Pat Robertson Attacks Young Earth Theory As A Joke

Submitted by: SweepOfDeath 3 years ago in

Responding to the debate between Young Earth creationist Ken Ham & Bill Nye. He disagrees with Hams form of creationism
There are 9 comments:
Male 579
@TurdBurglar, I disagree in part. I think science and religion work fantastically together. I think its a gross misrepresentation that being religious somehow means you can`t be logical and reasonable. The Catholic Church actually does a ton of scientific research and is very open to new ideas. But that`s not what you hear in the media and certainly not what the majority believe. Does believing that a Creator is responsible for evolution actually change the theories of evolution? Nothing as of yet tells me that is not so.
0
Reply
Male 2,528
I only watched the first 20 seconds of he video and couldn`t stop laughing at how Pat Robertson apparently thinks that the middle ages was around "1800 and something".

Damn! So `Merica was around in the middle ages after all!!!
0
Reply
Male 4,891

Religion may prefer creationism, but if it want`s to survive, it will need to evolve.

I actually agree with Pat.

Science doesn`t disprove god or gods.
Religion is different than believing in god/s.

Religion doesn`t play well with science.
( A.K.A - reality)

0
Reply
Female 6,381
He still thinks the 1800s was the Middle Ages. And that`s there`s a dino called Terrasaurus Rex. Well, and that "God" runs evolution, which denies the very concept of the word "evolve."
0
Reply
Male 15,187
heh heh, Christians
0
Reply
Male 7,123
Augustine pretty much covered that.
0
Reply
Male 39,589

This is the guy who blamed hurricanes on gay marriage. So when someone that bat-poo crazy tells you that you look foolish....BELIEVE IT!
0
Reply
Male 3,327
Wait. What? Pat Robertson making sense? What is the world coming to?
0
Reply
Male 938
Link: Pat Robertson Attacks Young Earth Theory As A Joke [Rate Link] - Responding to the debate between Young Earth creationist Ken Ham & Bill Nye. He disagrees with Hams form of creationism
0
Reply