Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

# Do The Maths [Pic]

### Submitted by: B-diddy

[Total: 18    Average: 4/5]
Hits: 9328
Rating: 4
Category: Weird
Date: 05/03/13 03:45 PM

### 26 Responses to Do The Maths [Pic]

1. B-diddy Male 13-17
460 posts
May 3, 2013 at 3:46 pm
2. mykunter Male 40-49
2424 posts
May 3, 2013 at 3:56 pm
A serving is 8 oz.

Sorry I`m a label reader. Most important number on a label? Number of servings. It`s a multiplier if you consume the whole thing.
3. 12chars Male 18-29
906 posts
May 3, 2013 at 4:07 pm
Gerry using your equation there would only be 12 oz of fluid to equal 1 1/2 servings.
8 oz = 1 serving
16.9 oz per bottle = 2.11 servings (not 1 1/2 Gerry)
2.11 servings should equal 21 calories.

The maths do not add up. So is this dumb or are you?
4. Rex_Podicum Male 30-39
6 posts
May 3, 2013 at 4:22 pm
It`s not just a trick with serving size.

10 cal Ã· 8 oz = 1.25 cal/oz.
16.9 oz Ã— 1.25 cal/oz = 21.125 cal
21.125 cal â‰  15 cal
5. Jake_Justus Male 50-59
7033 posts
May 3, 2013 at 4:25 pm
Set the Wayback Machine for the year 1885. We`ve got to find Dr. Pepper himself and unravel this mystery.
6. Corydoras87 Male 18-29
642 posts
May 3, 2013 at 4:44 pm
this is a safeguard.. there might be 15 (kilo)calories in the whole thing, but if someone decides to test this and pours 8 fl oz of drink that contain 9 calories, they can not complain. Even if the rest of the liquid contains less calories in more liquid. Who says that every pour of liquid contains the same amount of calories?

whats with the "1 calorie" drinks? you can just separate a cup taht contains the little calorie and then drink the rest.
7. LandoGriffin Male 30-39
3844 posts
May 3, 2013 at 4:48 pm
perhaps there are 10 calories in 8 oz of soda, the bottle contains only 12 oz of soda and the remaining 4.9 fluid oz of liquid in the container is just water. Thus the soda has 10 calories in 8 oz but the 16.9 fluid oz bottle has 15 calories because it is diluted.
8. Agent00Smith Male 18-29
2581 posts
May 3, 2013 at 5:04 pm
Sucralose and other "0 calorie sweeteners" cause brain damage.
9. 5Cats Male 50-59
31771 posts
May 3, 2013 at 6:19 pm
The soda has 10 bold tasting calories, but if you eat the bottle? THAT has 15 calories too!

Who says that every pour of liquid contains the same amount of calories?
@Corydoras87: Um, really?
10. Plangkye Female 18-29
258 posts
May 3, 2013 at 6:42 pm
Simple. 10 of the calories are bold-tasting, the other five are bland as hell. Why was this so hard to figure out?
11. freddyferret Male 40-49
11742 posts
May 3, 2013 at 8:10 pm
10 calories drinking the soda, 15 eating the bottle. Duh.
12. skullgrin Male 18-29
937 posts
May 3, 2013 at 8:12 pm
it says it right there....10 calories per 8oz, 15 for the whole bottle...dur dur. retards.
13. skullgrin Male 18-29
937 posts
May 3, 2013 at 8:14 pm
"this is a safeguard.. there might be 15 (kilo)calories in the whole thing, but if someone decides to test this and pours 8 fl oz of drink that contain 9 calories, they can not complain. Even if the rest of the liquid contains less calories in more liquid. Who says that every pour of liquid contains the same amount of calories?

whats with the "1 calorie" drinks? you can just separate a cup taht contains the little calorie and then drink the rest."

lol, thats not how calories work.
14. OldOllie Male 60-69
15844 posts
May 3, 2013 at 8:46 pm
The reason is that the USDA makes them round up to the nearest 5 calories. An 8-oz. serving probably has 6-7 calories which has to be rounded up to 10. The whole 16.9 oz. bottle would then have 13-14 calories which rounds up to 15. Simple.
15. ak47reaper Male 18-29
117 posts
May 3, 2013 at 8:51 pm
last five taste horrible?
16. luke182 Male 18-29
412 posts
May 3, 2013 at 9:45 pm
no skullgrin. you are the retard. it does say 10 calories per 8oz. and it does say 15 for the whole bottle. but what you didn`t notice is that there are 16.9oz in the whole bottle. that would mean more than 20 calories in the whole thing, but somehow it only works out to 15. DERRR!!!!
17. Magentab0b Female 30-39
1467 posts
May 3, 2013 at 11:34 pm
Bwahahaha if you look at the ingredients it still contains HFCS. Ooo look you diet drink has super sugar and aspartame!

Sucralose is fine. Don`t worry they just cook it in turpentine they don`t ship it with the broth. Everyone needs a good whore`s bath once in a while.
18. Kegomatix Male 18-29
1341 posts
May 4, 2013 at 6:41 am
@ak47reaper

Agreed, I`m thinking the last five-ish calories just aren`t as bold.
19. Draculya Male 40-49
14544 posts
May 4, 2013 at 7:26 am
250lb Americans arguing about the difference between 10 and 15 calories in a bottle. Hur hur.
20. auburnjunky Male 30-39
10339 posts
May 4, 2013 at 8:11 am
What is maths? Oh you mean MATH.
21. auburnjunky Male 30-39
10339 posts
May 4, 2013 at 8:14 am

Draculya once again can`t help but try to suck an American dick.
22. 5Cats Male 50-59
31771 posts
May 4, 2013 at 9:35 am
O_o The USDA makes them round it off? Well, I guess that makes a tiny bit of sense...

23. desslox Male 30-39
94 posts
May 4, 2013 at 9:44 am
\$5 says its 1 1/2 servings per bottle
24. deyv87 Male 18-29
302 posts
May 4, 2013 at 11:18 am
Well, 10 of the calories are bold tasting, the other 5 are kind of bland.
25. chalket Male 50-59
2712 posts
May 4, 2013 at 2:06 pm
Ollie is mostly right. Except it`s the FDA and you don`t have to always round up.

"50 calories or less--Round to nearest 5-calorie increment: Example: Round 47 calories to "45 calories"
Above 50 calories--Round to nearest 10-calorie increment: Example: Round 96 calories to "100 calories" 21 CFR 101.9(c)(1) Also see Appendix H for rounding guidelines."

See questions N7 and N8.
26. rubbiten Male 18-29
145 posts
May 6, 2013 at 6:02 am
it does ad upp, 10 calories taste bold and 5 calories taste coward