Who Do You Have For Third Period? [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 5 years ago in Weird

He"s a new teacher--his name"s Mr. Subliminal.
There are 27 comments:
Male 15,832
[quote]Old Ollie, money isn`t a genetic trait.[/quote]
No, but IQ is, and IQ has been directly linked to income which is a significant factor in the size of family you can support. When you give money to people with low income and low IQs, you are subsidizing their reproduction --> Idiocracy.
0
Reply
Male 296
Sadly those that are the most fit aren`t always the smartest, hence why we have thousands of dumb redneck families with 10+ kids.
0
Reply
Male 2,513
...Then we will breed a race of super-smart super-bored children that will have all the intelligence of Stephen Hawking and the same mobility as they will be glued to the computer screen.
0
Reply
Male 2,513
@Tekinette
On to your plan of sexing up all the female I-A-B`ers and I gotta say, brilliant!

F-ing brilliant even.
0
Reply
Male 15,182
I have to admit it, I missed it the first time I read it.
0
Reply
Male 273
Smart people tend to have less kids than morons so yeah... Luckily on iab we`re all super smart, let`s breed you guys, there`s probably 1 female for 100 guys so we`ll have to work some kind of system.. hmm... I`ll look into this and contact you guys when the plan is ready k ?
0
Reply
Male 1,674
"Then explain trailer trash."
it`s called natural SELECTION. And have you seen the selection they have in those trailer parks? yikes.
0
Reply
Male 787
Old Ollie, money isn`t a genetic trait.
0
Reply
Male 7,123
TKD_Master

You come to my family with selective sterilisation in mind and I will shoot you in the face. I don`t don`t even have a gun, but expect to be shot in the face.
0
Reply
Male 7,123
OldOllie.

I`m guessing Idiocracy befeore I click.

Yes. I was right. That wasn`t actually a documentary.

Who gets to choose who breeds?

0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]@OldOllie: Welcome to Costco, I love you.[/quote]
Love ya, too, patches, but we don`t have Costco here, just Walmart.
0
Reply
Female 7,997
Plus it seems that some of you believe that selection leads to improvements- often it really doesn`t. Pandas for a start....
0
Reply
Female 7,997
TKDmaster- oh yes it does. Natural selection is alive and working just fine thank you. Cannot find source at presentbut try here andhere
0
Reply
Male 399
Non-aggression pact - I don`t hate, steal from, kill you & vice versa, that`s (in theory anyway) how society works, i.e. human rights

[quote]This is why we need selective sterilization.[/quote]

careful now, how should said parameters be chosen: strength? intelligence? wealth? how about religion? you probably want to make sure that you yourself are white listed so your own genes stay within the pool, as does everyone else

0
Reply
Male 5,811
@OldOllie: Welcome to Costco, I love you.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
Natural Selection no longer applies to human beings. As a society, we typically support our weaker humans, giving them the chance/ability to reproduce. This is why we need selective sterilization.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]OldOllie, on the other hand, seems to have no problem with checking his sympathy.

Darwin is often blamed for eugenics, but he clearly and specifically opposed it from the start. [/quote]
Darwin`s disapproval of eugenics is totally irrelevant to the phenomenon of dysgenics. By ensuring the survival of those who would not survive on their own, humans have essentially repealed the law of natural selection as applies to their own species. If you want to know where that leads, just click here:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/
0
Reply
Male 7,123
OldOllie, on the other hand, seems to have no problem with checking his sympathy.

Darwin is often blamed for eugenics, but he clearly and specifically opposed it from the start.
0
Reply
Male 7,123
DuckBoy87

Darwin recognised that complex human societies were kinda sidestepping the whole `survival of the fittest` side of things, but also recognised that caring for the less able was one of our greatest virtues.

` Nor could we check our sympathy, if so urged by hard reason, without deterioration in the noblest part of our nature. The surgeon may harden himself whilst performing an operation, for he knows that he is acting for the good of his patient; but if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit, with a certain and great present evil. Hence we must bear without complaining the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; `
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]Then explain trailer trash.[/quote]
Same explanation as ghetto trash: welfare.
0
Reply
Male 5,811
@Duckboy:

-------------
can`t read
-------------
0
Reply
Male 3,620
@patchgrabber:

-------the joke----->

------your head-----
0
Reply
Male 1,436
"Then explain trailer trash."

With out any natural predators or any kind of real environmental dangers, the fittest are soon outnumbered by those who simply procreate the most often.
0
Reply
Male 5,811
@Duckboy: Because natural selection doesn`t exactly apply to humans the way it does in nature now that technology has allowed just about everyone (excluding developing countries) to reach the age where they can pass on their genes. We still evolve, but natural selection doesn`t quite have the same meaning for us.
0
Reply
Male 3,620
"Fittest will reproduce more often"

Then explain trailer trash.
0
Reply
Male 40,300
If he`s fapping he`s not replicating his DNA properly...
0
Reply
Male 20,827
Link: Who Do You Have For Third Period? [Pic] [Rate Link] - He`s a new teacher--his name`s Mr. Subliminal.
0
Reply