The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 14    Average: 2.3/5]
24 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 10057
Rating: 2.3
Category: Sports
Date: 12/04/12 06:33 AM

24 Responses to Kenny Bell Blows Up Devin Smith

  1. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 6:54 am
    Link: Kenny Bell Blows Up Devin Smith - See rugby guys, US football is just as brutal *and* our refs also suck! Hit was perfect, but Ref flagged it anyway.
  2. Profile photo of kingdomCome
    kingdomCome Male 18-29
    338 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:11 am
    Didn`t think helmet to helmet was allowed...
    seems a good call to me
  3. Profile photo of kingdomCome
    kingdomCome Male 18-29
    338 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:14 am
    inb4itsnothelmettohelmet
  4. Profile photo of dm2754
    dm2754 Male 40-49
    3347 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:15 am
    foot ball sucks. i don`t see why anyone would wast their time and money. that said.
    it was a bad call. the hit was to the chest to the head.
  5. Profile photo of Palfas
    Palfas Male 30-39
    411 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:43 am
    You fail at inbefore...
  6. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:44 am
    Ouch, full-on lawnchair.
  7. Profile photo of Foodcoma101
    Foodcoma101 Male 18-29
    2 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:53 am
    was a good call. you can clearly see the blockers head strike the defenders head at point of contact, even if his shoulder hits first.
  8. Profile photo of Foodcoma101
    Foodcoma101 Male 18-29
    2 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 7:55 am
    not to mention that the blocker left his feet for the hit, otherwise known as "launching" and you can`t do that either.
  9. Profile photo of Jimjamjeroo
    Jimjamjeroo Male 18-29
    17 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 8:38 am
    Now lets see him take that hit without the girly armour and helmet.
  10. Profile photo of fancythat
    fancythat Male 30-39
    1950 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 8:50 am
    another example of "watch where you`re going"
  11. Profile photo of bacon_pie
    bacon_pie Male 30-39
    3061 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 9:38 am
    That`s a good hit, but it`s hard to top "The Hit" from Quentin Coryatt.
  12. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 1:15 pm
    "even if his shoulder hits first."

    If his shoulder hits first, it is not helmet to helmet.
  13. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 1:42 pm
    You consider that "brutal"? Seriously? That was just a push.
  14. Profile photo of tedgp
    tedgp Male 30-39
    3287 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 1:44 pm
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8v-qZFVYnc

    ALL those were more powerful than that pathetic attempt.
  15. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 2:38 pm
    It`s already been established that US Football has harder hits on a regular basis, because the illusion of fear is gone due to the pads.
  16. Profile photo of jendrian
    jendrian Male 18-29
    2516 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 3:14 pm
    where`s the blow job?
  17. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 4:33 pm
    I watched that program, Auburnjunky, and I saw the obvious flaw. The program was clear about it, but then ignored it in their summary. I assumed they did so deliberately to declare it a draw.

    The obvious flaw is that the numbers for the total impact force per game explicitly *ignore the padding*. They accurately summarised the effects of the padding in the main body of the program but completely ignored it for the summary.

    If they hadn`t done that, the conclusion would have been rather different. In the body of the program, they explained that the effect on a rugby player being tackled was harsher than the effect on a USA football player being tackled (remember "a hospital pass" and broken ribs). More harmful hits 3 times as often per game would have been a conclusion that rugby is much harder-hitting. So they had to ignore the padding completely to jack up the USA football results to match rugby.
  18. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 4:38 pm
    I think they`re both beaten by Australian Rules Football, anyway. Australian Not Many Rules Football would be an accurate description.
  19. Profile photo of cyborg
    cyborg Male 13-17
    2790 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 6:36 pm
    this hit was good but the game as a whole was terrible

    go huskers *sigh*...
  20. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    December 4, 2012 at 8:05 pm
    Sorry Cyborg. I like both teams. Auburn has beaten Nebraska rather recently, but fell short to Wisconsin.
  21. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    December 5, 2012 at 12:18 am
    "where`s the blow job?"

    This is what`s called "Blowing up" a tackler in US football lol.
  22. Profile photo of kcpd2050
    kcpd2050 Male 40-49
    330 posts
    December 5, 2012 at 12:34 am
    Yet one more reason USA is going into the crapper. When the hell did we start giving penalties for hitting too hard in football. Give me a break. I`m sure the player has Obamacare. Relax.
  23. Profile photo of drawman61
    drawman61 Male 50-59
    7749 posts
    December 5, 2012 at 4:57 am
    I`m English and love US football, hate rugby. Btw, that hit looked good to me.

Leave a Reply