The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 26    Average: 3.5/5]
45 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 5278
Rating: 3.5
Category:
Date: 10/10/12 06:50 AM

45 Responses to Mitt Romney Debates Himself

  1. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    October 9, 2012 at 5:35 am
    Link: Mitt Romney Debates Himself - Damn, which of these guys am I supposed to vote for?
  2. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 7:24 am
    I think that video could have been much longer. I swear when they say they`re "rebooting" Romney`s campaign they do a full format and reinstall. I suppose it would be hard to argue against someone who doesn`t even seem to have viewed his own webpage.
  3. Profile photo of Bredlom
    Bredlom Male 18-29
    41 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 7:32 am
    Im not sure if politics is getting worse or Im just noticing how drated it is now
  4. Profile photo of chalket
    chalket Male 50-59
    2712 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 8:17 am
    @Bredlom
    Politics in America has most definitely been getting worse... much, much worse.
  5. Profile photo of tatripp
    tatripp Male 18-29
    1196 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 8:35 am
    two of those weren`t even contradiction.
  6. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 8:36 am
    WHICH IS WHY OBAMA WAS SO CONFUSED.

    He showed up to debate Mitt on Mitt`s stances and then Mitt had different stances. Hard to prepare for that.
  7. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 8:49 am
    tatripp

    "I will not reduce the taxes paid by high income americans"

    "We`re going to cut taxes on everyone, including the top 1%"

    "I reject the idea that I don`t believe in more teachers"

    "He says we need more teachers, did he not get the message? It`s time for us to cut back on government"

    "preexisting conditions are covered in my plan"

    "we can`t play the game that way, you have to get insurance when you`re well"

    HOW are two of those not contradictions?
  8. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 8:56 am
    This video could have been ten minutes long. Not mentioned are Romney`s "evolving" stance on abortion and climate change.
  9. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:07 am
    Hard to prepare for that.

    Obama could`ve at least pointed that out.
  10. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:13 am
    @tatrip

    Q = Romney will cut taxes on the top 1%
    E = Romeny will cut taxes on the bottom 99%

    "I will not reduce the taxes paid by high income americans" therefore not Q

    "We`re going to cut taxes on everyone, including the top 1%" therefore Q && E

    (not Q) && Q therefore W

    W = Romney does NOT have logically coherent a tax plan.

    Of course the assumption being Romney is going to do what he says.

    Oh wait...
  11. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:14 am
    Yeah not a Romney supporter either, he really is a weak-kneed flip-flopper.
  12. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:15 am
    Cajun247

    "Obama could`ve at least pointed that out."

    I seem to recall Obama saying something about Romney changing what he had said and Romney said "No I didn`t". What was he supposed to say "Yes you did"?

    I mean should the presidential debate turn into a round of liar liar pants on fire?
  13. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:20 am
    All I have heard from Romney

    Raise Defense spending 2.1 trillion over 10 years.
    Cut PBS and Obamacare.
    Cut all taxes 20%

    Then some how MAGICALLY balance the budget and lower the debt.

    Raise spending and lower revenue. I`m pretty sure that is always how Republicans think you lowered the debt. Probably why Reagan tripled the debt.

    Such a joke. Yet every 4 years suckers rally to the Republican cry of "fiscal responsibility". Look at Reagan, Bush, and Bush 2. Now look at Romney. The fiscal conservative is dead.

    In the last 3 decades Republicans had 20 years in power. THEY RAISED THE DEBT EVERY YEAR. Please stop being suckers.
  14. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:21 am
    I mean should the presidential debate turn into a round of liar liar pants on fire?

    Might as well, the debate has been entirely devoid of substance. Hell the idea that someone "wins" the debate undermines the intrinsic purpose of debate. That is to unravel the truth. Sure they might of presented some facts, but no real path forward.
  15. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:27 am
    @HG: It`s ok, Ryan said he ran the numbers and it`s good. I mean, what sane individual would blindly give support to someone who has not revealed any specifics of his plans to reduce the debt? You should be content with PBS, because Romney has said that he won`t cut some of the biggest entitlements and deductions on the books. But at least you have an across the board 20% tax cut to look forward to with absolutely no negative consequences whatsoever.
  16. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:34 am
    Cajun247

    "no real path forward."

    Here is what I have heard from Obama: "We`ve been making progress. Things are getting better. We are headed in the right direction. Let`s stay the course"

    Here is what I have heard from Romney: "I`m going to fix everything. I am. I can`t tell you how. But I am."

    I`ll go with option A. That seems like substance to me.
  17. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:35 am
    Raise Defense spending 2.1 trillion over 10 years.

    I agree, wasteful and actually makes us more vulnerable.

    Cut PBS and Obamacare.

    Former should be low priority. The latter on the other should be replaced with a law that penalizes states for enforcing interstate insurance bans and converts MediCare into gauranteed contribution plan.

    Cut all taxes 20%

    Go to a 15% rate on all income minus deductions. My idea is rather than having a libraries worth (I really mean that) of tax code, simply put if you can justify an expense as the cost of producing a good or service then it can reduce your taxable income. This way wages and salaries get deducted from corporate earnings and thus AREN`T double taxed.
  18. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:36 am
    We`ve been making progress. Things are getting better. We are headed in the right direction. Let`s stay the course

    That statement will ring hollow when govt debt obliterates all of those gains.
  19. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:47 am
    On top of which looking at Nominal GDP per capita, unemployment, govt debt, AND deficit it`s not better than when Obama took office.
  20. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 9:58 am
    From usual I-A-B right wingers: *cricket*
  21. Profile photo of inaria
    inaria Female 18-29
    1515 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:05 am
    Romney`s BS is so blatant its as if he has no idea wtf he is doing. Oh wait, he doesn`t. Ya`ll need leaders educated in science, economics, simple math.
  22. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7378 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:06 am
    Republicans rally behind the worst candidate in the history of candidates and the call democrats stupid.
  23. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:10 am
    The problem with the Obama plan is that it is a gamble with the US economy (and, by extension, the world economy). Obama`s plan ASSUMES that it will be successful and that the costs (massive debt increases) will DEFINITELY be offset by the gains (modest economic improvement).

    The problem I see is that we have had a truely massive increase in debt over the past several years yet only very modest economic improvements. Honestly, stats showing such gains or losses are meaningless over the course of several years since those are bounds within normal market fluctuation.

    Consider this: George Bush raised the GDP per capita from 36k to 45.3k during his 8 years; this is a 25.8% increase over two terms. Obama over his single term has raised it from 45.3k to a generous estimate of 50.5k (2012 est); this is an 11.5% increase. By this logic, Bush was better for the economy than Obama.
  24. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7470 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:12 am
    The biggest positive in the favor of Obama is realism. Obama keeps speaking about "we" rough of a ride ahead of us, but we can get there. He then tells us how he plans to get there. Romney/Ryan keep giving this fairy tale about how "they" are going to fix everything without telling us how.

    I was never a big fan of fairy tales.
  25. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:27 am
    @HumanAction

    Usually I agree with you but I`m afraid I`m gonna nitpick here. Bush achieved that growth over two terms. So for each term that goes to around 12.2% (square root of 1.258). A better example is if we look term by term. In 2005 NomGDP/Capita was $42.5K.

    This means Bush had a growth of 21% in his first term followed by 7% in his second. So logically Bush did better than Obama in his first term. But then he wasted political capital on the wars rather than halting the housing bubble, then there was the bailouts.
  26. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:38 am
    @Cajun247: I think you misunderstood me...

    First off, I wasn`t suggesting that the Bush administration was "good" for the economy. Also, I tried to carefully word my sentence to show that I was comparing a 25.8% increase over two terms (12.9%/term) to an estimated 11.5% increase over one term. Again, the reasoning was not to convince anyone that Bush was greater than Obama economically.

    I have recently noticed someone posting a great many stats that pick an arbitrary point in time (usually "today") and making a comparison to a "worst point". This is being done as an attempt to show that the current administration is positively affecting the economy.

    I am trying to show that these types of statistics are silly as they are not accurate portrayals of the economic state.
  27. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:42 am
    For instance, here is one that I`ve seen:

    AVERAGE HOURLY EARNINGS
    Worst point 2009: $22.03
    Today: $23.58
    Source: tinyurl.com/9tu5d8r

    However, using the same data, if the current month were November, 2008, I could do this:

    AVERAGE HOURLY EARNINGS
    Worst point 2006: $20.06
    Today: $21.93
    Source: tinyurl.com/9tu5d8r

    You`ll see that Obama`s increase is roughly 7.04%. However, the Bush increase is 9.3%. Therefore, if this stat is going to be used as evidence that Obama is making good economic choices, then logic dictates that the same person MUST agree that Bush made better economic choices.
  28. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 10:58 am
    I am trying to show that these types of statistics are silly as they are not accurate portrayals of the economic state.

    Ah, okay then. Of course and I actaully gave a similar response to those stats.
  29. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3889 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 11:16 am
    So which Mitt Romney is the liar? They both can`t be telling the truth. He`s a bigger flip-flopper than Kerry. What is it with the Massachusetts boys and their inability to tell the truth?
  30. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 11:25 am
    `This means Bush had a growth of 21% in his first term followed by 7% in his second. So logically Bush did better than Obama in his first term. But then he wasted political capital on the wars rather than halting the housing bubble, then there was the bailouts.`

    I`m not sure it`s fair to say Bush did better in his first term. He was working with a functional economy when he came into office, which Obama wasn`t. Not trying to blame Bush or anything, just stating the facts.

    I think the media coverage of the debate has really made Obama`s performance out to be worse than it was. Sure, he didn`t perform well. But that was mainly due to his poor opening and miserable closing statements. He did alright in between, though he missed some golden opportunities to call out Romney for position reversals and distortions. Unfortunately, I think the media can often have a stronger effect on the public than the actual candidates` words.`
  31. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 11:29 am
    What is it with the Massachusetts boys and their inability to tell the truth?

    He`s from Detroit.
  32. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3889 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 11:35 am
    Paul Ryan`s convention speech was littered with lies. He had the fact checkers working overtime. Wonder if he will flip-flop too in tomorrows debate to try and throw Biden off. Should be a fun one to watch. The VP debates get a little more heated.
  33. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 11:36 am
    I`m not sure it`s fair to say Bush did better in his first term

    I don`t think so either, but going with those calculations alone that is a conclusion you could draw. I don`t think it would be a very honest one though. Bush was a horrible President, he wasted most of his political capital on two gloriously unjustified wars when he should`ve directed it towards FM and FM and the housing bubble they were creating.
  34. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3889 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 11:38 am
    "He`s from Detroit."

    So he governed Massachusetts from Detroit?
  35. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 12:00 pm
    So he governed Massachusetts from Detroit?

    Nope but the inability to tell the truth probably lies in our flock of Kennedy lemmings.
  36. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 12:11 pm
    cobrakiller

    "I was never a big fan of fairy tales."

    You know what? Maybe that is why the religious folks are behind mitt. Christians have the ability to accept absurd lies on faith alone.
  37. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6754 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 12:18 pm
    HumanAction

    "Therefore, if this stat is going to be used as evidence that Obama is making good economic choices, then logic dictates that the same person MUST agree that Bush made better economic choices."

    1. Obama took office in a recession he didn`t cause. OF COURSE growth has been slow. I`m just showing there has been growth.

    2. Of all the stats I posted, that one is probably the least useful. Wages go up under every president. Wages go up fairly constantly if only based on inflation.
  38. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3889 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 12:31 pm
    "Nope but the inability to tell the truth probably lies in our flock of Kennedy lemmings."

    "I a did not kill that woman, Mrs Kopechne"
  39. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 1:02 pm
    He did somehow get Mass with a surplus budget his last two years. Then we elected the democrat known as Dolittle Patrick and we`re back in debt.....

  40. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 3:59 pm
    That`s still fewer contradictions than Obama has made in the last 4 years.
  41. Profile photo of HumanAction
    HumanAction Male 18-29
    2357 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 6:28 pm
    @HolyGod

    Obama took office in a recession he didn`t cause. OF COURSE growth has been slow. I`m just showing there has been growth.
    In the case of these stats, Obama actually "benefits" from coming in during a recession year. In essence, it allows us to create an inflated showing of growth.

    Wouldn`t it stand to reason that, if Obama is pulling us out of a recession (as in, we`ve already hit the lowest point), we SHOULD see "explosive" growth? We certainly have seen this type of growth in a "private" market - stocks. I doubt you`ll deny that both DOW and NASDAQ have recovered well.

    Why then, if a "private" market can explosively recover from a recession, do the other stats fail to explode in a similar manner?

    Consider this, in Bushes first term, these improved: GDP per capita, NASDAQ, DOW, Unemployment, Change in Jobs, Ave. Earnings, Employed People, and New Home Builds.
  42. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 6:40 pm

  43. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    October 10, 2012 at 8:32 pm
    FoolsPrussia: It is possible for someone to be `pro-life` and not want the total elimination of abortion, in all cases.

    Also there are no `abortion bills`, pro or con, in the house or senate right now, which explains his earlier statement.
  44. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    October 11, 2012 at 7:25 am
    @CJ: You are so full of sh*t. What, exactly, were the contradictions Obama`s made that outnumber Romney`s? And the fact that you aren`t even defending him, merely using some logical fallacy to distract the argument, speaks volumes. Keep on supporting a flip-flopping mystery man who hasn`t told you *how* he`s going to do any of the outrageous things he says he`s going to. Anything for the elephant, huh CJ?
  45. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    October 11, 2012 at 11:56 am
    patchgrabber: He has said how the cuts would be done, through congress, through the ways and means committee. He`s set the goal, like a leader does, and he`s leaving it to the congress to meet that goal.

    The minutia of how and what is cut is not the role of the president, that`s the role of congress. The president is supposed to lead, Obama hasn`t lead, that`s why we`ve been so screwed over the last 4 years.

Leave a Reply