Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 13    Average: 4/5]
16 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 4797
Rating: 4
Category: Science
Date: 05/07/13 06:48 AM

16 Responses to Reusable Rocket Passes Test With Flying Colors

  1. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 6:48 am
    Link: Reusable Rocket Passes Test With Flying Colors - SpaceX`s Grasshopper rocket looks like something off the cover of a 1950s sci-fi magazine.
  2. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4747 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 6:57 am
    Admittedly, I haven`t been following this so maybe there is more to the story but...What the heck was that?!?

    Lifting a rocket into the air and setting it back down has NOTHING to do with going into space and coming back again.
  3. Profile photo of BoredFrank
    BoredFrank Male 40-49
    2169 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 7:10 am

    It has EVERYTHING to do with space travel. What you just saw was the culmination of a dream decades in the making -- rocket takes off, enters orbit, leaves orbit, and lands. No dropping of booster stages. no splashdowns. The same vehicle takes off and lands.

    The savings are enormous. The vehicle could take off and land from a tiny patch of concrete.

  4. Profile photo of BoredFrank
    BoredFrank Male 40-49
    2169 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 7:11 am
    Edit to add: Yes, this rocket didn`t enter orbit. This was a flight test to determine stability and control. But a similar rocket will soon blast off for space and land, just as this one did.
  5. Profile photo of Mikeoxsbiggg
    Mikeoxsbiggg Male 30-39
    1503 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 7:26 am
    1950 sic-fi mag would have had rings around it for some reason.
  6. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 7:32 am
    @ Patchouly: This may help. Here`s an animated video of SpaceX`s endgoal, of which the Grasshopper rocket is a key component: LINK.
  7. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 7:48 am
    @ Mikeoxsbiggg: LOL. Yes, rings or really big fins. And either silver or red, not white. Here (below) is the kind of image I had in mind when I wrote the post`s description.

  8. Profile photo of Dead_mind
    Dead_mind Male 18-29
    303 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 7:54 am
    Alternative title - Your moms dildo just arrived.
  9. Profile photo of fancythat
    fancythat Male 30-39
    1951 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 9:08 am
    The stability seems great - awesome what today`s computers and sensors working in tandem can do. The bigger questions are, can it survive multiple trips through the atmosphere, and once landed on alien soil, how much fuel must already be there to enable another lift off?

    Personally, I was hoping to see more of an X-15 - something that can be strapped on the back of a larger horizontal take off, then jettison mid-flight and leave the atmosphere. Still, I guess that doesn`t solve the landing aspect, nor the re-takeoff once landed outside of this planet.

    Kudos, Sir Branson.
  10. Profile photo of chalket
    chalket Male 50-59
    2705 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 9:24 am
    Thanks for the link, Squrlz.
    I don`t see how they can carry enough fuel to reach escape velocity and still safely land 3 separate pieces using thrusters. Doesn`t seem to compute, to me.
  11. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 9:47 am
    @ Chalket: I understand your thinking there. It`s hard to understand how there`d be enough fuel left over after the ascent to land the pieces vertically like that. But SpaceX has already demonstrated enough technical know-how, I think, for us to assume they know what they`re doing. In May 2012, their Dragon spacecraft resupplied the ISS.

    In fact, it`s looking to me like the right stuff may have departed NASA and found a new home at SpaceX.
  12. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 12:46 pm
    It takes out a bird at lift-off @ around the 10 sec mark. You see it enter at the bottom of the screen and gets taken out as the rocket ignites.
  13. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    35649 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 1:29 pm

    The tail rocket landing is for the moon or other airless planets. To return to earth you just attach wings for more fuel economy. Save the fuel to push the payload UP to space.

    I`m glad to see space privatized. The only way we`ll get passenger service up there is for profit. The guv`ment don`t care about sending us.

  14. Profile photo of gary8162
    gary8162 Male 40-49
    932 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 5:22 pm
    What`s the big deal? It`s not rocket sci......nevermind.
  15. Profile photo of drips
    drips Male 30-39
    904 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 8:36 pm
    Cool beans.

    To me it looks like an incredible engineering feat that flexes the great rocket control systems they have developed. I wonder about the ultimate utility though because there`s a big difference between going up and hitting several hundred(?) miles per hour and floating back down, and getting to orbital velocities and trying to reorient a big tube to come in on a vertical descent. So says the I-A-Ber, the smartest folks in the land.
  16. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15845 posts
    May 7, 2013 at 11:34 pm
    That`s the way a REAL rocket ship should take off and land!

Leave a Reply