And The Royal Baby`s Name Is... [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 4 years ago in

I know, who cares, right?
There are 48 comments:
Male 325
@Gerry perhaps you`d like to back that claim to facts up with some actual data / facts
0
Reply
Female 6,381
I, for one, welcome our new 3rd-in-line overlord...
0
Reply
Male 676
I`ve always wondered.... does it bother British people that there still is a Royal Family? I mean people wandering around living a posh, extravagant lifestyle because they "used" to be important? Like our movie stars here. I give them the same respect, none.
0
Reply
Male 39,556

boogarcym - you`re an idiot.
The royals give farm more into the economy than they take out. Golly, facts are inconvenient things, aren`t they.

Now go wipe the egg off of your face.
0
Reply
Male 325
Bunch of parasites the lot of `em
0
Reply
Male 1,104
baby boy george ...


0
Reply
Male 2,862
The next one will be called Zippy Sergey Tulisa.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
George it is!

0
Reply
Male 58
0
Reply
Male 546

0
Reply
Male 58
I think this name rocks! I`m from the city of Prince George, BC and it`s great that we get to share our name with a living royalty who will hopefully be king one day.

Of course, I`m a staunch monarchist. It doesn`t impact our government as much as everyone makes it out to.
0
Reply
Male 3,842
I said [quote]Do they not realize his initials are GAL[/quote]

Rodin said [quote]@landogriffin -- Don`t you realize that if you rearrange you`re title it spells douchebag?[/quote]

Can someone please tell me what I did that was so wrong?

At least I don`t write "you`re" as a possessive. I am not a title.
0
Reply
Male 2,841
Whoopty doo. When is the news going back to tits and blood?
0
Reply
Male 616
Trayvon
0
Reply
Male 15,184
Albert
0
Reply
Male 39,556

turdburglar, [quote]"Remember...He is better than you."[/quote]
NOW you understand royalty!
Good to see an American admit it. All that "equality" crap the force feed us here...
0
Reply
Male 4,891

You limeys are so damn sensitive. Anyone says anything about the royals or the country, and yall come unglued. Somehow America is free game?

The royal baby is, without a doubt, the least interesting story imaginable. Little sucker won the paternal jackpot. Have fun worshiping someone elses kid. Remember...He is better than you.
0
Reply
Male 1,104
lol @Gerry1of1
0
Reply
Male 3,060
Why not Ralph?

0
Reply
Male 13,630
Rodin

@landogriffin -- Don`t you realize that if you rearrange you`re title it spells douchebag?
---
Guess you aint had wall to wall `special reports`
on TV for the last 4 fecking days, and brought a newspaper, and you have to go 15 pages in to read the REAL news, No douche or what ever baggery here
Its a fecking sprog, and 11 million as already been spent on making sprog`s home comfy
god damn
0
Reply
Male 13,630
LandoGriffin

Do they not realize his initials are GAL
-------
GAL Windsor, sounds like a failed tranny
0
Reply
Male 892
@landogriffin -- Don`t you realize that if you rearrange you`re title it spells douchebag?
0
Reply
Female 4,359
should have named him louis Cefer...
0
Reply
Male 3,842
Do they not realize his initials are GAL
0
Reply
Male 13,630
slut_etta

they should have named him something-something-Spencer.
what like Frank?



0
Reply
Male 1,454
George, fantastic name! The name of the Patron Saint of England
0
Reply
Male 39,556

King Louis?

0
Reply
Female 4,086
they should have named him something-something-Spencer.
0
Reply
Male 13,630
Fecking George???
Ahhh interest lost already.........
0
Reply
Male 892
I think it`s a nice name -- very classic. I don`t really get why so many members of I-A-B have bad things to say about the name of a baby. You won the war in 1783. If people in the commonwealth want to celebrate a birth -- let them. You have the Kardasians.
0
Reply
Female 2,228
George? That one kinda sticks in our collective American craw a wee bit, (shades of the III) they could`ve chose something better.

But then again I suppose crawling around a vast palace estate whilst odd looking giants keep referring to you as "It" all the time really isn`t the best alternative, psychologically speaking.
0
Reply
Male 39,556

"George" ? `King George`, It`s been done VI times already.
"Alexander" That`ll make the Scots happy
"Louis" ....too french.
0
Reply
Male 3,908
The Onion has the best coverage of this royal bullsh*t.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
How about Symbol or formally known as...
0
Reply
Male 1,442
@turdburglar: We don`t circumcise here, unless you want it done to yourself. Still... lol.
0
Reply
Male 4,891

Looks like Fancylad is running the show today...12noon pacific time and 1 lame post. Cmon fancy, were bored.
0
Reply
Male 11,739
@Neoptolemos - my meter isn`t even budging.
0
Reply
Male 4,891

When they circumcise the little lad, does the queen get to stand by and shout "off with his head!"?
0
Reply
Male 625

0
Reply
Male 2,419
so uhmm, he`s quite the Gal aye? oh those british boarding schools are going to love him!
0
Reply
Male 1,442
Do people get points or something for every time they say they don`t care about something popular?

"Oh god three days of news, I am going to die! Why can`t they have more about fat lady`s complaining that schools don`t give their obese children enough bacon."

Yey for George!
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Should have named him Arthur.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
<---- cares
0
Reply
Male 7,031

Should have been Cosmo.
0
Reply
Female 1,539
I feel pretty certain they were given a specific list of names to choose from.
0
Reply
Male 883
They should have been original and named him Beuford Eugene
0
Reply
Male 2,579
Just give him all the old king names at once.
0
Reply
Male 20,827
Link: And The Royal Baby`s Name Is... [Pic] [Rate Link] - I know, who cares, right?
0
Reply