The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 18    Average: 2.1/5]
19 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 11174
Rating: 2.1
Category: Misc
Date: 09/30/12 02:33 PM

19 Responses to This Is What You`re Missing On TV, Part 431 [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18834 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 2:34 pm
    Link: This Is What You`re Missing On TV, Part 431 - Good News: You`re on TV! Bad News: For this...
  2. Profile photo of USAF27
    USAF27 Male 40-49
    96 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 2:49 pm
    Peter, I`ll take Paul Lynn for the block...
  3. Profile photo of paddy215
    paddy215 Male 18-29
    1677 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 3:40 pm
    Bit harsh on the guy on the top left, I mean, he could have been looking at anything.
  4. Profile photo of BlankTom
    BlankTom Male 30-39
    1674 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 3:51 pm
    is that Dave Coulier
  5. Profile photo of KAKABAKA
    KAKABAKA Male 30-39
    402 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 4:06 pm
    holy sh*t! i live in san jose.
  6. Profile photo of avail9988
    avail9988 Male 18-29
    700 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 6:26 pm
    Its illegal to publish pedophiles names / pictures here.. should name them all
  7. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 7:46 pm
    The one at the top left had "child molester" written all over his face
  8. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 9:23 pm
    " The one at the top left had "child molester" written all over his face "

    And crazy written all ove rhis eyes.
  9. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 9:53 pm
    Bit harsh on the guy on the top left, I mean, he could have been looking at anything.
    I think Paddy just won the internet. Bravo sir. Bravo.

  10. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 10:01 pm
    I have no sympathy for pedos, but should they really be publishing pictures of SUSPECTS? Aren`t they presumed innocent until proven guilty? They probably ARE all guilty, but what if one or more of them was framed by a cop because he caught him fooling around with his wife or some other such nonsense. It`s rare, but it does happen, and I don`t think you should completely destroy someone`s life till they`re found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Then you can skin them alive with red-hot pliers for all I care.
  11. Profile photo of alsobored
    alsobored Male 18-29
    347 posts
    September 30, 2012 at 11:02 pm
    lol that`s pretty cruel openly mocking them in public. it`s a bit barbaric if you ask me.
  12. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 7:14 am
    I agree with Ollie. How can any adult NOT have a problem with using media like this to destroy the reputations of those *accused* of doing wrong?
  13. Profile photo of USAF27
    USAF27 Male 40-49
    96 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 8:26 am
    Salem Massachusetts, 1692 all over again. Child molesters are the lowest form of life, however, this is America and even OJ Simpson was kinda considered innocent until proven...innocent(?)
  14. Profile photo of botfly
    botfly Male 50-59
    616 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 2:23 pm
    @ OldOllie, I might add, while hanging them by their testicles with fish hooks.
  15. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 4:40 pm
    They probably ARE all guilty, but what if one or more of them was framed by a cop because he caught him fooling around with his wife or some other such nonsense. It`s rare, but it does happen, and I don`t think you should completely destroy someone`s life till they`re found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    There are many more possibilities than police corruption. A few off the top of my head:

    1) Either there weren`t any children in the pictures or the pictures weren`t pornographic (or both). You`d be surprised at what has been called "child porn".

    2) The pics were put on their computer without their knowledge due to compromised security.

    3) The suspect used their card to buy legal porn from people who, unknown to them, also sold child porn.

    4) Someone else used the suspect`s card details to buy child porn (or as for 3).

    The biggest child porn op in the UK included a fair bit of 3 and 4. ~40 suicides
  16. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 5:00 pm
    Here`s a brief overview of the main flaws in the op I mentioned:

    Operation Ore - extremely flawed.

    Hundreds of lives ruined, dozens of people dead and nobody has any idea if any of them were guilty of anything.

    [quote">They are the victims of a combination of technical naivety and fear, fed by a media circus demanding fast results and the exposure of big names. As the Internet continues to become more transparent, the risk is that the stage may be set for a 21st century witch-hunt.[/quote">


    Any time you see people lusting after torturing people to death (botfly provides a perfect example just below), you can be sure that a witch hunt is on the cards. Psychos who fantasise about torturing people to death and getting away with it are never much bothered about whether their victims are guilty of anything.
  17. Profile photo of botfly
    botfly Male 50-59
    616 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 6:45 pm
    oh give it a break
  18. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    October 1, 2012 at 7:30 pm
    While we`re not yet at the gruesome levels of torture that botfly et alia yearn for, the witch hunt has already had many victims. As a random example, I just saw a story on an IT news website I read.

    A man sent a text to his girlfriend that was sexually suggestive. Well, that`s what he meant to do. He accidentally sent it to everyone in the contacts list on his phone.

    Embarrassing mistake, right? "Hey Dad, about that text I sent you..." But no real harm done.

    Wrong. He was jailed for 18 months for sexually abusing children. It was reduced to 9 months on appeal, but he`s still going to be a registered sex offender (and therefore a "legitimate" target for botfly et alia), he`s still sacked and he`s still going to fail every background check for every job he might apply for. He was a swimming coach, but it`s now illegal for him to ever work with anyone under 16.

    Under witch hunt conditions, no-one is safe and no conviction
  19. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    October 2, 2012 at 12:19 pm
    Angilion, are you really that dense that you cannot recognize hyperbole, i.e., rhetorical exaggeration?

Leave a Reply