The Science USED TO BE Settled! AGW Walks Back[Pic

Submitted by: 5cats 4 years ago in

But this won"t stop the dogmatic belief in Human-Cause Global Warming, of course.
There are 18 comments:
Male 1,421
One of those again.. About as objective and truthful than... i can`t think of agood example here, probably in the lines let`s say jihadist talking about christians. Started skipping about at line 10 when the whole scientific community was labeled buffoons. Not worth the electricity to keep that article online, the same usual crap that 5Cats submits.
0
Reply
Male 3,894
Oh. my. god. How many times will this sh*t get posted?
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]Climate change deniers are wrong.[/quote]
Maybe, maybe not, but I`m still not going to let you boss me around and take my stuff.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Isn`t a Mad Gremlyn pretty much the same thing as a pissed-off troll?
0
Reply
Male 17,511
Mad_Gremlyn: Get back under your bridge.
0
Reply
Male 559
Climate change deniers are wrong.

Link
0
Reply
Male 40,764
[quote]Do you even realize that you`re the IAB freak show on display 24/7?[/quote]

@Mad_Gremlyn: You know you`re name-calling and poop-flinging on the internet, right? You DO understand the irony here...

The IAB Liberal Brigade is consistent: Insult, name call, ignore honest questions. Alinsky Tactics to a "T". We `right thinking people` have grown entirely used to it...
0
Reply
Male 512
5Cats, you and the rest of the Nothing-Better-to-Do losers that constantly post here are just part of the show. OldIdiot, AuburnFlunky, CrakrJackass, et al. are just doing the work for the site owners. No matter how bad the posts might get, people will come back to laugh at your stupidity . Do you even realize that you`re the IAB freak show on display 24/7? Seriously. Do you realize that?
0
Reply
Male 3,908

0
Reply
Male 176
That article is quite simply pathetic. When the opening paragraph contains "where thousands of so called experts..." You know it`s someone who is pissing into the wind.
0
Reply
Male 40,764
Grammar & Spelling? THAT is all you can fault?

IT`S A BLOG people! Not the NY Times (which is full of grammar and spelling errors too, FY...

This Article Is Better But has no links. I hope it gets posted too, it`s VERY well written.

It points out how AGW has become a religion...
0
Reply
Male 6,077
That was a pretty weak article. I think the problem is that we have idiots shrieking that we`re all about to die from the global warming that we`re causing, and idiots who are shrieking that that can`t possibly happen. As usual, the truth is likely somewhere between. Likely we`re causing an element of warming that`s only evident over very long periods but easily obscured by long and short term natural planetary warming and cooling cycles. To simply disbelieve that the crap we`re spewing into our atmosphere can`t possibly cause any effect of global warming is as stupid as thinking we`re going right over the precipice with the next striking of a match. The article was written by an obviously smug, non-believing a$$hole who will only quote articles that support his belief. I understand doing that, that`s how you make a strong point. But we, as readers, have to recognise that the truth is rarely, if ever, entirely on one side of an argument.
0
Reply
Male 1,743
I love how both the article and description have misspellings. People who make up s*** on the spot don`t feel the need to waste their time on "being correct" or "fact-checking."
0
Reply
Male 7,123
Dogmatic. You keep using that word...
0
Reply
Male 1,471
Sigh...

95% certainty is the scientific term for "we`re as sure as we`re ever going to get!"... If you had any knowledge of science, you would know that.
0
Reply
Male 7,123
That is possibly the least convincing article I have read this year.
0
Reply
Male 7,941
This article has misspellings and incorrectly used grammar. On top of that it`s an opinion piece with no data to support/deny it. In other words this article is written diarrhea.
0
Reply
Male 40,764
Link: The Science USED TO BE Settled! AGW Walks Back[Pic [Rate Link] - But this won`t stop the dogmatic belief in Human-Cause Global Warming, of course.
0
Reply