The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 18    Average: 4.1/5]
29 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 8595
Rating: 4.1
Category: Tech
Date: 07/30/15 01:30 PM

29 Responses to An Example Of Well Done Code [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of ElectricEye
    ElectricEye Male 50-59
    2729 posts
    July 29, 2014 at 6:47 am
    Link: An Example Of Well Done Code - All HTML should look this good.
  2. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33083 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 1:45 pm
    <crtl-C>
    <ctrl-V>

    That would be sweet too!
  3. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 1:49 pm
    "I think there should be a bit more nesting..."
  4. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1214 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 2:16 pm
    Depracated. Should be a div with tits attributes from the style sheet. Otherwise there`s no uniformity to the tits and all the tits will look different.
  5. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 2:48 pm
    Incorrect, ArgusTuft. <tits> would be in keeping with all the new semantic/structural element tags introduced with HTML5 such as <header>, <footer>, <canvas>, <article>, <aside>, <video>, <audio>, <nav> etc.

    Try being more informed instead of just opinionated.

    8-) LJ
  6. Profile photo of ferdyfred
    ferdyfred Male 40-49
    13631 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 3:06 pm
    Ok guys ok below, just enjoy the view...
  7. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1214 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 3:24 pm
    @LJ. It`s an object container you tool. If you knew coding, you`d have got the jibe. My apologies for using intelligent humour.
    What`s with the low self esteem in this place?

  8. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:12 pm
    Interesting attempt, ArgusTuft. I`m a 3rd year student, double majoring as a software and mobile developer with a 3.93 GPA. Wanna try again?

    I will restate: Try being more informed instead of just opinionated.

    8-) LJ
  9. Profile photo of pazerlenis
    pazerlenis Male 40-49
    1380 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:15 pm
    Sounds like a good reason to pull out my engineering degree and do a little QA...
  10. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1214 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:36 pm
    Good on you LJ. I`ll send you a link for the special olympics registration. Since you have a need to compete, that`s probably a more relevant arena for you.
    3rd year huh? *insert Willy Wonka meme pic here*.
    I`ve been writing code since the 1970s.
    In fact now, I supervise 120 code writers in a university. Oh, and lecture on mobile platformS.

    As Judge Judy says, don`t p iss on my leg and tell me it`s raining, little man.
  11. Profile photo of Langer
    Langer Male 18-29
    394 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:45 pm
    Seriously, you guys are just being pedants over non-existent features because you`re imagining different implementations. That`s why programming jokes have to be short & simple.

  12. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:48 pm
    In this context, <tits> refers to an element, not an object, ArgusTuft. HTML, in and of itself, is not an object oriented language, but a markup language. HTML does not HAVE object containers, you tool. However, HTML5 has introduced the ability to embed objects with the <object> element tag. If you knew anything about MODERN coding standards, you`d have realized that your jibe fell short.

    You humor was based on an old model, that of putting everything into <div> tags and then using id`s and classes in order to target them with CSS, JavaScript, etc. This is now frowned upon, considered to be old thinking and has been given the nickname, "divitus." HTML5 has introduced many new element tags in order to semantically target elements and to stave off code conflicts. You "intelligent" humor made no sense with the new standards, hence why I corrected you. You have simply failed to keep up with standards.

    Deal with it and get over yourse
  13. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:51 pm

  14. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1214 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 4:58 pm
    LJ. What was the first word in my first post? "Depracated".

    Loser.
    Go away.
  15. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 7:29 pm
    Yes, and as has been pointed out, your assertion is fallacious, humor or not. I`m glad that`s finally settled.

    "Go away"

    No.

    8-) LJ
  16. Profile photo of turdburglar
    turdburglar Male 30-39
    4896 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 8:46 pm

    Wow. So much nerd. I love it.

    In a way, the winner is the biggest looser.

  17. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33083 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 8:59 pm
    @Lord_Jereth: His like this -literally- all the time. Don`t feel singled out, eh? :-)

    Did you like my "copy - paste" comment?
  18. Profile photo of HiEv
    HiEv Male 40-49
    621 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 10:00 pm
    You know, this could be XML, instead of HTML. Difficult to tell without a proper header.

    If someone could direct me to this fine lady, I`d be happy to investigate this properly. ;-)
  19. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14652 posts
    July 30, 2014 at 11:11 pm
    "You know, this could be XML, instead of HTML. Difficult to tell without a proper header."

    I bet she could give some proper header
  20. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1214 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 12:13 am
    And that gives you the right to attack, you emotionally retarded human being.
    You and 5Cats - the sort of kids that kick someone in the shin, and then going running and hiding behind your big sister and claim you`re being bullied. And guess what, you`re both still those little kids.
  21. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 12:38 am
    Awww, ArgusTuft, is this you trying to be all witty and sanctimoniously dismissive again? So adorable.

    Yeah, you see, that only works when you actually have a pot to piss in. You bragged that you`ve been in the business for 40 some-odd years, yet you haven`t bothered to keep abreast of the best-practices and standards of the industry - and got schooled on it by a 3rd year student. And you say you get paid to supervise other students? Not sure I`d be bragging about that, if I were you. Too funny.

    Anyway, welcome to the internet. Aren`t all these colors and lack of vacuum tubes something?

    Nah, 5Cats, I`m not taking anything personal. Just having a little fun taking the piss out of a blowhard with delusions of grandeur.

    *chuckle*

    8-) LJ
  22. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 12:44 am
    Oh, and by the way, I didn`t attack YOU, so much as your logic and knowledge. There is a difference. You fired the first personal attack when you called me a "tool." Surely, if you`re such an august member of the academic and scientific communities you`ve learned to handle a little criticism along the way. Methinks I touched a nerve there, somewhere.

    8-) LJ
  23. Profile photo of Tiredofnicks
    Tiredofnicks Male 30-39
    5097 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 1:30 am
    I`m in love. Gorgeous woman!
  24. Profile photo of ArgusTuft
    ArgusTuft Male 50-59
    1214 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 3:14 am
    Im shaking my head and walking away from this, because, you still don`t get it. It was never about "coreect code" you poor dumb hic, it was about you walking in and waving your dick in the wind from the get go.
    I pity you and your slow uptake.
    "Schooled". Ha! Dream on girlie.
  25. Profile photo of Sakamura
    Sakamura Male 30-39
    237 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 5:12 am
    *eats popcorn*
    Well that escalated quickly :)

    Although the tags are a little bit low for proper binding. Need the arguments size="+2" or verticalOffset="-3", or a t-shirt a size smaller.
  26. Profile photo of deputy
    deputy Male 50-59
    449 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 10:40 am
    @draculya: maybe she prefers the double header
  27. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 1:20 pm
    Not sure what, "coreect code" is. Maybe that`s what they call it down under. No wonder you have no clue about industry standards. I do, however, know what "correct code" is. That makes one of us, at least. You probably should have taken that into account before you made more of an ass out of yourself. Well, live and learn. Ooops, that`s obviously a sore spot with you. Sorry.

    There you go again, trying to be sanctimoniously dismissive. Aren`t you just the cutest thing when you`re butthurt. But, the next bit really cracked me up: First you claim that I waved my dick around and then attempt to conjure up your lost dignity by calling me a "girlie." Yeah, that`s probably your best recourse at this point, you should probably walk away. You seem more confused than ever. Take your meds, gramps. You`re slipping, again.

    8-) LJ

  28. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    July 31, 2014 at 4:53 pm
    Are you motherf*ckas still going on?!
    Save the goddamned .asp to the server and let`s get the hell out of here!!
  29. Profile photo of spentmiles
    spentmiles Male 30-39
    114 posts
    July 30, 2015 at 1:40 pm
    That`s clearly XML.

Leave a Reply