Celebutards in 39 Pics: In Magazines Vs. Real Life

Submitted by: fancylad 4 years ago in Entertainment

Don"t feel so bad--no one looks as good as these supposedly "hot" female celebutards do in magazines.
There are 26 comments:
Female 1,236
lol. Take enough photos of anyone & you`re bound to get several clunkers.
0
Reply
Female 87
Cellulite is very common and both thin and chunky women get it, it`s often simply genetic.
People who believe magazines are twonks.
0
Reply
Male 1,931
Some of them look better in real life than in the magazines, to be honest. A lot of them are just disgustingly thin, though. They look half dead.
0
Reply
Male 567
T_T

Lies.... all lies!
0
Reply
Male 13,630
posts like this ought to be chucked in every
teenagers faces, just to stop em from starving themselves and going all emo n crap n tits
0
Reply
Male 1,106
We already knew that`s how bad Kate Moss looked... but many of these are just catching people in the worst possible light.
0
Reply
Male 296
Cottage cheese anyone
0
Reply
Female 631
ooouuhhuuhh.. cellulitis...

but still a lot of these photos are not flattering and also a great deal of the "model" photos and "real" photos are years apart.. people do grow older...
0
Reply
Female 6,381
1) I`ll take my wrinkly undersized ass over Coco`s monstrosity.
2) I have better thighs than Mischa Barton!
3) I have Kesha`s figure!
And that`s all I have to say about that.
0
Reply
Female 1,682
Holy poo, you mean that if celebrities bend forward, their skin doesn`t remain flat and flawless? And you`re also telling me that most women have at least some cellulite? ... Mind BLOWN!

^Exactly what I was thinking...
0
Reply
Male 1,045
So to recap, they`re pretty much all hot, keisha and tara reid notwithstanding.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Those saggy butts smooth out real nice when you get their ankles up behind their ears.
0
Reply
Male 459
If these magazines didn`t go to great lengths to point out and shame women for having cellulite, I really don`t think it would be that much of an issue.
0
Reply
Male 39,893

I agreee with chalketard... wait, no I don`t
0
Reply
Female 457
Holy poo, you mean that if celebrities bend forward, their skin doesn`t remain flat and flawless? And you`re also telling me that most women have at least some cellulite? ... Mind BLOWN!
0
Reply
Male 2,440
Kelly Brook looks great in both pictures. And Jennifer Love Hewitt looked hot as hell in "Heartbreakers." Shapely and petite.
0
Reply
Male 335
Ya, ya, real life sucks. But thanks for reminding me.
0
Reply
Male 7,774
Is it any wonder gullible young girls make themselves ill trying to match these false images?
0
Reply
Male 51
Some of the real vs magazine pics have a 20 year time difference. So there`s that...
0
Reply
Male 2,675
Sorry, I have the temptation to call bullpoo on some of these. Yes, I know celebs are photoshopped into unreality, but honestly I think many of these "real" photos are photoshopped the OTHER way.
0
Reply
Male 3,894
Kesha is a rectangle.
0
Reply
Male 2,711
Fancy, I`d like to suggest a belated New Year`s resolution for you and this site: NO MORE APPENDING `TARD` ONTO THINGS TO MAKE THEM DEROGATORY. It just makes you look stupid and insensitive. (Not that you`re not possibly both, but why reinforce it?)
0
Reply
Male 2,988
i dunno, either they do more photoshop than i thought or some of these "real version" pictures are not actually that persn
0
Reply
Female 8,045
Oddly that helps- I have no idea who half of these women are but at least my thick waist and cellulite looks less freakish now!!
0
Reply
Male 1,015
"Celebutards" really ????
0
Reply
Male 20,901
Link: Celebutards in 39 Pics: In Magazines Vs. Real Life [Rate Link] - Don`t feel so bad--no one looks as good as these supposedly `hot` female celebutards do in magazines.
0
Reply