The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 5    Average: 3.5/5]
13 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 2829
Rating: 3.5
Category:
Date: 04/06/14 08:08 AM

13 Responses to 3D Printed Metal Gun 500 Round Endurance Test

  1. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    April 6, 2014 at 6:32 am
    Link: 3D Printed Metal Gun 500 Round Endurance Test - In other news, they have also made 3D printed bullets.
  2. Profile photo of Nickel2
    Nickel2 Male 50-59
    5879 posts
    April 6, 2014 at 9:33 am
    I`ve seen a picture of a 2-D printed gun, but it wasn`t awesome.
  3. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    April 6, 2014 at 10:43 am
    Still not *yet* an issue, for two reasons:

    1) Printing in metal is still far too expensive for widespread use.

    2) It isn`t yet possible to print explosives. Bullets are just pieces of material to be propelled by an explosion. A gun with only bullets is just an inefficient club. It won`t work as a gun because there`s nothing to propel the bullets.

    The second one is the main one because it won`t be changed by a reduction in the cost of printing equipment (which is very likely to happen in the near future). It`s neither easy nor safe to manufacture explosives at home.
  4. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    April 6, 2014 at 12:53 pm
    Yeah, I agree it`s not an issue yet. But this technology is really taking off, If this is what they have in 2014, imagine 2024.

    As for the 3D printed bullets, they wouldn`t really be hard to make. I wouldn`t describe bullets as the same as explosives, either.

    3D-Printed Bullets Are Terrifyingly East to Make
  5. Profile photo of dognose82
    dognose82 Male 18-29
    153 posts
    April 6, 2014 at 4:18 pm
    1. Although a neat idea, as Angilion stated, it is too expensive for the average company, let alone person.

    2. The fear that those whom classify themselves as anti-gun or pro-regulation comes about from private individuals manufacturing their own firearms with a 3D printer. The problem is that it is MUCH cheaper to just make one with standard machines and tools; which is 100% completely legal and requires no serial number or registration.
  6. Profile photo of llaa
    llaa Male 30-39
    1664 posts
    April 6, 2014 at 4:48 pm
    Cheaper and easier to make a gun the old fashioned way.
  7. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    April 7, 2014 at 7:02 am
    As for the 3D printed bullets, they wouldn`t really be hard to make. I wouldn`t describe bullets as the same as explosives, either.

    Neither has anyone else. If you thought I did, you utterly misread my post because I explicitly stated the opposite.

    In essence, a gun is a thing for throwing things very forcefully. You need a gun, a bullet *and a way to apply a very large amount of force to the bullet*.

    Let`s say I make a gun and a bullet. What do I have? I have a crappy club with a small piece of material inside it. It`s not going anywhere unless I throw it. A chair leg (or any similarly shaped piece of wood) is a more dangerous weapon than a gun and a bullet.

    Bullets don`t move by themselves. They need to be moved by something else. Something extremely forceful. Something explosive.

    Unless, of course, you`re talking about a slingshot or a bow. They work in different ways.
  8. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    April 7, 2014 at 7:15 am
    So, for those who think that 3D printing can print *everything* required to fire a bullet;

    How do you print the means to propel the bullet?

    You can do what the person did in the video Andrew155 linked to did - print a bullet *and use explosive material manufactured in a munitions factory to propel it.* But you can`t print the required explosive material and you won`t be able to until it`s possible to print atom by atom at home, which sure as hell won`t happen by 2024.

    Or you could use mechanical force to propel a bullet. Which means *you* have to supply the force for every shot. It also means that what you`ve made is essentially a bow. It would be easier and more effective to print a crossbow and quarrels.

    It`s been possible for many years to make guns and bullets (but not a means to propel them) at home. All you need is some metalworking tools and materials you can buy in a hardware shop. Printing would just make precision easier.
  9. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    April 7, 2014 at 8:54 am
    @Angilion

    You`ve just created a precision piece of machinery and think getting an explosive material is going to be the impassible hurdle?? LOL UK the island of denial......

    75% saltpeter (5 parts)
    15% charcoal (1 part)
    10% sulfur (2/3 of 1 part)
  10. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    April 7, 2014 at 8:56 am
    Besides the fact the world is already awash in modern powder and munitions but ya Queen Mummy keeps the scary stuff out of there at least that`s what they keep telling you....
  11. Profile photo of Mr_Ike
    Mr_Ike Male 18-29
    178 posts
    April 7, 2014 at 10:30 am
    Mcgovern, blackpowder is pretty much useless in a semi-automatic weapon. It creates too much by-products and smoke, causing the weapon to jam very rapidly. You`ll need a smokeless powder, which is slightly more involved to make.
  12. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    April 8, 2014 at 6:53 am
    Mr_Ike I realize that but he asked for a propellant and he got one. You could also make something far more destructive than a gun with that I`ll let you use your imagination for that one.
  13. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    April 8, 2014 at 9:29 pm
    McGovern1981, you`re either a troll or a nationalist bigot. Either way, you`re irrelevant. But I`ll answer you anyway, because I have some spare time.

    Please explain to me how you would use a 3D printer, which prints objects in plastic or metal, to *print* saltpeter, charcoal and sulfur.

    I don`t mean to print objects using those materials - that might be possible.

    I mean to do what you have claimed is possible - to use the printer to create those materials.

    Of course you could buy them and make your own explosive to use as a propellant (just like you could buy some materials and make them into a gun using conventional tools). Nobody has said you can`t, so you`re arguing against something nobody has said. Which is silly and pointless, just like talking to you.

Leave a Reply