?
  48. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5480 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 7:10 am
    Liberals are more racist than they want to let the public know:

    example 1

    example 2

    example 3 (bonus Obama administration!)
  49. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5480 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 7:13 am
    This link was good, it shows that you can indeed have fun with guns, even if you hate them. You liberals need to stop crying so much, and lighten up. I suggest a warm bath, and here is some shampoo:




    I use these products on my infant, I highly recommend them.
  50. Profile photo of jorshdan
    jorshdan Male 18-29
    48 posts
    August 20, 2014 at 11:59 am
    The brunette girl in the white shirt with palm trees on it is going to wind up being some sort of closet gun nut. Anti gun rallies in the day, Thousands of rounds at night.
  51. Profile photo of normalfreak2
    normalfreak2 Male 18-29
    4085 posts
    August 21, 2014 at 10:18 am
    @McGrendle How exactly is the Republican Party representing bigots and Crazy Evangelicals a talking point? Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Mitch Mconnell, etc. Nearly all the teabaggers are crazy christian hypocrites. How is that inaccurate in any way shape or form?
  52. Profile photo of Magickrat
    Magickrat Male 40-49
    535 posts
    August 19, 2015 at 5:56 pm
    I don`t need a gun. I have a working penis.
  53. Profile photo of jay
    jay Male 30-39
    1881 posts
    August 20, 2015 at 1:52 am
    Open minded Liberals? Not surprised.

    Wondered if there was a video for "Conservatives smoke weed for the first time"...couldn`t find one.

    I`d still rather hang out with a hippie than a gun nut.
  54. Profile photo of JessicaJoy
    JessicaJoy Female 18-29
    51 posts
    August 30, 2015 at 10:57 pm
    Acquire the latest deals on luxury items from jewelry to baby wipes. Check out our blogs or website at

    DailyDiscounts

Leave a Reply