Revealing The Truth

Submitted by: piperfawn 4 years ago

From art to reality.
There are 20 comments:
Male 2,290
It did lose all of its emotion though. The eyes use the downward slanted angles, and darkening to make them look sad. Those eyes are sad.
0
Reply
Male 2,290
There is nothing depraved about his mind. Perhaps it wasn`t like yours in a lot of ways, but it doesn`t make him depraved. He was a genius.
0
Reply
Female 1,467
I didn`t get it. Like it was erasing the painting to show the reality underneath but like it lost some of it`s emotion. If it was another painting inside like the id and ego thoughts I would have dug that cause it`s like pretentious but nope just a digital painting/photo of the thing we were already looking at. Maybe it was supposed to illustrate that there are other artists capable of doing master level work but for a modern era but idk it lacked the passion of the mentally depraved.
0
Reply
Female 1,236
I really liked this. Thanks!
0
Reply
Male 3,631
That`s pretty cool
0
Reply
Male 5,019
InTheNameOf that don`t work with Gerry he use...IE
0
Reply
Female 267
Agrees with drawman61 and McThstlpnts. I just thought it was interesting...
0
Reply
Male 7,775
piperfawn, there are people on here that will argue black is white and up is down because that`s all they have in their life. You don`t have to justify yourself. It was interesting, do more plz.
0
Reply
Male 335
No adds for me....the add block plugin makes sure I don`t have to see them!
0
Reply
Male 37,914

Do you guys ever click on the ads?
`Cause that ad for "Grilled Chicken with a Twist" sounds delicious.
0
Reply
Male 646
It`s weird to think that paintings used to be the only method of visual representation. I once saw an ad for a photo studio from the early 1900`s that showed a photograph and a painting side by side. The ad said something like

"Photographic technology has advanced so much that now you can hardly tell the difference between a painting and a photograph!"
0
Reply
Male 5,019
Wow guys calm down... i didn`t think to create such a debate .Is just a little work that pretend to unveil reality from abstract, in no way i post that to debase "Art". Pfweew! ;-)
0
Reply
Female 1,540
Was this done to make it "look better"? I assumed that it was just bringing to reality how Van Gogh perceived himself. Which, of course, would be a bit different from how he actually looked. I don`t believe this was done to take away from the artistic value of the original work.
0
Reply
Male 259
Yes... because Realism is the epitome of art...

I`d rather look at cave paintings from the paleolithic era than at computer generated poo that attempts to make actual art look "better."

Using a computer to create is one thing. Using it to make something that is already beautiful "better" is retarded.
0
Reply
Male 809
what a waste of time
0
Reply
Male 1,216
There`s also this:

0
Reply
Male 1,216
There`s an actual photo of Van Goch, and he looks quite different from the painting.




0
Reply
Male 3,578
why the drat would you do that!
do you not get the point of ART!


why does this make me so angery?
0
Reply
Male 486
Original`s better. It just is.
0
Reply
Male 5,019
Link: Revealing The Truth [Rate Link] - From art to reality.
0
Reply