The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 17    Average: 4/5]
105 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 3107
Rating: 4
Category:
Date: 01/22/14 07:46 AM

105 Responses to Sanders Tears Into Walmart For Corporate Welfare

  1. Profile photo of SweepOfDeath
    SweepOfDeath Male 18-29
    938 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 7:41 am
    Link: Sanders Tears Into Walmart For Corporate Welfare - Should the wealthiest family in this country have large numbers of employees who depend upon government help?
  2. Profile photo of BoredFrank
    BoredFrank Male 40-49
    2374 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 7:56 am
    Love the squirming and evasion from the fat-cat toadies.
  3. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:11 am
    Horsesh|t. My pay check is taxed by about 45%, which goes to state, federal, and health insurance.

    Let me have all of my pay check, and then argue that you are subsidizing my company.

    Its the same for walmart too. Let those employees have their checks, and watch the quality of living go up.
  4. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3279 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:14 am
    Made it halfway before realizing it was -this- argument again...

    Supply and demand: there is a huge supply of the unemployed. Anyone can fill out these positions. The current employees are not worth a "living wage" at these McJobs.
    These employees need to take night classes and gain skills while working these McJobs to make it out of poverty.

    Increases in the minimum wage will throw the supply and demand of money off balance.
    With a bigger supply of money, goods will be worth less and thus increasing the price of the goods. Now we`re back to them living in poverty, and even more people will be as well because:

    If the min wage increases to $X, everyone making more than $X will not be scaled. So now someone with their BS and working a more difficult job will be (eventually) making a poverty level wage, and the high school drop out will be making the same amount.
  5. Profile photo of DromEd
    DromEd Male 40-49
    1945 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:14 am
    Wouldn`t it be great to spend a weekend at his house?
  6. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:15 am

    More people living in poverty now than at any time in history?
    Bull Schitt. Yes things are bad and we are declining but let`s not exaggerate the situation. But I`m not seeing barefooted kids working 14 your shifts in factories. THOSE were poor people with no guvment assistance at all.

    When people who are employed also get guvment help it`s just Corporate Subsidies. The company doesn`t have to pay workers enough to live on because they know the guvment will step in.

    Back in the day a working family would move grandma in and she`d watch the kiddies. Now people expect the guvment to provide day care. It helped the parents, it ensured security for the granny. People relied of their families and that has just fallen apart. It`s not the only solution, but it`s part of it.
  7. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3279 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:16 am
    That`s a very good point @elkingo.

    While we`re at it, let`s go back to the way thing were set up, as in being a politician was a service to the country and earned no wages for the politician.

    Let`s cut all of their benefits and see how many politicians are there for the money, and how many are there to help the country.
  8. Profile photo of MelCervini
    MelCervini Female 50-59
    2242 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:28 am
    Our military families qualify for foodstamps, welfare and section 8 housing AND are getting their benefits cut, pay raises don`t exist and neither does quality healthcare... where`s the outrage against their "boss"?
  9. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:32 am
    elkingo

    "Horsesh|t. My pay check is taxed by about 45%, which goes to state, federal, and health insurance."

    There is absolutely no way I believe that.

    Let`s say you make $60,000 a year. Health insurance comes out at $250/month. You`re telling me you pay $24,000 a year in taxes? THAT is horsesh|t.
  10. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:34 am
    MelCervini

    "where`s the outrage against their "boss"?"

    Their boss wanted to raise taxes and was repeatedly blocked. Where do you think money to pay government employees like the military come from? TAXES.
  11. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14652 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:42 am
    All countries should govern for the sustainable betterment of the standards of living, happiness, health and welfare of their citizens and residents.

    Therefore, public policy in a fair country should look like this:

    The government and lawmakers should be looking at the well-being of measured by country`s median (representing the majority) and should also seek to better the lot of the worst off and ensure the opportunity for relative upward mobility of the less well off.

    However, in less than ideal political systems, governments tend to focus on the total gross national product, because this relates to the recurring income of the nation and hence the power that the government can wield.

    even worse, corrupt governments favour the interests of those parties who can bolster the power of, and enrich, the government, especially the higher echelons that control policy.
  12. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:43 am
    DuckBoy87

    " The current employees are not worth a "living wage" at these McJobs."

    What an a.sshole.

    So what`s a McJob? Anyone in the retail, service, or restaurant industry? So our society needs people to fill these jobs, huge numbers of people, and your position is f.uck em, let them live in poverty so that the people that own the company can make billions?

    It isn`t like every job at mcdonalds, walmart, dennys, or sears can be taken part time by a high school kid. We, WE, need adults to take these jobs for our economy to function. Should that mean they are somehow deserving of being put in some sub-class with no value or prospects?

    America flourished under manufacturing. You think ANYBODY couldn`t go to a factory and work an assembly line? However they were still paid a wage that allowed them to raise a family and buy a house and a car.

    There are so many heartless f.ucks on this site it is amazing.
  13. Profile photo of MelCervini
    MelCervini Female 50-59
    2242 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:49 am
    Holygod... right.. but raised themselves raises, trips, vacations, parties etc... Yet some leech who dropped out of school to freely spit out 6 kids from 6 different baby daddies, bitches that they can`t make a living at mcdonald`s, gets all the `outrage` and news coverage.
  14. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:55 am

    elkingo - 45% ? Dude what`s wrong with you.
    I`m middle class and paying 23-25%. If you are in a tax bracket at 45% you need a new accountant so you don`t pay that much. Hell, even billionaires pay less tax percentage than their maids {Warren Buffet}. If you pay 45% tax it`s your own fault.
  15. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:55 am
    MelCervini

    "Yet some leech who dropped out of school to freely spit out 6 kids from 6 different baby daddies, bitches that they can`t make a living at mcdonald`s, gets all the `outrage` and news coverage."

    Why are they a leech if they have a job?

    Is being a soldier a more worthy job to society than making food? I don`t think anyone was every tortured at mcdonalds. I`m pretty sure no wedding parties were ever killed by cheeseburgers.

    I don`t understand.

    I live near an airforce base. People in the military survive off of their jobs. People at McDonalds cannot. I don`t see the comparison.
  16. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:56 am

    " The current employees are not worth a "living wage" at these McJobs."
    Go to the blackboard and write "I will not make stupid statements" 100 times!
  17. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14652 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:57 am
    Nor do I suggest that most US politicians that identify as liberals/Democrats etc. buy into the ideals of good governance that i described. They too, favour the lobbies and oligarchy of the rich, even if its to a lesser extent.

    Economic measures that are so hotly debated, such as the minimum wage, healthcare, social security, special spending programmes, immigration, tax incentives, the size of the government and targeted lending are all imperfect tools. However, everyone (and politicians especially) should all be mindful of the end-goals of social morality, upward mobility and the common good and the corrupting temptations that those in power must resist.
  18. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 8:57 am
    Gerry1of1

    " If you pay 45% tax it`s your own fault."

    He doesn`t. He`s totally full of s.hit.

    I pay self employment taxes, make 6 figures and withold a ton in 401k, HSA, life insurance, and college savings and I don`t even get near 45% taken out of my pay.
  19. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:03 am

    I think it`s funny the ones who say they don`t deserve a living wage, or are "leaches" also bitch when those people get guvment assistance. You don`t want them to earn enough to buy health insurance, but you also don`t want them getting medicare.

    Make up your mind. Pay them enough to support themselves or you can expect your tax dollars to help support them.

    At least they work where/when they can! They`re not sitting at home sexting other on their ObamaPhones or selling their EBT cards for crack.
  20. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:04 am
    PFFFSSSHHH please Colonel Sanders pays his employees min wage too!!! Should`ve kept the beard BTW!
  21. Profile photo of Musuko42
    Musuko42 Male 18-29
    2850 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:04 am
    45% tax can`t be right.

    I live in the "socialist tax-aholic" UK, and my total tax (not counting VAT/sales tax stuff) comes to 19% of my pay. And that includes the cost of my healthcare.

    How could you be paying more in the US? I`m sceptical.
  22. Profile photo of Dead_mind
    Dead_mind Male 18-29
    303 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:07 am
    @Draculya
    Yeah. i cant belive Murmikans still belive in the two party system. its just one party.
    At day they go to two difrent houses and have a party. by nigth, they all end up at the same house, same party.
  23. Profile photo of Musuko42
    Musuko42 Male 18-29
    2850 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:08 am
    @DuckBoy87

    "These employees need to take night classes and gain skills while working these McJobs to make it out of poverty."

    A: how can they afford to pay for that if they don`t even have enough money to live off of with the job they have that isn`t worth a living wage?

    B: Taking classes and gaining skills isn`t worth anything if there isn`t a demand for those skills either.

    C: If there IS demand for those skills, then if every McJob employee managed to do as you suggest, then the supply of trained people for those jobs will end up just as high, and they`ll all be back at square one.

    D: Supply and demand economics should be used for PRODUCTS, not PEOPLE! People are NOT resources and shouldn`t be treated like they are.

    E: Be a f*cking human being.
  24. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14652 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:10 am
    "The current employees are not worth a `living wage` at these McJobs."

    I won`t debate the accuracy of that statement today, but I object to the loaded terms "worth" and "living wage". It seems to imply such people have no productive place in society.

    Instead of "worth", we could consider whether it is appropriate to allocate capital and resources to ensure that these people contribute a net positive to the greater good. Not all capital and resources are private enterprise and neither private, nor public enterprise can have the expectation of profit without consideration of societal impact.

    The term "living wage" is also controversial. However, all people in society, regardless of the circumstances of their origin, deserve the opportunity to be able to rise on their own efforts, decisions and merits to achieve all that they can for themselves. There is a difference between being dirt poor and being dirt poor wi
  25. Profile photo of Musuko42
    Musuko42 Male 18-29
    2850 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:16 am
    I do worry that a lot of people seem to think and act like the health and happiness of the economy is more important than the healthy and happiness of the people that economy is meant to serve.
  26. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14652 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:35 am
    @Musuko42 exactly; it is how we define and measure the `economy` that is the heart of this. It is real people, real lives and a lot of them, too.

    Measuring a country`s success by its GNP/GDP/etc. fundamentally assumes that one dollar = one vote. that is called a Capital Democracy.
  27. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 9:49 am
    Awesome post below by Gerry re: those who need to make up their minds.

    I don`t always agree with you, Gerry (and vice versa), but you really hit it out of the park with that one. 100%.
  28. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3909 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 10:15 am
    "I think it`s funny the ones who say they don`t deserve a living wage, or are "leaches" also bitch when those people get guvment assistance. You don`t want them to earn enough to buy health insurance, but you also don`t want them getting medicare.

    Make up your mind. Pay them enough to support themselves or you can expect your tax dollars to help support them."


  29. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 10:36 am
    At day they go to two difrent houses and have a party. by nigth, they all end up at the same house, same party.


    Parliament just gets piss drunk right where they are.
  30. Profile photo of MelCervini
    MelCervini Female 50-59
    2242 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 10:40 am
    they`re leeches because they continue to live beyond their means and have children/more children! THAT is what makes them leeches! "I know I can`t live on this wage for myself, but I`m going to spit out a few kids SO I can get on assistance (not `forced` to pfft) ANYWAY." Sorry... to me, taking a bullet for your country and making sure YOU don`t have to take one either, is a little more important than making sure I have fries with that.
  31. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 10:44 am
    So will we be raising everyones wage or just Wally world and McDs? Either way it does nothing to help the income gap and they`ll just up the cost of things accomplishing nothing. If you`re only qualified to hold a job like this that`s your fault. So you`ll have to work a bit harder for awhile to get out of it because it`s your laziness and stupidity that got you in that situation in the first place.
  32. Profile photo of nucnik
    nucnik Male 18-29
    85 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 11:24 am
    This is bullpoo. I`m all against corporatism, which is creating this state of affairs in the first place, but attacking a specific family for being rich is the same as wanting to increase minimum wage without considering how many jobs will be lost as a result of that. It`s idiotic and immoral. I agree with what that lady who spoke before the one at the end said: it`s their choice to work.
  33. Profile photo of madduck
    madduck Female 50-59
    7607 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 11:25 am
    Governments should not subsidise profitable businesses by the back door. If a company makes millions yet pays its staff so badly they get government help of one form or another- then that business is being subsidised. In the UK the hospitality industry is a prime example. I used to work 50 hours a week as bar manager- getting paid for 45 , yet I could not earn enough to pay my rent, so I got housing benefit and tax credits. The brewery made a killing every year- shareholder effectively being given money by the government... lunacy. YET all we hear is how a living wage will kill business--- hmmm.
  34. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    599 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 11:49 am
    Do not forget were the ATM came from and what a mess it is now.
  35. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 12:17 pm
    That whole, "pay them a living wage or don`t criticize excessive welfare" argument is pretty much a strawman argument.

    You see, if you mandate labor to be sold at no less than $15/hr, then not all of those people will be working. That`s a fact, Jack. The Liberty Tax guy who holds the sign, pointing where their store is, will be gone. But he`s just the first. I can guarantee Walmart could carry on with employment reductions as well, easily 10% of the workforce nixed.

    And so, the money you save because people are now making a "living wage" is more than offset by the number of people who have zero work.

    You see, it`s a false argument. It argues against critics of a "living wage" without actually addressing any of the completely legitimate arguments against a living wage. Namely, that not all of the people will get paid a living wage, but rather the absolute minimum wage of $0/hr.
  36. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 12:18 pm
    Also, can we seriously stop using this term "living wage". It literally means that you should get paid more if you have 3 children than if you have 2 or 1. Or none (you know, the responsible choice if you can only achieve minimum wage labor).
  37. Profile photo of Agent00Smith
    Agent00Smith Male 18-29
    2581 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 12:26 pm
    It`s funny how the rich have trained poor people to think this is fair, and when someone points out that it isn`t, all you here is "it`s YOUR fault that the only jobs available to you are slave jobs, just work harder so you can become a slave master (manager, ceo, whatever)"

    It physically is not possible for everyone to be a manager of a business. How are people so stupid as to see the flaw with that argument?
  38. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3909 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 12:43 pm

  39. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 12:50 pm

    dang007, "Do not forget were the ATM came from and what a mess it is now."
    I rather like the ATM. I put my card/pin in and I get money out. What`s the problem?
  40. Profile photo of SethDog
    SethDog Male 18-29
    768 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 12:56 pm
    Ohhh I thought this was going to be Colonel Sanders talking...
  41. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 1:48 pm
    Andrew155

    "You see, if you mandate labor to be sold at no less than $15/hr, then not all of those people will be working. That`s a fact, Jack. The Liberty Tax guy who holds the sign, pointing where their store is, will be gone. But he`s just the first. I can guarantee Walmart could carry on with employment reductions as well, easily 10% of the workforce nixed. "

    Let`s say you are right. The 90% that sees it`s income doubled can all of a sudden afford to actually live a life. They may be able to buy a car. Buy a vacuum cleaner. Eat out once in a while. Now with all these people having more money to spend, guess what? More businesses and more jobs for the people who got nixed.

    You take money from billionaires whose spending habits won`t change at all and give it to worker`s whose spending will go way up. You really don`t think that will grow the economy?
  42. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 1:53 pm
    Gerry1of1 "If you pay 45% tax it`s your own fault."

    Re-read it.. I pay around 45% in taxes and health insurance.
  43. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:05 pm
    @Holy God - I am not going to post a pay stub on here, but I will give you some numbers.

    My last check was for 1146.64

    I paid out a total of 143.94 in state and federal taxes, and a total of 300.43 for insurance.

    That works out closer to 38% but I hadn`t considered my recent raise.
  44. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:05 pm
    elkingo

    "That translates to around 1100 per two week period. Out of that, I pay for health insurance for my wife and I at around 347 dollars per pay check. I pay out around 38 dollars in state tax, and around 112 in federal tax.

    You do the math."

    Well then you pay 13% in taxes. Don`t tack on health insurance for you AND your wife that you CHOOSE to pay and then act like the GOVERNMENT takes half your money. They take 13%. The rest is taken by insurance companies.
  45. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:07 pm
    Sorry, I had some of the original numbers wrong.

    Also, if you go back and re-read my first post, I said I pay out around 45% in taxes and health insurance. I don`t know why you are so up in arms about it.
  46. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:09 pm
    You are right though, I do choose to pay for insurance. However, didn`t Obamacare make it a law to have it? Doesn`t matter that point anyway, as I would have it anyway.


    I am simply stating, that my life would be much more pleasant if I could keep more of my paycheck. Not trying to be deceptive here at all.
  47. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:10 pm
    elkingo

    Your original statement was "My pay check is taxed by about 45%, which goes to state, federal, and health insurance."

    That would be like if I had 70% withheld for my 401k and then came on here b.itching that I am taxed 95%, which goes to state, federal, and retirement.

    The government takes a small percentage of your money.
  48. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:13 pm
    elkingo

    You enjoy public roads. You probably went to a public school. You enjoy protection from the military, the police, the firefighters. You have access to libraries and parks. Etc, etc, etc.

    You`re going to bitch about 13%?

    Where do you think the money to make our society function comes from?
  49. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:17 pm
    HolyGod - Lol. You crack me up man.

    Do you honestly think I do not enjoy roads, schools, parks or the like? Do you not think I enjoy military and police protection? No.. Hell, I want to pay taxes. I also want to have health insurance.

    I am just making the very simple statement, that if the government took less from me I would live a better standard.

    How that occurs is debatable.

    For one, the law about health insurance could be changed so it doesn`t cost me 600 per month. I could sure put that money to work elsewhere, but hey - gotta have my health insurance.
  50. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:18 pm
    Actually, for college I went to a private school. Thanks.
  51. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:20 pm
    elkingo

    "I am just making the very simple statement, that if the government took less from me I would live a better standard."

    If insurance companies took less from you your standard would be much higher than if the government took less. Maybe you should advocate for national health care.
  52. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:24 pm
    Holygod - I agree with you to some degree. However, I disagree with the assumption that my health insurance cost is not related to government.
  53. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:25 pm
    Although, that 143 bucks per pay check (286 per month) would purchase my entire families groceries for about 3 weeks.
  54. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:27 pm
    BTW - switching to Obamacare, or as its named in my state KY Health Net, would cost me an additional 186 dollars per month -- *IF* I dropped my pregnant wife and didn`t pick up elkingo jr.
  55. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 2:41 pm
    Hmm.. wait.. a better way to look at this might be what we are actually arguing about. *The 7.10 dollar an hour worker*.

    7.10 is roughly half of what I make, if you consider them full time.

    That means, you can half my income of around 1100, and assume that a full time min wage worker makes around 550 every two weeks.

    If they pay out 200 per pay check in health care, and 12% tax rat, that means they only get to bring home 284 dollars per 2 weeks.


    My argument is easy - if health insurance cost less, and they paid out less in taxes, their standard of living would go up dramatically. 284 dollars every two weeks is in fact no enough to live on, but 550 isn`t impossible.

    I know families in my area that live on 10k total bring home a year. FAMILIES not individuals.

  56. Profile photo of Modwain
    Modwain Male 40-49
    336 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 3:32 pm
    i love that scott winship is using a lot of words to make sure he isnt answering the given question... After all, the question wether the workers should be earning a living wage is a direct question. His answer is, we should not increase the pay to a level where walmart will not hire people.. FAIR ENOUGGH< DO NOT PAY THEM $100 AN HOUR. But, seriously, $16 is still doable, right?

    And if there are almost no places for people to work you cannot claim that it is their choise to take a low pay or go work somewhere else when there is no somewhere else.

    B
  57. Profile photo of Modwain
    Modwain Male 40-49
    336 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 3:33 pm
    But yeah, Do not have a living wage, or a minimum wage, after all, that is to much a socialist thing, right? cant work, right? i mean, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, all on the brink of bankrupcy, right?
    Nah, lets defend the right of walmart to rip of their employees and blaming the poor people for being poor.
    I think the saying is Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. John Steinbeck
  58. Profile photo of Viking864
    Viking864 Male 40-49
    1444 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 5:26 pm
    No, the reason why Socialism never took root in American is because it`s a bad idea. I noticed how you left off Greece, Spain, and Ireland in your examples.
  59. Profile photo of Laran
    Laran Male 40-49
    467 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 5:43 pm
    I got fed up with making bosses millionaires while the workers were being paid a pittance.
    One day I exploded and quit, moved as far out bush as I can get. Life has NEVER been so good.
    Being the man with the skills, I can build almost anything I require.(while I was employed all those years I slowly bought tools and equipment).
    For the last 2.5 years now I have lived like a King on a $0 income. no welfare, nothing.
    Most of my mates are insanely jealous and struggle to comprehend how it can be done.
    The answer is easy- Don`t be lazy & knowledge is power.
    everything starts with the generation of power- once you have a power source you can complete other tasks like filter water etc.
    Technically I do get paid as people offer things for me to come around and resolve some problem they seem unable to understand or cant fix.
    Bosses take advantage of the fact that most people are not as smart as they think.
    If you want more then stand on your own two feet
  60. Profile photo of JadesDitoyr
    JadesDitoyr Male 18-29
    841 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 7:36 pm
    @HolyGod
    "You take money from billionaires whose spending habits won`t change at all and give it to worker`s whose spending will go way up. You really don`t think that will grow the economy?"

    Well, that`s not what he explained. By laying off some employees and giving it to others to pay them the extra 7 dollars an hour; they`re paying the same in wages as before. The billionaires lose nothing.

    You`re taking money out of the hands of people who need it and putting it in the hands of people who need it. Not out of the hands of people who have it into the hands that need it.
  61. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 7:51 pm
    JadesDitoyor

    "Well, that`s not what he explained. By laying off some employees and giving it to others to pay them the extra 7 dollars an hour; they`re paying the same in wages as before. The billionaires lose nothing.

    You`re taking money out of the hands of people who need it and putting it in the hands of people who need it. Not out of the hands of people who have it into the hands that need it."

    I disagree. He said nix 10% of the workforce. That means 90% would be getting twice as much money.

    If Y is numbers of workers:

    .9Y x $15/hr > Y x $7.25
  62. Profile photo of Tupinambis
    Tupinambis Male 18-29
    568 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 11:53 pm
    LOLOLOL
    " workers decide where to work." That`s some funny zhit right there.
  63. Profile photo of Tupinambis
    Tupinambis Male 18-29
    568 posts
    January 22, 2014 at 11:57 pm
    Also, our acceptance of these timed forums on critical matters is completely insane.
  64. Profile photo of toeachhisown
    toeachhisown Male 50-59
    418 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 12:15 am
    Should the wealthiest family in this country have large numbers of employees who depend upon government help?

    No, take away the government help. Problem solved.
  65. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 7:34 am
    Two very important questions:

    1. Is Walmart at fault for using a resource that`s readily available, or is government at fault for offering/allowing it?

    2. Do we all agree that *someone* will need to pay the difference if we raise minimum wages?

    Regarding the second question, who are some possible candidates to pay for this new minimum wage difference? Well, it could be the business owner (pay higher wages or close business), the consumer (higher prices), taxes (welfare or subsidies like the current minimum wage), or the employee (less hours, less other comp, lay offs, etc.).

    Does anyone here actually think that the business owners (those who control two others groups - consumers and employees) are going to eat the total cost? Seriously, that`s naïve.
  66. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 8:18 am
    HA

    "Does anyone here actually think that the business owners (those who control two others groups - consumers and employees) are going to eat the total cost?"

    They eat it now with minimum wage don`t they?

    I mean walmart and mcdonalds would probably love to pay people less than minimum wage if they could.
  67. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 8:20 am
    HA

    However, even if it DOES hit consumers, I don`t really care. If my meal goes from $5 to $5.20 so that the employees working there can actually have a sustainable life, then great.

    An average McDonalds serves 8 people every minute they are open. Let`s say each person spends an average of $5. If the McDonalds is open from 6am to 10pm that is $38,400 from 7,680 consumers.

    Let`s say there are 25 employees between the multiple shifts and they all make minimum wage, which they don`t obviously. They each work 8 hours at $7/hr. Raise their wages to $15/hr. That costs the store an extra $1,600.

    Pass it on to each consumer at a WHOPPING 20 cents each.

    Where`s the problem?

    Walmart`s raise on consumers would be even less.
  68. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 9:19 am
    @HG

    They eat it now with minimum wage don`t they?
    That`s an impossible question. How do we know where the difference between market value and minimum wage comes from? There`s no way to know.

    It`s possible that business owners make up the difference; it`s possible that less people are working that could be otherwise; it`s possible that compensation packages are less than they would be otherwise; it`s possible that prices are higher than they would be otherwise; it`s a certainty that tax dollars are used to subsidize it.

    We don`t, we can`t, know who is paying for it now. However, what we can do is take some best guesses at who *will* pay the difference if it`s raised.

    My guess?

    1. Consumers/Employees - That`s a tossup;
    2. Government;
    3. Businesses.

    What`s more, there`s no way to force business owners to be the ones to bear the brunt.
  69. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 9:23 am
    @HG

    Pass it on to each consumer at a WHOPPING 20 cents each.
    Who`s more likely to seek out goods and services tendered by minimum wage employees - poor people, middle class people, or rich people?

    Well of course it`s poor people. The people who spend the largest % of their income on goods and services tendered by minimum-wage earners also make minimum-wage.

    Therefore, passing the cost on to consumers (raising prices) hurts minimum-wage workers more than anyone.

    Ideally, you`d want to pass the cost on in this order to least hurt minimum-wage earners:

    1. Business owners;
    2. Government/Taxes;
    3. Consumers;
    4. Employees.

    In reality, almost the exact opposite will happen:

    1. Employees/Consumers;
    2. Government/Taxes;
    3. Business Owners.

  70. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 9:27 am
    HA

    "The people who spend the largest % of their income on goods and services tendered by minimum-wage earners also make minimum-wage.

    Therefore, passing the cost on to consumers (raising prices) hurts minimum-wage workers more than anyone."

    EXCELLENT point. However, now that THEY make an extra $8 an hour at THEIR minimum wage job I`m sure they won`t complain about the extra 20 cents for their meal at mcdonalds too much.

    In fact I`m pretty sure they will now be able to buy more things at walmart and more food at mcdonalds even with the slight increase in cost. So again, WHO does this hurt? I`m still sorta waiting.
  71. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 9:57 am
    $15 an hour for a completely unskilled job is a joke. Typical entitlement attitude. Do you really think most of these people who think they should be getting paid this for making no effort and some spitting out kid while making a poor wage would actually spend it wisely not $200 dollar sneakers, nail job and $50 underware? Ya lets support getting by without any effort what so ever what`s the worst that could happen......
  72. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 10:03 am
    McGovern1981

    "$15 an hour for a completely unskilled job is a joke."

    I agree with you. I think $10 is much more reasonable. I`m only using $15 because, for whatever reason, it is the number that has been used in the debate spanning a few posts.

    How do you define "skilled" out of curiosity? Is a guy that changes oil and brake pads skilled? How about a guy that fixes air conditioners or washing machines? Electricians, plumbers, etc?

    Those are all jobs that can be done by pretty much anyone after a couple weeks of training. Is that "skilled" in your opinion?
  73. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 10:28 am
    @HG

    So again, WHO does this hurt? I`m still sorta waiting.
    Again, it still hurts minimum wage workers the most if the price of each good produced by minimum wage workers increases; this is because minimum wage workers are most likely to purchase products and services tendered by other minimum wage workers.

    I`m not sure where you`re lost at. You seem to agree with the reasoning I`ve provided, yet, you just refuse to accept that it is reasonable.
  74. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 10:33 am
    @HG

    You`re tossing around a lot of numbers to support your case that you`ve pulled out of thin air. These are nothing more than baseless assumptions you`re "guessing" at (by guessing, I mean arbitrarily setting at a point that supports your argument) to "prove" your point.

    For example, you suggest that the price of each good will rise some negligible amount (20 cents) if we raise the minimum wage to some arbitrary amount ($10hr), but of course you can`t know that number.

    There is no number you can use that will be evidenced-based to support you argument. If you have an issue with the reasoning I`ve provided, argue against that. Please do not provide data you`ve magically created and act as if it is gospel.
  75. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 10:38 am
    How do you define "skilled" out of curiosity? Is a guy that changes oil and brake pads skilled? How about a guy that fixes air conditioners or washing machines? Electricians, plumbers, etc?

    Yes those require knowledge of many things. Most of those especially entry level don`t even make $15 an hour. BTW Electrician and Plumbers require years of working in the field to become a master. Did plumbing for 1 1/2 years.
  76. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:07 pm
    McGovern1981

    "Yes those require knowledge of many things. Most of those especially entry level don`t even make $15 an hour. BTW Electrician and Plumbers require years of working in the field to become a master. Did plumbing for 1 1/2 years."

    I can`t imagine it takes all that much more training to change oil as it does to learn the machinery and systems at mcdonalds. The point is ANYONE can do it.

    I`m not talking master electricians or plumbers. I`m talking the entry level jobs.
  77. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:10 pm
    HA

    " Please do not provide data you`ve magically created and act as if it is gospel."

    I didn`t magically create it. I googled how many people the average mcdonalds serves in a day. I`ve eaten at mcdonalds enough times to make a pretty fair guess at the average meal price and average number of workers per shift.

    The numbers I gave might not be exact but they are pretty damn close and they clearly show that even if ALL the burden of a higher minimum wage were passed on to the consumer the increase would not be that significant at all. I mean hell, say I`m WAY off and it is double what I said. So a meal at mcdonalds goes up 40 cents. Who cares?
  78. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:11 pm
    HA

    "Again, it still hurts minimum wage workers the most if the price of each good produced by minimum wage workers increases; this is because minimum wage workers are most likely to purchase products and services tendered by other minimum wage workers."

    So raising the minimum wage will hurt the minimum wage workers because the costs of the things they buy will go up? You really don`t get why that sounds retarded?

    If you DOUBLE someone`s salary you think it will be a hardship that the goods and services they buy goes up 10%? Or even 25%?

    You aren`t stupid. I know you aren`t. Think how stupid this argument is.

    Someone makes less that $1,200 a month at a minimum wage job. They have to pay for rent, utilities, etc out of that. Double their wage and now they have 3 - 5 TIMES the disposable income.

    You think they are going to be hurt because walmarts and mcdonalds prices go up a bit?
  79. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:30 pm
    @HG

    I didn`t magically create it
    Yes, you did. Unless you can source the study you got your 20c notion from, it`s fabricated. What`s more, you`re relying on it for your argument. Do you understand why that sounds "retarded" as you would say? I mean, you are relying on a made-up statistic to "prove" your point.

    So a meal at mcdonalds goes up 40 cents. Who cares?
    I had no idea that the only minimum wage workers out there were from McDonalds. I had assumed that there were such wages in a variety of different places, such as Walmart, Target, Walgreens... I now realize how silly I am for thinking this way. (<--- Sarcasm)
  80. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:34 pm
    @HG

    So raising the minimum wage will hurt the minimum wage workers because the costs of the things they buy will go up?
    This is the best case scenario and it`s a net-zero. The other more likely scenarios are net-negatives.

    10%? Or even 25%?
    This is what I`m talking about - it`s a made up statistic. You just said raise wages to 10$ per hour earlier, and now you`re doubling it. You aren`t even being consistent with your made up statistics.

    Think how stupid this argument is.
    I agree! I f*cking hate when people just start making sh*t up to "prove" their arguments; it annoys the absolute sh*t out of me.

    You think they are going to be hurt because walmarts and mcdonalds prices go up a bit?
    They`re going to hurt because they won`t have a job anymore. Skilled people who currently make $15/hour will replace them via attrition.
  81. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:38 pm
    I can`t imagine it takes all that much more training to change oil as it does to learn the machinery and systems at mcdonalds. The point is ANYONE can do it.

    Mmmm kind of they usually do a lot more than oil at those places too though. AC recharge, trans fluid, belts and ect. All makers are designed differently to so there`s a bit to know and they don`t even make $15 an hour last I checked.
  82. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:40 pm
    HA

    "This is the best case scenario and it`s a net-zero. The other more likely scenarios are net-negatives."

    HOW THE HOLY F.UCK DO YOU FIGURE?

    If someone`s income doubles for it to be a net-negative then the things they spend money on would have to more than double. Are you telling me you project that the costs of goods and services provided by minimum wage workers is going to more than double if you raise the minimum wage?
  83. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:40 pm
    @HG

    At the end of the day, if - and it`s a big if - the only negative consequence is an increase in prices, then it must be a net-zero. Total sales revenue must increase the same amount that total expenditures decrease.

    If this doesn`t happen, then someone else is also starting to pay for the new wage increase; at this point, the negative consequences really start to shine. Most likely, it will be in the form of employee cost, which includes things such as: increased unemployment, decreased hours, and/or decreased supplementary compensation.

    Now, if you want government to pay for it, then stop trying to be sneaky and stop trying to trick people - you want more welfare. Call it what it is, and we will see if the nation supports it; there is no need to be tricky if it`s supported by the public.
  84. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:42 pm
    HA

    "This is what I`m talking about - it`s a made up statistic. You just said raise wages to 10$ per hour earlier, and now you`re doubling it. You aren`t even being consistent with your made up statistics."

    Bulls.hit.

    It has been $15 for our entire debate. $15 was the carryover from our previous debate. My guess is someone chose it because that is what the mcdonalds workers in new york wanted. I didn`t pick $15.

    I mentioned that I thought $15 was high to mcgovern and that $10 was more reasonable.

    That has nothing to do with our debate.
  85. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 1:50 pm
    @HG

    That has nothing to do with our debate.
    OK, fair enough. I had mentioned that you arbitrarily set the new minimum wage to $10/hr. earlier and you did not dispute it then. As such, I continued with the assumption that we were using it.

    Either way, the number doesn`t really matter; it`s arbitrary and does not significantly change the reasoning involved.
  86. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:18 pm
    HA

    "Yes, you did. Unless you can source the study you got your 20c notion from, it`s fabricated."

    FINE.

    Average mcdonalds serves 8 people a minute:
    http://tinyurl.com/ny5c43s

    Mcdonalds are open approx 18 hours a day
    I looked up their hours

    Average spent per transaction in the US is $5.50- 5.75
    http://tinyurl.com/mhferrz

    14,000 mcdonalds in america
    http://tinyurl.com/kas6bfz

    $15 wage hike cost mcdonalds $8 billion a year US
    http://tinyurl.com/lsw3ljg

    $8,000,000,000 / 8 / 60 / 18 / 365 / 14,000 =

    DUD DUH DUH

    18 cents per transaction

    Guess I was pretty good huh?
  87. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:23 pm
    @HG

    Guess I was pretty good huh?
    Actually yea, that was pretty good. There`s a problem though...

    The prices would also go up everywhere else too. McDonald`s isn`t the only place that employs minimum wage workers.

    Let`s look at this at another angle. If raising the minimum wage is a net-positive, then why not raise it even higher? Why is it good to raise it to $15/hr. and not $30/hr. or $60/hr.?

    I mean, let`s reason it out.

    If raising the minimum wage from $7.25/hr. to $15/hr. helps people who make less that $15/hr., then raising it to $30/hr. should help even more people.

    Based on this, we should raise it as high as it can go, because it is a net-positive. Right?
  88. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:29 pm
    @HG

    I`ve read here before that you make six-figures, right? Perhaps we should raise minimum wage to your salary.

    By your reasoning, this would transfer wealth from people who make more than your salary into the hands of people who are less fortunate than yourself.

    It`s perfect.
  89. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:35 pm
    HA

    "I`ve read here before that you make six-figures, right? Perhaps we should raise minimum wage to your salary."

    I DON`T think everyone should be equal. I have never advocated for pure socialism. Without financial reward many jobs that require skill / schooling / hard work would go away.

    I don`t think a fry cook deserves as much as a doctor or a businessman. I just think that if you work 40 hours a week in america and provide a needed service to society you shouldn`t have to live on welfare.

    Your main thing was that if you raise the wage it would be passed on to consumers. I just proved that isn`t all that significant.

    So now you are arguing principle. I GET that you are against any mandate or intervention by the government on business. I GET it.
  90. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:36 pm
    HA

    "The prices would also go up everywhere else too. McDonald`s isn`t the only place that employs minimum wage workers."

    Let`s take walmart.

    There is less employees per transaction at walmart would you agree?

    The average transaction at walmart is WAY higher, would you agree?

    So the affect on the end user would be even LESS than at mcdonalds, would you agree?

    "Let`s look at this at another angle. If raising the minimum wage is a net-positive, then why not raise it even higher? Why is it good to raise it to $15/hr. and not $30/hr. or $60/hr.?"

    I`m not trying to make people rich from working minimum wage. I`m not saying they deserve to drive brand new cars and buy huge houses. I`m just saying they deserve to survive without welfare if they work.
  91. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:38 pm
    @HG

    There is less employees per transaction at walmart would you agree?
    That`s probably a fair assumption.

    The average transaction at walmart is WAY higher, would you agree?
    I think you mean the average cost per transaction, in which case, yes.

    So the affect on the end user would be even LESS than at mcdonalds, would you agree?
    That`s another impossible to know answer. We don`t know how many times per week out imaginary average consumer shops at Walmart vs. McDonalds. That is a VERY important question to answer before figuring out where costs will rise most.
  92. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:41 pm
    HA

    "That`s another impossible to know answer. We don`t know how many times per week out imaginary average consumer shops at Walmart vs. McDonalds. That is a VERY important question to answer before figuring out where costs will rise most. "

    No dude. It isn`t. If we agree that the increase on mcdonalds is about 4% per average transaction and we agree that there are fewer employees per transaction and a higher average transaction then the increase will be even less than 4%.

    It doesn`t matter who shops or how often. All we`re doing is talking about the increase in the cost of goods or services to consumers.

    We know walmart`s will be less than mcdonlads by pure common sense.
  93. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:41 pm
    @HG

    I`m not trying to make people rich from working minimum wage.
    Hang on now, that`s not what I was getting at.

    Your argument is that raising minimum wage is a net-positive, or at the very least, it helps people under the minimum wage proportionally to the amount it hurts people over the minimum wage.

    Therefore, if this is your argument, in order to stay internally consistent, you must also agree that increasing it further will help more less-fortunate people.

    So, is it a good idea, as in, is it good for our society, to raise the minimum wage to $100/hr?

    If you believe so, then you`re delusional. Sorry, but that`s about all I can offer you. Otherwise (and I`m assuming you don`t actually think it would be a good idea), your original statement is incorrect.

    Right?
  94. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:43 pm
    Socialists make the rules, and then whine when the capitalists still manage to win the game.

    Pathetic.
  95. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:44 pm
    @HG

    If we agree that the increase on mcdonalds is about 4% per average transaction and we agree that there are fewer employees per transaction and a higher average transaction then the increase will be even less than 4%.
    This is different than what you said a couple posts ago, though. Here, you`re saying that the INCREASED COST PER TRANSACTION is lower at WalMart. That seems reasonable.

    Before, your statement was written such that you were saying that there was a greater TOTAL INCREASED COST at Walmart; we can`t know that.
  96. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:45 pm
    @HG

    Also, it`s inappropriate to compare percentage increase amongst different companies. They all have different costs and differently priced products, so percentages make little sense.
  97. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:47 pm
    @HG

    For example, let`s say the profit at McDonalds per transaction is $0.10. On the other hand, since Walmart has larger transactions, the average profit is $1 per transaction.

    We can clearly see that a 4% increase at McDonalds costs the end consumer far less than a 2% increase at WalMart.
  98. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:47 pm
    HA

    "This is different than what you said a couple posts ago, though. Here, you`re saying that the INCREASED COST PER TRANSACTION is lower at WalMart. That seems reasonable.

    Before, your statement was written such that you were saying that there was a greater TOTAL INCREASED COST at Walmart; we can`t know that."

    Don`t know what I said that made you think that, but yes, "the INCREASED COST PER TRANSACTION is lower at WalMart."

    I said "So the affect on the end user would be even LESS than at mcdonalds, would you agree?"

    I meant one consumer going to walmart for one transaction. Not all consumers as a whole.
  99. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6905 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:50 pm
    HA

    "Also, it`s inappropriate to compare percentage increase amongst different companies. They all have different costs and differently priced products, so percentages make little sense."

    Agreed. Forget it.

    You already agreed that there were less walmart employees per transaction. So since increased employee costs is all we are talking about we know it will be LESS than 18 cents per transaction at walmart.
  100. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:52 pm
    This is different than what you said a couple posts ago, though. Here, you`re saying that the INCREASED COST PER TRANSACTION is lower at WalMart. That seems reasonable.

    Before, your statement was written such that you were saying that there was a greater TOTAL INCREASED COST at Walmart; we can`t know that.

    OK... I messed this up in a few places.

    Should be INCREASED COSTS PER TRANSACTION AS A PERCENTAGE. Also, second paragraph should be "...increased total cost at McDonalds"
  101. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:53 pm
    OK... I messed this up in a few places.

    Nevermind... you`ve already noticed.
  102. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 2:57 pm
    Well, it`s been real, but I`ve got to run. I`ll try to check back later tonight or tomorrow to see where we are.

    I`m still curious why you think raising it to some value (say, $15) will be a positive, but raising it to a higher value (say, $60) will be negative.

    I don`t understand what possible thing may exist or occur that would suddenly make raising the minimum wage shift from net-positive to net-negative.
  103. Profile photo of elkingo
    elkingo Male 30-39
    5471 posts
    January 23, 2014 at 5:15 pm
    "Those are all jobs that can be done by pretty much anyone after a couple weeks of training."

    What an non-nice individual.

    It takes more than 2 weeks to become an electrician, HVAC man, or any of the other jobs you listed.
  104. Profile photo of piratefish
    piratefish Male 40-49
    675 posts
    January 25, 2014 at 10:35 am
    "Dozens of people line up for Walmart jobs." Maybe because there are no other jobs to be had, unless you want to work at Taco Bell.

    "People choose to work at Walmart." Oh really? What are their other options, McDonalds? Are these pompous @sses serious?

Leave a Reply