Proof Of Fake Moon Landing The USA Tried To Ban

Submitted by: drawman61 3 years ago in

You don"t even need a tinfoil hat to see the facts presented
There are 69 comments:
Male 3
@drawman61 - why don`t a group of you folks who think it was faked actually spend a bit of your money on faking your own... after all, you know all the tricks used, *plus* modern technology is cheap enough that a few of you can afford to do it.

As part of your hoax, I like you to do the following:
1. Fake the signal so that the tracking stations around the world believe that you are in transit to the moon/orbiting the moon
2. Fake the placing of a laser reflector, so that you can fool the scientific world that they are receiving a reflected signal from a *specific* point on the moon, like NASA and the US Govt managed to do
3. Ensure that you have approx. 400,000 people involved - and then ensure that *all* of them are willing to go to their graves within the next 60 years *without* feeling guilty enough to admit the hoax
4. Ensure that you have approx. 20,000 companies and organisations helping you, so that they can all help you cover it up

You know th
0
Reply
Female 297
I`m so sick of people claiming the moon landing was faked and using the same tired old arguments that have been debunked time and time again. The entire conspiracy theory is based entirely on people`s ignorance of the facts. They think that if they say it with enough confidence that people will believe them.

Maybe the conspiracy theorists here could further display their ignorance of science by explaining that there should`ve been a blast crater under the lander or how the radiation from the Van Allen belts would have killed the crew?
0
Reply
Male 5,824
@Zed68,
Thank you! Seeing that was so fulfilling!
0
Reply
Male 7,775
please submit 4 more videos on the faked moon landing please!

@kja1995 Ok, the next ones up.
@crakr The next vid will debunk your pretty NASA pictures.

0
Reply
Male 123
@drawman61 please submit 4 more videos on the faked moon landing please!
0
Reply
Male 1,015
This is the best answer ever given to those "no moon landing idiots" : Thank you buzz !!
0
Reply
Male 5,824
Wow! That is among the dumbest, most ignorant bullsh*t I`ve ever seen! How old is that piece of trash? Do they really expect us to believe that the craft was in low Earth orbit merely because they said it was so often?
0
Reply
Male 883
[quote]The astronauts are comfortable in Nevada, free to wander about Las Vegas with showgirls, except for some check-ins with Mission Control. They partake of the excellent buffet served on the 24th floor of the Sands Hotel and watch color television broadcasts from a private Telstar satellite[/quote]

Seriously? That`s what Bill Kaysing wanted the world to believe? I can say he`s wacky now that he`s dead...unlike when he sued Jim Lovell for saying it back in 1996. It was dismissed for obvious reasons.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
drawman61: Question answered.





Next time do a 10 second internet search before you stick your foot in your mouth.
0
Reply
Male 436
I don`t trust any film that uses paint splatter transitions
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@drawman61

Go away. This old debate is not entertaining or enlightening in the slightest. I am not interested in playing chess with a pigeon today.
0
Reply
Male 5,183
We all know the Earth is hollow and the Moon is just a projection on a crystal sphere.
0
Reply
Male 5,183
There are real conspericies the people should be worried about. Not this Nonsence. Things like the Governments willingness to test bioweapons on US citizens. There are multiple examples of this in documented history such as project Buzz in the 1950s or MKUltra experiments in the 1970s, Nerve gas testing in NY tunnles, 1980s, etc...
0
Reply
Male 5,183
If you zoom all the way in on Google maps of the moon you actually see the truth, It is made of cheese.The degradation of the original footage was due to sdeveral factors the Tv camera the Astronoughts had was highly modified to weigh only 7 pounds, the standard cameras of the day were about 40 to 60 pounds. This stripping down of the camera left it with low resolution and a very weak sending signal. Also the signal was sent from over 250 thousand miles away with a very low powered transmitter.
0
Reply
Male 7,123
I`m assuming Drawman put this here for us to mock, and not to convince us.

Although his track record ...
0
Reply
Male 14,334
If you have an extremly powerful telescope you can see the MULTIPLE landing sites.......



I bet you also belive in the illuminati too drawman..
0
Reply
Male 7,759
ferdyfred-"lets just say the Earth is flat..."

And is resting on the backs of four giant elephants (or is it five?) which, in turn, stand on the back of a giant turtle, Great A`Tuin, as it swims slowly through the ether.

Where is it heading? Only the Great A`Tuin knows.
0
Reply
Male 2,670
Oh for poo`s sake.

We went to the Moon. More than once. We left behind landers and telemetry and even an optical reflector that`s still there and still in use.

Freakin` morons.

0
Reply
Male 2,579
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
0
Reply
Male 4,746
MeGrendel:
"(see patchouly, I kept politics out of it)"
-------
LOL! And you got a shot in at "Honey Boo Boo"! Okay...you win this round.
0
Reply
Male 2,521
Drawman61, I`m getting the impression you are fuzzy on words like "Facts" and "Proof".
0
Reply
Male 2,521
Wow. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, folks.
0
Reply
Male 7,775
What did you think, that they could rocket a 5 ton news van with a satellite dish, news crew, and power station to the moon?

@ crakrjak, but you don`t see a problem with rocketing a LEM that nearly killed Armstrong on his one and only test-flight or a rover that even NASA can`t agree on whether or how it folded up to fit inside?
It doesn`t reflect badly on you guys because your government lied.
Maybe Watergate was a lie and Clinton getting caught out was a lie and you really did win in Vietnam.
0
Reply
Female 2,415
Not surprising at all. Nice to see something that might actually be proof of the governments lies, though.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
The problem wasn`t in recording color TV on the moon, the problem was transmitting it live via the very limited bandwidth available. They knew ahead of time that was going to be a problem and built special low weight, low bandwidth, low power TV cameras.

What did you think, that they could rocket a 5 ton news van with a satellite dish, news crew, and power station to the moon?
0
Reply
Male 406
Who the drat cares about this... really and if so why??
0
Reply
Male 7,775
@ whodat, Oh well that explains it. If only they had thought of that in the years leading up to man`s `biggest achievement`.

@djwajda, that was posted tongue in cheek, obviously...must remember to put up a neon sign in future.
0
Reply
Male 215
But God IS a badger called Norman. Who told you otherwise?
0
Reply
Male 13,624
Ahhh hell lets just say the Earth is flat and the moon is made O cheese
and God is a badger called Norman
0
Reply
Male 307
Go back to /x/.
0
Reply
Male 14,835
I think fancylad is fake. Prove it ain`t so.
0
Reply
Male 13,624
Time to put this to bed - really

google Earth pics of moon
0
Reply
Female 6,381
It really strains the imagination to believe that some of the credulous conspiracy crowd still believes this lunacy.
Like all great imagined conspiracies, it fails to explain how none of the hundreds of people who had to be involved a) ever said "No!" when approached about their criminal involvement in the massive deception of the the public and government, and b) has failed to keep their silence to the grave, not one feeling enough guilt to tell the "truth." Ever.
0
Reply
Male 390
Some people are so insistent that their delusion should be adopted by everyone as reality.

You can`t fake lunar gravity. Here is the video proof. The Debate is over. We did go to the moon.

http://tinyurl.com/pjjd3yo

and good luck faking the particle behavior of the dust on earth:

http://tinyurl.com/psal5rk
0
Reply
Male 62
0
Reply
Male 7,759
One small problem with the capsule being in `low earth orbit` for the entire mission: That would have been discovered within hours.

There`s these highly advanced technologies called `radio direction finding` and an even newer one called `triangulation`.

A craft in low earth orbit transmissions would alternate from 360 degrees about every 90 minutes or so.

Seeing as there were MANY organizations and individuals tracking and listening at all times, they could tell that the direction of the signal changed in accordance to the Earth`s rotation, not from an orbit.

And any two divergent stations could easily triangulate the distance from the Earth of the signal.

Anyone who thinks the Moonlanding was faked probably thinks Wrestling is real and that Honey Boo Boo is `quality entertainment` (see patchouly, I kept politics out of it)
0
Reply
Male 38,507

As you can clearly see in the photo, we obviously went to the moon. You can see where the space capsule landed.

0
Reply
Male 89
holy irony...watching a grainy video complaining about grainy video.
0
Reply
Male 316
"Facts" and "proof" HA! I have more technology in my pocket than went ot the moon and these people think a grainy image is suspicious. My skype gets a little grainy too. I wonder what my mother is hiding?
0
Reply
Male 11,740
There was proof? Where?
0
Reply
Male 10,855
Who keeps posting this crap? Quit trying to waste my computational capital!
0
Reply
Male 2,469
Of course I don`t need a tin foil hat to see what is presented..

I`d just need one to believe it.

I sure hope Tom Hanks doesn`t see this thread.
0
Reply
Male 2,675
omfg ... worst "evidence" yet. It`s not even worth picking apart.

We went to the moon. Deal with it.
0
Reply
Female 1,743
Mythbusters already proved it was real.

Jamie and Adam would never lie to us. <3
0
Reply
Male 37,865
OF COURSE the US Government is keeping secrets about the whole "Lunar Project"!

Does that "prove it was fake"? = nope.

This footage may prove they were telling lies, but that in no way proves fakery of the actual landings.
0
Reply
Male 37,865
@Kain1: Noooo... the "Official Story" is that the camera was PRESSED up against the window. Therefor the shadow and the later "pull back shot" would be utterly impossible.
THAT part seems true.

Does that "prove" the landings "fake"? Of course... NOT!

They TRIED to get "good video" for other (propaganda) purposes! Duh! It looked crappy so they didn`t use it. "For Playback" means for later release... simple.

LATER MISSIONS (As @auburnjunky points out) they improved their methods and got good, useable, footage.

Many people listened to and recorded the LIVE audio transmissions. They were "unscrambled".
BUT several times the astronauts switched to the "secure channel" after some (alleged) UFO sightings.
Did they see aliens? Or specks of dust?

I don`t know. But the Gov`t has been lying to "the people" since the dawn of time. It wouldn`t shock me.
0
Reply
Male 2,579
It`s funny how even plain video evidence is refuted just because people are trained to avoid anything other than what the media tells them, even going as far as to condemn all who see the truth... The world is turning into George Orwells "1984".
0
Reply
Male 2,419
@turdbuglar

not saying it`s fake, not saying it happend either. until i set my own foot next to Armstrong`s. Got a ticket?
0
Reply
Male 47
If it was fake, they would have replaced it with a convincing or real modern rendition and paraded it in front of us to prove it was real. The fact that the government does not even care to rebuke these claims is proof enough that the moon tapes are legit.
0
Reply
Male 4,079
@drawman61: Do you actually believe that the moon landing was faked? Or were you just posting this? I really hope you`re brighter than this.
0
Reply
Male 1,471
huge load of bs right there..

The speaker claims to have several clips where they`re discussing how they were faking it, yet all we got to see was a 20 sec clip, where some guy says "talk"..

"arm in from of the lens"... some shadow, that could just as easily be the ACTUAL frame of the window..

I`m done wasting more time on this, it was obviously not faked for 1 simple reason.
The cold war.
The soviets had the technology to track radio signals, and they were definitely listening in. if they had had the slightest suspicion that the signals weren`t coming from the moon they would have just called the US on their BS, and win a major propaganda and morale victory.
0
Reply
Male 757
I believe, it did happen. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a clown too stupid to converse with any further. Sorry brother, but it happened.
0
Reply
Male 490
bunk
0
Reply
Male 4,893

Who here thinks the moon landing was fake?

Seriously, I am curious if anyone who believes the landing was fake, will admit they don`t believe.
0
Reply
Male 1,015
Still waiting for the "proof"
0
Reply
Male 3,909
Hahahahaha!!! Well that was quick, I only had to see 30 seconds of this and the first thing she said about the tv broadcast is wrong.

She said the press "were not even allowed to take a direct feed which further degraded the quality" of the video.

They couldn`t take a direct feed of the video from NASA because their video format wasn`t compatible with the existing standard broadcast television signal.
0
Reply
Male 757
This is all BS as usual, the absolutely did so land on the moon.
0
Reply
Male 4,746
@djwajda, The comment was more directed toward VicAginal.
0
Reply
Female 231
I will never understand why people think the moon landings are faked. It`s the most retarded thing to be a conspirator.
0
Reply
Male 883
wow, and what`s with a liberal getting pissy when a conservative actually says Obama`s birth certificate is real? Who mentioned politics in the first place? I merely mentioned the most recent ridiculous conspiracy that came to mind.
0
Reply
Male 4,746
And what`s with the Republitards here making this into a political thing? What does this have to do with Democrats or Obama? Man...you guys really have to let the brainwashing take a day off.
0
Reply
Male 4,746
Really? They made the shot of the Earth look, good for television, and that`s proof they didn`t go to the Moon? You`re going to have to do better than that.
0
Reply
Male 883
Sorry Gerry but it was E.J. Mackernutt...




0
Reply
Male 883
Yup, about as fake as Obama`s birth certificate...

you tried this before and failed miserably did you not?

Fail 1
0
Reply
Male 10,339
What about the other moon missions that are proven with high clarity color video?

Also, if they are shooting the Earth within Earth`s orbit through a small round window, you would be able to tell because of the clouds going by, wouldn`t you?
0
Reply
Male 38,507

Moon landing was totally faked.
Andy Griffith is the only man ever to go to the moon and back ins his home made space craft Salvage 1.

0
Reply
Male 38,507

555555
That is worthy of Nancy Grace!
Wonderfully distorted perspective finding a conspiracy where there is none.
55555
0
Reply
Male 5,190
240p lol
0
Reply
Male 7,775
Link: Proof Of Fake Moon Landing The USA Tried To Ban [Rate Link] - You don`t even need a tinfoil hat to see the facts presented
0
Reply