The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 21    Average: 2.6/5]
70 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 8504
Rating: 2.6
Category: Funny
Date: 01/30/13 12:33 PM

70 Responses to Gun FAILS

  1. Profile photo of Oliwood
    Oliwood Male 18-29
    28 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 12:35 pm
    Link: Gun FAILS - Second Amendment Rights Gone Wrong
  2. Profile photo of robthelurker
    robthelurker Male 18-29
    2873 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 12:48 pm
    clearly people do not deserve the right to bear arms.
  3. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 12:56 pm
    Cleary rob is a buffoon.
  4. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33132 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 12:57 pm
    The last one was the best :-)
  5. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:03 pm
    Blaming the second amendment for this is like blaming Betty Crocker for cutting yourself with a knife.

    Also not all of those are Americans, and many (not all) of them were learning the proper use of a gun at what appeared to be gun ranges. Of those who were learning the proper use of a gun (as they should), they have learned a valuable lesson, and will most likely not make the same mistake.
  6. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:06 pm
    Well I for one feel so much safer now knowing these ersatz John Waynes are out there protecting us. Or something...
  7. Profile photo of Mantistador
    Mantistador Male 18-29
    2200 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:08 pm
    funny how quick the biggest gangster wanna-be turns into the biggest little puss ever... "you ain`t nothin" *POW* "MY MOMS GUNNA KILL ME!"
  8. Profile photo of technophebe
    technophebe Male 30-39
    25 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:31 pm
    I was going to say In B4 gun apologists saying "that`s not fair!" but looks like I`m too late.

    @MrPeabody "they have learned a valuable lesson"?

    Oh well that`s fantastic, tell that to the families of the tens of thousands of people who lose their lives annually due to firearms: "don`t worry love, I know your son accidentally killed your other son because you left a loaded gun lying around, but at least he learned a valuable lesson!"

  9. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:48 pm
    I blame the first amendment for the eyes that got gouged by pencils.
  10. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:49 pm
    robthelurker-"clearly people do not deserve the right to bear arms."

    You don`t deserve that computer. Come on, hand it over.

    Several of these are not in the US, so the 2nd Amendment does not apply.

    Some people are not responsible with guns. Same can be said of cars, knives, blunt objects, computers and Freedoms (to name a few).

    They will take away your cars, computers and freedoms when you demonstrate you can not be responsible with it.

    But for some reason, small minded idiots want to take away guns from EVERYONE prior to any such demonstration.
  11. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:52 pm
    @technophebe

    Do you sit down when pissing???
  12. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 1:59 pm
    Calling for banning guns based on this would be comparable to banning cars based on all of the Russian Driving videos on IAB.

    Or banning bikes, skateboards and playground equipment based on all the Fail vidoes posted.
  13. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:04 pm
    Swimming pools kill more children than guns. OUTLAW HIGH CAPACITY SWIMMING POOLS!!! No more than 10" of water.....
  14. Profile photo of technophebe
    technophebe Male 30-39
    25 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:10 pm
    Cajun, number of people killed in pencil related accidents/suicides/homicides last year? 10 maybe? Number of gun related? A thousand time that. Now I can tell you with absolute *certainty* that there are a lot more pencils in the US than guns.

    Guns are tools for KILLING. That is their only purpose. Hunting = KILLING. Target shooting = practice for KILLING.

    Fine, let the militia keep their guns, like it says in the constitution, but for gods sake get them out of the hands of the public who are by gods A THOUSAND times too stupid to handle them safely.

    It is not a "natural right" to own a tool designed purely for efficient killing just on the *minute* off chance that you get an opportunity to use it legitimately *and* have the presence of mind not to just spray bullets randomly about. Your family are in vastly more danger from the ACTUAL gun in your closet than the IMAGINED at-some-point-in-the-future home intruder.
  15. Profile photo of technophebe
    technophebe Male 30-39
    25 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:14 pm
    And that argument is equally tired and invalid when applied to cars or swimming pools you morons.

    Stop regurgitating whatever you heard Alex Jones said and come up with your own valid argument for gun ownership - oh wait, there isn`t one. Losers.
  16. Profile photo of drawman61
    drawman61 Male 50-59
    7751 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:19 pm
    And you lot want to be trusted. I wouldn`t trust you to make it across the f*****g road safely.
  17. Profile photo of Linkenberger
    Linkenberger Male 18-29
    1164 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:21 pm
    I think if you put a minimum IQ bar for gun owners you`d seriously reduce gun crime in the states.

    Guns are kinda like money; you give a good guy money, you get a good guy with more influence. You give an idiot money, you get an idiot with more influence.
  18. Profile photo of 13thDoctor
    13thDoctor Male 30-39
    48 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:23 pm
    Dude at 1:02 is lucky as hell. And a moron for not looking down into the chamber
  19. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:33 pm
    "Second Amendment Rights Gone Wrong"

    Is the footage of crazy people with easily obtained guns murdering children? Because if so, I don`t want to watch it.
  20. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:37 pm
    MeGrendel

    "They will take away your cars.. when you demonstrate you can not be responsible with it"

    Yes. However, here is a HUGE difference. You have to EARN the right to drive and demonstrate that you can do it before you get a license to be able to drive legally. Remember driver`s ed? The driving test?

    So would you support a similar process for gun ownership? Take a class, pass a written test, and then demonstrate an ability to operate it safely before you get a license to operate or posses a gun?
  21. Profile photo of Pandabee
    Pandabee Female 40-49
    857 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:50 pm
    Who was it who said, `don`t restrict the guns, just make bullets 5 Grand each, cause if someone does get shot, they had it coming!`
  22. Profile photo of r66tramp
    r66tramp Male 40-49
    674 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 2:52 pm
    Some jerk 17 year old almost wasted me on the range in Gagetown, New Brunswick during a missfire after jamming his riffle during basic training. All I saw was dirt flying up around me and a Master Corporal jumping the kid and pounding his face into mush. I told the instructors to go f-themselves and I stayed on range and finished my live practice shots that day. True story!
  23. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 3:14 pm
    @Pandabee: Chris Rock said that.
  24. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 3:17 pm
    So would you support a similar process for gun ownership? Take a class, pass a written test, and then demonstrate an ability to operate it safely before you get a license to operate or posses a gun?
    No, because the government has already proven itself woefully inadequate at determining user proficiency - as is evidenced by the millions of accidents each year. It would only be a gigantic waste of money.

    Guns are kinda like money; you give a good guy money, you get a good guy with more influence. You give an idiot money, you get an idiot with more influence.
    This is brilliant - I may have to steal it from you a time or two.
  25. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3286 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 3:30 pm
    technophebe: "Fine, let the militia keep their guns, like it says in the constitution,"

    Good idea! And let`s keep the guns in the hands of the people, because, like you said, "like it says in the constitution"!

    "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
  26. Profile photo of Pandabee
    Pandabee Female 40-49
    857 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 3:35 pm
    @ FoolsPrussia: That is it! Chris Rock, thank you.
  27. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 3:51 pm
    Guns are tools for KILLING. That is their only purpose. Hunting = KILLING. Target shooting = practice for KILLING.

    Ya no sporting purpose whatsoever it`a not like the Olympics has competitions involving them....
  28. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 3:53 pm
    `don`t restrict the guns, just make bullets 5 Grand each, cause if someone does get shot, they had it coming!`

    Ya it`s not like you can reload shell casings LOL!!!!
  29. Profile photo of Kegomatix
    Kegomatix Male 18-29
    1341 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 4:00 pm
    It does scare the crap out of me that people like this own guns. I went to a party at a buddies house once and he had a friend there that I didn`t know. This guy was waving his gun around like an idiot, fully loaded clip but he claimed nothing was in the chamber. He was pointing it at people thinking he was being funny, and I gave him one warning to be sure he doesn`t point it at me. He did, and I put his ass to sleep and I was asked to leave, like I was in the wrong! I gladly left because that is how idiots with guns kill others or themselves.
  30. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 4:49 pm
    DuckBoy87

    "Good idea! And let`s keep the guns in the hands of the people, because, like you said, "like it says in the constitution"!

    "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

    The 2nd amendment says:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    Those commas seem relevant to me. Let me give you an example. Let`s say I have a law that says:

    "Universal accessibility, being important to the blind, dogs in restaurants and all other public places shall be allowed."

    Now, do you read that as all dogs are allowed in all restaurants for any reason whatsoever?

    We may differ on our interpretation of what the founding fathers truly meant, but you can`t deny that analogy is spot on.


  31. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 5:03 pm
    technophebe-"valid argument for gun ownership"

    Actually, an argument for gun ownership is not required.

    HolyGod-"Remember driver`s ed? The driving test?"

    Neither required to purchase,own or drive a car.

    And your `interpretation` sucks ass.
  32. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 5:12 pm
    Megrendel

    "Neither required to purchase,own or drive a car."

    Really? I had to pass a driving test to get my license. I have to have a license to legally operate my car. You didn`t / don`t?

    "And your `interpretation` sucks ass."

    How so? It is a matter of grammar and whether they intended to have the second part stand on its own or simply refine the first. My point is that no sane person would read the dog law and assume it meant all dogs were allowed in restaurants.

    In my reading, if they wanted all people to own guns, and NOT just those in a well regulated militia then the first part is COMPLETELY redundant and superfluous. Why not simply say " The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." and leave it at that? Why specify anything further if you intend for everyone to have a gun?
  33. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 5:25 pm
    I have to marvel at folks who go all "2ND AMENDMENT1!1" right away all the time.

    It always makes me wonder whether or not they know any other amendment in the Constitution (1st isn`t going to cut it, & no love for the 3rd? Jayzus it must be so lonely just sitting there all the time) let alone have a comprehensive understanding of those other amendments.

    It`s a marvelous document peeps, and if all you can do is boil it down to BANG BANG, you`ve already missed the basic point of it all anyway.
  34. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33132 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 5:49 pm
    @QueenZira: The first 10 "Amendments" form the
    United States Bill Of Rights
    which is one of the landmarks of human freedom.

    Attacking one part of the BoR weakens the rest, which is exactly what "the left" desires.
    "Domino Effect"
    "Hole in the dike"
    "Weakest Link"
    These all apply, and more.
  35. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 5:56 pm
    I`m so glad you can google there poindexter, and you did it in your finest tin foil too, stunning. But that isn`t going to replace a decent scholarly understanding of the Constitution.

    Besides, you dwell under the kindly expansive folds of The Maple Leaf, won`t your country feel sad and left out if you don`t tend to Her first?
  36. Profile photo of HalfPintRoo
    HalfPintRoo Female 18-29
    2765 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 6:18 pm
    I`m all for gun rights (you know this from other posts)

    BUT

    If you have to film yourself holding your gun to show your coolness... you should own one.
  37. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 6:36 pm
    LMAO ... yeah, I`m a bad ass muhfuh... *BANG!* ..." my mom`s gonna kill me."

    *falls over laughing*
  38. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 6:37 pm
    P.S. Let`s put the 2nd Amendment back in the context of who wrote it and when ... then you can own alllll the muzzle loading muskets you want.
  39. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3286 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 6:41 pm
    @HolyGod, I understand where you`re coming from, but I disagree that your analogy is spot on.

    They way I read the second amendment is in two parts: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, ..., shall not be infringed." -- This part meaning that a well regulated militia will always be around.

    And: "..., the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." -- This part meaning that people may own guns.

    Ok, so I don`t agree with your analogy because the first part of your analogy points to nothing, where the 2nd points to the Miltia.
    After the first comma, it`s fine: they parallel.
    After the second comma, your analogy parallels what`s after the third comma in the 2nd.
  40. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3286 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 6:45 pm
    Runemang: "P.S. Let`s put the 2nd Amendment back in the context of who wrote it and when ... then you can own alllll the muzzle loading muskets you want."

    @Runemang, P.S. Let`s put the 1st Amendment back in the context of who wrote it and when ... then you may speak freely via the medium of newsprint, and not via radio, not via TV, not via internet; after all, the founding fathers couldn`t imagine the technology that we have today.
  41. Profile photo of Shelworth
    Shelworth Male 50-59
    389 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 6:45 pm
    Sorry, not "gun fails", should be "idiot fails". In not one of those clips was the gun at fault.
  42. Profile photo of DFWBrysco
    DFWBrysco Male 40-49
    307 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 7:18 pm
    `Sorry, not "gun fails", should be "idiot fails". In not one of those clips was the gun at fault.`

    @Shelworth - You are absolutely right... but the problem is that it is idiots like this that make up a goodly portion of gun owners, and are usually the first to run screaming "2nd Amendment! 2nd Amendment!" anytime someone wants to talk about responsible gun ownership and restrictions.
  43. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 8:06 pm
    HolyGod-"I had to pass a driving test to get my license."

    We were talking car purchase, ownership and operation. Not license. Different subject.

    HolyGod-"I have to have a license to legally operate my car. You didn`t / don`t? "

    Nope. A license is not require to purchase, own or operate a car. Please let me know if that simple concept needs to be explained to you.

    DuckBoy87-"you may speak freely via the medium of newsprint"

    And the newsprint can only be printed on a hand-screw type press, which after all was state-of-the-art at the time, and is obviously the only thing they had in mind when then wrote the 1st Amendment (oh, and the popular apple crate in the town square).


  44. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 8:14 pm
    DFWBrysco-" idiots like this that make up a goodly portion of gun owners"

    Let`s see, 270 million privately owned guns in the United States, and you could find 20 examples for this video (and you had to go OUTSIDE the US for several of them).

    seven/millionths of a percent hardly qualifies as `a goodly portion`.
  45. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 8:16 pm
    Runemang-"Let`s put the 2nd Amendment back in the context of who wrote it and when"

    The context is that we would have the right to carry the deadliest man-portable weapon available.
  46. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 8:17 pm
    "but the problem is that it is idiots like this that make up a goodly portion of gun owners"

    the best estimates are about 45% or 52 million of American households own 260 million guns

    So just what "goodly portion" of those 52 million households misuse guns? I would bet it`s a pretty small percentage.
  47. Profile photo of DromEd
    DromEd Male 40-49
    1945 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 8:19 pm
    HG...I don`t remember exactly who but either Andrew or HA (in another thread weeks ago) explained quite accurately why the militia sentence is included in the 2A. Please don`t insult us by pretending you didn`t read it and don`t make us repeat it.
  48. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 9:06 pm
    @QueenZira
    It`s a marvelous document peeps, and if all you can do is boil it down to BANG BANG, you`ve already missed the basic point of it all anyway.

    It is a marvelous document, and unfortunately you have missed the point. The first thing the founding fathers did after securing the rights of freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petitioning a governmental redress of grievances (all the ways the previous governments had used to control the people), they ensured the people would have the means to defend those freedoms from their government: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

    As for the other Amendments they as well as the rest of the amendments are worth a hill of beans without the first two. They are also not being attacked at this time.
  49. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 9:09 pm
    they as well as the rest of the amendments
    they as well as the rest of the Constitution
  50. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 9:34 pm
    MeGrendel

    "Nope. A license is not require to... operate a car. Please let me know if that simple concept needs to be explained to you."

    Explain it to me. To legally drive a car you need a driver`s license. Unless you are trying to split hairs and say you can drive it up and down your driveway without a license or something else as ridiculous.
  51. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 9:44 pm
    The fact that you even bring up the bugf%ck crazy argument that the framers wanted people shooting at *them* as they drafted it tells me you don`t have a clue how that amendment has been interpreted through our history. Hint, it was not seen as a right to armed treason.

    If you really subscribe to that, do you also believe average people should have the right to mini nukes? Because after all, you`re in an arms race with your own damn govt?

    Better question yet, would you be willing to shoot a uniformed American army serviceman/woman now? That`s right, do you have the absolute gall to tell me you can shoot one of our own right this very moment? Stars and Stripes on their backs and everything?

    Because if you can, you belong in a nice padded cell somewhere, preferably with a police escort.

  52. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 9:45 pm
    "They as well as the rest of the Constitution."

    You wouldn`t know what`s in the Constitution if it bit you in the a$$.
  53. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:03 pm
    I never get tired of seeing that DEA dickwad shoot himself in the foot. It`s truly sublime.
  54. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:35 pm
    [quote">tells me you don`t have a clue how that amendment has been interpreted through our history. Hint, it was not seen as a right to armed treason.[/quote">

    That statement better describes yourself actually

    @technophebe

    You own a gun, you accept the risks same thing goes when you don`t. It also does not follow that disarming otherwise law-abiding citizenry as a whole will make society overall safer. Likewise it has been demonstrated that gun ownership provides a significant deterrent effect against crime. Thus it could decrease the odds of attacking your home while not affecting those of injury or death within it.
  55. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:37 pm
    Cajun, you`re gonna have to do better than a gun fetishist web site sweetie. I expected more from you...
  56. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:38 pm
    Incidentally, how do *you* feel about shooting uniformed American regular army? Inquiring minds wanna know.
  57. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:49 pm
    Incidentally, how do *you* feel about shooting uniformed American regular army? Inquiring minds wanna know.

    Just ask...
    Chechnyans (best example), IRA (second best),
    PLO, Al Qaeda affiliates, Iraqi and Afghani insurgents, Vietcong, Taureg fighters and other Malian insurgents.

    The last 20 years of horrifically stupid foreign policy (and some episodes within the cold war) has demonstrated that even loose knit and unorganized militia cells can pose major challenges for any professional army.

    you`re gonna have to do better than a gun fetishist web site sweetie.

    Actually this was a website that suggested enforcing current gun control we already have now, so no not the loons you`d expect from Wayne LaPierre.
  58. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:56 pm
    No you misunderstand me. I ask does any gap toothed, inbred, frightened out of his bean American redneck who believes "Tyranny" is nigh have the right to shoot our own military personnel?

    Because when you get right down to it this is what every mouth breather really means when they talk about "Tyranny," the tyranny of his own government.

    I`ll try again, does the aforementioned redneck have the right to shoot and kill uniformed US regular military?
  59. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6912 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 10:57 pm
    QueenZira

    "Hint, it was not seen as a right to armed treason."

    Gotta counter you there.

    Thomas Jefferson
    "What country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms."


  60. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 11:00 pm
    HG, the founders were of many minds on a lot of things and not everything they wrote is a reflection on the Constitution. And there is a long history of interpretation of the 2nd that does *not* embrace paranoid insurrection as it`s meaning.
  61. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 11:05 pm
    I ask does any gap toothed, inbred, frightened out of his bean American redneck who believes "Tyranny" is nigh have the right to shoot our own military personnel?

    Well if said soldier IS plundering said redneck`s land, for whatever illegitimate reason, then yes.

    "Even a paranoid can have enemies."
    -Henry Kissinger
  62. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    January 30, 2013 at 11:10 pm
    And there is a long history of interpretation of the 2nd that does *not* embrace paranoid insurrection as it`s meaning.

    On the other hand there is ALSO a long history of interpretation that treats the militia part of the 2nd as a RATIONALE not a QUALIFIER.
  63. Profile photo of carmium
    carmium Female 50-59
    6381 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 12:05 am
    This vid is yet another cogent argument for everyone should have the unimpeded right to bear arms. (And also an illustration of why far more people are killed by accident each year than in acts of self-defense.)
  64. Profile photo of avail9988
    avail9988 Male 18-29
    700 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 1:11 am
    More guns please sir
  65. Profile photo of SavageChef
    SavageChef Female 50-59
    2692 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 5:57 am
    Bless the inbreds, for they know not what they do.
  66. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6267 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 6:45 am
    HolyGod-"Explain it to me. To legally drive a car you need a driver`s license."

    Incorrect. A driver`s license is not required to purchase, own or drive a car. I was driving trucks when I was 10, legally. One of my current jeeps I`ve had for 12 years has never had a license plate on it, nor is one required. Why? I never drive it on public roads.

    If you`ll look carefully at any state`s driver`s manual, you will find a statement similar to: "every person must be licensed to operate a motor vehicle upon public streets and roadways."

    Your statement was: `To legally drive a car you need a driver`s license`.

    It has just been proven incorrect. You DO NOT need a license to drive legally. You need a license ONLY if you plan to do so on the infrastructure built with public funds for that express purpose.
  67. Profile photo of Scuzoid
    Scuzoid Male 30-39
    1268 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 6:47 am
    Queen Zira vs this thread reminded me of that Piers Morgan vs Ben Shapiro debate.
  68. Profile photo of OpsAss13
    OpsAss13 Male 30-39
    514 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 9:35 am
    HG, have you ever considered the fact that people DO drive illegally. You know, DUI or without a license?
  69. Profile photo of scheckydamon
    scheckydamon Male 60-69
    716 posts
    January 31, 2013 at 11:25 am
    What we had here was a lack of gun control. Everyone of these nimrods should have had their weapon pointed at their foreheads and helped keep the gene pool clean.
  70. Profile photo of TuckFarted
    TuckFarted Female 18-29
    87 posts
    February 1, 2013 at 8:55 pm
    MURRICAH

Leave a Reply