Rhetological Fallacies [Pic]

Submitted by: 5cats 4 years ago in Science

Errors in logic and thinking: Seen on IAB -every- day! Look at "Lies" lolz!
There are 43 comments:
Male 2,167
This chart is awful.
0
Reply
Male 37,826
[quote]"Opium induces sleep because it has a soporific quality"[/quote]
@randomnxp: Isn`t that "Circular Reasoning"? idk... Yes, they got that one wrong too.

We agree that "plastic" is right out! Eh? lolz! I couldn`t think of what else Dr Seuss would wrap a baby in. Wubb Fur?

@madduck: Where`d you go?

0
Reply
Male 1,293
5Cats

As for ad hominem, your example it does connect the characteristic to the correctness (albeit falsely). Their example is just making a random insult against anyone who has a certain opinion. Had they said "We shouldn`t allow the mosque because those that want to are America-hating liberals" that would have been a rather poor example of an ad hominem fallacy. As it is their construction does not even look like it relates to a debate.
0
Reply
Male 1,293
5Cats

You make the same mistake with appeal to authority, albeit with a better example. Imagine I say that tinfoil is best because babies lose heat through radiation. Saying that a soft blanket is better because Dr Spock says so is a fallacy. A valid argument would be to outline Dr Spock`s reasoning.

I just noticed they got begging the question completely and utterly wrong! Begging the question is making an argument that assumes the conclusion or simply restates it. I cannot even twist their example to actually beg the question, so I will nick Wikipedia`s example:

"Opium induces sleep because it has a soporific quality"
0
Reply
Male 508
Seems to me everything a person could possibly say would end up on this fallacies list...

Oh look, I just made a hasty generalization.
0
Reply
Male 20
tl;dr
0
Reply
Male 2,841
Titties.
0
Reply
Male 284
What`s the big idea posting this logic junk? What are you trying to do ruin the internet?!!!
0
Reply
Male 37,826
Yes, they do get the "Jumping to Conclusions" wrong. idk if it`s the definition or the example or both? But it`s poor. Luckily it one of the easiest to understand! After all, everybody does it... oops! (Mind #3)

It`s not my fault! ("They`re Out To Get Me Fallacy")

The "I spelled fallacy wrongly 4 times out of 5" reality...
0
Reply
Male 37,826
[quote]Given that he gets the appeal to authority completely arse about face...[/quote]

@randomxnp: It`s the "Appeal to Authority FALLACY" not the "Appeal to authority logical technique" eh?
If it were an appeal to a "proper" authority it wouldn`t BE a fallacy! So they define it as an appeal to a false or incorrect authority.

Dr.Spock says: Wrap babies in a soft blanket.
= Appeal to Authority (logical)

Dr.Suess Says: Wrap babies in tinfoil.
= Appeal to Authority FALLACY (unqualified)

Dr.Kavorkian says: Wrap babies in a plastic bag.
= Appeal to Authority Fallacy (untrustworthy)

Ad Hominum: "You can`t be correct, your (sic) a Canadian!" See? It doesn`t have to "relate" to anything! It can be perfectly random. Just ask @madest!
0
Reply
Male 907
I stopped reading when I figured out that every example would either be silly or a swipe at the political views this guy obviously hates.
0
Reply
Male 427
"You see this is a good example of a straw man. No it doesn`t mean that the argument is incorrect. What it means is that the argument is not valid, that it has no bearing on the discussion."
It means that just because someone used a fallacy their conclusion can still be true.
It`s a fallacy called "fallacy fallacy", not a straw man fallacy
0
Reply
Male 1,293
5Cats

Classic case is the Ad Hominem. The Ad Hominem fallacy would be more like "your argument that we should be tolerant of the mosque cannot be valid, because you are muslim" - i.e. a claim that the argument must be wrong because of some characteristic or other expressed opinion of the person arguing it. The example given is just a random insult, it bears no relation to the discussion.

Others are correct examples but address well-known debates with clear straw men.

For example the Jumping to Conclusions example, a clear reference to a specific argument, but a clear misrepresentation of that argument.

Perfectly valid as an example, but rather ironic and harmful to credibility. Given that he gets the appeal to authority completely arse about face and makes his own appeal to authority in the example, it suggests that the person writing this does not really understand fallacies.
0
Reply
Male 1,745
The example for the popular belief fallacy is "Milk is good for your bones". That isn`t true?
0
Reply
Male 1,293
Some of the definitions are wrong too. For example the appeal to authority is not a fallacy because of reliance on an unqualified person. Indeed it is quite the opposite, it is claiming that something is right because an expert says so, not because the evidence and argument is sound.
0
Reply
Male 1,293
Canoas

"Even if someone uses a fallacy in an argument it does not mean that the argument is incorrect."

You see this is a good example of a straw man. No it doesn`t mean that the argument is incorrect. What it means is that the argument is not valid, that it has no bearing on the discussion.
0
Reply
Male 3,894
Everyone on IAB: I *NEVER* use these, but everybody else does.
0
Reply
Male 37,826
[quote]I guess my response would be an Ad Hominem.[/quote]
@markust: It`s "sarcasium ad nausium" actually ;-)

[quote]Nice submission BTW![/quote]
Thankjs @davymid! I knew the moment I saw it that it was "IAB worthy" :-)

Did you see my "typo explanation" the other day?
#1 I cannot spell
#2 Not enough coffee
#3 Cat sleeping on my left arm

In this case it`s #2-A too much coffee... (buzz buzz)
0
Reply
Male 4,395
Holy crap 5Cats you finally got a Post rating above 2.5 - congratulations. I guess my response would be an Ad Hominem.
0
Reply
Male 37,826
[quote]Even if someone uses a fallacy in an argument it does not mean that the argument is incorrect.[/quote]
@Canoas: "Fake but true" you mean like that? Yup! I`ve seen that a lot...

[quote]"dolphins can fly because they have wings".[/quote]

"Penguins can fly..." would be a better example, I think...?

Dammit! I spelled "originally" wrong, and I just looked it up 5 minutes ago! AAAG!
0
Reply
Male 37,826
@randomnxp: I went to informationisbeautiful.net (IIB, not IAB! lolz!)
...and it was the 4th one on their site.
Origionally at Ace Of Spades HQ a "right wing" blogger with a fine sense of humour!

@randomnxp & @Gerry1: I`d disagree: The "fine print" is just fine in their explainations. The examples given are light-hearted but accurate.
For example: "Appeal to Athority" is -wrong- when it`s an UN-qualifed "expert" (in quotes!). Not when an honest to goodness expert says so.

Probability: To say it "must be true" is the false part. The truth is: It`s "highly likely" NOT 100%. (in their example)

Mostly I just "lol`d" a lot while reading it!
0
Reply
Male 427
"I could claim there`s no such thing as gravity because empirical evidence is worthless, and that would be a fair argument. "
No, it wouldn`t. You first need to prove why empirical evidence is worthless. That`s the same as saying "dolphins can fly because they have wings". No, dolphins don`t have wings, such a statement, while logically correct, is not true and therefore it`s conclusion is irrelevant.

Not using any fallacies means your logic is correct, but fallacies do not address the veracity of your claims. For an argument to be correct you need both logic and veracity, not just one of those.
0
Reply
Female 7,867
Not sure all of these are correct- my screen is playing up a bit. I have my copy of `thinking from A to Z` open- I will get back to you ( really- it`s a handy book)
0
Reply
Male 427
They forgot the fallacy fallacy, which is probably the most common of them all. Even if someone uses a fallacy in an argument it does not mean that the argument is incorrect.


0
Reply
Female 3,562
You can literally debunk absolutely any argument using at least one of these. I could claim there`s no such thing as gravity because empirical evidence is worthless, and that would be a fair argument.
Also, many of these fallacies are the same thing with only slight tweaks in definition based only on context, but it`s still the same type of fault.
0
Reply
Male 109
"Cum Hoc"

*giggle*
0
Reply
Male 1,950
...boy, that sure is a lot of words...
0
Reply
Male 1,293
It`s a good list, but the examples are terrible. Most of the ones I looked at are either not examples of that fallacy at all, or they are themselves based on straw man fallacies.
0
Reply
Male 38,498

And? some of those are valid ways to make a point.
Probability, Relativism, etc
0
Reply
Male 3,894
Good thing to have around.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
Saved, will likely use excerpts in the forums later on.
0
Reply
Male 2,097
Arggg, everything I know is wrong.
0
Reply
Female 2,764
it is pi day isn`t it?
0
Reply
Male 1,497
I like pie.
0
Reply
Female 9,478
And I have seen, if not all, most of these tactaits take place on the internet.
0
Reply
Male 37,826
Ah, @kitteh9! I should have guessed. @FancyLad doesn`t roll out of bed until 3... (j/k! Well sorta) thx! It really is a speed record :-) I`m #1!

@greekhop: #5, #11, #12 and oh #19 for sure! ;-)
(I`m joking again! See, they`re not numbered, so I`m not really point his fallacies out...)
0
Reply
Male 116
I guess this means we will be closing down the comments section, nothing left to say. Every single argument Ive ever read here, and probably everywhere, falls into one of more of these rhetological fallacy categories.

No go on and point out my fallacy...
0
Reply
Male 2,619
Blah blah blah.
0
Reply
Male 2,549
*huddles into a corner and shivers* ...can`t...write...anything without succumbing to existential crisis.
0
Reply
Female 8,044
;-)
0
Reply
Male 6,702
Oh the Irony...
0
Reply
Male 37,826
A NEW IAB Speed Record! Hooray!

I like this list: it really covers all the bases AND it`s funneh too!

Thanks @FancyLad or @The_Mods!

0
Reply
Male 37,826
Link: Rhetological Fallacies [Pic] [Rate Link] - Errors in logic and thinking: Seen on IAB -every- day! Look at `Lies` lolz!
0
Reply