The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 12    Average: 1.9/5]
28 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 11556
Rating: 1.9
Category:
Date: 12/22/12 09:40 PM

28 Responses to Iowa Court Says It`s OK To Fire Hot Chicks [Pic+]

  1. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    December 22, 2012 at 9:53 pm
    Link: Iowa Court Says It`s OK To Fire Hot Chicks - Personally, I think he defines `whipped.` Injustice and spineless catering...
  2. Profile photo of Runemang
    Runemang Male 30-39
    2676 posts
    December 22, 2012 at 10:56 pm
    "because she`s ugly" ... wrong.
    "because she`s not ugly" ... ok.
    "because he`s black" ... wrong.
    "because he`s not black" ... ok.

    Yeah, I guess that fits with the way our society does things.
  3. Profile photo of thatjimguy
    thatjimguy Male 30-39
    458 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 12:20 am
    have to wonder why he didnt just say he was going to lay her off just to lay her off. how did the conversation in the end work out like that? he just tell her? sounds like bs
  4. Profile photo of paperduck
    paperduck Male 18-29
    1745 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 12:50 am
    So obvious the dentist`s wife was pmsing and told him to fire her in a fit of rage.
  5. Profile photo of carmium
    carmium Female 50-59
    6381 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 12:57 am
    What if the dentist considered his assistant so homely that the thought of her was putting a hitch in his marital relations? Would these idiot judges find it acceptable to fire her for that?
  6. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14653 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 2:51 am
    This is the Muslim/early Judeo-Christian model of morality: Woman looks too tempting, so cover up or stone the women.
  7. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 3:28 am
    Yeah, see, she wasn`t fired for being hot--she`d been there for ten years. She was fired because the dentist`s wife didn`t like that her husband thought she was hot. And their Taliban pastor decided that, instead of counseling them to do the right and just thing (like, at least finding her a job with equal benefits), they could just blame her hotness for threatening their marriage. Yay religion--providing excuses for drated up treatment of fellow humans for thousands of years.
  8. Profile photo of drawman61
    drawman61 Male 50-59
    7751 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 3:43 am
    If her skin colour had been different this wouldn`t have been allowed. Yay, reverse racism.
  9. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    7066 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 3:52 am
    Pathetic.
  10. Profile photo of tommy2X4
    tommy2X4 Male 50-59
    3447 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 4:37 am
    She worked for ten years and only got a months pay? This is wrong and it is discrimination. She might have drawn business in. If she works for another dentist, she might bring some of Knights patients with her, I hope.
  11. Profile photo of mervviscious
    mervviscious Male 40-49
    1793 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 5:10 am
    It will be overturned...
  12. Profile photo of Nomud
    Nomud Male 18-29
    102 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 6:27 am
    If it`s a right to work state, he didn`t need a reason to fire her. But since he gave one, and the one he gave is incredibly sexist, she can easily have his business through a sexual harassment lawsuit. Cheers Nelson, enjoy your millions. You earned it.
  13. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36847 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 6:31 am

    Here is one of the significant differances between men and women.
    If this happened to a man, he`d get pissed, then he`d get on with his life. Not sue and bitch and whine about it for months or years, however long it took to get to the state supreme court.
  14. Profile photo of slut_etta
    slut_etta Female 50-59
    3881 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 8:17 am
    ridiculous. if he can`t control himself as an adult male professional, he should just go home and fap all day long. what a jerk.
  15. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    7066 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 8:26 am
    gerry,

    So a man just lets himself be screwed over and does nothing about it and that`s good thing. A woman takes the bastard on (bitch and whine) and that`s a bad thing.

    If your employment depends on how sexually attractive your boss finds you then you have the right to make an issue of it.
  16. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36847 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 8:28 am

    Lord Jim, sometimes life sucks and you just have to face up to it. No, it`s not fair... that`s life!
  17. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    7066 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 8:40 am
    You always have the option of not letting yourself be walked on. Or you can ie down and say thak you for not wearing golf shoes. It`s not a man/woman thing. It`s more about how you react to being pissed on.
  18. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 8:50 am
    Here is one of the significant differances between men and women.
    If this happened to a man, he`d get pissed, then he`d get on with his life. Not sue and bitch and whine about it for months or years, however long it took to get to the state supreme court.

    You could make that same statement about gay men and "real" men, Gerry. Some thick people probably do.
  19. Profile photo of GhettoNinja
    GhettoNinja Male 30-39
    886 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 9:01 am
    I was fired for being too hot too.
  20. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    7066 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 9:10 am
    As for `that`s life`.
  21. Profile photo of Django
    Django Male 30-39
    230 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 9:14 am
    "At Will" employment sucks. This situation isn`t fair and this guy (and his wife) are dix! But, it`s not illegal. She needs to pick herself up, dust off, and move on.
  22. Profile photo of CaptKangaroo
    CaptKangaroo Male 50-59
    2347 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 9:19 am
    It`s pretty clear that each indulged in some inappropriate behavior. There are consequences for that. Too bad, so sad.
  23. Profile photo of darkmagic14n
    darkmagic14n Male 18-29
    1625 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 9:31 am
    is the chick in the OP the one fired for being too "hot"? I would appeal stating that she is, in fact, not hot.

    the funniest thing about people who get fired is that its never that they were doing a bad job (or behaved badly), its for every other reason including, but not limited to, race, sexual orientation, hot or not, etc
  24. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    7066 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 9:42 am
    Was anyone else reminded of Dr Johnson`s remark to Garrick?

    "I`ll come no more behind your scenes, David; for the silk stockings and white bosoms of your actresses excite my amorous propensities"

    At least he took responsibility for his own arousel.
  25. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 6:46 pm
    s the chick in the OP the one fired for being too "hot"? I would appeal stating that she is, in fact, not hot.
    It wasn`t a matter of her being a Photoshop-less super model.
    It was that his wife worked there too and was jealous of their friendship so, she made him fire his assistant.

    I`ve seen this happen and been through similar.
  26. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 7:01 pm
    he should just go home and fap all day long.
    Uh... DENTIST...
    He could probably afford internet in the office for that...
    XD!!!
  27. Profile photo of darkmagic14n
    darkmagic14n Male 18-29
    1625 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 7:02 pm
    @code jockey, there is a difference between "hot" and "attractive."

    a 300lb woman could be attractive to someone, a 125lb DDD super model is `hot`
  28. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    December 23, 2012 at 7:45 pm
    It doesn`t matter if YOU think this particular woman is `hot.`

    The problem is, the court has set a president now: A person can be refused employment/terminated on the grounds the employer feels their presence would interfere in the marriage of third parties in the business.
    No direct action required on the part of the person being fired.

    It`s a bad court ruling. If she didn`t commit any misconduct and she wasn`t being laid off due to lack of payroll, she shouldn`t have been removed.

Leave a Reply