1001 Reasons To NOT Vote For Obama

Submitted by: 5cats 4 years ago in Funny

And y"all thought 5Cats hates Obama? Lolz!
There are 87 comments:
Male 34
You failed. The fact that you failed doesn`t mean the next candidate won`t fail. However, he has much more experience in job creation, and the economy in general. More experience, and not failing as you have. OVERSEAS... fail. Why? You can try IAB... logic.
0
Reply
Male 38,365
History Lesson Time!
Barack`s Order Features prominent mention of the Geneva Convention, which is good.
However, the creation of Gitmo is because of the GC!
Soldiers in uniform have GC rights, but those NOT in unifrom have... none!
It used to be spys, scouts and partisans who were non-uniformed soldiers, but now it`s "terrorists" who fill that catagory.

If you capture a non-U soldier, you can shoot him on the spot! Or "question him" (you`re not supposed to use torture, but beatings are OK) and THEN shoot him!

The US Army had to come up with a plan to keep captured non-U alive, (the notion of Americans shooting POWs is a no-go!) but still be able to interrogate them.

Gitmo is an elegant solution! It`s worked just fine! THAT is why Obama has chosen to keep it open.
0
Reply
Male 38,365
@chalket: I do recall an order to "study the removal" which seems to be what you`ve linked.
That`s fine.

However it`s NOT the Republicans who "stopped BHO" in that case, it`s the DEMOCRATS who told him "sorry Mr.Prez but closing Gitmo isn`t prudent!"

My points remain:
#1 No Republican stopped BHO from closing Gitmo (although they OBVIOUSLY rejected the idea, duh! That`s their JOB as opposition!)
#2 BHO`s own people refused to close it.
#3 Rather than admit the truth, Obama (and his people) spread LIES to cover his butt on the subject.

A REAL PotUS would say: The BucK Stops Here!
Obama Says: The evil Republicans MADE ME do it!

He promised to close it in YEAR ONE and did not. It`s a fact!~ no excuses can change that.
0
Reply
Male 38,365
#10 I honestly don`t know if Obama said 2011, nor do I care really. Still it`s a sure sign of his LACK of knowledge and experience, eh?

#11 "It`s not the best solution" = Opposed it!
And he (and the rest of the Democrats) DID oppose it! Called Gen "Betray-Us" (remember that?) a murderer for supporting such a plan!
Later Obama... oreder a Surge in Afghanistan! Led by... General Petraeus! Suddenly the Democrats LOVE this guy!
So it`s not so bad that Obama did what his party told him, but he`s still responsible for his words and actions!
#12 Oh most certainly: Obama claimed 100% of the credit for withdrawl in Iraq!~ Bush was never mentioned, and the MSM were happy to comply!

I thanks you for your reasoned, polite discussion! So rare these days on IAB... feel free to continue to disagree, I don`t mind!

0
Reply
Male 38,365
[quote]2) you side-stepped my challenge about super-majorities. go home, eh?[/quote]
@jtreb: Side stepped what? I answered it up, down AND sideways! Please explain what you`ve failed to grasp.

@Tekinette: There`s links provided to get the "full story", easy-peasy! Putting the "full story" on EVERY point would make the list 5 miles long!!!
6 & 7: so it`s true, good.
#8: "minus the torture" LMAO! No really, my ass just fell off because I laughed AT YOU so hard!
Just what ARE they doing to prisoners on those "black ships" in international waters? Hummm? Playing Parcheesi?
#9 Obama kept his promise, but of course he followed the EXACT timeline Bush had ordered! So in FACT it was Bush how "ended the war in Iraq" and not Obama (although it happed while he was PotUS...)
#10 - when the chatacter counter gets near 900? Chances are it`s time to post reply (lolz!)
0
Reply
Male 409
When the first one was `flubbing the oath of office` I knew it was a BS list. If you cannot even start from a point of substance, then you have lost me.

Also, when several Tea Party Republican congressmen erroneously took their oaths in front of a TV while watching the ceremony on CSpan, did this web page all them out for it? Even when several of their votes had to be withdrawn because of their stupidity? No.

Be consistent. Be relevant. Be accurate. Then maybe I will listen.
0
Reply
Male 2,711
@5BrainlessCats "Fun Fact: I challenged @madest to show me the Close-Gitmo bill from Obama`s first year in office (like BHO promised) which the Repubs defeated... he linked an article from 2011, that TALKED ABOUT a POSSIBLE BILL... amazing!"

Are you really forgetting Obama`s attempt to close Gitmo? Really? Amazing!

Executive Order, Jan 22, 2009
0
Reply
Male 83
As an undecided voter, those have to be the stupidest reasons to not vote for something. Half of those are untrue pieces of story out of context. The other 3/8`s are useless sentences thats part of the previous point or preceding point. Then, for probably less than the 1/8 that`s left there might be valid reasons, depending on which side of the story you fall on.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]Wouldn`t a genius realize that if even we were socialist we`d still be a democracy because we voted for it?[/quote]
Wouldn`t someone with an IQ of 85 and an 8th-grade education know that the US is not a democracy?
0
Reply
Male 3,364
SCFAN: "Like I need a 1000 reasons not to voter for this lying piece of poo of a president."


I only need one reason to think you`re a conservative. LOL!
0
Reply
Male 3,364
@5cats: 1) Name one conservative who kept every campaign promise. 2) you side-stepped my challenge about super-majorities. go home, eh?
0
Reply
Male 273
K Im running out of text again lol...

Anyways

# 11 He said he didn`t think it was the best solution. He later admited that the surge did work. Most military experts were skeptic it would work, he admited he was wrong, that`s a good thing to me really.

# 12 He put an end to the war in Iraq, he didn`t mention any "victory" because it wasn`t, he did talk about the troops and their success but not about bush. How is that bad ? Should he have used a 2nd mission accomplished banner with Bush ?

Anyways this is stupid, Obama did some mistakes but this list seems to really have a hard time finding them. I can list more lies of Romney and he isn`t even president yet, how sad is that ?
0
Reply
Male 508
Vote for the guy that tied his dog to the roof of his car. lol If nothing else was against him that would be enough to say "hmmm maybe this guy doesn`t exhibit good judgment after all". Just saying.
0
Reply
Male 273
#6 Obama as a senator did speak out against it, saying it could be improved and he prefered the senate version of the bill... And once Obama became president he did pass key measures in the executive branch that added oversift and transparency to it. Once again : true fact omitting the full story.

# 7 Same thing

#8 "Obama continues the “Bush practice” of extraordinary rendition." Once again omiting that it`s minus the torture. A new CIA unit monitored and following strict rules which outlans the use of physical force. Also no more detainess sent to countries known for torture interrogations. He was even praised by the Human Rights Watch for the transparency.

#9 Obama said "1st day in office, I would give the military a new mission: ending this war" and he did. He promised to bring all combat troops within 16 months, he did it in august, combat troops that is, he was 3 months late, not 34...

# 10 He never said that, st
0
Reply
Male 2,085
Like I need a 1000 reasons not to voter for this lying piece of poo of a president.
0
Reply
Male 273
@5Cats

#3 Oh come on, are you kidding me ?

In May 2009 the Congress voted to block the funding of Guantanamo.
The following month Congress voted a bill that required the administration to report plans before moving any detainee and prevented them from moving them onto US soil as well as restrictions to transfer or release any Guantamo detainee to a foreign country.

Meanwhile the Congress had no problem with Bush releasing over 500 detainees or transfering more than 600 detainees to foreign countries.

#5 Ya let`s just stick to american citizen, let`s not mention terrorist on purpose..

So if a terrorist working for Al Quaida has an american citizenship he can`t be killed ? If Obama does nothing or if he sends an army to arrest him he`s going to be criticized as well, so much hypocrisy.. And yes there`s many proof that he was a terrorist, there`s even tapes of him talking about it.

0
Reply
Male 335
One reason is enough for me: NDAA.

How can I vote for somebody who took a poo on our constitution? Sure, he lied about a lot of things to get elected - thats the way politics works. Ok, he takes bribes from lobbyists - they all do. Etc, Etc...

But I can not vote for anybody (not even by voting against his opponent) who does not believe in the basic liberties granted by our constitution.
0
Reply
Male 167
"158. When President Obama threw out the first pitch at baseball game, he nearly launched it into the bleachers."

Well that is convincing, I know now I can`t vote for this man, clearly this shows the weakness of his character
0
Reply
Male 38,365
Fun Fact: I challenged @madest to show me the Close-Gitmo bill from Obama`s first year in office (like BHO promised) which the Repubs defeated... he linked an article from 2011, that TALKED ABOUT a POSSIBLE BILL... amazing!
Yet consistant.

@tekinette: Yes, 1 & 2 are just silly!
#3: Obama SWORE he`d close it in his first year! He VOWED to! PROMISED it over and over again!
But, he lied...
#5 Yes, it`s a fact, Obama has a "kill list" AND has deliberatly targeted American Citizens for drone strikes! Tell me again about "right to a fair trial"...
#6 = true fact
#7 = true fact
#8 = true fact
#9 = true fact
#10 = true fact
#11 = true fact
#12 = ...seeing the pattern here?
0
Reply
Male 38,365
@HG: Be quite boy, your ignorance is showing!
#1 they HAD a supermajority in the House.
#2 they HAD a supermajority in the Senate!

Tell me again how `it doesn`t matter`! Because BHO DID have it!
Oh boo hoo, for 7 months there was only a 59-40 majority in the Senate, therefore it`s IMPOSSIBLE to pass a SINGLE BILL! Right? Yup!
NOT ONE PotUS ever passed a single, solitary Bill without a Senate Supermajority! NOT ONE! It`s a FACT! Gee, thanks for your "edumication" @HG

Oh! But if one Repub just didn`t vote? 59-39 = Supermajority Too! You`re telling me that not ONE Senate RHINO couldn`t be persuaded to sit on his/her hands? Hellfire, some even supported Obamacare!!

Now I say AGAIN: Show me the Gitmo legislation that the Repubs DEFEATED in 2009, go on! I`ll even give you until Nov of 2010...
0
Reply
Male 99
So HG, are you saying you think the entire blame of why Obama sucks can be put squarely on the filibuster law?

What other constitutional laws don`t you agree with?
0
Reply
Male 8,303
5Cats

"Are you denying that in 2009 the Democrats held MAJORITIES? If not, then STFU FFS!"

Ughhh. Educating you gets tiresome. Majorities don`t do anything in American politics. You need a super majority to be able to block filibusters.
0
Reply
Male 99
You too, Sindley. Are you just an enraged little girl who doesn`t want to pay for condoms, who thinks she knows about politics?
0
Reply
Male 99
ByOwlPost, are you even old enough to know what you`re talking about?
0
Reply
Male 99
Tekinette, are you one of those undocumented european voters?
0
Reply
Male 273
#1 He botched his oath of office ? Wrong : Roberts made the mistake, who cares anyways ?

#2 read above.

#3 Obama promised to close Guantanamo. Yes and the congress won`t let him, they won`t let him finance trials for the prisonners or move them in a new state prison in Illinois.

Should we talk about who opened Guantanamo ? Or about Romney who already changed his mind on things he promised ??!

#4 Obama promised to restore habeas corpus. Yes and obviously with the situation being stuck at Guantanamo he can`t.

#5 "President Obama ordered the assassination of an American citizen." An american citizen who happen to be a leader of Al Qaeda in Yemen that Obama put on the "kill or capture" list..

K that list is just full of BS. Like every president, Obama made some mistakes but this list seems to really have a hard time finding actual mistakes so I`m happy voting for him again.

0
Reply
Female 19
like Romney`s any drating better.
0
Reply
Female 519
Alright, they couldn`t make a list against Romney nobody could read it all before the election ends. :P
0
Reply
Male 156
Eh... I thought as much, I scanned through the list, and in the effort of scrounging up this ridiculous amount of reasons, they had to put in there, that he was taller than Mitt Romney!? What the hell? And that he had fewer shoes than Romney? That was just some I found around the late 800`s reasons. Pick the "good" ones and write 684 reasons not to vote Obama, or something and KEEP SOME DIGNITY reporter, that famehunting and sensationalist writing makes me sick to my stomach and I won`t even consider the serious ones, like when he passed Patriot act, or when that nation al defence act or whatever, that makes it legal to detain people without trial. I call yoour argument invalid, conservatie dayly news, and ignore it all,

[email protected]
0
Reply
Male 38,365
VV @jtreb: Um, I`ve gotten SO TIRED of your B1TCHING that I`ve simply stopped feeding you, troll-boy!
And yet? You STILL won`t drop it!
Are you denying that in 2009 the Democrats held MAJORITIES? If not, then STFU FFS!

[quote]...your lie about Obama lying about wanting to close Guatanamo has been disproven.[/quote]
What? Obama NEVER promised to close Gitmo in the first year of office? O`really? Wanna bet money on that?
"Disproven" = your credibilty, dummy!
0
Reply
Male 3,364
5cats: maybe you should learn the differences between a majority, and a supermajority. you might also take note that not every politician always votes down party lines. that being said, your lie about Obama lying about wanting to close Guatanamo has been disproven.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
#340: I`ll just say this; living in our borders should NOT be a privilege.
#352: Gay rights needs endorsements, not tax dollars.
#353: This *wasn`t* taken care of already? Wow.
#378: Good for him.
#392: In fairness we were the only nuclear nation to use nukes, twice.
#410: Exercise Reforger, just sayin`
0
Reply
Male 181
Lol! It`s amazing how so many Americans believe that the US President is some kind of autonomous actor. `But he said this and then he did that!` Seriously people, if you want politics to be THAT simple regress back to childhood and start organizing the distribution of your birthday treats in kindergarten or something. But please feel free to keep blasting your ignorant rants on to the web; very amusing. And sad. Also very, very sad.
0
Reply
Male 38,365
[quote]Congress has used its spending oversight authority...[/quote]
@jtreb: Congress? In 2009? That would be the Majority Democrat House and the Majority Democrat Senate, yes?
So... the DEMOCRATS blocked Obama? OK then. Obama doesn`t even have the support of his OWN PARTY!

[quote]The budget Bush put in place IS the budget Obama signed.[/quote]
@HG: So Bush put the GM Bailout in place? You are clearly, factually, wrong.

SOME of the Bush-era polices (the tax breaks the Democrats HATE so much) were indeed re-singed BY OBAMA!
OTHER spending items obviosly were NEW in the 2009 Budget, Obama signed, for spending BEFORE Sept 30!
IT`S-A-FACT.

My facts > your spin
0
Reply
Male 2,552
Hey, don`t go lumping G.W. Bush in with Conservatives... that idiot was middle-of-the-road at best.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
#230: Not that I like Obamacare or a public option, but do any of you think that you can live forever?
#232: I think the term "anticonstituional super-legislature" is more fitting. Yes ANTIconstitutional, not a typo fellas.
#239: Would you still be complaining if Obama actually rolled back a lot of regulations and taxes?
#265: It`s the TRADITIONAL motto actually. One I`d prefer to "In God We Trust" as it`s actually secular.
#291: This freudian slip is forgivable considering that many Americans have been insinuating he`s a Muslim while he was candidate.
#295: Turkey, Kosovo, Albania, Indonesia just sayin. Such bigotry is hard to find among American Muslims.
#308: ...which the president himself did not fund.
#327-330: In fairness it later turned out that Mr Gates was trying to enter his own home.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
#144: This is bad WHY?
#146: The NYT article doesn`t outright say it has a nuclear weapons program. It`s rather troubling when hawks are immediately assuming the worst about a program that can very well be used for civillian purposes.
#150 and 151: Okay fellas make up your minds, to bow or not to bow? Answer the question
#154: Not sure why this is a problem.
#197: Why is this an issue?
#199: Considering our "history" in the region, it shouldn`t be a surprise to ANYONE. What do you want, more meddling? They`ll come around, especially if we let them handle their own internal affairs from now on.
#200: Aside from his stupid "praise" not a lot any president can do about the violence.
#215 & 216: Trade one form of mindless economic meddling for another I suppose.
#223: Unfunded wars yes, tax cuts no.
0
Reply
Male 3,364
5Cats: "@jtreb: No, we blame him for NOT keeping his promise! He LIED about it, ok?" No he didn`t, 5cats

0
Reply
Male 5,190
Me and a few friends decided to actually vote for Obama because of this post.
0
Reply
Male 3
tl;dr
0
Reply
Male 1,421
BS list.. O is criticized of leaving Afghanistan and not leaving, a lot of that kind of rhetoric..
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]I only need one reason: he`s a socialist f***tard.[/quote] ------------
Wouldn`t a genius realize that if even we were socialist we`d still be a democracy because we voted for it?
0
Reply
Male 17,512
HG: factcheck.org is funded by The Annenberg Foundation, which took a hard turn to the far left after it`s founder Walter Annenberg died.

Bill Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, who appointed Obama Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.

Those connections taint everything they supposedly `fact check`.
0
Reply
Female 22
This seems a bit obsessive to me. :P
0
Reply
Male 99
hey hg, enough with the url trackers
0
Reply
Male 8,303
CrakrJak

"We already know that factcheck.org is a liberal shill organization."

Who is "we"? I thought factcheck.org was a pretty reliable non-partisan site.

This is from townhall.com, a leading conservative site:

"The gold standard in the truth-seeking industry is the non-partisan FactCheck.org, which occasionally irks both sides, but generally does a solid job."

http://tinyurl.com/8e6pc57

However if you think they are biased the page I linked to is mostly just data. Do you disagree with the data? I mean if you post dredge report, the site is biased, but if the article is just data I`ll look at the data.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
HG: We already know that factcheck.org is a liberal shill organization.

Perhaps you should do some more reading. Here
0
Reply
Male 2,345
what I read

"blah blah blah blame Obama for every damn thing that has gone wrong and as conservative take ZERO responsibility for our part in anything that has happened in the last 12 years."

conservatives, keep spinning that fast and your are gonna start flying around that wheel like a dizzy little hamster.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
Goodnight conservative friends.

Further reading on how budgets work: http://tinyurl.com/bw2f7pl

Please read the whole thing. If you want to continue arguing about this we can pick it up in the morning.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
CrakrJak

"Whoops, forgot about that little detail didn`t you?"

That little detail that I quote in my own post 2 spots below yours? You are such a joke.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
HG: Obama owns the 2009 budget because he not only signed it, he added to it and if he didn`t like it he could`ve vetoed it.

Sorry, your foisting off of Obama`s responsibility to Bush is completely deceitful.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
HG: "The final spending bills for the budget were not signed into law until March 11, 2009 by President Barack Obama, nearly five and a half months after the fiscal year began." - Wikipedia

Whoops, forgot about that little detail didn`t you? Obama signed that budget, it`s his, period.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
... This s.hit is such a waste of time. 2009 federal spending was laid out in the budget created by the Bush administration plain and simple. It is not even something worth debating.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
5Cats

"THAT has nothing to do with the BUDGET OBAMA SIGNED in 2009!"

I don`t know how else to put this I guess.

http://tinyurl.com/986hze

Read the whole page.

"The final spending bills for the budget were not signed into law until March 11, 2009 by President Barack Obama, nearly five and a half months after the fiscal year began. "I am signing an imperfect omnibus bill because it`s necessary for the ongoing functions of government," Obama declared."

The budget Bush put in place IS the budget Obama signed. So I`d say yes, it did have SOMETHING to do with the "BUDGET OBAMA SIGNED in 2009!"

This is really simple. I don`t know what you`re not getting. This is super basic. I have told you repeatedly, there are LOTS of things Obama has done wrong. Lots I have problems with. Let`s talk about them. This s.hit is such a waste o
0
Reply
Male 38,365
Question: Did 9/11 happen during:
Clinton`s Presidency?
Bush`s Presidency?

Case closed. FUNQ!
0
Reply
Male 38,365
@HG: You`ve really jumped the shark dude.

"The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2009 began as a spending request by President George W. Bush to fund government operations for October 2008 – September 2009."

THAT has nothing to do with the BUDGET OBAMA SIGNED in 2009!
Fiacal Year =/= BUDGET YEAR!

You are clearly confused. Or overly hung-up on semantics...
And a hypocrite: since if you really REALLY believed this, you`d extrapolate Obama`s deficits out to Sept 2013, but you don`t!

Your own link points out that in 2010, 2011 AND 2012 no budget was passed... but they still had a fiscal year!
Get it yet?
The Budget Obama passed in 2009 is the problem! Obama re-signed many items in the 2008 Budget or they would no longer exist! (in 2009`s Fiscal Year: October 2008 – September 2009.)
0
Reply
Male 15,832
HG, I consider Jan. 2007 as the point when it all started going downhill. That`s when Pelosi and Reed took over Congress, and that`s when it all started turning to $#!+.

I fault Bush for not standing up to them and vetoing more of their crap. He was more concerned with his image as "a uniter, not a divider" than he was about doing the right thing for the country.
0
Reply
Male 3,909
Y`all? Who the f*ck says y`all?!
0
Reply
Male 8,303
5Cats

"BHO signed the 2009 budget which had HUGE spending increases,"

It`s pretty clear you don`t understand how our government works. We`ve had this conversation before. You have even consented that I am right. 2009 was a budget put together by Bush for fiscal year October 2008 – September 2009.

http://tinyurl.com/986hze
0
Reply
Male 38,365
@HolyGod: Do you really have not one single clue on how your own governemt works? Not a one?

"Over Obama`s four budget years, federal spending is on track to rise from $3.52 trillion to $3.58 trillion, an annualized increase of just 0.4%

This is because spending increases need to be passed in a Federal Budget.
BHO signed the 2009 budget which had HUGE spending increases, and more pork than any other in history! Remeber his promist to VETO ANY pork-laden budget? Forgot that too eh?
Ah well.
The point is that gov`t spending hasn`t gone up much since then... because there`s BEEN NO budgets passed!
Despite the legal requirement to do so, Obama, Reid and Pelosi REFUSE to present or vote on ANY budget. (except Obama`s personal offering, defeated 435-0 and 99-0 because it sucked!)

This is not a "good thing" for Obama, it`s a mark of SHAME.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
OldOllie

"unless you adjust it for inflation; then stock prices and profits are in the toilet."

Huh?

NASDAQ
Worst point 2009: 1293
Today: 3136
Source: tinyurl.com/8a96afo (change to 5yr)

DOW
Worst point 2009: 6,626
Today: 13,610
Source: tinyurl.com/455lbcj (change to 5yr)

WHat are you talking about?
0
Reply
Male 8,303
CrakrJak

"Considering that`s an increase of 78% since 2008, that`s quite a lot actually."

Can you check your data ever? Just do a quick search to see if what you are saying is correct.

2008`s federal spending WAS NOT $2.9 Trillion (from your other post) it was $3.168 Trillion.

2012`s federal spending WAS NOT $3.8 Trillion (from your other post) it was $3.563 Trillion.

That`s an increase of 12% NOT 78%. Hell your WRONG numbers are only an increase of 31%. Can you math?

By the way, my numbers are from heritage.org so PLEASE don`t call it biased.

http://tinyurl.com/8hormzp

This is all besides the point that 2009 is Bush`s budget.

You should feel ashamed on multiple levels.
0
Reply
Male 38,365
[quote]..not like Canadians are voting on it too.[/quote]
@Dead_Kittens: 420: the jobs refered to are American jobs! You know, the kind Obama keeps promising to create? With Keystone he KILLED THEM! Dead like doornails! AND he broke some sort of trade agreement too!
Now Canada is free to sell the same oil to CHINA! Where before we weren`t.
Nice job BHO!

[quote]Yeah, that`s about all I had to see to not click it.[/quote]
@Sepheroth: You open mind is SO MUCH smarter than my closed one!

[quote]Republicans didn`t want Guantanamo shut down. Now they`re blaming him for not doing it?[/quote]
@jtreb: No, we blame him for NOT keeping his promise! He LIED about it, ok? I know for a fact you liberals value "truthfullness" about as much as vampires value garlic, but c`mon! He openly lies and YOU still defend him?
Sad.

@madest: My shirt? It`s not tucked in!
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]... dow jones is higher than ever before, record profits...[/quote]
Right, unless you adjust it for inflation; then stock prices and profits are in the toilet. And no, I`m not talking about the phoney CPI. That doesn`t even count food and energy, because they`re "too volatile." The only things left in the "consumer shopping basket" the government uses to report the inflation rate is flat screens, flash drives, and flip phones.

Look at any commodity that is traded on the world market -- oil, corn, gold, etc. -- and you can see that the dollar has lost nearly half its value since Obama took office, which is the ONLY thing pushing stock prices higher -- well, that and the fact the Bernanke is creating $trillions completely out of thin air to buy T-bills at 0% interest which artificially drives more money into the stock market pushing prices higher.

The fact is, our economy is in complete shambles, and Obama and the Democrats are to blame.
0
Reply
Male 38,365
HAHA! I submitted this quite a while ago, not in response to that "Why Obama" posting.

I mean seriously, there are some true, valid and well reasoned reasons to NOT give BHO another 6 trillion dollars to play with at the site...
... and other which are just plain silly!

But I know, for a fact, that the IAB Liberal Brigade will find something to get their collective panties in a twist over!

And I like that EACH ONE has a link so you can fact-check it for yourself! Unlike, oh, 90% of liberal clains about Romney.

668.President Obama broke his promise to increase the minimum wage to $9.50.

= LOLZ! So many broken promises! Lets give him 4 more years to... still not keep them!
0
Reply
Male 8,303
CrakrJak

"Considering that`s an increase of 78% since 2008, that`s quite a lot actually."

Oh come on. We have been through this. 2009`s federal spending is from the budget proposed and passed by Bush and covers October 2008 – September 2009. Nobody disagrees with that. It isn`t up for debate. So comparing 2008 to 2009 is simply comparing one Bush budget to another. Obama`s first budget is fiscal year 2010.

http://tinyurl.com/986hze
0
Reply
Male 17,512
HG: Considering that`s an increase of 78% since 2008, that`s quite a lot actually.
0
Reply
Male 132
@Merv
Thank God we can always fall back on the race card when there`s nothing else to say. Can you honestly defend the last 4 years of this president? Even by crybaby liberal standards, Obama has been a horrible failure.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
OldOllie

"I only need one reason: he`s a socialist f***tard."

"Over Obama’s four budget years, federal spending is on track to rise from $3.52 trillion to $3.58 trillion, an annualized increase of just 0.4%."

http://tinyurl.com/bm9rgmb

WHAT A SOCIALIST
0
Reply
Male 17,512
OldOllie: Agreed Ollie, Agreed.
0
Reply
Male 1,793
if he is a socialist he is the worst one in history... dow jones is higher than ever before, record profits... so if you want to call President Obama a socialist just be honest and crawl out of your whole and embrace your bigoted ass..
0
Reply
Male 15,832
I only need one reason: he`s a socialist f***tard.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
#12: It also further enhanced Iran`s influence in the region not a very good thing.
#13: Another reason why the surge didn`t work.
#14: Government is the spontaneous outgrowth of a nation. It will NOT take hold if constructed by a foreign government.
#16: Actually a good thing.
#19: Rumsfeld and Saddam shake hands, just sayin.
#23: It was a diatribe, good thing he didn`t pay attention.
#25: We shouldn`t be handing out tax payer dollars to any foreign anyways, so whatever.
#26: GOOD the Iranians are fed up with our involvement. But no, McCain gives a train-wreck of a response
#27: GOOD
#58: That`s a reason some would actually vote for.
#60: Some endorsements you simply don`t ask for.
#112: Not a FU<KING thing the president can do about it.
#140: No he isn`t, see EVERY FREAKING PRESIDENT BEFORE HIM!
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Yeah IAB needs a new 5Cats political sweeper. Who comes here for a consevative Canadian cat lovers opinion of American politics?
0
Reply
Male 3,364
Republicans didn`t want Guantanamo shut down. Now they`re blaming him for not doing it? LMFAO!! 5cats...you`ve jumped the shark, buddy.
0
Reply
Male 1,442
Isn`t a database large enough for the list of not Romney reasons.
0
Reply
Male 955
I`m becoming convinced that not even right wingers even read this stuff or believe it, but it wouldn`t surprise me anyways.
0
Reply
Male 1,252
42.The one quote provided from the article cited by Politico contains a grammatical error “in to" instead of "into."

Really? I mean come on lol.

87. $1 million was given to a Chicago dinner cruise company to "combat terrorism."

LOL


420. When presented with the Keystone pipeline proposal, a multi-billion dollar project that would create thousands of jobs and eventually lead to lower energy prices by improving supply chain efficiencies, Obama refused to immediately approve it.

Thats just plain retarded ..not like Canadians are voting on it too.
0
Reply
Male 2,516
none of those I`m afraid, a reason to vote for Romney
0
Reply
Male 955
conservativedailynews.com

Yeah, that`s about all I had to see to not click it.
0
Reply
Male 2,711
More like 1001 Reasons 5Cats is a dumbass.
0
Reply
Male 8,303
Well I really did attempt to read these.

1. I don`t trust anything from an openly biased blog.

2. I fact checked a few right off the bat and found they were lies.

3. The list is filled with things like makes mcdonalds include apple slices in happy meals. LOL. Yes, how DARE he want the children in the fattest nation on earth to get some fruit.

Obama has done plenty of bad things that are legitimate to talk about. Why waste time with a list pumped this full of bulls.hit, propaganda, and anecdotes. Put together a list of 100 serious things and then have an intelligent discussion about it.
0
Reply
Female 2,525
I don`t base my vote on who writes the best poetry.
0
Reply
Female 2,525
Some of these are decent reasons not to vote for him, but some are just stupid.
0
Reply
Male 12
Some of these are actually reasons in favor of Obama.
0
Reply
Female 280
TL;DR
0
Reply
Male 38,365
Link: 1001 Reasons To NOT Vote For Obama [Rate Link] - And y`all thought 5Cats hates Obama? Lolz!
0
Reply