Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 11    Average: 2.4/5]
109 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 13296
Rating: 2.4
Category:
Date: 03/11/13 01:50 PM

109 Responses to N. Korea Threatens To Nuke United States [Pic+]

  1. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 1:47 pm
    Link: N. Korea Threatens To Nuke United States - What did Dennis Rodman say when he was over there?
  2. Profile photo of ForSquirel
    ForSquirel Male 30-39
    2059 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:06 pm
    bring it beotch
  3. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:12 pm
    The Pacific Ocean will really feel the pain of that nuke blast.
  4. Profile photo of spanz
    spanz Male 50-59
    833 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:14 pm
    so lets take this snott nosed douche bag at his word and nuke him and his stone age country first.
  5. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:27 pm
    Good idea spanz, except iran, china and russia would obliterate the US overnight.
  6. Profile photo of El_Chinche
    El_Chinche Male 18-29
    546 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:27 pm
    The official U.S response.

  7. Profile photo of dm2754
    dm2754 Male 40-49
    3286 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:32 pm
    look like the USA is starting trouble agian. this is why everyone hayes the US.
  8. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:32 pm
    Translation from the original Korean:

    "PAY ATTENTION TO US!! WE`RE SO ANGRY RIGHT NOW!! *STOMP STOMP STOMP*"
  9. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6203 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:38 pm
    tedgp

    "Good idea spanz, except iran, china and russia would obliterate the US overnight."

    Wait. Was that serious? If so, that is absolutely f.ucking retarded. Iran does not have the means to adequately attack the United States. China and Russia combined do not have the military of The United States and even if they did they wouldn`t attack. China`s economy is dependent on the U.S. They aren`t going to bite the hand that feeds them.

    Not to mention attacking the U.S. would bring in Britain, France, Italy, Israel, Germany, Spain, etc.

    Weapons are too sophisticated now for modern countries to attack modern countries. It would be mutual armageddon. That is why the Cold War never happened and why no modern country has declared war on another modern country in the last half century.
  10. Profile photo of soundman655
    soundman655 Male 50-59
    1558 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:44 pm
    I`m with spanz
  11. Profile photo of El_Chinche
    El_Chinche Male 18-29
    546 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:50 pm
    @tedgp
    Um....no. The amount of nuclear war heads the us has in it`s possession dwarfs most countries. It`d be suicide for any country to try to start a nuclear war with the US. Look for yourself.
  12. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3907 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:57 pm
    "Good idea spanz, except iran, china and russia would obliterate the US overnight."


  13. Profile photo of handimanner
    handimanner Male 60-69
    2095 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:57 pm
    You pay attention to us now or we starve our people some more.
    PS: Send Elvis records, keep Dennis Rodman.
  14. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    6666 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 2:58 pm
    Just a routine scheduled tantrum, as you would expect. NK has more or less been ruled for generations of the kid from `It`s a Good Life` (Bixby).

    The country has been ruled by generations who continue to look and behave like petulant teenagers however old they get.

    If China actually applies the sanctions they voted for Then NK is less of a problem. They haven`t in the past, but I`m puzzled to think why China would want a second, and deeply dippy, hand on pulling the trigger from their side of the ocean.

  15. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:04 pm
    Here I was hoping he would be less crazy than his father.
  16. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:05 pm

    Kimmie {that`s what I call him, we`re very close}
    Kimmie has got too many people. He needs a war
    to get rid of a million or two...or 3
  17. Profile photo of spanerbulb
    spanerbulb Male 30-39
    1244 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:06 pm
    spanz are you really 50-59 years old? Your comment would suggest you are under 12.
  18. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    6666 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:13 pm
    `so lets take this snott nosed douche bag at his word and nuke him and his stone age country first.`

    Obviously stupid. It`s a country full of people, most of whom are probably very nice.

    Good idea spanz, except iran, china and russia would obliterate the US overnight.`

    Obviously not. Iran can do bugger all, the rest of the world would wait for you to arrest the maniacs responsible before nervously getting together to debate how to deal with an insane super-power.
    `
  19. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:17 pm
    @holygod if the US started the war, none of those countries would be behind the US. Not even the UK.
  20. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:19 pm
  21. Profile photo of REV666
    REV666 Male 30-39
    191 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:20 pm
    this should be cute...
  22. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6203 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:37 pm
    tedgp

    "if the US started the war, none of those countries would be behind the US. Not even the UK"

    They had no problem following us into Iraq and that was a country that posed NO threat to us whatsoever. Now we are talking bout a country with nuclear weapons and a leader publicly threatening nuclear attack.

    I am in no way advocating nuking their country, but I`m pretty sure that if the U.S. decided to take him out China and Russia wouldn`t say boo.
  23. Profile photo of teq78
    teq78 Male 30-39
    216 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:38 pm
    Ok, see, this is why we cant have nice things, lol were all gonna die!
  24. Profile photo of Tiredofnicks
    Tiredofnicks Male 30-39
    5101 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:45 pm
    As was posted a few days ago:

  25. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:45 pm
    @holygod. I see you like taking things out of context.

    The US LIED to get other countries to support them in iraq. This has been proven multiple times and G W idiot even said so himself.

    However, theres a huge difference between going in with ground force and containing areas, than issuing first strike orders with nuclear weapons.

    Go back to the second world war, when the US dropped 2 bombs on a civilian populations simply to see the effects. Most of the allies condemned it, and it was lucky the war ended as The US would have been ostracized.
  26. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:46 pm
    @tedgp

    The critical piece of the puzzle that is missing is that the countries you mention lack FORCE PROJECTION. Put plainly, they do not have the means to land a considerable force on the US mainland.

    Force projection is a skill that the US is a monopoly of. Consider the Falkland Islands, which the UK could barely strike. Consider Mali, in which the French need US KC-135s to refuel.

    If a war were to occur, it would occur in the opposing country.
  27. Profile photo of skullgrin
    skullgrin Male 18-29
    937 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:47 pm
    we should just nuke them and then play dumb and be all like, maybe one of their tests went wrong or something...
  28. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6203 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:54 pm
    tedgp

    "However, theres a huge difference between going in with ground force and containing areas, than issuing first strike orders with nuclear weapons."

    Maybe your reading comprehension is suffering because it is Monday.

    I JUST said: "I am in no way advocating nuking their country, but I`m pretty sure that if the U.S. decided to take him out..."
  29. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:56 pm
    *Yawn* We already went over the End of the Pacific War last time remember, tedgp? Go read the Potsdam declaration to see exactly where you are so egregiously wrong, I get tired of spoon feeding people.

    Oh and I`m sure Europe would`ve abandoned us in WW2, seeing as how we came in and totally Saved The Day and all. I mean we could`ve just let you rest on the tender mercies of Stalin`s Russia for crying out loud.
  30. Profile photo of lukeforv123
    lukeforv123 Male 18-29
    1053 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 3:58 pm
    Don`t bomb our country, just bomb our government. We`re not all that bad. Besides, you guys love our movies and Dennis Rodman, both live in California, the only state you can hit worth hitting.
  31. Profile photo of djwajda
    djwajda Male 40-49
    885 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:02 pm
    I`m pretty sure China and Russia look at Kim and his little gang as the cousins that nobody wants to claim and facepalm collectively every time Kim opens his mouth.

    In a conventional sense they might be able to bumrush the south initially, but it wouldn`t take long to push em back and spank em badly.
  32. Profile photo of djwajda
    djwajda Male 40-49
    885 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:03 pm
    Forgot to mention too that maybe if we send them some yummy birds and snow-coffee they`ll be happy.
  33. Profile photo of danagamer
    danagamer Male 30-39
    701 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:04 pm
    I`m so ronry...

  34. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:13 pm
    @holygod, the US could EASILY take NK out. The problem lies with russia and china backing them up every step of the way. Including military action, which they have stated multiple times.
  35. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:14 pm
    @queenzira America saved the day? i think your schools need to teach people actual history instead of what they want you to hear.
  36. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:24 pm
    Yeah actually we did, well us and Russia. Russia especially in terms of manpower and sheer amount of lives lost.

    So essentially at the end of the war you have two choices of whom you`d like to have truck with, Democratic "Special Relationship" us, or Become One With Communist Mother Russia Da?

    It`s not a hard choice really...
  37. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31795 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:36 pm
    Here I was hoping he would be less crazy than his father.
    @markust: Well, he has the same "beurocratic infrastructure" supporting him as his dad. kinda like the past 10 US Presidents... (11 if you include JFK...)

    Also: His older brother was "passed over" for the job because he:
    #1 Didn`t want it.
    #2 Is likely gay.

    when the US dropped 2 bombs on a civilian populations simply to see the effects. Most of the allies condemned it...
    @tedgp: Um, which allies exactly? Britian, who gave the USA ALL the n-research they had done? Canada, who supplied the uranium? China, France, Russia? WHO? No-one "condemned the USA", that`s a fact.
    "Just to see..." NO! They did it to KILL CIVILIANS! It was quite on purpose, you idiot! They KNEW what a Bomb would do already from Trinity!
  38. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:42 pm
    Ignore 5cats, he`s just mad because Canada was there, fell into the English Channel and was sumarrily never heard from again. :-D
  39. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31795 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:47 pm
    It`s not a hard choice really...

    @QueenZira: I agree with you 100%.

    (I hope you`re not angry with me...)

    Without Stalin:
    A) WW2 would never have started.
    B) Nazi Germany would have won.

    Without the USA`s (AND Canada`s!!) help? Option B would have been a lock.

    Note: Option A is highly relative:, a another, even worse World War would likely have broken out by 1942! But that`s not what really happened so we`ll never know!

    @QueenZira: WW2 started in 1939, not Dec 1941... :-P
    Canada and Britian and Russia won the War in Europe. Y`all did OK in the Pacific Theater though...
  40. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:50 pm
    We need a good ol` fashioned Ronald Regan, "Yeah? BRING it, bitch!"


  41. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 4:54 pm
    I`m serious, about Canada I mean, Dieppe ring a bell? ;-)

    We helped too, liberation of France @Normandy, helping Britain we bombed Germany in the day and they took over the night shift. Anything Ike and Patton did. No doubt Britain`s a tough old badass to crack, but a little island nation can`t do it all alone. It would`ve been a tragedy to lose them to the Nazis...
  42. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:00 pm
    Hmm...why USA is in South Korea doing some military exercises? Is it possible for your country to stop going around the world with your army ?
    And for the people that belive Iran is not a menace...do you remember that morning of september some years ago?
    You can be sure to win this war as you want but the price you gonna pay after the "obliteration" that you wish for NK is so huge you can`t immagine. If i were in you i will take my luggages and leave the zone at the speed of light. China and Russia will never let someone attack Asia. This time you are ramming at the wrong door.
  43. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:05 pm
    Pf we`re there because of a little thing called The Korean War, when we stopped the North from turning the South communist. And we`ve had to be there ever since the armistice.

    And anywhoo *they`re* the one doing the (empty) threatening here, not us.
  44. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:17 pm
    QueenZira well, doing some army exercise few km from borders of NK or filling the coasts with ships can be seen as a threath from the neighbour,can you understand that?
  45. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:19 pm
    Right, in the sense that we`re reminding them if they get out of hand there`s gonna be a hot welcoming party waiting. It`s not the same thing as openly threatening nuclear assault however...
  46. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:28 pm
    QueenZira i don`t want to take any part here i don`t mind about NK and i don`t want to side with that country...but why every time your country is involved in wind of wars? Why your country need to permanently spread war all over the world? Economic reasons? Maybe. The fact is that your army is no longer seen as a saviour army by the large part of the other states of the world but most likely as an aggressor army due the recents facts and how your politician have managed to tell bullshats all around. I would not count so much on the help of others countries if i were in you.
  47. Profile photo of djwajda
    djwajda Male 40-49
    885 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:44 pm
    @piperfawn

    perhaps if you`d do a little research, you`d find that these exercises are an annual event. In other words, they happen each and every year. And guess what? N. Korea knows that. It`s had a few names over the years...

    Operation Team Spirit
    RSOI (Reception, Staging, Onward Movement, Intergtration)
    Operation Team Resolve

    Now, can you understand that?

  48. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:55 pm
    djwajda i know all,but the fact that this exercises are annuals don`t mean at all that NK appreciate it. In the past there are been similar situations right cause of this exercises. You know? Is like a mosquito, you see him,you ear him and you know that his final target is to bite you. Just for the fact you know all this things you will never surrender at the idea of being bited, at the first occasion you will try to smash him.
  49. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:56 pm

    Tempting though it is, we can`t nuke`m.
    1: the world would turn on us for using a snuke.
    2: Our allie South Korea is related to them so it`s like shooting your friends family, he`s not gonna like you so much after that.
    &
    C: It doesn`t generate billions in money to war profeteers when you nuke`m. Convetional warfare is much more profitable ... for them.
  50. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 5:58 pm
    No matter how many time that mosquito have "threaten" you every year ,untill that mosquito is in the room all you want is to stop him.
  51. Profile photo of djwajda
    djwajda Male 40-49
    885 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 6:12 pm
    @piperfawn

    agressive actions over the years

    maybe you should take a look at how many times the North has been the aggressor.
  52. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 6:14 pm
    Please. Do it. Nuke San Fran or LA or maybe Seattle. It`ll help us out a little, and give us reason to turn your country into a glass parking lot.

    C`mon little buddy.
  53. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 6:15 pm
    That .gif is epic el chinche.
  54. Profile photo of djwajda
    djwajda Male 40-49
    885 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 6:18 pm
    @auburnjunky

    It`s like the old Robin Williams bit when he`s talking about Gadaffi, only insert `lil kim`s name..

    `ok you cross this line you die. this line you die. this line you die....ok you knock on my door i`m not answering`
  55. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 6:32 pm
    Well. With this president, I have no doubt we would "enter aggressive peace talks" if they nuked a city somehow.

    I would hope he would say "Oh really?" and just unleash hell.
  56. Profile photo of Laran
    Laran Male 40-49
    467 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 6:32 pm
    If I told a cop I was going to shoot somebody he would be obligated to arrest me on the spot.
    the same principal needs to be applied to ANY country that is stupid enough to even threaten nuclear strikes.
    that pooe is just way too serious to be taken lightly.
    personally I dont really care too much what N.Korea does- as long as they keep to themselves and allow anyone who wants no part of it to leave and live their own lives in peace.
  57. Profile photo of REV666
    REV666 Male 30-39
    191 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 7:37 pm
    people look at this on too big of a scale. think of NK as a kid that picks on his lil bro SK. well, when NK acts up, the adults have to put them on restrictions, and naturally theyll throw a tantrum. its not until they go out of their way to break the ONE rule that the spanking will commence. right now, were just reminding them that they really arent a threat to us, and until the defecation hits the oscillation we`ll just let them rant (much like 5cats). but by dog let them press that button and youll see a parking lot above SK.

    on a lighter note, anyone else thinking that property values at the border are dropping fast?
  58. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 7:57 pm
    "Well. With this president, I have no doubt we would "enter aggressive peace talks" if they nuked a city somehow."

    That`s funny because just last week you neo-cons were accusing him of being such a war monger that it would be possible for him to bomb Americans on our own soil using drones. Something even John McCain called ridiculous. You`re starting to trip over your talking points.
  59. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14544 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 8:22 pm
    "bring it beotch"

    Fair trade. They can plop a mushroom on the top 5 US cities and in retaliation the US can blanket nuke the country. The world will be a better place.
  60. Profile photo of bacon_pie
    bacon_pie Male 30-39
    3061 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 8:24 pm
    my friend from North Korea smuggled out footage of a secrect missle launch.
  61. Profile photo of carmium
    carmium Female 50-59
    6381 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 8:38 pm
    You guys have all the military technology in the world, more guns and drones and bombs and - hopefully - tactical intelligence than any other country could ever use. Why can`t you send a guided bullet into Dum Jung One`s head?
    ...or whatever his name is.
  62. Profile photo of sutra46
    sutra46 Female 40-49
    2550 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 8:42 pm
    Just give him the Dennis Rodman and throw in Kobe :-)
  63. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6203 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 8:49 pm
    AuburnJunky

    "Please. Do it. Nuke San Fran or LA or maybe Seattle. It`ll help us out a little"

    Help Us? America depends on the financial industry, tech industry, and entertainment industry. Why would you want to wipe out two of the tech centers and the entertainment center?

    Wouldn`t it better to nuke a place that doesn`t contribute much of anything to the GDP in proportion to its population and takes the most in welfare without paying its share of taxes? Someplace that ranks among the fattest, unhealthiest, and least educated? Some place like, oh, I dunno Alabama?
  64. Profile photo of TheeAJ123
    TheeAJ123 Male 30-39
    118 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 8:51 pm
    The US already sent in a biological weapon, we call it Dennis Rodman. If North Korea doesn`t succumb to bad basketball,cross dressing,and venereal disease in seven days we have No choice but to release the SNOOKI!
  65. Profile photo of TheGuySmiley
    TheGuySmiley Male 18-29
    1243 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 9:22 pm
    Look!!!!!! Another voice chanting "DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! DEATH TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!! ....."

    I wonder how many more chanters it`s going to take to get through? People in nations all around the world are chanting it, even in the very country in question. People aren`t fools, they know what country in the NA continent has the biggest terrorist regime in the world.
  66. Profile photo of El_Chinche
    El_Chinche Male 18-29
    546 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 9:33 pm
    @TheGuySmiley
    I wouldn`t call the Mounties terrorists, I hear they`re actually pretty nice folks.
  67. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 9:41 pm
    yea america is real scared after their last nuke test
  68. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 10:42 pm
    @HolyGod:

    Alabama isn`t on the West coast, and is even more unlikely to be hit.

    I was just talking proximity. If they can hit `Bama, or Mississippi, or Arkansas, then by all means. It`ll mean they`re doom, so do it!
  69. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6203 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 10:55 pm
    AuburnJunky

    "Alabama isn`t on the West coast, and is even more unlikely to be hit."

    I know, I was just f.ucking with you. Actually I thought the closest they could get right now was alaska.
  70. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 11:04 pm
    Well actually, they don`t have amissile strong enough to deliver their huge heavy low yield nuke. I think the farthest they can deliver one by missile is just over the border.

    THEY CAN hit us with a dirty bomb though. A missile filled with goopy nasty uranium.
  71. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3907 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 11:15 pm
    @piperfawn - We`ve had military bases in South Korea since the Korean war, like QueenZira said. My older brother was in the Air Force for 10 years, 3 of those years were spent in Korea. Nothing anyone does at the border & the DMZ is considered a threat unless someone decides to cross the border uninvited. Both North & South Korea have a strong military presence at the border, a few American MP`s are there but they`re basically just tour guides. They literally just stand there all f*cking day staring at each other.
  72. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    March 11, 2013 at 11:40 pm
    N. Korea annulled the 1953 cease fire.

    This can only mean they are ready to start some sh|t.

    So hold onto your hats folks, we may have to send tens of thousands of troops there.
  73. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:08 am
    Obama won`t do it Crakr.
  74. Profile photo of Laran
    Laran Male 40-49
    467 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:46 am
    Kim Jong Un strikes me as a petulent child who has daddy`s keys to the car and wants to drop a burnout.
    He is a spoilt brat who will chuck a tantrum if he doesn`t get his own way.this makes him dangerous and unpredictable.
    He seems likely to take a swing even though he knows what the outcome would be.
    He is on an ego trip because he is "glorious leader" without earning the right for himself.
    everything about him makes me uneasy.
    Even china has backed away from him.Get them patriot missiles and phalanx`s ready boys, you just might need them for this nutter coz he`s unstable
  75. Profile photo of ferdyfred
    ferdyfred Male 40-49
    13602 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:48 am
    S Korea has already said it would flatten NK
    if it starts aggression,
    just a matter of time I guess till the rest of the
    loopy assed countries get involved, then sh it
    will be hitting the fan
  76. Profile photo of ferdyfred
    ferdyfred Male 40-49
    13602 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:50 am
    @Laran
    That was going to be my next comment,
    well done sir :-)
  77. Profile photo of Laran
    Laran Male 40-49
    467 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:54 am
    It seems to me that the two biggest risks on the whole planet is Jong-Un and Ahmadinejad.
    they want to poke the beehive and don`t think they are gonna get stung.
  78. Profile photo of ferdyfred
    ferdyfred Male 40-49
    13602 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 3:02 am
    Like you said
    petulant kids,
    well Im guessing before long,
    the sting is going to be coming,
    and its going to be a hell of a flame war
    this kicks off, Pakistan will probably start on India, just for fun, Iran will start on Israel,
    and everyone one else with a snidey grudge will
    just kick off, WW3 will be on its way
  79. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6203 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 3:58 am
    AuburnJunky

    "Obama won`t do it Crakr."

    Since when is Obama a dove? He has been just as hawkish as most presidents. I mean a week ago he was such a hawk that we "had" to have a filibuster to ensure he wasn`t going to start drone striking Americans on American soil. Now he is a giant pussy who will take s.hit from anyone?
  80. Profile photo of tommy2X4
    tommy2X4 Male 50-59
    3441 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 4:15 am
    See, I got no calluses on my hand.
  81. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 4:49 am
    Hmmm. You may be right HG.
  82. Profile photo of Justin9235
    Justin9235 Male 18-29
    1582 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 5:25 am
    North Korea seems just a little desperate for attention.
  83. Profile photo of SnoopyBG
    SnoopyBG Male 18-29
    653 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 5:53 am
    By US logic NK should`ve been invaded long ago to "free" the people from the despotic regime. There isn`t much to steal there, however.
  84. Profile photo of pompousass7
    pompousass7 Male 40-49
    259 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 7:02 am
    thats right..no oil
  85. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 7:09 am
    Why can`t you send a guided bullet into Dum Jung One`s head?

    We don`t need to make a martyr out of him he`s doing a good job of killing thwe country from the inside out.


  86. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 7:15 am
    @SnoopyBG

    You should go live there and see what "fre" is.

    @piperfawn

    LOL! greaseball taking the anti US approach again! We`ve been there since the Korean War guess they don`t call it the forgotten war for no reason. In fact the wars never been settled so we`re technically still at war. As for why we police the globe it`s because your little clustf**k of a continent started 2 world wars when we didn`t which killed millions upon millions. If you threaten to nuke us ya we`re gonna send a welcoming party.
  87. Profile photo of HalfPintRoo
    HalfPintRoo Female 18-29
    2765 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 7:17 am
    Um, I`m the first to admit I`m ignorant on this topic and I have not read all 85 comments before me, but why wouldn`t we go in there before they got a chance to be stupid?

    If someone said they were going to do harm to me, I would take action to make sure they didn`t have a chance to do so, even if I thought they were just blowing smoke out of their ass
  88. Profile photo of den3jlb
    den3jlb Male 18-29
    364 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 7:33 am
    And in other news, there`s reports of Germany invading Poland...
  89. Profile photo of Vexys
    Vexys Male 18-29
    74 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 8:06 am
    Haven`t china already condemned any attacks North Korea have threatened? And given free reign to the US to retalliate? I`m sure I`ve read that somewhere. China`s economy is simply too reliant on exports now to risk conflict with the west.

    So despite NK potentially being able to launch some nasty stuff at SK and potentially chemical /dirty bombs at the US, defense systems will likely nullify 95% of any air borne threats. They have a well trained and sizeable ground army sure but every bridge across the Han river is already rigged to blow and will be destroyed the second NK moves across the border via tunnels in the DMZ. It would be a matter of days before NK fell
  90. Profile photo of Vexys
    Vexys Male 18-29
    74 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 8:16 am
    Also in my mind the DPRK are just about the worst government in the world right now. I`m sure theres examples of other countries that are very bad but many can be argued to great length about depending on religion, political stance and tonnes of other factors.

    Having spoken to defectors from NK that have been lucky enough to leave relatively guilt free due to having no family for Kim and his ilk to kill as a threat, just about everything that countries government does is absolutely and unequivocally monstrous
  91. Profile photo of Vexys
    Vexys Male 18-29
    74 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 8:31 am
    HalfPintRoo, honestly I`m not sure, I`d like to think (possibly naively) its because a great deal of us would rather solve this without conflict. Not to mention a great deal of their population are innocents under the control of a horrific government. I think invasion would cause alot of casualties for the populous. Waiting for them to move their armies and catch a sizeable chunk of it without suffering huge innocent losses, whilst not being the ultimate solution would be the best way to go about bringing a resolution via conflict
  92. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31795 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 8:39 am
    There`s an "international agreement" that forbids the assassination of another country`s leader, no matter how vile.

    In Desert Storm #1 the USA`s commander spoke of sending a "hit team" to get Saddam and was immediately "relieved of command". It`s a serious treaty!

    The USA is in a no-win situation:
    They invade North Korea (or Syria, or Zimbabewe or a dozen other hell-holes) and THEY are the bad guys.
    If they don`t invade? They get blamed for "not doing anything".

    I`m guilty of that sort of thing too.

    I`ve read that during the Bangladesh Liberation War 1971 there were (apx) 2,000,000 civilian deaths! Puts Syria into perspective...
  93. Profile photo of whodat6484
    whodat6484 Male 30-39
    3907 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 10:45 am
    @5Cats - They invade North Korea (or Syria, or Zimbabewe or a dozen other hell-holes) and THEY are the bad guys. If they don`t invade? They get blamed for "not doing anything".

    That statement is 100% true. You`re damned if you do, damned if you don`t!

    I just read that they "tore up the cease-fire" signed in 1953 after the Korean War after an annual exercise involving the US & South Korea began last night. That`s like a sports team accusing their opponent of cheating for practicing.
  94. Profile photo of spanz
    spanz Male 50-59
    833 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:14 pm
    So, North Korea is posturing to start a war. They have nuclear missiles that could easily reach naval vessels, and possibly Japan/Hawaii. They have proliferated nuclear technology to other countries like Iran, and will continue to do so. They just tore up the 1953 armistice, and are threatening open nuclear war on the US....And you do not want to strike them first and eliminate the threat from these mad dog idiots for what reason??????? I am all ears for you solutions!
  95. Profile photo of Magentab0b
    Magentab0b Female 30-39
    1467 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:14 pm
    The article reminds me of a movie from the late 1950s The Mouse That Roared.
  96. Profile photo of djwajda
    djwajda Male 40-49
    885 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 12:52 pm
    Yep, if we don`t do something and they do attack first then the `peans will cry that we didn`t stop them. If we did strike first the `peans then cry we`re being too aggressive.

    What the N. Koreans fail to tell people when they are whining about the annual exercises is that they are in fact conducting their own military exercises as well.

    `Lil Kim wants so badly to be relevant to the world (and to his own oppressed masses) he`s going to continue to rattle the sabre for all he can.
  97. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 1:09 pm
    @djwajda

    The `peans will cry over anything they can find. It`s all they`ve become good for.

    It takes a real special type not to see the writing on the wall here.
  98. Profile photo of Kegomatix
    Kegomatix Male 18-29
    1341 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 2:44 pm
    Yep, I`d agree with that, damned if we do damned if we don`t. If we were attacked the Europeans would say "well what did you guys expect, they told you they were going to!"
  99. Profile photo of eduardoleon
    eduardoleon Male 18-29
    500 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 7:50 pm
    attention whores lol
  100. Profile photo of freddyferret
    freddyferret Male 40-49
    11742 posts
    March 12, 2013 at 10:43 pm
    Can`t we just nuke those f*ckers off of the planet? Would anyone really care if we did, or would they just slap us on the back and buy us a beer?
  101. Profile photo of richanddead
    richanddead Male 18-29
    3318 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 12:41 am
    North Korea tests tabun and vx gas on kids, trains its doctors on political prisoners without anesthetic, has a cannibalism problem, and lets guard dogs rip people apart for fun. Its average death camp holds 50,000 people like at Yodok and camp 22. Also it is developing nuclear weapons and sells weapons to Iran.
    Yea, this is a country we should go to war with or at least have a "military action". Screw what Europe thinks, they`ve had over 50 years of talking, with the usual results, nothing. Except for the fact that the EU likes to import clothes, electronics, jewelry, machinery, plastic products and salt from the abused and staving slave labor force in NK.


    Death camps:
  102. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 7:39 am

    @ richanddead - "this is a country we should go to war with"
    we already went to war with them.
    The Korean War 1950-53
    They won.
  103. Profile photo of furryblob
    furryblob Male 18-29
    574 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 8:22 am
    North Korea says many things, Iran has no nukes and only energy ambitions N Korea has no energy program and is rapidly developing more nukes. And yet the media tells us there is this grave urgency with Iran? Bullpoo!
  104. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 8:28 am
    They won

    Not really.
  105. Profile photo of richanddead
    richanddead Male 18-29
    3318 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 11:27 am
    @Gerry1of1: I like you man, but they didn`t win. The Chinese had to fight for them or else we would have won in less then a year. And as far as the Chinese were concerned, Peng Dehuai China`s prominent military leader and later Defense Minister was quoted as saying "You should go to the front and see with your own eyes what food and clothing the soldiers have! Not to speak of the casualties! For what are they giving their lives? We have no aircraft. We have only a few guns. Transports are not protected. More and more soldiers are dying of starvation."
    The Armistice was crated by India and it was accepted by the UN. Dwight D. Eisenhower was newly elected, wanted to legitimize the newly formed 10 year old UN so it didn`t end up like the league of nations, and because for the most part American`s were war fatigued from ww2, didn`t want to invest the money, and really didn`t care about Korea, and it didn`t help him politically, hence why it was called "the forgotten war
  106. Profile photo of richanddead
    richanddead Male 18-29
    3318 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 12:08 pm
    @furryblob: Right, Iran only wants enrichment for energy ambitions, sure. And they are willing to go to war over it, oh I get it.

    You don`t need weaponized plutonium for a nuclear reactor. The pressurized heavy water reactor can use unenriched uranium and can permit refueling without shutdowns, the Canadians have their own similar designs as well. But I sure the Iranians just haven`t realized that yet, eh?

    Espeshally when Iran has the world`s second largest reserves of oil. Or if they wanted to be Earth-friendly they also have the world`s second largest reserves of natural gas and multiple thermal energy plants and hydro-electric plants like Karun-3 Dam commissioned in 2006. Iran`s unique geographical position also means 90% of the country has enough sun to generate solar power 300 days a year.

    Yea they really need 3,000 centrifuges for enriching uranium for nuclear power, and it has nothing to do with the US and Israel. Don`t blow rainbows up my ass.
  107. Profile photo of richanddead
    richanddead Male 18-29
    3318 posts
    March 13, 2013 at 12:16 pm
    Alaeddin Boroujerdi, head of Iran`s parliament`s national security and foreign policy committee, already said

    "Fordow will never be shut down because ... our national duty is to be able to defend our nuclear and vital centers against an enemy threat...
    This suggestion (shutting down Fordow) is meant to help the Zionist regime."
  108. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    March 15, 2013 at 8:00 pm

    However they won, chinese backing or not, we were beaten to a standstill. It`s war, winner take all . We lost therefore they won, no matter who backed them.

Leave a Reply