Another Genius Legislator From Colorado

Submitted by: 5cats 4 years ago in

State legislator Claire Levy (D) accidentally tells the truth about "gun control."
There are 44 comments:
Male 206
McGovern, (sigh), UK police have armed response units all over the country. I put in a 999 call about six months ago, within 10 minutes two officers responded, flak jackets, side arms and automatic weapons.
Airports are regularly openly patrolled by officers similarly equipped.
Re an early comment, if you think Eire citizens are scared of the IRA you really do not understand the Irish.
0
Reply
Male 884
Someone`s gonna get fired for telling the truth.
0
Reply
Male 14,332
In the UK the only place police officers can carry a firearm is NI........
0
Reply
Male 14,332
[quote]fascinating how McGovern`s certainty stems from total ignorance of the subject. [/quote]

Much like your knowledge of firearm laws in the US.
0
Reply
Male 206
Fascinating how McGovern`s certainty stems from total ignorance of the subject.
I`m betting I`ve spent more time in the States than McG has in Europe; might even be true of Davy.
0
Reply
Male 14,332
[quote]During my own travels (my family originate there) round the Republic I couldn`t find one Irish citizen who wanted unification with the North. [/quote]

Yes and I`m sure the ones that want too talk freely about it because that wouldn`t potentially compromise their saftey/freedom.
0
Reply
Male 14,332
Oi, dipsh*tdavy, don`t tell me about the US. Ask me about it and I`ll tell you what it is like, but don`t pretend to tell me about it. Otherwise it`s all fair game.
0
Reply
Male 14,332
[quote]"We don`t want a million angry feckin` Protestants dumped on us!"[/quote]

That`s because they belong in the UK. Afterall it`s were they came from. Close to 100 years of conflict which your blessed royalty could`ve ended from the start by simply leaving. Must be a conspiricyzzz!!! NI HAZ DA OIL DEPOZITZ!!
0
Reply
Male 12,138
[quote]How`d that work out for N. Ireland again???[/quote]
Oi, dipsh*t, McGovern. Talking to you. You couldn`t get guns in Northern Ireland, so back in the day all the guns were shipped in from Libya. Thankfully most of them were caught at the border, whether by boat or airplane. How much more of a clusterf*ck warzone would it have been if anyone of age and of sound mind (which let`s face it, is the vast majority of the population) would have been allowed to buy guns at the local equivalent of Walmart, and swap them around like Christmas Crackers?

Making guns hard to obtain is not a bad idea.

Also, don`t tell me about Northern Ireland. Ask me about it and I`ll tell you what it was like, but don`t pretend to tell me about it.
0
Reply
Male 206
Oh, McGovern 1981, how little you understand.
Majority of population in NI Protestant - want to be British (hence the Partition).
Recent poll showed slightly over half the Catholics in NI wanted to remain in Britain. Even assuming over estimate by a factor of 2, still real majority of NI population want to remain part of the UK.
Referendum of Eire population in the run up to the Good Friday agreement rescinded all claims of the Republic to NI by close to 80% majority.
During my own travels (my family originate there) round the Republic I couldn`t find one Irish citizen who wanted unification with the North.
"We don`t want a million angry feckin` Protestants dumped on us!"
0
Reply
Male 14,332
Hard to say mabey it would`ve gotten the UK out of where they don`t belong solving the problem for good.

Also, don`t tell me about the US. Ask me about it and I`ll tell you what it is like, but don`t pretend to tell me about it.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
[quote]How`d that work out for N. Ireland again???[/quote]
Oi, dipsh*t, McGovern. Talking to you. You couldn`t get guns in Northern Ireland, so back in the day all the guns were shipped in from Libya. Thankfully most of them were caught at the border, whether by boat or airplane. How much more of a clusterf*ck warzone would it have been if anyone of age and of sound mind (which let`s face it, is the vast majority of the population) would have been allowed to buy guns at the local equivalent of Walmart, and swap them around like Christmas Crackers?

Making guns hard to obtain is not a bad idea.

Also, don`t tell me about Northern Ireland. Ask me about it and I`ll tell you what it was like, but don`t pretend to tell me about it.
0
Reply
Male 37,697
@MacGovern: It`s true, the British are polite like that, eh?

Customer: I`d like to buy a gun please.
Salesman: You must have a liscence, permit, background check, 30 day wait period...
C: Oh no! I`m a terrorist, and plan to shoot the coppers tomorrow!
S: Oh well then! 25 pounds & fifty, here you go! Cheeri-o!
0
Reply
Male 37,697
iirc: The IRA used many "home built" guns too.

Fact remains: it`s a "race-based gang issue". Get rid of "The War On Drugs" and 80% of it would vanish.
Same for those huge murder rates in Central and South America. Much of it is driven by "drug cartels" who are makin zillions shipping drugs to... THE USA!

And since the Democrats are sending arms to the Cartels? While imposing sanctions on certain legitimate governments? I doubt this will change any time soon...
0
Reply
Male 14,332
@mikesex

SO gun laws don`t apply to terrorists then??? So that`s how they got those ebil guns and explosives!!!
0
Reply
Male 206
@McGovern1981

Northern Ireland is a terrorist issue. Different thing entirely.
0
Reply
Male 2,357
@davymid

[quote]it wasn`t written by Jesus or God or Moses[/quote]
Of course not. However, it is an Amendment in the Bill of Rights. To attempt to alter it should be discussed with the same concern and distrust as any other - such as the right to free speech. If you are not willing to discuss the alteration of the First Amendment, then you should also be unwilling to alter the Second.

[quote]I would just like to please not get shot in the face[/quote]
Considering that, on any day, on the average, you have a 0.0000088% chance of being murdered with a gun in the US - I think you`ll be fine.

See, the argument comes down to viewpoints. In your suggestion, you mitigate statistics by sacrificing individuals. The logic is that you can limit the amount of damage an attacker can do. However, this approach does not consider the person being attacked and whether or not it is fair to disarm them.

0
Reply
Male 14,332
[quote]If you don`t have a gun, and I don`t have a gun, then it`s hard for either one of us to shoot me in the face. That makes me happy. [/quote]

How`d that work out for N. Ireland again???
0
Reply
Male 10,339
"If you don`t have a gun, and I don`t have a gun, then it`s hard for either one of us to shoot me in the face."

BUT... If I don`t have a gun, and you don`t have a gun, Tyrone (or Chaz if you think that`s racist) from across the tracks has one. He also has a rap sheet a mile long and has no regard for the law. He`s gonna shoot us both in the face, because he knows we won`t and can`t do anything about it.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
[quote] Liberalism: The idea that allowing two people of the same sex to get married is somehow more important to our existence than the Second Amendment. [/quote]
See, this is where it get`s funky. With the ultimate respect I can possibly offer, I`m not American. I don`t give a f*ck about your Second Amendment, it wasn`t written by Jesus or God or Moses. It`s not sacrosanct. I`m a world citizen who travels to the US a lot. I would just like to please not get shot in the face if at all possible. If you don`t have a gun, and I don`t have a gun, then it`s hard for either one of us to shoot me in the face. That makes me happy.
0
Reply
Male 4,394
Again both extremes are idiots. Here is a town where the mayor set a law three years ago that requires the head of every household to own some kind of weapon (Criminals and the mentally ill are exempt). Why the need for the law? "There`s a big push out there to take away our right to keep and bear arms." So the Mayor`s whole argument is based on fear and lies. Sounds about right in line with the arguments on both sides.
0
Reply
Male 37,697
[quote]Let`s reduce the number of guns.[/quote]
A FINE idea @davymid! First lets remove the "already illegal" guns. Then take the guns away from criminals, who already illegally own them.

AFTER you get the guns which are CURRENTLY illegal? THEN you can think about taking them away from law-abiding citizens.

No need to pass "new laws" at all: just enforce the ones which currenly exist...

Passing "laws" which do absolutely nothing? Isn`t an intelligent option...
0
Reply
Male 2,357
@davymid

[quote]Let`s reduce the number of guns.[/quote]This is a red herring, though. Across the other 23 first world nations (excluding the US as an outlier), there is actually an obvious inverse trend between guns per capita and homicides per capita.

Stated plainly, on the average, first world countries with more guns per capita enjoy less homicides per capita.

So what`s my point then? It`s that gun ownership rates are not the cause of the problems. Most likely, there is another factor at work in the US that needs to be examined. In my opinion, it`s culture.
0
Reply
Male 2,357
@RobSwindol

Liberalism: The idea that allowing two people of the same sex to get married is somehow more important to our existence than the Second Amendment.

See? We can all do it - doesn`t make it any more correct.
0
Reply
Male 37,697
This is what the "gun control" movement is all about: Grabbing Your Guns!
They don`t want YOU to have that right any longer, so they`ll pass enough laws to (eventually) take ALL your guns away! Just like Australia.
Of course criminals will still have guns, as will the Police...

Don`t listen to the lies: It`s not about "safety" it`s not about "the children" it`s ALL about taking legal guns OUT of the hands of legal owners.

Oh, and spending 100s of BILLIONS of "taxpayer dollars" doing exactly nothing. That too.
0
Reply
Male 2,521
Conservatism: The idea that allowing two people of the same sex to get married is somehow more threatening to our existance than an object specifically designed to destroy life.
0
Reply
Female 7,866
Gerry- Crakr reckons everyone should have a gun. Never seen a handgun. Shotguns yes, because I live rurally. I know a couple of people who own a rifle for deer but those are always locked up if not in use. Handgun- never set eyes on one- and i have lived and travelled all over the UK. Seen holsters when abroad- but never once a gun in anyones hands. I feel safe like that because if there is no gun to attack me you would have to come up close to get hold of me- then I could fight.
0
Reply
Male 560
@Gerry1of1 Let`s give every country nuclear weapons, that way we`ll have no war or conflict because victim countries have a way to fight back :D
0
Reply
Male 38,457

Davymid, exactly! You`ve had guns pointed at your head in the US because the bad guys have the guns {the cops and others} so the only sane recourse is to arm the victims. At least give them a chance to defend themselves against rapists and robbers.
0
Reply
Male 11,740
Thanks davymid, it`s good to know that there are a few sane people still left.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
Look, I grew up in Belfast, Northern Ireland, at the height of the Troubles, a legitimate f*cking warzone. Yet I`ve had a gun pointed in my face exactly twice, both times in the US, one of which by a cop while reaching for my drivers licence (which he asked me for). One wrong move and I`d have been headless.

More guns is the answer? I suggest not. Call me a bleeding-heart liberal, libtard, leftist, whatever (heard it all before). I don`t care.

No offense at all meant to my American friends, but I felt safer in Northern Ireland than I do visiting the US. And no, before you ask, the prospect of the random guy at the next table having a concealed firearm when sh*t goes all Tarantino gives me no comfort.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
Gun free zones = Unarmed victim zones.

Jesus Harold Christ Crakrjak, really?

So your solution to reducing the number of gun death victims is to give everyone a gun? Here`s a radical and diametrically opposite idea. Let`s reduce the number of guns.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
Gun free zones = Unarmed victim zones.
0
Reply
Male 761
I personally would love to ban that GOD DAMN STUPID SONG!
0
Reply
Male 4,394
I`m tired of all these knee jerk gun reactions and these stupid partisan posts. Both sides are idiots. The anti-gun people are acting without thinking and the pro-gun people are doing the same with arming our teachers. F*cking knee jerks.
0
Reply
Male 37,697
This clueless bint is making laws in the USA? Oy!

It`s honest of her to admit there`s NO relationship between "gun free zones" and violent crime. Of course she still wants them... idiots.
0
Reply
Male 38,457

It`s rediculous to have a law, then limit where the law works and where it doesn`t. Not at a college which is full of adults, then why not make all Malls gun-free zones? That didn`t work out too well for Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. She was shot in the head at a Mall that was a gun-free zone.

0
Reply
Male 15,832
What, then, IS the purpose of the bill?
0
Reply
Male 2,460
The whole point of the legislation isn`t to reduce any crime. It`s to make people on campus feel better. I heard it right from their very mouths.
0
Reply
Male 1,268
http://tinyurl.com/9w9tqyt

She killed the bill herself. While it would`ve been interesting to try and find out what the purpose of the bill was, if not to attempt to reduce violence, the point is moot. It`s gone.

The bills that were killed, were done so rightly. Those that passed onto the Senate, are all bills worth some rational consideration.
0
Reply
Male 636
It wasn`t an accident, she said violent crime not gun crime. Most violent crimes don`t involve guns.
0
Reply
Male 2,756
I would like to propose a bill that creates a new holiday; Pop a politician day- a day each year that it`s legal to shoot politicians.
I don`t know if this will increase or reduce gun violence, but well... you know.
0
Reply
Male 38,457

So many facepalms. So little time.


0
Reply
Male 37,697
Link: Another Genius Legislator From Colorado [Rate Link] - State legislator Claire Levy (D) accidentally tells the truth about `gun control.`
0
Reply