The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 21    Average: 2.5/5]
18 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 4754
Rating: 2.5
Category:
Date: 09/27/13 10:32 AM

18 Responses to The Science USED TO BE Settled! AGW Walks Back[Pic

  1. Profile photo of normalfreak2
    normalfreak2 Male 18-29
    3878 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 10:57 am
    This article has misspellings and incorrectly used grammar. On top of that it`s an opinion piece with no data to support/deny it. In other words this article is written diarrhea.
  2. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    6942 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 11:11 am
    That is possibly the least convincing article I have read this year.
  3. Profile photo of Kain1
    Kain1 Male 18-29
    1473 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 11:13 am
    Sigh...

    95% certainty is the scientific term for "we`re as sure as we`re ever going to get!"... If you had any knowledge of science, you would know that.
  4. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    6942 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 11:29 am
    Dogmatic. You keep using that word...
  5. Profile photo of bliznik
    bliznik Male 30-39
    839 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 12:28 pm
    I love how both the article and description have misspellings. People who make up s*** on the spot don`t feel the need to waste their time on "being correct" or "fact-checking."
  6. Profile photo of broizfam
    broizfam Male 60-69
    4852 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 1:02 pm
    That was a pretty weak article. I think the problem is that we have idiots shrieking that we`re all about to die from the global warming that we`re causing, and idiots who are shrieking that that can`t possibly happen. As usual, the truth is likely somewhere between. Likely we`re causing an element of warming that`s only evident over very long periods but easily obscured by long and short term natural planetary warming and cooling cycles. To simply disbelieve that the crap we`re spewing into our atmosphere can`t possibly cause any effect of global warming is as stupid as thinking we`re going right over the precipice with the next striking of a match. The article was written by an obviously smug, non-believing a$$hole who will only quote articles that support his belief. I understand doing that, that`s how you make a strong point. But we, as readers, have to recognise that the truth is rarely, if ever, entirely on one side of an argument.
  7. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32786 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 1:33 pm
    Grammar & Spelling? THAT is all you can fault?

    IT`S A BLOG people! Not the NY Times (which is full of grammar and spelling errors too, FY...

    This Article Is Better But has no links. I hope it gets posted too, it`s VERY well written.

    It points out how AGW has become a religion...
  8. Profile photo of banjolegs
    banjolegs Male 30-39
    176 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 2:35 pm
    That article is quite simply pathetic. When the opening paragraph contains "where thousands of so called experts..." You know it`s someone who is pissing into the wind.
  9. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3908 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 4:02 pm

  10. Profile photo of Mad_Gremlyn
    Mad_Gremlyn Male 30-39
    512 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 4:53 pm
    5Cats, you and the rest of the Nothing-Better-to-Do losers that constantly post here are just part of the show. OldIdiot, AuburnFlunky, CrakrJackass, et al. are just doing the work for the site owners. No matter how bad the posts might get, people will come back to laugh at your stupidity . Do you even realize that you`re the IAB freak show on display 24/7? Seriously. Do you realize that?
  11. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32786 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 6:50 pm
    Do you even realize that you`re the IAB freak show on display 24/7?

    @Mad_Gremlyn: You know you`re name-calling and poop-flinging on the internet, right? You DO understand the irony here...

    The IAB Liberal Brigade is consistent: Insult, name call, ignore honest questions. Alinsky Tactics to a "T". We `right thinking people` have grown entirely used to it...
  12. Profile photo of trippyhippy9
    trippyhippy9 Male 18-29
    559 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 7:31 pm
    Climate change deniers are wrong.

    Link
  13. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 8:24 pm
    Mad_Gremlyn: Get back under your bridge.
  14. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 8:38 pm
    Isn`t a Mad Gremlyn pretty much the same thing as a pissed-off troll?
  15. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 8:39 pm
    Climate change deniers are wrong.
    Maybe, maybe not, but I`m still not going to let you boss me around and take my stuff.
  16. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    September 27, 2013 at 10:33 pm
    Oh. my. god. How many times will this sh*t get posted?
  17. Profile photo of CreamK
    CreamK Male 40-49
    1423 posts
    September 28, 2013 at 6:22 pm
    One of those again.. About as objective and truthful than... i can`t think of agood example here, probably in the lines let`s say jihadist talking about christians. Started skipping about at line 10 when the whole scientific community was labeled buffoons. Not worth the electricity to keep that article online, the same usual crap that 5Cats submits.

Leave a Reply