Man Sets Bus On Fire In China: 47 People Killed

Submitted by: MrPeabody 4 years ago in

Not a single shot was fired.
There are 19 comments:
Male 2,711
This has nothing to do with guns, has everything to do with idiot people trying to draw idiot parallels to their idiot arguments. Moving on...
0
Reply
Male 1,920
whodat6484 pretty much summed it up. Banning guns is not going to prevent crazy people from committing such atrocities. There is no legal gun ownership in China yet mass killings like this happen, and it`s not the first time.

Also people tend to overlook the fact that at Columbine and (I believe) Aurora, the murderers had IED`s ready but did not use them, or they failed. Had they focused on those devices instead of their guns, the death tolls arguably may have been much higher.
0
Reply
Male 40,290
@collegebound: Oh you innocent lad!
#1: The Gun-Grabbers DO INDEED want to grab ALL the guns! Every last legally owned one of them! Look at Australia! What they did?

#2 Columbine: NOT "military grade" weapons. Aurora? NOT "military grade" weapons.
In fact? "military grade" weapons use in murders of ANY sort are SO RARE it`s unbelievable! At least in the USA. In Africa? Commonplace. But that`s a WHOLE NEW kettle of worms isn`t it?

When`s the last time any gun-using shooter(s) killed 47 people in the USA? Hummm?
0
Reply
Male 3,745
i dont keep up with the whole gun control thing but last time i checked we didn`t want to ban ALL of the guns...just military grade ones from people who ARENT military...

we`re tired of columbine kids and movie shooter uppers...
0
Reply
Male 15,178
That kind of poo happens all the time in China. It didn`t even hit the news here.
0
Reply
Male 425
Hmmmmmmmmm. Jacob.. even though you seem to hate me for exercising my rights. i want you to know that i care more about you and your rights than your government does.... Fancy that..
0
Reply
Male 40,290
*nod nod*

@WhoDat is correct: EVERY single time we "Pro-Gunners" say mass murderers don`t NEED guns? The Gun-Grabbers say "that`s impossible!" (or words to that effect, eh?)

I hope this does not become a "world wide trend"! It`s highly lethal and almost impossible to prevent.
0
Reply
Male 3,908
I`m just commenting on the link description and why I think it was used...

Whenever a bunch of people are killed by a mad man with a gun anti-gun people say ban guns. Pro-gun people say you don`t need a gun to kill people if you really want to, you can still kill people without using guns (like set a crowded bus on fire). Then, the anti-gun people reply that if he didn`t use a gun there would have been more survivors. In this case, there probably would have been fewer deaths if the guy used a gun.
0
Reply
Male 14,331
Someone made a valid point about blaming objects for peoples behaviours and the ridiculousness of the UKs "control laws!!" fark fark farkedy fark arse arse!
0
Reply
Male 260
F*ck this caption. F*ck all the morons who agree with it. Compare gun deaths to arson deaths in the US. F*cking do it.

Arseholes. This site is full of disingenuous f*cking arseholes.
0
Reply
Male 14,331
[quote]On a side note- what has this got to do with guns? [/quote]

Fire..... firearms!


Serously though if it were done with a firearm what would you be saying don`t kid yourself.
0
Reply
Female 7,994
Very sad, kill yourself by all means- please do not take others with you. On a side note- what has this got to do with guns?
0
Reply
Male 14,331
[quote]of course it is. any excuse no matter how stupid it makes you sound[/quote]

Kind of like blaming problems on inanimate objects huh?
0
Reply
Male 2,419
Reignblazer

of course it is. any excuse no matter how stupid it makes you sound, ever seen an NRA ad?
0
Reply
Female 4,359
thats it, add fire to the ban list, along with guns and spoons.
0
Reply
Male 14,331
[quote]It that supposed to be some drated up remark on US gun legislation?[/quote]

Geee you`re right you should just enact fire control ban gas!!! cause......


This isn`t the first time it`s happened BTW in 2009 an unemployed man in Chengdu killed himself and 26 others by setting fire to a bus.
0
Reply
Male 1,216
They REALLY have too change something in their culture before things get really messed up. This is just awful.
0
Reply
Male 2,332
It that supposed to be some drated up remark on US gun legislation?
0
Reply
Male 1,920
Link: Man Sets Bus On Fire In China: 47 People Killed [Rate Link] - Not a single shot was fired.
0
Reply