An Example Of Well Done Code [Pic]

Submitted by: ElectricEye 1 year ago in Tech

All HTML should look this good.
There are 29 comments:
Male 115
That`s clearly XML.
0
Reply
Male 5,617
Are you motherf*ckas still going on?!
Save the goddamned .asp to the server and let`s get the hell out of here!!
0
Reply
Male 723
Not sure what, "coreect code" is. Maybe that`s what they call it down under. No wonder you have no clue about industry standards. I do, however, know what "correct code" is. That makes one of us, at least. You probably should have taken that into account before you made more of an ass out of yourself. Well, live and learn. Ooops, that`s obviously a sore spot with you. Sorry.

There you go again, trying to be sanctimoniously dismissive. Aren`t you just the cutest thing when you`re butthurt. But, the next bit really cracked me up: First you claim that I waved my dick around and then attempt to conjure up your lost dignity by calling me a "girlie." Yeah, that`s probably your best recourse at this point, you should probably walk away. You seem more confused than ever. Take your meds, gramps. You`re slipping, again.

8-) LJ

0
Reply
Male 448
@draculya: maybe she prefers the double header
0
Reply
Male 237
*eats popcorn*
Well that escalated quickly :)

Although the tags are a little bit low for proper binding. Need the arguments size="+2" or verticalOffset="-3", or a t-shirt a size smaller.
0
Reply
Male 1,253
Im shaking my head and walking away from this, because, you still don`t get it. It was never about "coreect code" you poor dumb hic, it was about you walking in and waving your dick in the wind from the get go.
I pity you and your slow uptake.
"Schooled". Ha! Dream on girlie.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
I`m in love. Gorgeous woman!
0
Reply
Male 723
Oh, and by the way, I didn`t attack YOU, so much as your logic and knowledge. There is a difference. You fired the first personal attack when you called me a "tool." Surely, if you`re such an august member of the academic and scientific communities you`ve learned to handle a little criticism along the way. Methinks I touched a nerve there, somewhere.

8-) LJ
0
Reply
Male 723
Awww, ArgusTuft, is this you trying to be all witty and sanctimoniously dismissive again? So adorable.

Yeah, you see, that only works when you actually have a pot to piss in. You bragged that you`ve been in the business for 40 some-odd years, yet you haven`t bothered to keep abreast of the best-practices and standards of the industry - and got schooled on it by a 3rd year student. And you say you get paid to supervise other students? Not sure I`d be bragging about that, if I were you. Too funny.

Anyway, welcome to the internet. Aren`t all these colors and lack of vacuum tubes something?

Nah, 5Cats, I`m not taking anything personal. Just having a little fun taking the piss out of a blowhard with delusions of grandeur.

*chuckle*

8-) LJ
0
Reply
Male 1,253
And that gives you the right to attack, you emotionally retarded human being.
You and 5Cats - the sort of kids that kick someone in the shin, and then going running and hiding behind your big sister and claim you`re being bullied. And guess what, you`re both still those little kids.
0
Reply
Male 14,835
"You know, this could be XML, instead of HTML. Difficult to tell without a proper header."

I bet she could give some proper header
0
Reply
Male 621
You know, this could be XML, instead of HTML. Difficult to tell without a proper header.

If someone could direct me to this fine lady, I`d be happy to investigate this properly. ;-)
0
Reply
Male 37,826
@Lord_Jereth: His like this -literally- all the time. Don`t feel singled out, eh? :-)

Did you like my "copy - paste" comment?
0
Reply
Male 4,893

Wow. So much nerd. I love it.

In a way, the winner is the biggest looser.

0
Reply
Male 723
Yes, and as has been pointed out, your assertion is fallacious, humor or not. I`m glad that`s finally settled.

"Go away"

No.

8-) LJ
0
Reply
Male 1,253
LJ. What was the first word in my first post? "Depracated".

Loser.
Go away.
0
Reply
Male 2,675

0
Reply
Male 723
In this context, <tits> refers to an element, not an object, ArgusTuft. HTML, in and of itself, is not an object oriented language, but a markup language. HTML does not HAVE object containers, you tool. However, HTML5 has introduced the ability to embed objects with the <object> element tag. If you knew anything about MODERN coding standards, you`d have realized that your jibe fell short.

You humor was based on an old model, that of putting everything into <div> tags and then using id`s and classes in order to target them with CSS, JavaScript, etc. This is now frowned upon, considered to be old thinking and has been given the nickname, "divitus." HTML5 has introduced many new element tags in order to semantically target elements and to stave off code conflicts. You "intelligent" humor made no sense with the new standards, hence why I corrected you. You have simply failed to keep up with standards.

Deal with it and get over yourse
0
Reply
Male 395
Seriously, you guys are just being pedants over non-existent features because you`re imagining different implementations. That`s why programming jokes have to be short & simple.

0
Reply
Male 1,253
Good on you LJ. I`ll send you a link for the special olympics registration. Since you have a need to compete, that`s probably a more relevant arena for you.
3rd year huh? *insert Willy Wonka meme pic here*.
I`ve been writing code since the 1970s.
In fact now, I supervise 120 code writers in a university. Oh, and lecture on mobile platformS.

As Judge Judy says, don`t p iss on my leg and tell me it`s raining, little man.
0
Reply
Male 1,380
Sounds like a good reason to pull out my engineering degree and do a little QA...
0
Reply
Male 723
Interesting attempt, ArgusTuft. I`m a 3rd year student, double majoring as a software and mobile developer with a 3.93 GPA. Wanna try again?

I will restate: Try being more informed instead of just opinionated.

8-) LJ
0
Reply
Male 1,253
@LJ. It`s an object container you tool. If you knew coding, you`d have got the jibe. My apologies for using intelligent humour.
What`s with the low self esteem in this place?

0
Reply
Male 13,624
Ok guys ok below, just enjoy the view...
0
Reply
Male 723
Incorrect, ArgusTuft. <tits> would be in keeping with all the new semantic/structural element tags introduced with HTML5 such as <header>, <footer>, <canvas>, <article>, <aside>, <video>, <audio>, <nav> etc.

Try being more informed instead of just opinionated.

8-) LJ
0
Reply
Male 1,253
Depracated. Should be a div with tits attributes from the style sheet. Otherwise there`s no uniformity to the tits and all the tits will look different.
0
Reply
Male 5,617
"I think there should be a bit more nesting..."
0
Reply
Male 37,826
<crtl-C>
<ctrl-V>

That would be sweet too!
0
Reply
Male 2,729
Link: An Example Of Well Done Code [Pic] [Rate Link] - All HTML should look this good.
0
Reply