Chick-Fil-A Vs. The Rainbow Oreo [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 5 years ago in

Ugh, pointless hate is so confusing.
There are 56 comments:
Male 309
Bingo Avatar John. Nobody on the right hates gay people. All the hate comes from the left.
0
Reply
Male 1,059
I`m sorry, but this is just factually incorrect. It`s more like this:

Oreo situation:
Right: "Meh, they`re entitled to their opinion. I personally won`t be eating any more Oreo`s, but you can do what you want."
Left: "OMG! Oreo`s are being persecuted by the right! Those hateful bigots, let`s string them up and show them how their `hate` is not to be tolerated and must be punished severely!

CFA situation:
Right: "Meh, they`re entitled to their opinion. I personally will eat there more often now, but you can do what you want."
Left: "OMG! What hateful bigots! Their businesses must be ruined! Their personal property must be destroyed! They must be executed or at least run out of the country and genrally not tolerated for their difference of opinion! Let`s protest! Let`s kiss-in! Let`s create a general nuisance of ourselves and try and destroy as many American institutions as we possibly can in the name of our insa
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]A minister is not a legal entity, they are "men of the cloth" not judges. Secular judges confer legality. All of which I *just said*. Ministers confer sacramental status according to their religious tradition. That`s it.[/quote]

So if two people go to a church in the USA and have a wedding as part of a Christian ritual, conducted by an officially recognised Christian cleric in an officially recognised Christian church with an officially recognised Christian marriage service...they`re not legally married? Their wedding has no legal status at all? In the eyes of the law, they are still single and have no marriage-related rights or responsibilities?

Is that really true?

Or does it double as a legal wedding as well as a religious one?
0
Reply
Male 15,832
[quote]Almost every time I see someone like you make an ignorant or bigoted conservative statement I just look over at their age and am relieved that they and their worthless brethren will be gone soon. Society progresses when the bigots die off.
[/quote]Maybe so, but not until I`ve spent every last f***ing penny you`ve paid into Social Security, you gullible liberal f***tard! Ha ha ha ha ha!
0
Reply
Male 1,810
Deciding to either go to a restaurant and buy a chicken sandwich, or not....is now a political act that puts you in either one hate group, or another.

Wtf.....
0
Reply
Female 2,228
A minister is not a legal entity, they are "men of the cloth" not judges. Secular judges confer legality. All of which I *just said*. Ministers confer sacramental status according to their religious tradition. That`s it.

Northern Ireland is part of the UK, those poor people regularly have car bombs planted for them and they`re killing each other in the streets over which river will take their collective barge to heaven, the Tiber or the Thames? If you didn`t know any better you`d think you were walking through some enclave in the Middle East.

The US learned from Europe`s gigantic religious mess and crafted our Constitution specifically to avoid that. And It worked too. Say what you will about our psychotic Religious Right, but at least we`ve never spilled blood over it.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Or are you telling me that religious marriages in the USA have NO legal status at all? They come with no legal rights and no legal responsibilities?

If they are legal marriages, that legality part is the point because the legality part has its roots in the law. So it`s a secular matter, not a religious matter. They`re seperate, right? If law and religion really are seperate, there`s nothing stopping all legality being removed from religious weddings.

Feel free to continue to insult me rather than answering any questions or providing any evidence. I find it amusing and the more you do it the more you weaken your own argument.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]With your fantastically limited understanding of this country`s Constitution and your hubris & total ignorance about the way things are done in the real world, you ought to keep your great ignorant mouth shut. Or to use the British- you Git.[/quote]

That doesn`t distract from the fact that you didn`t answer the question.

I`m going to assume it`s because you don`t like the answer.

As for the idea that religion is a bigger factor in politics in the UK than in the USA, that`s very amusing. Nobody with a clue would think that. You can look at a couple of summary pages and see that the UK has an official state religion, but that minute or so isn`t enough to tell you the reality of the situation. It`s a formality for historical reasons and it`s almost completely ignored in Britain. It`s part of politics in northern Ireland, which is a big part of the problem, but not in Britain.
0
Reply
Male 9,524
OldOllie

"More liberal lies and slander. That`s all they have left."

Almost every time I see someone like you make an ignorant or bigoted conservative statement I just look over at their age and am relieved that they and their worthless brethren will be gone soon. Society progresses when the bigots die off.
0
Reply
Female 2,228
Secular authorities already grant marriage certificates, you can walk right down to the courthouse and get one, and religious ministers already perform the religious marriage ("in the eyes of god" vs "in the eyes of the law").

Because you know...of the Separation of Church and State.

With your fantastically limited understanding of this country`s Constitution and your hubris & total ignorance about the way things are done in the real world, you ought to keep your great ignorant mouth shut. Or to use the British- you Git.
0
Reply
Female 2,228
Angie the 1st amendment to the US Constitution states two things about religion, 1 Non Establishment, there is no state religion, (*unlike in the UK and other European countries. In fact this is one of the reasons you`ll never get rid of your Queen, she also functions as the head of the Church of England, vaguely like the Pope*) and the state cannot promote any religion. And 2, Free Exercise, members of any religion are allowed free exercise of their beliefs.

Creationism/ID whatever you want to call it has been illegal forever, every once in a while some county in Texas will try to force it otherwise and they immediately get smacked down and the 6th amendment expressly forbids any religious test for office.
0
Reply
Male 486
Shopped!
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Can a legally recognised marriage be carried out anywhere in the USA by anyone? So, for example, if someone was to stop a random stranger in a random shop and wed with someone else in front of that stranger, would that constitute a legally valid marriage under USA law?

I suspect some sort of approval is required from the authorities, either of place, person or both.

If so, then that approval can be withheld. Surely you`d want it withheld from anywhere that discriminates to such an extent? There certainly are people who do want that.

So maybe it wouldn`t be possible to force religious places to perform homosexual marriages (and maybe it would be possible, since church and state are not seperate in the USA), but it would probably be easier to force them to stop performing marriages at all.

There would be a way. Your declaration that it`s impossible isn`t one you have the power to impose on the country.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]And dynamo, no the federal government could *not* force houses of worship to perform gay marriages if that *private* house of worship does not believe in it. It could never happen. That`s the whole point of separation of church and state.[/quote]

Church and state are not seperate in the USA. Maybe they might sort of be on paper, but they`re far from seperate in reality.

For example, which presidents have been openly atheist? Presidential candidates? Anyone in or a serious contender for any senior political office anywhere in the USA?

If there was seperation of church and state, there wouldn`t be any chance at all of religion being taught in schools, let alone a deliberately deceitful attempt to corrupt and destroy the entire idea of science by abusing it as a host for religion and forcing that on children. Yet there continues to be an issue with "intelligent design", which is exactly that.
0
Reply
Male 319
I always likes KFC better anyway.
0
Reply
Male 1,243
it`s ironic
0
Reply
Male 4,431
Only one single, and very essential difference: pro gay rights legislation doesn`t hurt anyone. It doesn`t limit the rights of anyone, nor does it force them to do anything. It`s not discriminatory in ANY way, and is only INCLUSIVE.

Anti-gay legislation is, by its very nature, discriminatory. It limits rights. Period. It is, by *it`s* very nature, EXCLUSIVE.
0
Reply
Male 1,010
Not only should gay marriage be legal, it should be mandatory! Everyone should lay their sexuality aside and go explore. Personally, I am going for the first opportunity to sodomize the next legal boy I see.

When it comes to God and Jesus, I have learned one thing: Don`t pray for God to give you something, like a bike or a car. That`s not how He works!

You go out and steal one. Afterwords you ask for forgiveness! Ask the Pope, he knows how this works. And he does not allow condoms either, could it get any better? LOL :-)

In the name of the Lord Jesus, I say to all his disciples thy shall all go man with man and lay down and explore every cavity and let thy semen rain upon thee as Gods own life giving rain does on the dry soil you live upon. Sing Hallelujah!
0
Reply
Male 1,435
Those Oreos STILL look FAAAAABULOUS!!! Delicious too. Never had a Chick-Fil-A (none here in Canada) but I`d still like to try it. The owner`s views are one thing, their food does not make one a gay basher. At least, I hope it doesn`t. I mean, Orson Scott Card has the same views, but I enjoyed Ender`s Game and playing Shadow Complex.
0
Reply
Male 1,745
anyone who starts or stops eating at chikfila over this are douchebags
0
Reply
Male 208
"The question is not whether someone is a hypocrite or not, the question is how much of a hypocrite is someone compared to everyone else."
0
Reply
Male 15,832
More liberal lies and slander. That`s all they have left.
0
Reply
Male 7
this is like getting a lap dance and complaining your stripper is a Communist her tits are out who cares what her beliefs are!
0
Reply
Male 771
or how about OMG EVERYBODY SHUT UP.
0
Reply
Male 2,528
"Just because someone has a point of view you are too thick to understand, you hate them and lie about their point of view!"

Random, you obviously need to educate yourself. Only then will you not sound like such an idiot. There is a huge difference between a person having and opinion and practicing discrimination in a work place. One is legal and the other is not. If Chick-fil-a is allowed to get away with the discriminatory crap they`ve been pulling for years then it will be because of morons like you.
0
Reply
Female 2,228
And lest I forget- SPAMMER BEGONE!
0
Reply
Female 2,228
Welcome to Election Year in America folks!

*Puts on top hat, grabs cane and dances a vaudeville.*

And dynamo, no the federal government could *not* force houses of worship to perform gay marriages if that *private* house of worship does not believe in it. It could never happen. That`s the whole point of separation of church and state.

The house of worship`s doctrines are to help their members get to heaven, the state`s duty is to treat everyone with justice under the law, two completely different responsibilities.
0
Reply
Male 4

ONLINE STORE :

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

Christan Audigier bikini $23

Ed Hardy Bikini $23

Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

Sandal $32

christian louboutin $80

Sunglass $15

COACH_Necklace $27

handbag $33

AF tank woman $17

puma slipper woman $30
==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====
sdfwegwe
0
Reply
Male 554
people really need to get over themselves.. on all sides
0
Reply
Male 802
I believe this statement is incorrect. MOST people don`t care who says or does what. Loud annoying people seeking attention and the media are the ones represented in this graphic.
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Chick-fil-A is so last week
0
Reply
Male 3,842
@Angilion
[quote]arsenokoitai[/quote]

Since "coitus" refers to heterosexual genital sex (with a penis and vagina, you know, the way babies are made) and everyone knows "arse" is the butt, then obviously "arsenokoitai" is "butt sex" between heterosexuals. The New Testament (you know, the Christ part) says men are not allowed to have butt sex with women but doesn`t say anything about two men and what they do together, or even if it forbids butt sex, it doesn`t say anything about guys blowing guys or handjobs.

(ps - I`m joking - no one knows the actual translation)
0
Reply
Female 21
and vice versa? How surprising. And people who have opinions and support others who share the same opinions and boycott those who don`t are so stupid
0
Reply
Male 82
OH WOW. People who support gay rights are supporting companies that do the same and boycotting those who do the opposite, and vice versa? How surprising. And people who have opinions and support others who share the same opinions and boycott those who don`t are so stupid. =_=
0
Reply
Male 2,516
@Angilion: k then, a silly translation of the ancient text
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]for the sole reason that an ancient text full of mostly gibberish told them it`s evil[/quote]

I`d say it because that`s what they think that ancient text says. What it actually says is unclear. In some places, what they`ve been told it says is simply made up. The clearest example of that is arsenokoitai. It`s almost the entire basis for the claimed condemnation of homosexual sex in the new testament but in reality nobody knows what the word means. Seriously - it first appears in the NT and nowhere else, without any indication of meaning. Given that a fair bit of ancient Greek writing that mentions homosexual sex still exists and the word `arsenokoitai` doesn`t appear in any of it, I`m inclined to believe that`s not what the word actually refers to.
0
Reply
Male 1,341
Really don`t care. Enough with the Chick-fil-A garbage.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Some of the leftist literature suggests denying 501(c)3 organizations their status based on not following federal marriage guidelines, providing the federal government steps in and legalizes same-sex marriage.[/quote]

Well, that would be the obvious next step. It probably wouldn`t pass soon, but it would be the obvious next step.

When people want to fight, they don`t stop if they`re ahead on points at the end of the first round. They go on to another round, until their enemy is defeated. Since there can`t be an end to group advocacy ("more for <x>" can`t have an end point since there`s always more), any fight based on it can`t end.

If you want to end the fight, you have to end the group advocacy. If anyone is suggesting that, they`re not making the news.
0
Reply
Female 160
People just need to shut the hell up about this crap. This is just as bad as the James Holmes thing. .-.
0
Reply
Female 471
Um, so, the difference here is that Oreo just made that picture to celebrate Pride. Meanwhile, Chick-Fil-A is actually legitimately oppressing people and fighting against equal rights. :/
0
Reply
Male 2,516
the only difference being one of those groups is trying to deny an entire group`s of people right to be happy for the sole reason that an ancient text full of mostly gibberish told them it`s evil
0
Reply
Male 6,737
Enough already.
0
Reply
Male 1,293
"Ugh, pointless hate is so confusing. "

Then why indulge in pointless hate? Just because someone has a point of view you are too thick to understand, you hate them and lie about their point of view!
0
Reply
Male 243
You know what would make this site even cooler - More Chick-Fil-A posts... definitely solving boredom by posting one after another... uhll
0
Reply
Male 2,424
so oreo loves to fill gays mouths with cream, and the ceo of chick-fil-a thinks the whole idea is gross.

And the world turns...
0
Reply
Male 715
Chick-fileagalize marijuana
0
Reply
Male 1,595
There were Rainbow Oreos?
0
Reply
Female 1,181
there is nothing wrong with boycotting a company that you don`t agree with. i stopped eating at c-f-a a long time ago, when i first found out what they stood for.
0
Reply
Male 5,314
pretty sure this is totally wrong
0
Reply
Male 330
Didn`t say anything when the Oreo thing hit the streets, and honestly it was nowhere near as big as the Chick-fil-A outcry that there is now.
0
Reply
Male 2,528
First off, I don`t get the oreo thing at all.

Secondly, if you think this Chick-fil-a thing is something new, then you need to shut the fuq up, because you`re a damn moron.

Like others, I have been boycotting Chick-fil-a for quite some time now. They have been oppressing women and homosexuals for several years now, so either get your facts straight, or go sit the fuq down.
0
Reply
Male 259
Stop denying gays the right to marry. Stop denying churches the right to be built (or mosques, or synogogues) and to govern their own sets of moral code. Yet these things happen on a regular basis and the regular joe-shmoe American applauds one loss of liberty as "saving America`s soul" and the other loss of liberty as "shutting up the *bigots*.

You are ALL losing your liberties.
0
Reply
Male 259
I`m a conservative Christian who is politically moderate. I don`t care if people get married who are gay - not my concern. Attempting to force me, a minister in the Church, however, is my concern. Some of the leftist literature suggests denying 501(c)3 organizations their status based on not following federal marriage guidelines, providing the federal government steps in and legalizes same-sex marriage. That is just as insidious and un-American as those who think it is ok to legislate from the Bible, or any other religious text *coughshariacoughqu`rancoughcough*. If the USA passes a Constitutional Amendment that allows for Bible Laws to happen (which could have been done in America`s early years but wasn`t - which should give us a hint to why things were set up this way) then maybe it would be legal to legislate against gay marriage. Under current American law, specifically the civil rights laws, this kind of government denial really should be stopped. At every level.
0
Reply
Male 2,578
People just need to chill out. If the oreo or chicken sandwiches really rile you up that much, something`s wrong.
0
Reply
Male 658
Uhhh.... no.
0
Reply
Male 20,828
Link: Chick-Fil-A Vs. The Rainbow Oreo [Pic] [Rate Link] - Ugh, pointless hate is so confusing.
0
Reply