Woman Tortured For 10 Hours As Protest [Pic+]

Submitted by: Angelmassb 5 years ago in

She goes through 10 hours of brutal treatment in public as protest against the use of animals for cosmetic testing.
There are 40 comments:
Male 689
acidballroom -
they do exist for us. sorry to burst your bubble but we NEED them to survive. we NEED to kill them for our safety.(deer on roads and such) if we were to do as you/peta claim and let them do as they please we wouldnt survive long. when was the last time you saw a hamster show happiness? it is not in their genes. they dont smile/laugh so how can you tell? also human happiness should be more valuable than livestock. i cant tell by taste that the cow im eating for dinner was happy or miserable so who cares. how about this, get a petition going signed by all of the animals on your side, then we can talk. until then i will continue to laugh at, taunt, and kill any animal i see fit. i will also see the testing on of said animals a necessary outcome of our evolutionary/scientific advances.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@SarahofBorg

"There are people who ENJOY what she put herself through, so how bad could it be for animals?"

If you ask for it: BDSM.
If you don`t ask for it: abuse/assault/torture.

The consent thing is pretty damn important. It`s only that little thing that separates sex and rape.

And last time I checked, I`ve not run into a kinky non-human animal (furries aside) who was capable of saying "thank you sir, can I have another?"

@darkmagic14n

"do you value an animal`s life above that of a human, how about a hundred animals` lives to a million human lives?"

Let me put the question back at you: do you value a human life over an animal life? What about the lives of individual humans...are they worth varying amounts? Is my life worth more or less your life? How do you calculate it, and who does the calculations?
0
Reply
Male 19
We test on animals so we won`t have to test on humans.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]Aren`t your prisons crowded with convicted murederers, gangbangers, rapists, violent thugs and other scum?[/quote]
I`ve always been in favor of using violent felons for medical research like testing new drugs and training surgeons.
0
Reply
Female 26
We should open up the possibility for inmates to volunteer for testing, both cosmetics and scientifically... Give them something they could do to give back to society, I suppose.
0
Reply
Male 4
@jops360
You say you don`t want testing to be done on yourself? Well what makes you think that the animals are fine with it? The fact is, animals do not simply exist for our use, we just happen to be the most capable of exploiting them. Animals suffer just like us. There is no reason why human happiness should be more valuable.
0
Reply
Male 689
there are plenty of other worthy causes to get behind, but animal testing? who cares. animals are there for us to use, simple as that. we use them to haul stuff, for travel, for entertainment, and for food. why cant we use them to make sure crap dosnt hurt us. i know that i dont want to be the beta tester of some eye drops just to find out i went blind. on top of all of that we kill millions of animals a day, not for food, because they are taking up to much space. go to an animal shelter, next week go back. more than half of the animals are gone. not because they were adopted, because they were unsellable. all i am saying is, PEOPLE and animals are suffering right now, lets take care of our own species before we worry about everything else.
0
Reply
Male 448
Demynted: testing cosmetics is not the same as testing medicines
0
Reply
Male 3,445
`You guy are fine with treating animals as disposable livestock for your hamburger patties, but cosmetics?! HOW DARE THEY?!??! Cry me a drating river.`

I personally am not okay with using animals for food, but you are missing the point. The problem is that acts such as this are cruel because they cause unnecessary harm. Most people don`t realize that you don`t need to eat animal products to be a healthy person, but I think most people realize that testing cosmetics on innocent animals is unnecessary and therefore immoral.
0
Reply
Male 1,754
I`m fine with testing cosmetics on animals. You guy are fine with treating animals as disposable livestock for your hamburger patties, but cosmetics?! HOW DARE THEY?!??! Cry me a drating river.
0
Reply
Male 1,243
I think it`s important for some of you retards out there to realise this is a protest against the testing of cosmetics on animals, not medical testing.
0
Reply
Male 3,445
`while its sad and "not right" its something that happens. get over it. they are animals. go complain about the homeless people out there or something...`

That is no excuse. It is preventable cruelty toward an innocent. Caring about abused animals doesn`t mean you can`t still care about homeless people or any other suffering people.
0
Reply
Male 78
Thanks to animal testing, she can now protest an average of 15 years longer...
0
Reply
Male 1,754
This is theater. There was no real torture. Torture?! Laughable.
0
Reply
Male 5,624
SarahofBorg
You are supposed to be caring for the pet as it were a child.
Please, don`t have children.
0
Reply
Male 369
This peta type crap would put me off using that particular LUSH store ever again, frankly.

0
Reply
Male 5,811
There are definitely benefits to some forms of animal testing, but not in cosmetics and not when the animals are put in needless pain. At least for published works you need ethics approval first, for private R&D you don`t...sad.
0
Reply
Male 1,216
We would lose so much of our technology without animal testing. Some are unnecessary, like tobacco and cosmetics, but medicine and other vital things are highly important to us. I could even bet you she is using products that could only exist with animal testing, and maybe even had her life saved by animal testing once.
0
Reply
Male 500
Aren`t your prisons crowded with convicted murederers, gangbangers, rapists, violent thugs and other scum? Is the life of a rapist still worth more than an animal, even though he behaved worse than said animal? Two birds with one stone.

Also, @SarahofBorg: yes, but in that case it usually involves a leather/latex clad sexy mistress.. :P
0
Reply
Male 1,510

My t-shirt was tested on animals. It didn`t fit.
0
Reply
Male 39,531

And some perv fapped to that under his coat.
Well done, lady, whoever you are.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Somewhere, some guy is fapping to this.

*** edit ***

For the record, I posted this BEFORE I read Quackor`s post.
0
Reply
Male 209
How terribly douchy.
0
Reply
Male 658
So she wasted a day?
0
Reply
Female 3,562
There are people who go through this for FUN. That kind of ruins her point. There are people who ENJOY what she put herself through, so how bad could it be for animals?
Anyway, I care about animal testing when it comes to blatant cruelty. Most of what these animals are going through isn`t much worse than treatments you get at the doctors office. Plus, when it comes to mice, I really don`t give a crap. I have a pet hamster while she`s very lucky she`s not a test subject she`s still miserable because she has to live in a cage. That`s life, hamster. You exist for my amusement and nothing else.
0
Reply
Male 143
what does she think this will change? i applaud her effort but its completely pointless and wont result in the slightest change in the industry
0
Reply
Male 1,625
@whyteman:

do you value an animal`s life above that of a human, how about a hundred animals` lives to a million human lives?

people who complain about animal testing are worse than vegans who push their beliefs on people. and people who complain about animal testing and then aren`t vegans are just hypocrites in their own right.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
i didnt know it was possible to be so butt hurt...

while its sad and "not right" its something that happens. get over it. they are animals. go complain about the homeless people out there or something...
0
Reply
Male 96
"People like this are trying to set science back. Without animals to test a number of things on, science is put in a very difficult position.

It`s worse for scientific progress than evolution and dinosaur deniers."

No, religion set science back. People like this, like me just want for us to treat other sentients better than we are. I happen to praise science.
0
Reply
Male 40,277
Save the animals! Use HUMANS for product testing!
0
Reply
Male 2,516
@Andrew155: They`re protesting animal use in cosmetics, not medical testing.
0
Reply
Male 2,578
People like this are trying to set science back. Without animals to test a number of things on, science is put in a very difficult position.

It`s worse for scientific progress than evolution and dinosaur deniers.
0
Reply
Male 1,442
Some people pay good money to go through that.
0
Reply
Male 2,855
fap fap fap
0
Reply
Male 2,551
Arcval - Thank you! At least in your clicking of the link, you saved me from doing so. Take some comfort in that.
0
Reply
Male 303
FFS IAB. WARN us when it`s a f*cking daily mail link!!! I HATE giving those mean persons any money!
0
Reply
Male 13,630
Hard, very hard, she needs to be acknowledged, to show how humans treat animals
0
Reply
Male 606
Take animals out of cosmetic testing and put them into medical testing!
0
Reply
Male 2,384
save the whales, eat the shrimp
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Link: Woman Tortured For 10 Hours As Protest [Pic+] [Rate Link] - She goes through 10 hours of brutal treatment in public as protest against the use of animals for cosmetic testing.
0
Reply