Jennifer Lawrence In GQ Mag: Before & After [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 4 years ago in Misc

The Hunger Games star was in GQ this month. But not before the art department got their Photoshop on her.
There are 45 comments:
Male 278
Isn`t the irony breathtaking? Isn`t this exactly what the story was supposed to be against?
0
Reply
Male 3,058
Before. No question. Someone please give after a sandwich.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
Which one is after?
The puffier one looks better.
0
Reply
Male 907
The photoshopper must have been female or gay.
0
Reply
Male 2,344
the before is MUCH MUCH better.
0
Reply
Female 1,324
Thick for me ;) Her arms look about ready to snap in the after photo.
0
Reply
Male 1,015
It`s just a shop by some random dude, GQ is ok.

And... those pretending the bigger pic is the shopped one, just look at the seam in the leather, lower left... it has definition in the "curvy" version and is blurry in the "skinny" version.
0
Reply
Male 16
I like my girls thick, before picture is much more attractive to me.
0
Reply
Male 1,178
I actually much prefer before...
0
Reply
Male 4,431
Well, I`m twice her age, but, if she`d have me, I`d be more than happy with the real version, please!
0
Reply
Male 7,123
I`m fine with either version.
0
Reply
Male 505
Since the more curvy paler version is the actual cover of GQ I think it is clear what is going on.
0
Reply
Male 2,619
It`s shopped, I can clearly see the pixels.
0
Reply
Male 950
looks better before
0
Reply
Male 26
The photo shopped pic is clearly the one that makes her look bigger. Also, Jennifer Lawrence has plenty of curve, go watch X Men First Class.
0
Reply
Male 616
jeez, at least give her some tits
0
Reply
Male 878
I don`t for one second believe this is a real before!after image. Just some prankster putting it out there.
0
Reply
Male 347
fake. I highly doubt they didn`t change the overall colour/tone of the image.
See, people like to make these before after shots but they actually photoshop the fat one.
0
Reply
Male 2,513
Damn, that couch got fat!
0
Reply
Male 3,285
The only person who shopped this was someone making a hunger joke. But don`t let me stop the white knighting.
--------

I dont think you know what `white-knight` actually means.
0
Reply
Female 3,696
She looked better before... From everything I`ve seen of her interviews, she`s pretty damn proud of her body. I wonder how she feels about it.
0
Reply
Male 144
Damn! If only the shoopers could start managing foreheads. It looks like the only thing that was not touched up.
0
Reply
Female 443
NOPE - I`d post the image from gq but it is to big
GQ Post
0
Reply
Female 1,743
Also, what Freddy said. I don`t care enough to google GQ magazine.
0
Reply
Female 1,743
She`s a cutie. I think her body is nice and healthy looking. I like her better with dark hair, though. It makes her eyes stand out a little more.

0
Reply
Male 11,739
[quote]anyone actually bother to see which picture GQ actually used or just very trusting in an IAB post?[/quote]

I didn`t because I don`t care. A few people bitching about magazines photoshopping pictures won`t change it. I just said I like the before picture better. She looks better in that one.
0
Reply
Male 15,261
I think she beat the hunger games. With an onslaught of cheeseburgers.
0
Reply
Female 4,420
scary
0
Reply
Male 3,310
The only person who shopped this was someone making a hunger joke. But don`t let me stop the white knighting.
0
Reply
Male 2,675
Google "Jennifer Lawrence In GQ" ... obviously the "photoshopped for GQ" is not the one GQ actually used, but nice frame up attempt. And chalk me up for another vote for "original is better".
0
Reply
Male 612
anyone actually bother to see which picture GQ actually used or just very trusting in an IAB post?

so either they changed to photo, or she the shopped picture is fake.GQ article
0
Reply
Male 11,739
I too agree, before is better.
0
Reply
Male 3,908
Seems like we`re all in agreement that the "before" picture is much better than the "after" yet they still feel the need to photoshop the sh*t out of everything they print or post online.
0
Reply
Male 1,293
Why would you do that? The before looks better, and the rib line in the after is obviously fake.
0
Reply
Male 390
Sad world. She is so much more attractive before the photoshop.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
I tried hard to find some way that she looked better in the `shopped image. All I could come up with was the angle of her left ear. Maybe. Other than that, she clearly looks better in the real image, especially her arms.

I can appreciate the skill of the `shopping, though, particularly the care they took in `shopping the furniture she`s lying on.
0
Reply
Male 1,735
yarp, before is better, looks like she ate something.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
*sigh*

I dream of the day when people will stop empowering the fashion industry.
0
Reply
Female 62
She looks sick in the shopped photo.
0
Reply
Male 340
Damn, the before picture is perfect. Women are supposed to have a little bit of curve.
0
Reply
Female 403
If this is what they did to her, it`s awful. She looks great before!
0
Reply
Male 66
before please, kkthxbye.
0
Reply
Male 3,285
She looks better beforehand. Although she could do with a bag over her face.
0
Reply
Male 2,551
If this is real, GQ needs better photoshoppers.
I`ve seen better amateur jobs.
0
Reply
Male 20,908
Link: Jennifer Lawrence In GQ Mag: Before & After [Pic] [Rate Link] - The Hunger Games star was in GQ this month. But not before the art department got their Photoshop on her.
0
Reply