Technology Shows Oswald Told The Truth [Pic+]

Submitted by: drawman61 3 years ago in

Approaching the 50th anniversary
There are 31 comments:
Male 2,850
@drawman61

Google Salad Fingers and enjoy.

"I post links. People like your good self may disagree but cannot articulate it so you resort to abuse."

We can articulate, but we don`t: because trying to explain to you why you`re wrong is like trying to play chess with a pigeon. No matter how well you play, the pigeon will knock over the pieces, poo all over the board, and strut about like it`s won. It`s impossible for us to win, because you and the pigeon don`t play properly. So most of us don`t even bother any more.

Seek therapy, please. Or at the very least, find a new hobby! Based on your age, you`ve got a reasonable expectation of about 10-20 years left in this world. Don`t spend them being a ranting paranoid lunatic.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
...you sound like frigging SALAD FINGERS.
@Musuko42- First off, I have no clue what that means but by the tone of your post I assume you`re being abusive.
Secondly, I clearly hit a nerve with you, go lie down.
Thirdly, You give me far more credit than I deserve. Superior, me? I think you will find I post links. People like your good self may disagree but cannot articulate it so you resort to abuse. Doesn`t calling me nuts mean you see yourself as superior?
0
Reply
Male 2,306
JFK was killed by the Russians not Lee Harvey.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@drawman61

Also, get over yourself: just because people disagree with your conclusions, doesn`t mean they disagree because they`re obeying what they`re told.

It is possible, you know, for someone other than you to do their own research and come to a different answer to you.

Frankly, the way you talk, as if you`re the only one with a mind and everyone else is just a puppet speaking with someone else`s voice...you sound like frigging SALAD FINGERS.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@drawman61

"You call people like me conspiracy nuts because it makes you uncomfortable to question what you have been told to believe, I understand that."

No, we call you conspiracy nuts because you are nuts. You have a psychological need to feel superior by having access to the secret "truth" that others are too ignorant to see. It`s a delusional state. It`s sad, and pathetic, and we really should stop feeding attention to you.

For your own sake, hurry up and do something that gets you sectioned, so you can get HELP.
0
Reply
Male 883
And for the record, I believe there`s a lot of things that can have more than one answer. I simply do not go for the easy and most crazy answer listed on the internet and take them as fact.
0
Reply
Male 883
@drawman61

If you can`t get that I use the reptile references to refer to how off the wall the majority of your posts are when it comes to conspiracies you`re worse off than I thought.

Again, there`s research, and there`s watching youtube. There`s research, and there`s conspiratorium.com or any other similar site. Pretty much every so called conspiracy you`ve posted has been scientifically debunked. The ONLY reason there`s not a definitive answer on JFK is the lack of release of all documents.
If you had half the `open mind` you claim, you wouldn`t post half the nonsense that we`ve seen so far.

Jesse Ventura does a show to get ratings. He does a show to...wait for it...make money! For all the good he did as governor of Mn, he`s pretty much thrown that credibility away in recent years. If you can`t see that then you`re not as open minded as you like to claim.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
@djwajda- I don`t know why you are so fixated on reptiles. I`ve never once claimed any belief in reptilians. From years of research I have read up or watched footage from all sides on various subjects with an open mind. Unlike yourself who sits back and waits to be told what to believe on any given subject. And name-calling, please. Are we back in the schoolyard?

0
Reply
Male 883
What it`s called is doing your own investigation of the evidence that`s out there and coming up with a common sense answer. Reading someone`s written opinion, or watching a horribly made youtube video doesn`t count.
0
Reply
Male 883
@drawman61

Come on now. You post crap on here that is so ludicrous it`s pathetic. Just because I think Oswald didn`t act alone doesn`t mean I believe every little conspiracy theory about the event that comes from a website devoted to wacked out conspiracies in general.

I joke about the reptiles, but did you know one episode of Ventura`s show dealt with a woman who believes she`s half reptile? The former governor is a mockery of his former self now. He`s become paranoid and delusional so please forgive me for not taking an article by him seriously.

When you stop posting silly conspiracies like they`re god`s honest truth then maybe I can take you seriously. Until then...


0
Reply
Male 7,774
@mykunter- Excellent link. Episode 9 more than confirms the events I got from other sources. Fills in so many holes in the story. Tbh, I don`t think it would harm government anymore if they confirmed it. Embarassment, maybe, that someone like that could rise to such power but otherwise I couldn`t see a problem.
0
Reply
Male 3,060
If you`re ever in Ft. Worth, there`s a little kick ass bar called The Ozzie Rabbit, which was a nickname for Oswald. Right down the road is the cemetery where he`s buried. We were gonna go, but got too gassed to want to.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
@djwajda- hold on, so if you agree with me that Oswald alone didn`t do this then why are you having a go? Does sticking your head above the parapet embarass you in front of your friends? You call people like me conspiracy nuts because it makes you uncomfortable to question what you have been told to believe, I understand that.
But if everyone was like you, Nixon wouldn`t have been found out, Clinton would have carried on abusing his position with interns and anyone suggesting there was something amiss would be a crackpot.
You need to realise your cozy world isn`t all sweetness and light.
0
Reply
Male 2,436
Never seen these before. Watch episodes 7, 8 and 9.

"Diane DiFlorio

If you haven`t watched *The Men Who Killed Kennedy* series --- you are not getting all the facts.

Parts 1 - 6 were broadcast, however the most damning, 7 - 9 series are difficult to find and were withdrawn after just one airing."


CLICKY CLICKY
0
Reply
Male 883
BTW, you`ve hit on 4 out of wiki`s top 10 UK conspiracy theories. I`m still waiting to see your post on `dinosaur-like reptiles rule the world`.
0
Reply
Male 883
@drawman61

Oh no, JFK was definitely shot. Oswald most likely didn`t act alone. That much is fact.

But if not believing in every conspiracy that comes down the pike makes me a `redneck` then I guess I am. Of course, believing them all as you seem to makes you a loon.
0
Reply
Male 1,215
Army trained snipers of the highest grade can`t pull off the number of shots in the amount of time Oswald supposedly did with that junky bolt action rifle. Never mind having to re-aim through the scope each shot. But I`m sure Oswald (who was the lowest grade sniper) was able to do it. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
@djwajda, oh so this didn`t happen? Head in the sand redneck.
0
Reply
Male 7,123
OK. You are making perfect sense. I agree.
0
Reply
Male 40,277
Paperwork = Evidence and court documents and stuff, eh?
Not their personal writings, except in Tesla`s case.
0
Reply
Male 40,277
@LordJim: noooo, I was referring to the fact that in a few weeks the 50th Kennedy Assassination Anniversary happens. Sometime after that the sealed documentation, never seen by the public, will come up for re-evaluation.

This will probably happen during Obama`s term.

Since he`s the MOST SECRETIVE PotUS ever? I highly doubt he`ll release a single page!

Tesla`s papers came up years ago, 1996? I forget. But while 2/3 of them were made public? 1/3 (apx) REMAIN sealed to this day!

The JFK paperwork will be followed (in a few years) by MLK`s and RFK`s. Both of which are... you guessed it! SEALED for 50 years!

Sorry if that wasn`t clear: I hope it is now.

Obama has nothing to do with Tesla`s papers, other than he "could release them" if he wanted to... but so could Bush, and he didn`t... why would GWB or BHO open that can of worms? Other than a desire to let the truth be known...
0
Reply
Male 7,123
5Cats,

The Tesla papers and you just have to bring up Obama? So now he has to publish not just his birth certificate but the Tesla papers to satisfy you?

That`s really dragging it in. Lighten up.
0
Reply
Male 883
Funny part is I could respect Ventura more when he dressed like this.


0
Reply
Male 883
All we needed to see is that it was an @drawman61 post and the site is named Conspiratorium.

And the latest I-A-B meme for such things is...





0
Reply
Male 15,832
"We don`t know this f***tard. We wish he`d stop using our name."

-- Libertarian Party
0
Reply
Male 7,774
One can only wonder: what`s so important that it MUST be kept secret?

@5cats- that`s how farcical it is. They tell us there`s nothing to see but hide it anyway.
0
Reply
Male 40,277
As for "voice stress analysis"? Sounds just like "voo-doo" or the polygraph: it should NEVER be allowed in court!

How could Oswald NOT be stressed? He`d been running, was arrested, interrogated without a lawyer for hours, accused of ASSASSINATION! If his voice ISN`T stressed? THAT is mighty suspicious...

3/4 of Americans do NOT believe the Warren Report, eh?
0
Reply
Male 40,277
No doubt it will all be "re-sealed" for another... idk how long the second time is.

Nicola Tesla`s papers? Many remain sealed, absolutely non-viewable.

After that comes the court evidence from the MLK shooting, and all the things sealed in the RFK killing.

One can only wonder: what`s so important that it MUST be kept secret?

I doubt we`ll ever know. Obama sure as heck won`t tell us! "Most Transparent President" indeed! lolz!
0
Reply
Male 7,123
Yes, interesting. On a related subject, this interesting.
0
Reply
Male 2,440
According to Jesse Ventura, eh? Good thing he`s not crazy or nuthin`. Nope. Not one bit.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
Link: Technology Shows Oswald Told The Truth [Pic+] [Rate Link] - Approaching the 50th anniversary
0
Reply