The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 7    Average: 2.6/5]
20 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 4142
Rating: 2.6
Category:
Date: 06/27/13 09:56 AM

20 Responses to SCOTUS Decisions on Gay Marriage [Pic+]

  1. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 9:57 am
    Link: SCOTUS Decisions on Gay Marriage - Damn, now how will I get out of making an honest man of him?
  2. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33127 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 10:11 am



    You cannot have Sera, I saw her first!
  3. Profile photo of Doiknowyou
    Doiknowyou Male 30-39
    999 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 10:16 am
    And to say, it was so close to being called SCROTUS
  4. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 10:26 am
    Keep pushing forward!
  5. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 11:00 am
    I can hear the neocon hypocrisy howling in the background.
  6. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 11:02 am

    Michelle Bachman immediately made a statement denouncing it, saying the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over marriage.

    You`d think she would be in favor of this since she herself married a gay man.
  7. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 12:51 pm

    The sword of gay justice rings true!

  8. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 12:54 pm
    saying the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over marriage.

    The fu<king govt shouldn`t be deciding who should marry who.
  9. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3909 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 1:21 pm
    I think it`s hilarious that the neocon douchebags who are saying the SCOTUS shouldn`t "have the authority to define marriage" are the same ones saying they should have the authority to tell a woman what she can & can`t do with her reproductive organs.
  10. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 1:59 pm

    Yes, the hypocrites who say Supreme Court can`t decide marriage law think that they CAN decide marriage law. After all, marriage is ordained by God...in several different ways & combinations and by several different gods as well.
  11. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 3:24 pm
    whodat6484

    "the same ones saying they should have the authority to tell a woman what she can & can`t do with her reproductive organs."

    Ughhhh. Not to get off on a tangent, but I HATE that argument. I DON`T care what a woman does to THEIR body or THEIR organs. If a woman wants to have her uterus removed and eat it for breakfast, more power to her. I care about what you can and can`t do to the body inside a woman`s body.
  12. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3909 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 5:43 pm
    @HolyGod - As far as I`m concerned that`s not your decision to make and it`s definitely not a decision that a bunch of judges/politicians should make. That decision is only for the woman and her family to make, no one else, period... do not pass go, do not collect $200... end of story.
  13. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.
    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.
    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.
    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.
    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.
    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.

    But I will say this... err Nope

    I`m not getting drawn into another abortion debate.
  14. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 7:04 pm
    whodat6484

    "As far as I`m concerned that`s not your decision to make"

    It comes down to a base philosophical difference on when you define life and when you (as a society) has to protect it.

    In my mind a woman shouldn`t have any more right to choose to kill her baby the day before it is born than she should have the day after it is born.
  15. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 8:24 pm

    Babies must be protected.
    Until they`re 15 and then you can kill them if you don`t like how they turned out.
  16. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33127 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 8:53 pm
    Soon! Soon I will be able to legally get married to both my kitties!

    First get rid of those polygamy laws...
    Then those "no marriage to things that aren`t humans" laws...
    Humm, both my kitties are 8 years old (apx) Looks like age restriction laws have to go too!~!

    (lolz! Not practical to wait for a kitty to turn 16 before getting married, eh?)
  17. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 9:09 pm
    Gerry1of1

    "Babies must be protected. Until they`re 15 and then you can kill them if you don`t like how they turned out."

    How did a gay marriage thread turn into a full on abortion debate?

    Can we stop that argument? Being against abortion and for the death penalty are not incongruous. It is comparing killing an innocent to killing someone that has done something to earn the punishment. personal responsibility. I have no problem with the death penalty but I don`t think being OK with killing a murderer means I have to be OK with killing a baby.

  18. Profile photo of Qwertyuiop95
    Qwertyuiop95 Male 18-29
    215 posts
    June 27, 2013 at 11:10 pm
    Let me get this straight. I look at a post on a ruling on gay marriage, and (this being IAB) expect a full-on debate in the comments. I then go to the comments to find a full-on debate... about abortion? What did I miss?
  19. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33127 posts
    June 28, 2013 at 6:57 am
    @HolyGod: I think @Gerry1 is referring to "retroactive abortions" where "fetuses" are aborted in their 24th trimester (IE: 5 years old...) or in his example 63rd trimester...

    @Qwertyuiop95: @WhoDat did it! *points* Not me! I put up a picture of a 22 year old, lesbian witch!

    Serenity Rose
  20. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36855 posts
    June 28, 2013 at 10:58 am

    HolyGod - don`t look at me, I didn`t start it.
    And why are you dragging the death penalty into it?
    I just made a joke about snotty teenagers, I`m not
    in this argument.

Leave a Reply