Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 26    Average: 3.8/5]
13 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 10598
Rating: 3.8
Category: Misc
Date: 05/25/13 02:27 PM

13 Responses to A Simple Yet Strange IQ Test For You [Pic+]

  1. Profile photo of kitteh9lives
    kitteh9lives Female 70 & Over
    8012 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 2:29 pm
    Link: A Simple Yet Strange IQ Test For You - Watch the video and then clicky clicky to see how you did. Are you a smarty pants?
  2. Profile photo of Tiredofnicks
    Tiredofnicks Male 30-39
    5101 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 2:48 pm
    ----Semi-spoiler alert---

    I got some of the big ones and some of the small ones, but almost none of the quick ones. On a traditional IQ test I usually score quite a bit above average, so I guess I fall outside the 64%.
  3. Profile photo of lauriloo
    lauriloo Female 40-49
    1803 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 4:21 pm
    I`m the same. Saw movement on all the but quickest ones, no matter what size they were. I was in Mensa so I don`t know what that means with regards to this test. I do buy into the notion that smart people think quicker and more precisely.
  4. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    30825 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 4:31 pm
    In between 0:22 and 0:23 seconds... it`s fast! You have to look several times to see it. idk how to "frame by frame" advance...

    WTF is up with that?

    About the "clicky" part: Yeah, having a "high IQ" doesn`t necessarily mean you are better at "survival" eh? Otherwise every human would be much smarter by now! (Due to natural selection as well as mate selection)

  5. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    30825 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 4:33 pm
    For the record: I saw the smallest ones best, even if they were quick, but had troubles with the largest ones.

    And I saw that 28 too...
  6. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 4:34 pm
    I think if you`re trying to test yourself right now after you`ve read the summaries and explanations, it`s already flawed. If you`re expecting the lines to move, and you`re aware that your intelligence hinges on it, it will screw up the experiment.

    I also have a few problems with the methodology in this. I have experience with some academics being overzealous if they find even a slight correlation in anything. Like, for instance, the more authoritarian a country is, the faster it has been growing in recent years. So dubious, but academics seize upon it things like this all the time.
  7. Profile photo of robthelurker
    robthelurker Male 18-29
    2588 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 7:22 pm
    my eyes hurt.
  8. Profile photo of handimanner
    handimanner Male 60-69
    2095 posts
    May 25, 2013 at 9:09 pm
    I`m a dizzy genius.
  9. Profile photo of Pinkminx22
    Pinkminx22 Female 18-29
    1073 posts
    May 26, 2013 at 8:09 am
    I could see both big and small. I don`t know of that makes me smart or not though.
  10. Profile photo of chalket
    chalket Male 50-59
    2705 posts
    May 26, 2013 at 4:31 pm
    No perceivable difference between large and small, for me. Whatever that means...
  11. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    May 27, 2013 at 4:39 am
    Andrew155, I don`t think any worthwhile academics *do* seize on bad or spurious data all that often. What I think often happens is that they publish decent papers with reasonable findings and the press jumps on a single correlation and blows it way out of proportion.

    As for me, I had a difficult time taking this test because I was concerned it`d be one of those screamer videos and I didn`t want to be concentrating too hard at the screen! :-)
  12. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    30825 posts
    May 27, 2013 at 12:33 pm
    The subliminal 28! It pops up right before "Did you get that one?" at 0:24!

    Please let someone else see it... :-/
  13. Profile photo of Magentab0b
    Magentab0b Female 30-39
    1467 posts
    May 27, 2013 at 2:34 pm
    Fun test if you don`t see all the after images.

Leave a Reply