Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 11    Average: 3.1/5]
61 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 7594
Rating: 3.1
Category:
Date: 10/04/13 04:07 PM

61 Responses to Man Kills Neighbor For Raping His Wife… [Pic+]

  1. Profile photo of drawman61
    drawman61 Male 50-59
    7707 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 4:08 pm
    Link: Man Kills Neighbor For Raping His Wife... - ...telepathically. God bless American gun laws.
  2. Profile photo of Jake_Justus
    Jake_Justus Male 50-59
    7033 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 4:17 pm

    An unfortunate mistake. Her neighbor was actually trying to "reach" Counselor Troi ...

  3. Profile photo of Dead-Kittens
    Dead-Kittens Male 30-39
    1038 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm
    If there wasn`t a moustache, I am not sure I could tell which one is the wife. Even still not 100%.
  4. Profile photo of oobaka
    oobaka Male 40-49
    877 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 4:24 pm
    Look at that bottom lip. I`d rape her telepathically too.
  5. Profile photo of Afugy
    Afugy Male 30-39
    199 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 5:29 pm
    She should have never removed her tin foil hat!
  6. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 5:36 pm
    God bless American gun laws.

    "Meloney Selleneit was accused of illegally purchasing a gun for Michael Selleneit, a violent felon... He pleaded guilty but mentally ill to attempted manslaughter and use of a firearm by a restricted person..."
  7. Profile photo of bacon_pie
    bacon_pie Male 30-39
    3061 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 6:05 pm
    I`m still wondering how gun laws come into play on this one.
  8. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 7:17 pm
    Wife: "He raped me."
    Husband: *looks wife up and down* .. "Yeah, right."
  9. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14544 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 7:22 pm
    Despite any screening procedures you may have, people like still get given guns.
  10. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36176 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 8:08 pm

    Sometimes it`s just obvious we need to cull the herd. Them and any offspring they may have. Prune that branch of evolution as a bad fruit.
  11. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 9:29 pm
    `merica
  12. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 9:44 pm
    I`m still wondering how gun laws come into play on this one.
    It just the typical liberal knee-jerk reaction, sort of like calling conservatives racists whenever they`re losing an argument.

    Anymore, I just take it as their declaration of intellectual bankruptcy.
  13. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 11:42 pm
    "I just take it as their declaration of intellectual bankruptcy"

    the fact that people mentioned in the story who, appear to have some form of mental issue *cough* are able to get guns. is a serious question mark about the gun laws. i`m not arguing about wether or not you should have them. But clearly when you talk about being raped telepathically you shouldn`t be ablte to get your hands on a gun?

    your knee jerk reactions to so called knee jerk reactions are getting boring and in the way of your judgement. just answer me: do you think these people should be able to get guns?
  14. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5606 posts
    October 4, 2013 at 11:59 pm
    "...people mentioned in the story who, appear to have some form of mental issue *cough* are able to get guns. is a serious question mark about the gun laws..."
    No, it isn`t. It wasn`t legally obtained.

    You think there`s no way to get weapon in your country?
  15. Profile photo of spanerbulb
    spanerbulb Male 30-39
    1244 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 12:11 am
    CodeJockey, the argument regarding gun availability to people with serious mental disorders is still valid even if it isn`t relevant to this particular situation. It still makes sense to have stringent rules and guidelines where gun ownership is concerned.
  16. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 2:24 am
    "No, it isn`t. It wasn`t legally obtained"

    what kind of argument is that? someone got shot in the back twice. becuase "she" though she was being raped telepathicaly..

    some idjit flies a plane into a building and 13 years later millions of people are still being molested, forced to strip and what not just to be able to get on a plane.

    pretty sure many more people got killed becuase of retards with guns. and your best answer is "it wasn`t obtained legaly"

    btw, i`m pretty sure it`s illegal to kill someone?
    how did that law work out here?
  17. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 2:32 am
    You think there`s no way to get weapon in your country?"

    sure there is, a few years back someone with a record of mental ilness gunned down a bunch of people in a shopping mall. you know what the first question was? How the F**k did he get his hands on a gun, and how did the system fail. resulting in a reform of gun ownership laws.
  18. Profile photo of Rizzo71
    Rizzo71 Male 40-49
    427 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 4:12 am
    Every idiot in the US needs a gun, because he thinks his neighbor is a bigger idiot.
  19. Profile photo of drawman61
    drawman61 Male 50-59
    7707 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 5:09 am
    Thanks Mr Orange for explaining things for OldOllie, I forget that what seems self-explanatary to most of us, others need a little more help.
  20. Profile photo of YugureKage
    YugureKage Female 18-29
    1205 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 5:16 am
    "It still makes sense to have stringent rules and guidelines where gun ownership is concerned."

    If only the U.S. could grasp this concept :(
  21. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 5:23 am
    More guns, more guns, access for everyone! More guns! Heh-heh-heh! Cool! More guns!

  22. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5606 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:15 am
    "how did the system fail. resulting in a reform of gun ownership laws."
    Unless you`re saying he purchased a weapon from a store, revising gun laws doesn`t help much.

    "It still makes sense to have stringent rules and guidelines where gun ownership is concerned."
    The US already has the most stringent laws of any nation with legal ownership.

    Making more procedure for people already operating within the law does not help.
    -Identify and help the mentally ill.
    -Identify and close the sources of durable illegal arms in reverse order of durability.

    People who operate legal gun shops have an incentive to keep their shops operating.
    People who sell illegal arms have already made a decision to risk 5 to 20 years of prison to make some profit.
    These are two different kinds of people who don`t have the same supply source.
    You`re attacking A without addressing B while A is not an active problem.
  23. Profile photo of richanddead
    richanddead Male 18-29
    3318 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:17 am
    This has nothing to do with guns. Yes the gun was used as the tool to kill but it could have been anything.

    Two weeks ago a crazy guy went on a stabbing rampage in Pioneer Square, Seattle. Just answer me: do you think these people should be able to get knives? What about the woman who rushed the capitol with her car. Just answer me: do you think these people should be able to get vehicles? What about the mentally ill kid who tried to use explosives to blow up West Albany High School in May. Do you think these people should be able to get information on how to make a bomb? What about people who drown their children because they are psychotic. Do you think these people should be able to have children? What about the mentally ill person who kill 16 people by setting a fire at the Greenwood Health Center nursing home? Do you think these people should be able to get a lighter?
  24. Profile photo of Dead-Kittens
    Dead-Kittens Male 30-39
    1038 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:22 am
    Jesus christ if his `wife` didnt get a gun (which probably wasn`t even mfg or sold in the USA) he would have stabbed him in the back or clubbed his skull in anyway ..gun laws have absolutely 100% nothing to do with this.
  25. Profile photo of richanddead
    richanddead Male 18-29
    3318 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:23 am
    I`m sorry this is a tragic incident but any time a mentally ill person kills people because of their illness, regardless of the tool, are equally bad. Poo still happens, and will continue to happen regardless if guns are there or not. You can`t legislate insanity out of people, you can only prevent the abilities of those who follow the laws.
  26. Profile photo of stk5m
    stk5m Male 18-29
    322 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:33 am
    Greatest mugshots EVER!
  27. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:35 am
    codejockey

    A is that people who shouldn`t have guns have guns, and that people die as a result of that.
    Now you can say America strict gunlaws and what have you not. that doesn`t change problem A.

    As for your claim that America has the strictest gunlaw in the world is Bullpoo and i`d slap the person who provided that information to you. they lied.
  28. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:45 am
    @dead kittens

    A claim that guns have 100% nothing to do with it?
    so you know for sure that if the "man" didn`t have a gun he would have killed him how? and by how i mean: How do you know that and how can you proof it?

    let`s be realistic and admit that guns have a point and click interface that is relaticly easy to operate. Killing someone with a sharp/blunt object takes at least strengt and more skill then click bang..
  29. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 8:55 am
    We have a problem with guns, the mentally handicapped and prisons in our society. We can`t refuse ownership of weapons to the crazies, they do something crazy and we warehouse them in prisons... Guns may not be the problem but easy access to them certainly is a contributor. I`d like to see background checks tied to mental evaluations and I`d also like to see people who are crazy be admitted (forcibly if necessary) to hospitals or doctors specializing in mental health issues. Prisons don`t treat the mentally handicapped.
    To richanddead, You have a chance to protect yourself from a knife wielder and you also can save yourself from a fire. To completely write off the easy access to guns in our society is disingenuous. Are you afraid of background checks? Afraid someone would deem your pinhead to be too pointy?
  30. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 9:29 am
    MrOranage-"A is that people who shouldn`t have guns have guns"

    B is that people who shouldn`t have cars have cars.
    C is that people who shouldn`t have knives have knives.
    D is that people who shouldn`t have clubs have clubs.
    E is that people who shouldn`t have fists have fists.
    F is that people who shouldn`t have Xboxes have Xboxes.
    G is that people who shouldn`t have spatulas have spatulas.
    H is that people who shouldn`t have toilet lids have toilet lids.
    I is that people who shouldn`t have pickle jars have pickle jars.
    J is that people who shouldn`t have bowling balls have bowling balls.
    K is that people who shouldn`t have microwaves have microwaves.
    L is that people who shouldn`t have drugs have drugs.
    M is that people who shouldn`t have shoes have shoes.
    N is that people who shouldn`t have belts have belts.

    All have been used to kill, yet you only have an irrational fear of one...
  31. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 9:51 am
    megrendel nice skipping around the topic. now lets get back on point shall we? oh and not to point out the bleedingly obvious, but...
    who said i have an irrational fear of guns and how do proposed to back that claim up?

    the point is, just becuase you seemed to have missed it. that these `folks" managed to get their hands on a gun and kill someone with it, had they used any of the things you mentioned then the question would have been. "who the F*ck gave these folk have acces to that?"
    since they didn`t i fail to see the relavance of the things you mentioned. try again though you usualy come up with intresting arguments.

    and i`m kinda intrested to see if Progun folks are also pro regulation to prevent "children of a lesser god" shooting up folks becuase they forgot to wear their tinfoil hat.
  32. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:07 am
    And just to point out the bleedingly obvious to all the folks that say.. well anything can be used to kill someone.. no really?

    i bet this woman had a kitchen, i bet that kitchen had several sharp objects in it, one could even be bold and say they had a basic toolbox which at least contained a hammer. they might even have a car (i don`t know that one, cant be botherd to check) yet with all these potential weapons around she went through all the trouble and money to go out and buy a gun to kill with... do you get it know or are you to busy claiming guns are good to realise your talking out of yer ass?
  33. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:26 am
    MrOrange-"`folks" managed to get their hands on a gun"

    Which they did illegally.

    Do you plan on making it double-super-secret illegal? The argument was `God bless American gun laws.`

    If someone habitually drive 80mph, changing the speedlimit law from 70mph to 60 mph does nothing to change the behavior of the guy driving 80mph.

    And should he be driving 80mph (breaking the law) and t-bones a bus of orphaned nuns, no one would be sayin `God bless American traffic laws`. You don`t blame the car, you don`t blame the traffic laws, you blame the person who broke the law.

    If you want to argue that American gun laws allowed a shooting, you need to find a case where a legally obtained gun was used by a legal gun owner murdered someone in a non-self-defense situation. (then I`ll point out that we have laws against murder, which he didn`t seem to follow)
  34. Profile photo of bordo
    bordo Male 50-59
    907 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:27 am
    One of the charges is, "possession of a dangerous weapon by a restricted person". Therefore, this guy had the gun illegally. So, it just shows that gun laws don`t work.
  35. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:32 am
    MrOrange-"do you get it know"

    Yes, we get that you know very little about the subject at hand and are not open to a reasonable and logical thought process.

    MrOrange-"or are you to busy claiming guns are good"

    Guns are inanimate. They are neither `good` nor `bad`. Neither `evil` nor `benevolent`.

    Guns are a tool. Do you say a spatula is `good` or `bad`? (I have one that is an excellently designed spatula..paid $40 of it. It`s `good` at what it does because it was well designed and constructed..but it is not `good`)

    Like any tool, it can be very beneficial, or can hurt people.

    MY guns have harmed no one, and one of them was very beneficial in its availability.
  36. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:41 am
    "If you want to argue that American gun laws allowed a shooting, you need to find a case where a legally obtained gun was used by a legal gun owner murdered someone in a non-self-defense situation."

    Good, this is an argument i can do something with and i understand the logic behind it.
    here is my argument: if i am driving without a drivers liscence and kill someone wouldn`t the logical question be.. How the F*ck did he get a car?
    as for your argument about the speed limit, i`m pretty sure that after a certian amount of people died as a result of speeding, residents would demand some form of action being taken to prevent it?
    i`m not arguing against guns right now, just saying that given all the info.. isn`t it time some form of review of said laws, and upholding of said laws was checked so people don`t get shot for this absurd reason?
  37. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:44 am
    "Yes, we get that you know very little about the subject at hand and are not open to a reasonable and logical thought process."

    Again, your missing the point by miles. folks who shouldn`t have a gun, are not allowed to have a gun, managed to get a gun. the system failed. time for a review. how hard is it to grasp that simple concept?

  38. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 10:46 am
    i mean.. i don`t know about you but i`d hate for my epitath to read: Shot dead after telepathically raping a cross between a hippo and a troll?

    or is that just me?
  39. Profile photo of Geogypsy
    Geogypsy Female 18-29
    2546 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:02 am
    I`ll be interested in reading the follow-up to the sentencing on the 31st. I`m somewhat surprised that she was found competent to stand trial and would like to know how those treating her on an outpatient basis perceived her from a professional vantage...granting that such information may be made public.
  40. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:09 am
    MrOrange-"if i am driving without a drivers liscence and kill someone wouldn`t the logical question be.. How the F*ck did he get a car?"

    That`s just it. NO ONE quesions how ANYone got a car. It much easier to buy a car than a gun. You don`t even need a license or insurance to purchase a car.

    Try finding an example that`s relevent.

    MrOrange-"i`m pretty sure that after a certian amount of people died as a result of speeding"

    Let`s see, though they`re not comparable, if you were to compare cars to guns:
    1 car death annually for every 1,879 cars in the US.
    1 gun death annually for every 6,484 guns. (if you eliminate suicides, it goes up to 1 murder per 18,053).
    But, that`s apples to oranges.

    MrOrange-"residents would demand some form of action being taken to prevent it?"

    They have and they do, and it`s mostly inneffective as Laws are for law abiding people. People who tend to break law, wel
  41. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:12 am
    MrOrange-"how hard is it to grasp that simple concept?"

    The original concept (which you`ve wandered from for `some` reason) is that somehow American gun laws are somehow responsible for someone who broke American gun law.

    MrOrange-"or is that just me?"

    I`d hate for my epitath to related in ANYWAY about said cross between a hippo and a troll.
  42. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:33 am
    Leftists painting mental health care problems as a gun problem... Yep no agenda there.

  43. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5606 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:35 am
    "A is that people who shouldn`t have guns have guns"
    By what standard? The FBI`s own compiled statistics proved the A`s BECAME A`s by NOT being criminals. It`s rare. They aren`t a priority.

    B`s and their suppliers are deliberately bypassing laws. They are an active problem.
    These particular B`s had already been detected as B`s.

    The thing to eliminate is B`s supply. It doesn`t come from A.
  44. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:36 am
    Despite any screening procedures you may have, people like still get given guns.

    This tards think people get handed guns here... Bet he possessed a drivers license too you know like that lady who got shot at the capitol. Think she was handed a car?
  45. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 11:39 am
    Again, your missing the point by miles. folks who shouldn`t have a gun, are not allowed to have a gun, managed to get a gun. the system failed. time for a review. how hard is it to grasp that simple concept?

    Yes lets make more laws to punish the law abiding for the actions of a person that won`t obey the laws anyway..... WHEW! UKer`s are quite the sheep.
  46. Profile photo of Jake_Justus
    Jake_Justus Male 50-59
    7033 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 12:32 pm

    What she thought was telepathic violation was probably just gas.
  47. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 1:05 pm
    McGovern1981-"Leftists painting mental health care problems as a gun problem."

    Please remember that 27% of liberals are currently on medications for mental health issues.

    That means that 73% are walking around untreated.
  48. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 1:56 pm
    Yes lets make more laws to punish the law abiding for the actions of a person that won`t obey the laws anyway..... WHEW! UKer`s are quite the sheep.

    yeah cuase a law abiding person didn`t get punished now by either failure of said law or is upholding...

    .... let me guess, you`re stil waiting for your gun permit to clear?


    p.p.s i`m also not brittish you canadian twat.
  49. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 2:02 pm
    The original concept (which you`ve wandered from for `some` reason) is that somehow American gun laws are somehow responsible for someone who broke American gun law.

    MrOrange-"or is that just me?"

    I`d hate for my epitath to related in ANYWAY about said cross between a hippo and a troll.


    well glad we agree on something, now let`s say i`d like to make sure of that, and folks like that arn`t supossed to be able to get guns by law, then iether the law isn`t right, it`s not being applied properly or it needs to be upheld better, because right now someones epitath: is Shot dead after telepathically raping a cross between a hippo and a troll.

    and that is just so damn wrong. you gotta hand me that right?

    you can have it your way, the laws are good. but somewhere someone F**ed up.
  50. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 2:12 pm
    Just to put it in perspective.. all of that guy`s friends and family. whoever he knew, will for the rest of their lives link his death to that "woman"
    and her claim that he raped her telepathically, and, at some point in their live try and work out how the hell that would be possible. Nice f**king legacy.. "so, how did your dad die? he spock f.u.c.k.e.d a hippotroll and her smeagul killed him"

    i`d rather die of drowing in an elephant bukakka..
  51. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 2:25 pm
    .. just to make the HORROR worse.. imagine of that "manthing" used a selfdefense claim: maah budd fell funnieee.. `n then i killed em..


    i would rather be gangbanged to death by a pack of midgetclowns and their ponies whilst being forced to sing justing beiber in front of a live audience..

    i want my life to have some meaning thank you, lets keep the herd clean enough so that i can at least have that..
  52. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5606 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 2:58 pm
    If you need, we arrange for you to be gang-banged by a number little person clowns.
    The elephants, however, we can`t help with because that`s illegal in both countries and we`d like to maintain our status as A`s...


    ----
    Person: "How did your father die?"
    Other Person: "After the divorce, he moved into a crappy neighborhood. His former felon neighbor and his neighbor`s mentally ill wife came to the conclusion that he was telepathically raping the wife so, they shot him."
    Person: "That`s crazy!! What are the odds?!!"
    Other Person: "Normally, zero but, fairly strong for him. He had a stage act where he`d pick your card from a deck..."
  53. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5865 posts
    October 5, 2013 at 7:42 pm
    MrOrange-"like that arn`t supossed to be able to get guns by law, "

    The point you`re missing is that they DIDN`T get guns by law. They got guns by BREAKING the law.

    MrOrange-"then iether the law isn`t right, it`s not being applied properly or it needs to be upheld better"

    That still makes no sense: "Change the law because people are able to break that law`.

    You seem to think that criminals will respect the NEXT law you pass. Please look up the definition of `criminal`.
  54. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    October 6, 2013 at 2:32 am
    ""MrOrange-"then iether the law isn`t right, it`s not being applied properly or it needs to be upheld better"

    That still makes no sense: "Change the law because people are able to break that law`""

    comphrensive reading isn`t your strong point is it? considering how you are claiming that the law itself is fine, i offerd the suggestion that it`s not being upheld.. you know enforced?

    "you can have it your way, the laws are good. but somewhere someone F**ed up. "

    see, i`m willing to settle, the laws are perfect. you just seem to have an issue with guns magically appearing into the hands of folks that shouldn`t have them. Me? apart from feeling sorry for the guy couldn`t give a ratts ass about how many americans get killed, considering your to stupid to realise that something is wrong. congratulations, guns are good, the law is perfect now go out and buy a beer and get shot for *random absurd reason*

  • Profile photo of SnoopyBG
    SnoopyBG Male 18-29
    653 posts
    October 6, 2013 at 2:23 pm
    Even in the most liberal gun control the law says you can`t kill people. Still people get shot. That`s why you have to make it harder for wackos to obtain them. If you halve the amount of guns in the hands of the population it would be twice as hard for smeagul here to get a gun. Meaning half of the smeaguls won`t have a gun a be able to kill.
    Simple logic, americans.
  • Profile photo of JohnFred
    JohnFred Male 40-49
    60 posts
    October 7, 2013 at 12:23 am
    Gawd, who`d want to go anywhere near that, even telepathically.
  • Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    October 7, 2013 at 6:38 am
    p.p.s i`m also not brittish you canadian twat.

    P.P.P.S there`s more than just brits in the UK.....
  • Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5606 posts
    October 7, 2013 at 6:41 am
    Snoopy, Orange: Please, try to evaluate this without emotion. It`s already clear you have a different system of values.

    -buys from->-buys from->

    -buys from->

    A types commit crime rarely. So much so, they are more likely to suicide than attack (current fed crime stats.)
    B types have already been detected as dangerous.
    C types are career criminals who haven`t been caught yet. >> Crime is a business to them. <<

    Your law change would affect group A without having any affect on B or C.
    Rural A`s have a probability of requiring guns to maintain their way of life.
    Urban/suburban A`s are more likely to want to defend themselves from urban/suburban C`s.
  • Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    October 7, 2013 at 6:43 am
    let me guess, you`re stil waiting for your gun permit to clear?

    LOL had mine for 10 years now. BTW quote marks are your friend. Or this just remove spaces BLAH BLAH BLABBEDY BLAH BLAH
  • Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5606 posts
    October 7, 2013 at 6:44 am
    cont.

    Some A`s just have a hobby.

    So, any change has to be justifiable by the order of disarming the C`s before disarming the A`s.
  • Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    October 7, 2013 at 6:46 am
    @SnoopyBG

    Criminals don`t obey laws. Simple logic plebeians.
  • Leave a Reply