The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 29    Average: 2.6/5]
56 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 12906
Rating: 2.6
Category:
Date: 08/04/12 02:24 PM

56 Responses to Chick-Fil-A Vs. The Rainbow Oreo [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18933 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 2:14 pm
    Link: Chick-Fil-A Vs. The Rainbow Oreo - Ugh, pointless hate is so confusing.
  2. Profile photo of Quik2TheStab
    Quik2TheStab Male 18-29
    661 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 2:40 pm
    Uhhh.... no.
  3. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 2:42 pm
    People just need to chill out. If the oreo or chicken sandwiches really rile you up that much, something`s wrong.
  4. Profile photo of bigfatdynamo
    bigfatdynamo Male 30-39
    259 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 2:54 pm
    I`m a conservative Christian who is politically moderate. I don`t care if people get married who are gay - not my concern. Attempting to force me, a minister in the Church, however, is my concern. Some of the leftist literature suggests denying 501(c)3 organizations their status based on not following federal marriage guidelines, providing the federal government steps in and legalizes same-sex marriage. That is just as insidious and un-American as those who think it is ok to legislate from the Bible, or any other religious text *coughshariacoughqu`rancoughcough*. If the USA passes a Constitutional Amendment that allows for Bible Laws to happen (which could have been done in America`s early years but wasn`t - which should give us a hint to why things were set up this way) then maybe it would be legal to legislate against gay marriage. Under current American law, specifically the civil rights laws, this kind of government denial really should be stopped. At every level.
  5. Profile photo of bigfatdynamo
    bigfatdynamo Male 30-39
    259 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 2:59 pm
    Stop denying gays the right to marry. Stop denying churches the right to be built (or mosques, or synogogues) and to govern their own sets of moral code. Yet these things happen on a regular basis and the regular joe-shmoe American applauds one loss of liberty as "saving America`s soul" and the other loss of liberty as "shutting up the *bigots*.

    You are ALL losing your liberties.
  6. Profile photo of RobSwindol
    RobSwindol Male 30-39
    2514 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 2:59 pm
    First off, I don`t get the oreo thing at all.

    Secondly, if you think this Chick-fil-a thing is something new, then you need to shut the fuq up, because you`re a damn moron.

    Like others, I have been boycotting Chick-fil-a for quite some time now. They have been oppressing women and homosexuals for several years now, so either get your facts straight, or go sit the fuq down.
  7. Profile photo of FoSchizle
    FoSchizle Male 18-29
    330 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:07 pm
    Didn`t say anything when the Oreo thing hit the streets, and honestly it was nowhere near as big as the Chick-fil-A outcry that there is now.
  8. Profile photo of ScottSerious
    ScottSerious Male 18-29
    5316 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:08 pm
    pretty sure this is totally wrong
  9. Profile photo of Xerasia
    Xerasia Female 18-29
    1181 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:09 pm
    there is nothing wrong with boycotting a company that you don`t agree with. i stopped eating at c-f-a a long time ago, when i first found out what they stood for.
  10. Profile photo of DShephard
    DShephard Male 18-29
    1595 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:24 pm
    There were Rainbow Oreos?
  11. Profile photo of smaus
    smaus Male 30-39
    715 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:25 pm
    Chick-fileagalize marijuana
  12. Profile photo of RoboPatton
    RoboPatton Male 30-39
    2424 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:36 pm
    so oreo loves to fill gays mouths with cream, and the ceo of chick-fil-a thinks the whole idea is gross.

    And the world turns...
  13. Profile photo of FreedomFrie
    FreedomFrie Male 30-39
    243 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:37 pm
    You know what would make this site even cooler - More Chick-Fil-A posts... definitely solving boredom by posting one after another... uhll
  14. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    "Ugh, pointless hate is so confusing. "

    Then why indulge in pointless hate? Just because someone has a point of view you are too thick to understand, you hate them and lie about their point of view!
  15. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:40 pm
    Enough already.
  16. Profile photo of jendrian
    jendrian Male 18-29
    2516 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:43 pm
    the only difference being one of those groups is trying to deny an entire group`s of people right to be happy for the sole reason that an ancient text full of mostly gibberish told them it`s evil
  17. Profile photo of HerColdHands
    HerColdHands Female 18-29
    471 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:46 pm
    Um, so, the difference here is that Oreo just made that picture to celebrate Pride. Meanwhile, Chick-Fil-A is actually legitimately oppressing people and fighting against equal rights. :/
  18. Profile photo of TeChNo_RaVe
    TeChNo_RaVe Female 18-29
    160 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:47 pm
    People just need to shut the hell up about this crap. This is just as bad as the James Holmes thing. .-.
  19. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 3:56 pm
    Some of the leftist literature suggests denying 501(c)3 organizations their status based on not following federal marriage guidelines, providing the federal government steps in and legalizes same-sex marriage.

    Well, that would be the obvious next step. It probably wouldn`t pass soon, but it would be the obvious next step.

    When people want to fight, they don`t stop if they`re ahead on points at the end of the first round. They go on to another round, until their enemy is defeated. Since there can`t be an end to group advocacy ("more for <x>" can`t have an end point since there`s always more), any fight based on it can`t end.

    If you want to end the fight, you have to end the group advocacy. If anyone is suggesting that, they`re not making the news.
  20. Profile photo of Kegomatix
    Kegomatix Male 18-29
    1341 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 4:00 pm
    Really don`t care. Enough with the Chick-fil-A garbage.
  21. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 4:01 pm
    for the sole reason that an ancient text full of mostly gibberish told them it`s evil

    I`d say it because that`s what they think that ancient text says. What it actually says is unclear. In some places, what they`ve been told it says is simply made up. The clearest example of that is arsenokoitai. It`s almost the entire basis for the claimed condemnation of homosexual sex in the new testament but in reality nobody knows what the word means. Seriously - it first appears in the NT and nowhere else, without any indication of meaning. Given that a fair bit of ancient Greek writing that mentions homosexual sex still exists and the word `arsenokoitai` doesn`t appear in any of it, I`m inclined to believe that`s not what the word actually refers to.
  22. Profile photo of jendrian
    jendrian Male 18-29
    2516 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 4:12 pm
    @Angilion: k then, a silly translation of the ancient text
  23. Profile photo of Kourogi
    Kourogi Male 18-29
    82 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 4:34 pm
    OH WOW. People who support gay rights are supporting companies that do the same and boycotting those who do the opposite, and vice versa? How surprising. And people who have opinions and support others who share the same opinions and boycott those who don`t are so stupid. =_=
  24. Profile photo of winallend90
    winallend90 Female 18-29
    21 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 5:15 pm
    and vice versa? How surprising. And people who have opinions and support others who share the same opinions and boycott those who don`t are so stupid
  25. Profile photo of LandoGriffin
    LandoGriffin Male 30-39
    3844 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 5:22 pm
    @Angilion
    arsenokoitai

    Since "coitus" refers to heterosexual genital sex (with a penis and vagina, you know, the way babies are made) and everyone knows "arse" is the butt, then obviously "arsenokoitai" is "butt sex" between heterosexuals. The New Testament (you know, the Christ part) says men are not allowed to have butt sex with women but doesn`t say anything about two men and what they do together, or even if it forbids butt sex, it doesn`t say anything about guys blowing guys or handjobs.

    (ps - I`m joking - no one knows the actual translation)
  26. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 5:28 pm
    Chick-fil-A is so last week
  27. Profile photo of Enjin
    Enjin Male 30-39
    802 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 5:46 pm
    I believe this statement is incorrect. MOST people don`t care who says or does what. Loud annoying people seeking attention and the media are the ones represented in this graphic.
  28. Profile photo of Zuriel
    Zuriel Male 30-39
    554 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 5:47 pm
    people really need to get over themselves.. on all sides
  29. Profile photo of iodfgdfgwgj
    iodfgdfgwgj Male 18-29
    4 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    ONLINE STORE :

    ==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

    Christan Audigier bikini $23

    Ed Hardy Bikini $23

    Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

    ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

    Sandal $32

    christian louboutin $80

    Sunglass $15

    COACH_Necklace $27

    handbag $33

    AF tank woman $17

    puma slipper woman $30
    ==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====
    sdfwegwe
  30. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 6:08 pm
    Welcome to Election Year in America folks!

    *Puts on top hat, grabs cane and dances a vaudeville.*

    And dynamo, no the federal government could *not* force houses of worship to perform gay marriages if that *private* house of worship does not believe in it. It could never happen. That`s the whole point of separation of church and state.

    The house of worship`s doctrines are to help their members get to heaven, the state`s duty is to treat everyone with justice under the law, two completely different responsibilities.
  31. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 6:09 pm
    And lest I forget- SPAMMER BEGONE!
  32. Profile photo of RobSwindol
    RobSwindol Male 30-39
    2514 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 6:48 pm
    "Just because someone has a point of view you are too thick to understand, you hate them and lie about their point of view!"

    Random, you obviously need to educate yourself. Only then will you not sound like such an idiot. There is a huge difference between a person having and opinion and practicing discrimination in a work place. One is legal and the other is not. If Chick-fil-a is allowed to get away with the discriminatory crap they`ve been pulling for years then it will be because of morons like you.
  33. Profile photo of YANKmyDOODLE
    YANKmyDOODLE Male 30-39
    771 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 7:31 pm
    or how about OMG EVERYBODY SHUT UP.
  34. Profile photo of zigzagman779
    zigzagman779 Male 18-29
    7 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 8:45 pm
    this is like getting a lap dance and complaining your stripper is a Communist her tits are out who cares what her beliefs are!
  35. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 10:24 pm
    More liberal lies and slander. That`s all they have left.
  36. Profile photo of 2L84ME
    2L84ME Male 18-29
    208 posts
    August 4, 2012 at 10:50 pm
    "The question is not whether someone is a hypocrite or not, the question is how much of a hypocrite is someone compared to everyone else."
  37. Profile photo of paperduck
    paperduck Male 18-29
    1745 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 1:00 am
    anyone who starts or stops eating at chikfila over this are douchebags
  38. Profile photo of korahn
    korahn Male 30-39
    1322 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 2:52 am
    Those Oreos STILL look FAAAAABULOUS!!! Delicious too. Never had a Chick-Fil-A (none here in Canada) but I`d still like to try it. The owner`s views are one thing, their food does not make one a gay basher. At least, I hope it doesn`t. I mean, Orson Scott Card has the same views, but I enjoyed Ender`s Game and playing Shadow Complex.
  39. Profile photo of Student_Law
    Student_Law Male 30-39
    1010 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 4:23 am
    Not only should gay marriage be legal, it should be mandatory! Everyone should lay their sexuality aside and go explore. Personally, I am going for the first opportunity to sodomize the next legal boy I see.

    When it comes to God and Jesus, I have learned one thing: Don`t pray for God to give you something, like a bike or a car. That`s not how He works!

    You go out and steal one. Afterwords you ask for forgiveness! Ask the Pope, he knows how this works. And he does not allow condoms either, could it get any better? LOL :-)

    In the name of the Lord Jesus, I say to all his disciples thy shall all go man with man and lay down and explore every cavity and let thy semen rain upon thee as Gods own life giving rain does on the dry soil you live upon. Sing Hallelujah!
  40. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 5:13 am
    Only one single, and very essential difference: pro gay rights legislation doesn`t hurt anyone. It doesn`t limit the rights of anyone, nor does it force them to do anything. It`s not discriminatory in ANY way, and is only INCLUSIVE.

    Anti-gay legislation is, by its very nature, discriminatory. It limits rights. Period. It is, by *it`s* very nature, EXCLUSIVE.
  41. Profile photo of TheGuySmiley
    TheGuySmiley Male 18-29
    1243 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 5:16 am
    it`s ironic
  42. Profile photo of Zach82
    Zach82 Male 30-39
    319 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 5:38 am
    I always likes KFC better anyway.
  43. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 7:36 am
    And dynamo, no the federal government could *not* force houses of worship to perform gay marriages if that *private* house of worship does not believe in it. It could never happen. That`s the whole point of separation of church and state.

    Church and state are not seperate in the USA. Maybe they might sort of be on paper, but they`re far from seperate in reality.

    For example, which presidents have been openly atheist? Presidential candidates? Anyone in or a serious contender for any senior political office anywhere in the USA?

    If there was seperation of church and state, there wouldn`t be any chance at all of religion being taught in schools, let alone a deliberately deceitful attempt to corrupt and destroy the entire idea of science by abusing it as a host for religion and forcing that on children. Yet there continues to be an issue with "intelligent design", which is exactly that.
  44. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 7:50 am
    Can a legally recognised marriage be carried out anywhere in the USA by anyone? So, for example, if someone was to stop a random stranger in a random shop and wed with someone else in front of that stranger, would that constitute a legally valid marriage under USA law?

    I suspect some sort of approval is required from the authorities, either of place, person or both.

    If so, then that approval can be withheld. Surely you`d want it withheld from anywhere that discriminates to such an extent? There certainly are people who do want that.

    So maybe it wouldn`t be possible to force religious places to perform homosexual marriages (and maybe it would be possible, since church and state are not seperate in the USA), but it would probably be easier to force them to stop performing marriages at all.

    There would be a way. Your declaration that it`s impossible isn`t one you have the power to impose on the country.
  45. Profile photo of Barnk
    Barnk Male 30-39
    486 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 11:05 am
    Shopped!
  46. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 11:30 am
    Angie the 1st amendment to the US Constitution states two things about religion, 1 Non Establishment, there is no state religion, (*unlike in the UK and other European countries. In fact this is one of the reasons you`ll never get rid of your Queen, she also functions as the head of the Church of England, vaguely like the Pope*) and the state cannot promote any religion. And 2, Free Exercise, members of any religion are allowed free exercise of their beliefs.

    Creationism/ID whatever you want to call it has been illegal forever, every once in a while some county in Texas will try to force it otherwise and they immediately get smacked down and the 6th amendment expressly forbids any religious test for office.
  47. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 11:37 am
    Secular authorities already grant marriage certificates, you can walk right down to the courthouse and get one, and religious ministers already perform the religious marriage ("in the eyes of god" vs "in the eyes of the law").

    Because you know...of the Separation of Church and State.

    With your fantastically limited understanding of this country`s Constitution and your hubris & total ignorance about the way things are done in the real world, you ought to keep your great ignorant mouth shut. Or to use the British- you Git.
  48. Profile photo of HolyGod
    HolyGod Male 30-39
    6908 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 2:58 pm
    OldOllie

    "More liberal lies and slander. That`s all they have left."

    Almost every time I see someone like you make an ignorant or bigoted conservative statement I just look over at their age and am relieved that they and their worthless brethren will be gone soon. Society progresses when the bigots die off.
  49. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 6:29 pm
    With your fantastically limited understanding of this country`s Constitution and your hubris & total ignorance about the way things are done in the real world, you ought to keep your great ignorant mouth shut. Or to use the British- you Git.

    That doesn`t distract from the fact that you didn`t answer the question.

    I`m going to assume it`s because you don`t like the answer.

    As for the idea that religion is a bigger factor in politics in the UK than in the USA, that`s very amusing. Nobody with a clue would think that. You can look at a couple of summary pages and see that the UK has an official state religion, but that minute or so isn`t enough to tell you the reality of the situation. It`s a formality for historical reasons and it`s almost completely ignored in Britain. It`s part of politics in northern Ireland, which is a big part of the problem, but not in Britain.
  50. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 6:39 pm
    Or are you telling me that religious marriages in the USA have NO legal status at all? They come with no legal rights and no legal responsibilities?

    If they are legal marriages, that legality part is the point because the legality part has its roots in the law. So it`s a secular matter, not a religious matter. They`re seperate, right? If law and religion really are seperate, there`s nothing stopping all legality being removed from religious weddings.

    Feel free to continue to insult me rather than answering any questions or providing any evidence. I find it amusing and the more you do it the more you weaken your own argument.
  51. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 7:23 pm
    A minister is not a legal entity, they are "men of the cloth" not judges. Secular judges confer legality. All of which I *just said*. Ministers confer sacramental status according to their religious tradition. That`s it.

    Northern Ireland is part of the UK, those poor people regularly have car bombs planted for them and they`re killing each other in the streets over which river will take their collective barge to heaven, the Tiber or the Thames? If you didn`t know any better you`d think you were walking through some enclave in the Middle East.

    The US learned from Europe`s gigantic religious mess and crafted our Constitution specifically to avoid that. And It worked too. Say what you will about our psychotic Religious Right, but at least we`ve never spilled blood over it.
  52. Profile photo of lawndartsftw
    lawndartsftw Male 40-49
    1811 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 9:25 pm
    Deciding to either go to a restaurant and buy a chicken sandwich, or not....is now a political act that puts you in either one hate group, or another.

    Wtf.....
  53. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    August 5, 2012 at 9:39 pm
    Almost every time I see someone like you make an ignorant or bigoted conservative statement I just look over at their age and am relieved that they and their worthless brethren will be gone soon. Society progresses when the bigots die off.
    Maybe so, but not until I`ve spent every last f***ing penny you`ve paid into Social Security, you gullible liberal f***tard! Ha ha ha ha ha!
  54. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    August 6, 2012 at 9:19 am
    A minister is not a legal entity, they are "men of the cloth" not judges. Secular judges confer legality. All of which I *just said*. Ministers confer sacramental status according to their religious tradition. That`s it.

    So if two people go to a church in the USA and have a wedding as part of a Christian ritual, conducted by an officially recognised Christian cleric in an officially recognised Christian church with an officially recognised Christian marriage service...they`re not legally married? Their wedding has no legal status at all? In the eyes of the law, they are still single and have no marriage-related rights or responsibilities?

    Is that really true?

    Or does it double as a legal wedding as well as a religious one?
  55. Profile photo of AvatarJohn
    AvatarJohn Male 30-39
    1059 posts
    August 6, 2012 at 9:20 am
    I`m sorry, but this is just factually incorrect. It`s more like this:

    Oreo situation:
    Right: "Meh, they`re entitled to their opinion. I personally won`t be eating any more Oreo`s, but you can do what you want."
    Left: "OMG! Oreo`s are being persecuted by the right! Those hateful bigots, let`s string them up and show them how their `hate` is not to be tolerated and must be punished severely!

    CFA situation:
    Right: "Meh, they`re entitled to their opinion. I personally will eat there more often now, but you can do what you want."
    Left: "OMG! What hateful bigots! Their businesses must be ruined! Their personal property must be destroyed! They must be executed or at least run out of the country and genrally not tolerated for their difference of opinion! Let`s protest! Let`s kiss-in! Let`s create a general nuisance of ourselves and try and destroy as many American institutions as we possibly can in the name of our insa
  56. Profile photo of KPres
    KPres Male 30-39
    309 posts
    September 14, 2012 at 6:46 pm
    Bingo Avatar John. Nobody on the right hates gay people. All the hate comes from the left.

Leave a Reply