Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 33    Average: 2.6/5]
120 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 6628
Rating: 2.6
Category:
Date: 07/10/12 11:54 AM

120 Responses to Don`t Eat Your Dog: Morality and Free Enterprise

  1. Profile photo of ozzymandiaas
    ozzymandiaas Male 30-39
    3 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 11:55 am
    Link: Don`t Eat Your Dog: Morality and Free Enterprise - This video explains why our bitter political fight in America isn`t really class warfare, but economic morality.
  2. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:04 pm

    The "Right to Pursue Happiness" does not mean the gov`ment has to guarantee you get happiness.

    The only valid arguement in favor of free enterprise is that our current system is failing and we have to have drastic changes or we`ll completely collapse.
  3. Profile photo of lyonartime
    lyonartime Male 18-29
    260 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:11 pm

  4. Profile photo of nubblins
    nubblins Female 18-29
    1743 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:13 pm
    lost me at "most good for most vulnerable"

    Children shouldn`t be working and/or sacrificing.
  5. Profile photo of wolladude
    wolladude Male 30-39
    361 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:15 pm
    Define "Income redistribution"....

    Is it free healthcare, free higher education and support for people unable, not unwilling, but unable to provide for themselves?

    Cause free enterprise can easily grow and thrive in such a socity, where workers are well educated and live long and healthy lives.
  6. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:15 pm
    If you can`t be bothered to sit through all seven minutes of this patronising diatribe, allow me to summarise it for you:

    Video: "I propose that fluffy kittens and sunny weather are good!!"

    Viewers: "Yay!"

    Video: "And I propose that kicking grandmothers in the shins is bad!"

    Viewers: "Booooo!!"

    Video: "Having money doesn`t make you happy."

    Viewers: "But we`ve never been in any situation where having some made it any worse!"

    Video: "Not having money doesn`t make you happy, either!"

    Viewers: "OK, get to the f*cking point!!"

    Video: "So, in conclusion, don`t do drugs."

    Viewers: "I never wanted to before, but I do now after listening to a blowhard like you for seven minutes."


    The End.
  7. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:18 pm
    I switched off at "Freedom". Meaningless word.

    Why can`t Americans (I hate to generalise, but it seems they don`t get it) understand theat there can be a middle ground?

    The free enterprise system *is* the only way that works at present. (Sadly for every person that succeeds in this system, more fail, but that`s another story.) But giving some of that money to the poor in the form of a well structured welfare state can coincide quite happily.

    I`m not poor. I earn a basic wage that is higher than average in the UK and I guess if you were to pigeon hole me, I`d be lower-middle class. I have worked hard to be where I am today and have stable employment in dangerous times as a reward.

    But I give to charity regularly. The UK has one of the largest welfare systems in the world, which has its faults but I support it whole heartedly. I pay my taxes and I am happy for that tax to be used to pay for health, education and services.

    There is a
  8. Profile photo of antagonizer
    antagonizer Male 18-29
    509 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:21 pm
    Tho he makes some great points, his classroom experiment is invalid as the points he is redistributing are attained from hard work. The rich gain wealth from wealth not hard work like the other classes. If you want to make it realistic, start it from;the standpoint that some students already are guaranteed a pass some are 50-50 and others are guaranteed a fail. Allow them to INVEST their banked points into acquiring more points by `paying for` A`s, and let the experiment continue. I guarantee a different result.
  9. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:23 pm
    I switched off at "Freedom". Meaningless word.

    It`s one of those words like "hood" and "pants" that mean something different over here to what they mean in Americaland. When they say it, it means "the ability to do exactly what the government tells you to do".
  10. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:27 pm
    *Continued*

    Hey why did it chop off my post? It said I`d done exactly 1000 characters... Heads will roll.

    What I was going to finish off with was:

    There is a middle ground between Communism and Unfettered Capitalism, America. Come join us! The waters lovely!
  11. Profile photo of Siolas
    Siolas Male 30-39
    138 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:29 pm
    I see nothing wrong with eating the dog.
  12. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:32 pm
    I see nothing wrong with eating the dog.

    That`s lovely. But enough about your sex life, we`re discussing economics here.
  13. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:32 pm
    >>>Is it free healthcare, free higher education<<<

    There is no such thing as free healthcare or free higher education..... So your question makes no sense.

    If your question is should we take EXTRA from higher income earners to pay for OTHER people`s healthcare and education, then yes it is income redistribution. Whether or not this is good or bad is a separate question.
  14. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:34 pm
    >>>Come join us! The waters lovely!<<

    Sorry I have been in Athens during a riot. I think I will stay here. Have fun.
  15. Profile photo of onoffonoffon
    onoffonoffon Male 30-39
    2314 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:34 pm
    nubblins--Why not? Shouldn`t kids have paper routes, mow lawns, ref soccer games, wash dogs, baby sit and sell lemonade. Children in all cultures provide the least skilled services. That is how you acquire skill, experience and money. That is how they become productive members of society. They would have money to spend and they would have learned how to earn money. People should absolutely be rewarded for their efforts and you shouldn`t reward people who haven`t made an effort. The video is totally correct. The most successful people I know have made the greatest sacrifices, the least successful have been unable to put aside their short term desires for their long term needs and wants. I have no doubt that this is how things work. I`ve seen it happen too many times.
  16. Profile photo of Arcval
    Arcval Male 18-29
    304 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:36 pm
    "most good for most vulnerable"

    Tell that to the sick and disabled. Nationalised healthcare systems produce lower mortality rates, less debt and when combined with a welfare system the best quality of life for the disabled.

    There`s no such thing as free enterprise as there are no free markets. Rigging markets in your favour is good business, hence why every company is trying (and many succeeding) to do it. The markets favour whomever controls them, and i`d much rather that not be corporations.
  17. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:37 pm
    This is a false argument to me. I don`t know a lot of people on the left who don`t believe people shouldn`t work hard to earn a living. I also don`t know very many who think we should "redistribute the wealth." There are even fewer people in government who think that way. If Obama is a leftist, it`s only because the Republican party has moved much further to the right.

    How is the health care overhaul harmful to free enterprise? It requires most people to buy from a private insurance company. That`s more customers for the private sector. Hong Kong has a health care system mostly under government control, but with a private care option. Do you think of socialism when you think Hong Kong? No, you think a free enterprise society that uses a flat-tax (a libertarian`s wet dream).
  18. Profile photo of Ripper398
    Ripper398 Male 18-29
    1310 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:37 pm
    I skipped the bullpoo. I love eating muffins. The dog would of been no exception.
  19. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:38 pm
    >>>The rich gain wealth from wealth not hard work like the other classes. <<

    One of the two main differences between the liberal point of view and the conservative point of view.

    Liberals, Every(most) rich got there through luck and/or oppression of others. All the poor are poor through no fault of their own just bad luck.

    Conservatives, The rich are rich because of their hard work. The poor are poor due to their lack of hard work.
  20. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:38 pm
    @dang007 and @onoffonoffon Just made my point exactly. It`s either MURICUUUUUUUUUUUH or it`s failed states à la Greece.

    You can`t all be lost causes, surely?
  21. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:40 pm
    >>>Nationalised healthcare systems produce lower mortality rates<<<

    Really???? To me the purpose of health care is to cure me when I am ill. There are several statistics that show that the system in the US has a higher cure rate, that`s lower mortality, from the most common forms of cancer.
  22. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:42 pm
    And Buiadh just made my point. "failed states à la Greece."

  23. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:44 pm
    >>>How is the health care overhaul harmful to free enterprise? It requires most people to buy from a private insurance company.<<<

    Because enterprise is not `free` if the GOVERNMENT requires people to make a purchase, or as in the case of the health care reform, make a purchase from Bill to by something from Sam.
  24. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:46 pm
    @dang - What does that even mean!? I have a feeling you don`t actually know what you`re talking about and are falling back on rusty rhetoric supplied by your republican friends.
  25. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:46 pm
    3:16 Perhaps "sacrifice" isn`t the best word, but I can`t think of a better one. Persist? Endure hardship? WORK (he already uses that word a lot).

    4:18 "spread the wealth around" Hummm, which modern politican said those EXACT words? He was answering Joe The Plumber`s question on raising taxes...

    Outstanding!
    I await the inevitable lib-tard attacks. "False Moral Equivelance" The #1 lefty weapon!
  26. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:51 pm
    @Buiadh Sorry what does what mean?
  27. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:55 pm
    for every person that succeeds in this system, more fail,
    @Buiadh: That`s true, but here`s the IMPORTANT PART: they have the >>freedom<< to try again! Or not! The US gov`t doesn`t hold a gun to people`s head and say "You will now smelt iron" like Mao did... (killing millions of people through starvation btw)

    @antagonizer: Your scenario is NOT more realistic: plenty of millionaires have lost it all, and plenty of hard working, honest folks have become millionaires: it`s a fact! The method in the video represents Communism to a "T".

    There is no such thing as free healthcare or free higher education
    WE HAVE A WINNER! @dang007 gets it!

    I also don`t know very many who think we should "redistribute the wealth."
    LOLZ! @FP: You`re funny! Try Barak Hussain Obama for one...
  28. Profile photo of Crabes
    Crabes Male 30-39
    1285 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:56 pm
    They make you believe hard work get rewarded because the richs need you to work hard for them... that is all
  29. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 12:58 pm
    I don`t really see a problem with eating the dog, so long as the body isn`t dirty and the family doesn`t mind it. I mean, were it my dog, I probably wouldn`t eat it considering that I don`t even know if dog tastes good, and I don`t have any trouble affording dinner from the store. That and, you know, the emotional attachment that would lead me to respect the corpse for sentimental reasons.

    But hey. To each their own. I wouldn`t begrudge someone a little dog-stew, especially if it wasn`t cruelly obtained.
  30. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:00 pm
    Again @5Cats, please understand there is a middle ground that works great!
  31. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:00 pm
    Before even trying to socailize healthcare perhaps they should look at why it charges so damn much! Just a thought before we all have to pay for it not like insurance companies would ever get together and take advantage of such a thing........
  32. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:03 pm
    >>Again @5Cats, please understand there is a middle ground that works great!<<

    Gee I hope you do not go to the hospital and get thirsty....
  33. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:05 pm
    There are people in the middle class who have worked their asses off their whole life only to see their pensions stolen. That is one of the places the distribution system is unfair. The CEO`s in these same companies still received humungous amounts of money even though they failed. How is that fair? Why are CEO`s still rewarded when they fail? When the workers fail they are let go with no compensation.
  34. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:07 pm
    Now that I`ve gotten past the dog portion of the video, this guy is using a straw-man argument for his opponents. They aren`t just crying because some people get left out in the cold. The problem with the free market is that it isn`t really free. You see, it`s incredibly profitable to corner the market in a way that coerces people into buying your product, no matter what price you set for it. As an example, look at college textbooks. They`ve found a niche where it`s imperative that you own the books in order to get through college, and at this point in time, it`s imperative that you go through college. They`ve got you over a barrel, and they proceed to mount you and mercilessly pound out of hundreds of dollars. That`s why people like red tape. It helps combat coercion in the "free" market.
  35. Profile photo of nubblins
    nubblins Female 18-29
    1743 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:07 pm
    @onoff

    Older children can to build responsibility, but never to the point of being a job that is forced because they have to support their family. Kids should get to be kids, regardless of their socioeconomic status.
  36. Profile photo of Keyh
    Keyh Male 18-29
    226 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:09 pm
    "I don`t really see a problem with eating the dog, so long as the body isn`t dirty and the family doesn`t mind it. I mean, were it my dog, I probably wouldn`t eat it considering that I don`t even know if dog tastes good, and I don`t have any trouble affording dinner from the store. That and, you know, the emotional attachment that would lead me to respect the corpse for sentimental reasons."

    Yeah, I agree with the overall message, but it`s not immoral to eat the dog. Socially unacceptable? Yes. If you killed the dog and didn`t eat it, that would be immoral. I don`t see how eating something that is dead is immoral.
  37. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:12 pm
    VV aaaand @markust is the first with the FME! Geez dude, he even warns against your `faulty logic` in the video!

    @Buiadh: The liberals destroyed the "middle ground" decades ago...
  38. Profile photo of nubblins
    nubblins Female 18-29
    1743 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:13 pm
    5Cats, if that were true, we`d already have universal healthcare.


    :`( Too bad it isn`t.
  39. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:13 pm
    "Before even trying to socailize healthcare perhaps they should look at why it charges so damn much! Just a thought before we all have to pay for it not like insurance companies would ever get together and take advantage of such a thing"

    Insurance companies in America charge so much because they are for profit. We are the only civilized country in the world where for profit health insurance is not illegal. It is complete BS that we still allow it to be for profit. The focus in health care should be on the person not on the profit.
  40. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:17 pm
    "The liberals destroyed the "middle ground" decades ago"

    BS. Trickle Down Economics destroyed middle America.
  41. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:18 pm
    I`m so glad I can think in a third dimension of politics. Somewhere outside the Cons/Lib that many Americans are blinkered with.
  42. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:20 pm
    in a way that coerces people into buying your product, no matter what price you set for it.
    @DrProfessor: ic! Like if a LAW was passed that FORCED someone to buy a product, say Insurance, even if they didn`t want it or need it! THEN the Insurance Companies could jack up the prices as high as they like since you CANNOT refuse to buy it, you`ll go to JAIL! $ca-chinga$

    That`s why people like red tape.
    Nooo, it`s corporations who LOVE "red tape" ok? They love to use it on their competition! Why do you think hundreds if not thousands of UNIONS have been granted "exemptions" from ObamaCare? Certain companies get exempt, others not, hummmm. I`m SO CERTAIN political donations has nothing at all to do with it...
    PS: It`s been going on since 1800 in America: using "laws" as a corporate weapon...
  43. Profile photo of Whitemn
    Whitemn Male 18-29
    155 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:25 pm
    I find odd is his last statement #3 he talks about far less people are in poverty(earning 1$ a day) when the value of a dollar since 1970 is far less.(at 6m mark)
  44. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:27 pm
    5Cats, if that were true...
    @nubblins: Which "that"? I`ve been spouting off on so many topics :-) I`m glad to answer your question though.

    @markust: Insurance Companies ARE "for profit" in Canada and I`m certain ALL OVER the world. Lloyds of London? Rings a bell?

    Trickle Down Economics destroyed middle America.
    @markust: #1 comparing political philosophy with socio-economic reality in such a way is... idiotic? To put it mildly.

    But you ARE "Captain FME" after all!

    #2: The US economy pulled OUT of Carter`s recession and BOOMED for 8+ years, spanning Reagan, Bush-I and Clinton`s first term.
    Facts, aquaint ones-self with them.
  45. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:31 pm
    "VV aaaand @markust is the first with the FME! Geez dude, he even warns against your `faulty logic` in the video!"

    What does FME stand for? How is my logic wrong? Why is it OK to reward failed CEOs but at the same time it is perfectly fine to steal the pensions of the hard workers below the failed CEO? Stealing pensions is the exact opposite of rewarding fairness and hard work. Pensions should be locked away in untouchable accounts.
  46. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:32 pm
    @Whitemn: It`s presumed he`s adjusted for inflation, eh? You are correct, it would be silly to compare 1970 dollars to 2010 dollars.

    I think the timefreame he`s covering is longer, like from 1800 - 2000. Before "free market capitalism" began there was MORE poverty and it was worse (by far!) than what we call "poverty" today!
    Hint: "Poor" people do not: own cellphones, x-boxes, designer shoes, get fat, have heat, clean water and 3 meals a day...

    Just a short list, there`s a LOT more things the world`s truely poor don`t have that "1st world poor" take for granted. Still: they`re better off now, and Socialism isn`t the reason...
  47. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:34 pm
    You can tell 5Cats is loosing an argument when he results to insults. I can`t believe I got sucked into an argument with him again. I need to stick hard to my ignore list which he is at the tip top.
  48. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:37 pm
    "False Moral Equivelance" It`s too long to type over and over again: and your posts drip with it!

    Pensions should be locked away in untouchable accounts.
    You failed "into to Economics" right? I`m simply aghast at this sentence!
    Where do you plan to "lock away" the pensions? Not Banks, you hate those! lolz!
    Part of the "pension" promised employees is based on it`s GROWTH over time: through investment. Shoving the money into a mattress LOSES money through inflation. K?

    I`m not saying they should be looted: OBVIOUSLY those who do so should go directly to jail, DUH!

    But that`s a "Legal Reform" issue, K?
    Recall my list of "who screws you"? Banks, Insurances... Lawyers!

    Is some of this getting past your "filters"?
  49. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:38 pm
    Actually, this would work out just fine if it weren`t for the rich folk taking advantage of the system. "Trickle Down" economics is the same way. If the rich folks keep all the money and pay everyone else less and less, eventually you have poor folks who can`t afford anything. Good, hard working folks who work 12 hour shifts and can barely afford to eat. Then, you want to take away their health care, pensions and welfare safety net and call that moral and fair? There are only three types who would buy that idea. The filthy rich, the morally corrupt and the ridiculously stupid.
  50. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:38 pm
    Yeah @markust: You`ve NEVER EVER insulted me!

    Oh wait, it`s another FME! Oh dear Ghod he has no idea at all...
  51. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:38 pm
    Free market economy is not what improved poverty FFS! I don`t buy that at all. Unchecked a free market economy would run the working class into the ground if it weren`t for the laws.

    What improved poverty rates, in the UK certainly, was the emergence of unions that look out for the workers.
  52. Profile photo of viperjason
    viperjason Male 18-29
    68 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 1:52 pm
    If it is truly free...there is no system to take advantage of as everyone has the same chance to succeed and fail.
    To bad we have never had a truly free market.
  53. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:03 pm
    @5cats--you`re ignoring the parts of the bill that prevent insurance companies from doing exactly that.
  54. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:04 pm
    McG i miss you.
  55. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:11 pm
    "Insurance companies in America charge so much because they are for profit. We are the only civilized country in the world where for profit health insurance is not illegal. It is complete BS that we still allow it to be for profit. The focus in health care should be on the person not on the profit."

    I was wrong on this statement. What I should have said is America is the only industrialized country in the world without a universal health insurance system. Not sure how I mixed that up with for Profit. I have made that erroneous statement many times. Whoops.
  56. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:34 pm
    vv kk, that makes more sense! I still don`t think it`s true though. Plenty of 3rd world shiite-holes with no healthcare: universal or otherwise!

    I know you specified "industrialized" but since the topic includes "global poverty" I`ll make this point:
    Unchecked capitalism or communism are both bad things! Rules and laws have been part of society since CAVEMAN times for a good reason: protecting ALL of the tribe is more important than a few members` enrichment.
    However: Without reward there`s little incentive to work hard. I mean beyond what`s neccessary to survive, eh?
    Free Enterprise (Capitalism) is the best way we know, throughout history, to fairly do this. (reward hard work)

    Communism: Provides incentive with a rifle.
    Capatilism: Provides incentive with money!

    I know which one I like.
  57. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:36 pm
    The reason you are on my ignore list 5Cats is because of three things:

    First, I make every effort not to talk politics with people who are submersed in the world of opinion media. I do not talk politics with my parents for this reason. And I have removed Facebook friends for this reason. You are up to your eyeballs in opinion media. I like to talk politics but only with people that have their own opinions. Not people who have had their opinions burned into their heads through repetition. Sadly it is harder and harder to find people who are not polluted by opinion media.

    Second, you turn peoples words around and make them the exact opposite of what was said just so you can win arguments. I can`t respect someone with that level of dishonesty and in turn can`t trust anything you say.

    Third, you very very very rarely admit you are wrong. That is a sign of insecurity and weakness. I can`t respect someone who can not admit when they are wrong.
  58. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:53 pm
    "I like to talk politics but only with people that have their own opinions. Not people who have had their opinions burned into their heads through repetition."

    And I will admit that I am a hypocrite when it comes to the health care debate because I was into opinion media when this went around the first time a few years back. I had a lot of garbage burned into my head, I should just excuse myself from healthcare debates because of this. I will do that now by getting off this thread.
  59. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 2:55 pm
    5Cats you love so much USA system and is ok, but have you ever immagine how would be if you go to live there and suddenly you start to understand what you have lost ( for example universal healtcare system)? Canada in my opinion is one of the most advanced ( if not the most) country in the world, you are rich, you have lot of wellfair, your politic tend to be not so linked with religion and your nature is astonishing....why you want to barter all this with something worst? Maybe you lack just some temperate weather but for the rest for me Canada could be a really nice place to pass my life. Do yourself a favor and enjoy the great conquers your country have achieved, is just a suggestion.
  60. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:15 pm
    You are up to your eyeballs in opinion media
    Allow me to use "Bing Translate"...
    You have opinions which are different than mine

    I like to talk politics but only with people that have their own opinions.
    I only listen to people who already agree with me, otherwise their views mean nothing

    Not people who have had their opinions burned into their heads through repetition
    Not people who use facts and logic, I`m a leftist and have no place for that crap

    @markust: you claim "libertarianism" yadda-yadda! But spout far-left talking points like it one of those Menthos-Coke bottles. srsly!

    I`d go on mocking you but I notice that your mind was made up a loooong time ago.

    I note how you have COMPLETELY stopped talking about the subject and have moved into 100% personal attack mode...
  61. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:17 pm
    Sweet Jeebus.

    5Cats. You can have capitalism with a well structured welfare system that works great for ALL the residents of the country. In this country the rich can succeed, but the poor are kept with their head above the water. This does NOT maketh a communist government.

    Let me introduce you to Gray (Not Fifty Shades Of...), it`s a colour between black and white. Try it some time!
  62. Profile photo of robosnitz
    robosnitz Male 40-49
    2737 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:19 pm
    I`d eat Muffin.
  63. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:19 pm
    @piperfawn: Hey, I`m a Canadian Patriot! I :heart: Canada!

    It`s just sad to see my Southern Cousins making such a HUGE mistake!
    And if their Economy suffers? OURS suffers!

    Omaba and the Democrats are driving the USA off a cliff of debt! People like @markust only want to whine about nonsense: it`s easier than looking at the truth.

    THAT`s one of the messages within this video btw...
  64. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:28 pm
    5Cats. You can have capitalism with a well structured welfare system that works great for ALL the residents of the country.

    Um, yeah? Is that a trick question?
    As a Canadian from the West: WE brought a LOT of "social reform" into Canada via Tommy Douglas and the NDP. That was back then, the NDP are just Union Stooges now.
    We of Mennonite heratige know a LOT about how co-operative living within a capatilist society. We practically invented it! lolz! Why do you think the Communists tried to kill us all?

    I cannot for the life of me recall saying the UK was "socialist". Ever, not just this thread. France yes, duh! Europe in general? Perhaps.

    Supporting "free market capitalism" isn`t black vs white either, eh? Irony? Hummm...
  65. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:42 pm
    `Omaba and the Democrats are driving the USA off a cliff of debt!`

    The car was off the cliff before Obama got into office. The way the Republicans have acted since 2008 is like the roadrunner cartoons where Wile E Coyote is still running above the canyon floor, and only falls once he realizes there`s no more ground beneath him.
  66. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 3:43 pm
    "Omaba(Obama)and the Democrats are driving the USA off a cliff of debt!"
    Oh seriously?
    This is the real reason why people don`t apreciate what you say. That sentence show how you are subjected to bias and to mass media. USA is on the cliff of the debit if not in the middle of the hole allready since ages, is not Obama fault and is neither democrats fault, is the whole USA system that is broken since loooong time.
  67. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:29 pm
    Lets see a few facts shall we:
    #1: @fools: The Democrats controlled the Senate and House in 2006, in 2008 they held ALL THREE branches, but it`s STILL the Republican`s fault? Oy-Vey!
    #2: True or False:

    True is the correct answer.

    US Debt Clock Today

    And in 2008?

    4 TRILLION lower!!
    Note: if you "Blame Bush" for debt after he left office? Then you ALSO must Blame Obama for HIS debt after HE leaves office too. In 2008 Obama signed "Stimulus 2" for 850 BILLION! Remember that?

    Sorry @piperfawn: I look at facts then form my own opinions. Canada faced a similar problem in the 90`s and CUT SPENDING (at lea
  68. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:30 pm
    We cut spending, at least a little bit!
    Obama`s answer: spend MORE!
  69. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:35 pm
    5Cats Obama is creating something that never exist before in his country, your country as near all the country in the world nowaday had to adjust the spending. This is the difference. But again if you are in a desert you prefere to have a bottle with few and maybe not so clean water or you prefere to not have the bottle at all?
  70. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:39 pm
    Oh and 5Cats you know that debt create debt? When Obama started he allready had a gigantic debt on the shoulder, he didn`t start with a 0 he start with a lot of minus generating minus in an exponential way. Numbers are true but void without explanations.
  71. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:47 pm
    Bush left office: debt = 7.8 trillion
    Obama Today = 15.8
    (4 months to go to ring up MORE - keep that in mind!)

    @piperfawn: you lost me, unless the cliff is in a desert...
    Yes, all countries have overspent and are now in trouble because they refuse to CUT! THAT is the problem.
    Not only does Obama not cut: he wildly spends even more!
    This is money the USA DOES NOT HAVE! They have to BORROW IT!

    And keep in mind: WHO got the Credit Rating Downgraded?

    "Debt creats debt" Yeah, and how is DOUBLING the debt helping that? Honest question @piperfawn, you`ve been elusive with the answers today...
  72. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:50 pm
    Thank you 5Cats for proving my second point - that you turn peoples words around and make them the exact opposite of what was said just so you can win arguments.

    I don`t waste my time talking politics with people who are in deep with opinion media. Spin that all you want but it won`t change me. I`ve been in the opinion media world. I know what a negative place it is. I will not be drawn back into that world. I have no problem talking to conservatives about politics (if they are not wrapped up in opinion media). Conservatives and liberals who are outside of opinion media can find many common grounds. Opinion media has created this false divide as if we are defined by our politics. It just isn`t true. You sir are a walking talking cable news conservative which makes you a waste of time as far as talking politics goes.
  73. Profile photo of imnakdjumpme
    imnakdjumpme Male 18-29
    598 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 4:59 pm
    5Cats you are annoying with your misinformation and lolz.
    as of Jan. 31, 2012, the rise under Obama had yet to surpass the rise under his predecessor, George W. Bush.http://www.factcheck.org/2012/02/dueling-debt-deceptions/

    Also, im all for incentivising people to work for their money, but the free market only helps the rich get richer, unless it is regulated.
    People dont create jobs, demand creates jobs. so we need to build up the low and middle income people so they create more demand, so companies can hire more. 93% of all the wealth generated in 2010 went to the top 1% which just means the gap keeps growing and less will be spent back into the system.
  74. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 5:00 pm
    "They have to BORROW IT!" like they have allways and ever done. Ask China for more info. I repeat, is not democrats or republicans, this is just the lark-mirror created to devide people so they can`t see the reality. The real fact is that the USA illusion or dream, call it as you like, have show what really is...an illusion or a drewam in fact. Someone say that to live the "American dream" there is just one thing to do...keep sleeping.
  75. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 5:38 pm
    @imnakdjumpme, forget January. As of today the debt has not surpassed the rise under George W Bush. Obama is sitting at $5.25 Trillion increase. This number can be easily checked here putting in Jan 20, 2009 as Obama`s first day in office. I`m not saying the debt growth under Obama isn`t frightening. I`m just curious if 5Cats can be man enough to admit he was wrong on his numbers.
  76. Profile photo of PeekaBOOM
    PeekaBOOM Male 30-39
    26 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 6:11 pm
    Welp,i watched the whole video and i could not stop thinking about disabled warvets and other people that can not earn money because of a handicap or otherwise.How about pensioners,or employees in restaurants that earn below minimum wage.

    Im sorry for the rant.
  77. Profile photo of evanbartlett
    evanbartlett Male 30-39
    559 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 6:17 pm
    Wow...for a professor, his analogies are pretty poor. The issues don`t surround giving portions of higher grades to those with lower grades. A more proper analogy is that he only allows in the strongest students to the classroom to take the test, and then complains to the weaker students that they never showed up. Fiscal progressives don`t argue that the outcomes are unjust, they argue that the very game is unjust.
  78. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 6:30 pm
    What this video conveniently leaves out is that we have a social contract with one another that is apart of being citizens of the same country.

    The Rich got that way either by being lucky or using this countries resources. We let them use those resources so they can make money and give back. We provide what is needed to the poor so that they have a chance to one day help themselves and also give back.

    Free enterprise leads to situations where the elite unfairly earn more than their work would be worth and the poor are barred from ever doing better for themselves.

    I do not believe that we should simply provide fish for all the hungry. But we should teach everyone to fish. That means providing everyone in this country with an education, healthcare, and whatever essentials that keep them from dying.

    Extremes are almost always harmful. Capitalism and Socialism are both bad ideas on their own. A balance must be struck between the two.
  79. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3149 posts
    July 10, 2012 at 8:12 pm
    I`ve read a couple of huge fallacies in this thread.

    One being that the rich want to drain the poor for all that the poor is worth.
    How is hurting the bottom line going to make the rich richer?
    Okay, maybe in a short term they will become richer, but once the bottom line is drained, there would be nothing left. How is that supposed to make them richer?

    Unless the idea that soon there will be only one person/family with 100% of the wealth, then that is just asinine. Though I suppose I could be miss reading that.


    Either way, I have no problem eating a dog I have no emotional connection to. Better to have a full stomach than to be lying in the street sleeping next to a dead dog with a growling stomach.
  80. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 12:45 am
    "Only" 5.25 TRILLION dollars, it is to laugh how spinny that is!

    10.6 (Obama sworn in)
    5.7 (Bush sworn in)
    = 4.9 Trillion @markust, over 8 NOT 3.5 years, BY YOUR OWN SOURCE`S NUMBERS.

    Tell me AGAIN how Bush spent more.
    Oh, and be sure to accuse me of "media influence" for doing simple math, I drating DARE you!

    Various sources give various measures. @imnaked`s gives 404 Error...
  81. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 12:55 am
    The Rich got that way either by being lucky or using this countries resources.
    @nottaspy: lolz! Lucky!!! Hard work? NOPE! Innovation? NOPE! Better service? NOPE! Fiscal Responsibility? NOPE! You`re so funny.

    How about GROUPS of people, who pool their funds and make large investments? Don`t THEY deserve to have a fair return? Like Pension Funds (someone mentioned earlier) these investments WILL make them "rich" over time, is it a crime?

    Back to @markust: Your OWN DATA proved my message and make a joke out of yours: Yes I said Omaba spent 8, it based on some data that said it was 7.8 when Bush left office, not 10.6 (which seems moe accurate). Perhaps the 7.8 came from when the Dems took the 2006 Mid-Terms? (site says 8.5, close!) But regardless: I`m correct. Your reply?
  82. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 1:05 am
    More Math:
    Obama: 5,250 / 41 months = 128 Billion PER MONTH
    Bush: 4,900 / 96 months = 51 Billion per month

    Add 7 more months at @128 per to the 15.879 = 16.775 the debt when Obama leaves office.
    Thus he will add: 6.1 trillion (apx) give or take.

    (waits for @markust to say "adjust for inflation"!!)
    (it`s at an all-time low, duh! Doing that would likely make Bush`s debt increase look smaller too! Compared to all previous debt)
  83. Profile photo of bex753
    bex753 Male 40-49
    221 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 4:40 am
    In blaming Obama don`t forget the USA was circling the drain in Jan 2009 and drastic things had to be done to shore up the economy. Oh and this video is BS
  84. Profile photo of JJdagdelen
    JJdagdelen Male 18-29
    102 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 5:05 am
    What is this propaganda bullpoo? Nobody is trying to get rid of the free enterprise system in America.
  85. Profile photo of New_Guy
    New_Guy Male 30-39
    406 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 5:10 am
    I call Bullcrap... how do you explain the European model? And before you start talking about the crisis I have to remind of how the supposed broke country of Iceland is dealing with not being in the union.
    Yes there banks put them in massive debt but by not being in the euro union they simply devaluated there currency and now they are some of our most reliable customers, the crisis is another thing and you have it over there to. So Bull-crap to the notion the being socially responsible towards the poorest and helping them on there feet is bad...


    wth trying fool me with propaganda delivered by a nice guy voice fratin frat frat.
  86. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 6:01 am
    >>>Unchecked a free market economy would run the working class into the ground if it weren`t for the laws. <<<

    God forbid that you ever look at history...
  87. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 7:05 am
    Hong Kong has a health care system mostly under government control, but with a private care option.

    You know how they decided on that? By doing a huge analysis of different systems of healthcare. They found models like Canada`s with a public standard and private option to provide the best overall care, whereas they found systems like that of the US to be the most costly and inefficient.

    And to top it off, Hong Kong is constantly rated as the number one most capitalist place in the world, even by the Wall Street Journal. Universal healthcare is not communist, mmkay 5cats?

    Also 5cats, mennonites have been attacked for decades because you`re pacifists, and those countries like Germany, Ukraine, Russia all wanted to take what you had. All your ancestors did was run away.
  88. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 7:08 am
    Another thing this video (and most conservatives) always seem to think is that everyone starts off with the same ability to achieve what the rich already have, which is blatantly false. Substance abuse, broken homes, poverty, disease, socio-economic status, all these things make every person start out in a different place.

    And since when is "living on $1 a day" considered the poverty line? What family anywhere in America lives on $365/yr? Up here I believe the poverty line is somewhere between $15,000-20,000. I could check the exact number but I`m just too lazy this morning.
  89. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 8:04 am
    >>>Substance abuse, broken homes, poverty, disease, socio-economic status, all these things make every person start out in a different place. <<<

    That`s right no one who came from a broken home, raised in poverty, had a disease, was born at a low socio-economic status, or had a substance abuse problem ever amounted to anything.

    Great point.
  90. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 8:19 am
    >>>Free enterprise leads to situations where the elite unfairly earn more than their work would be worth and the poor are barred from ever doing better for themselves. <<<

    This is patently absurd. Yes some people will for a time gain advantage. But the free market is a system were these imbalances are eliminated in time as other products and markets are introduced. As a result the advantage that a person may have for a time does not last forever.
  91. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 8:44 am
    @dang007: Way to miss my point entirely. I never said those people don`t amount to anything, stop deliberately misconstruing my real point, which was that "hard work" isn`t as cut-and-dry as you make it seem. Someone can work very hard but have specific disadvantages that preclude them from being able to obtain the level of success that other people that don`t have those hardships can obtain. The world is grey, not black-and-white.
  92. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 8:45 am
    As a result the advantage that a person may have for a time does not last forever
    Tell that to companies with overwhelming majority of their respective market share.
  93. Profile photo of Kalon
    Kalon Male 13-17
    368 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 9:20 am
    I honestly dont see how a single one of his scenarios have ANYTHING to do with free enterprise. The marshmallow study only proves that people who think with long term goals are more sucessful. The global poverty decrease was caused by urbanization and industrialization, the simple process of turning a 3rd world country into a 2nd or 1st world country. Their type of economy has little to do with type of economy.
    The anti-communism aspect of his arguement comes from nothing more than 1.) people are happiest to have worked for what they have and 2.) people all have the same ability to acchieve regardless of race, religion, disability, and socioeconomic staning.
  94. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 9:24 am
    Ha, you got me 5Cats. But I`ll call this a draw since we were both wrong in our number. Let this be a lesson to you to never trust the numbers in stupid picture graphs that are passed around. And a lesson to me to read the picture more closely. I thought it said Bush had raised it that much not all the presidents combined.
  95. Profile photo of Kalon
    Kalon Male 13-17
    368 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 9:29 am
    CONTINUED
    Firstly, communism does not result in no wealthy people and no impoverished people. That is just uninformed. People still work and people still earned what they have. A person who makes 100,000 a year as a lawyer doesnt nessisarily work harder than someone who makes less. The "road to communism" that some democrats want only would make people who work get similar wages to others who work just as hard per hour.
    Secondly, the arguement that someone has found success from every diffrent situation doesnt change the fact that more people have found success from alot of similar situations. There is not the same ratios of religion, race, disability, ect. in the top 1% as there is overall. Another thing that would help equal the playing field between wealthty people and average people is that most wealthy people get their money from stock, which has a much lower tax rate than income tax.
    This video is just uninformed propaganda.
  96. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 9:34 am
    You`re going to scream bloody murder but the true factor is to attribute the first year to the last President because budgets are already in place when the new president takes office. With that reality in place:

    George W Bush Jan 20 2002 - Jan 20 2010: Debt raised 6.3 Trillion
    Barack Obama Jan 20 2010 - current: Debt raised 3.5 Trillion

    Scream all you want but that is the reality.
  97. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:02 am
    Bill Clintons budget for 2001 only raised the debt 194 Billion under George W Bush`s first year. So I can see why conservatives don`t want to use the truth.
  98. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:14 am
    >>>.Tell that to companies with overwhelming majority of their respective market share.
    <<<

    Really...... Let`s see do you mean IBM, or perhaps you mean standard Oil, or perhaps the Dutch East Indian Company?
  99. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:17 am
    >>>@dang007: Way to miss my point entirely. I never said those people don`t amount to anything<<<

    And way to miss my point entirely. I never said that noone that is one of those situations DOES not work hard. And I never said that things were black OR white.
  100. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:18 am
    @patchy: "I never said those people don`t amount to anything,"
    BUT you implied that "the rich" DO NOT suffer from this sort of upbringing: that they`re given some sort of advantage it`s impossible for "poor people" to have. Grey areas, not Black & White, remember? You keep saying one thing while also saying the opposite... (not hypocricy! Inconsistancy)

    "5cats, mennonites have been attacked for decades because you`re pacifists..."
    Yup!
    "All your ancestors did was run away."
    Nope!

    While we are peacful in large numbers, as individuals Mennonites are quite willing and able to "mix it up". If you were in my presence and said that I`d punch you right in the face, for reals, I`m not joking.

    This Link Explains Why

    Note: My family went Catholic in 1896, but remai
  101. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:20 am
    >>>A person who makes 100,000 a year as a lawyer doesnt nessisarily work harder than someone who makes less. <<<

    No however they are likely to have made different decisions in the past that put them in the position they are currently in. In some cases it was hard, but not impossible, to have made a different decisions but they made that decision non the less.
  102. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:25 am
    >>>Firstly, communism does not result in no wealthy people and no impoverished people. That is just uninformed. People still work and people still earned what they have. <<<<

    Ok with the first sentence the second you surly meant as a joke right?? The wealthy people in the USSR worked for it, or were they party hacks??
  103. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:27 am
    >>>Fiscal progressives don`t argue that the outcomes are unjust, they argue that the very game is unjust.<<<

    And then they proceed with redistribution of wealth and dismantling any form of free market or competition. And your analogy is just as flawed, in a free market system there is no prohibition of `taking the test.`
  104. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:30 am
    @5cats: The community I grew up in was predominantly mennonite, I know enough about them and their ankle-length skirts and kerchiefs in the hair as well as their methods of business and fighting and such.

    BUT you implied that "the rich" DO NOT suffer from this sort of upbringing
    When did I imply that exactly? Was it when I said "make every person start out in a different place. "? I never singled out the rich as never having disadvantages, you came to that conclusion on your own. My point was simply that: that you can`t paint all people`s upbringing with the same brush.

    I never said that noone that is one of those situations DOES not work hard.
    And I never wrote a sarcastic paragraph implying that you did.
  105. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:34 am
    And I never said that things were black OR white.
    No. No you didn`t.
  106. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:40 am
    Cripes @markust! I was willing to live and let live but you continue sucking Obama`s... Spin!

    I have linked YOUR OWN data to show you how completely and utterly WRONG you are, but you attemt to "move the goalposts"? Pathetic.

    Barack Obama`s debt begins in Jan 20 2010? WTF? Bush is now responsible for Obama`s "Stimulus Part 2" also? ObamaCare? How drating dishonest ARE you? Very much so, apparently.

    Don`t worry your lib-tard arse about ignoring me @markust, unless you smarten up a whole lot? THAT will be MOOT...
  107. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:53 am
    "I know enough about them and their ankle-length skirts and kerchiefs in the hair..."
    Um, @patchy? Apparently NO, you do NOT!

    Mennonite
    Hutterite
    Doukhobors (while I`m at it)

    That punch in the face still stands...

    "everyone starts off with the same ability to achieve WHAT THE RICH ALREADY HAVE, which is blatantly false"
    See it? You`ve implied the rich are ALL "already there" while the poor suffer from those disadvantages you list.

    SO: People are all different, yet they should ALL have the EXACT same wealth? Or else it`s "unfair"?? I really don`t
  108. Profile photo of imnakdjumpme
    imnakdjumpme Male 18-29
    598 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:59 am
    If you were starving to death, would you take 1 marshmallow now or stare at it for 15 minutes to get 2? And does it make you wrong or bad at long-term planning if you decide to take 1 in that situation?
    My point being that a person that needs something now is different than a child that wants a treat, so you shouldnt use that study when we are talking about families that are struggling for basic needs every day.
  109. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 11:00 am
    Hummm, upon further research: it seems Mennonites outside the Canadian Prairies DO wear the traditional garb!
    While it is manditory for Hutterites, it`s optional for Mennonites. VERY few Mennonites I`ve ever met wear traditional outfits unless it`s a special occasion.
    There`s LOTS of Mennonites out here ;-) believe me!

    Anyhow, they`re both "good folks" in my books!

    It got cut-off below: My family tree went Catholic in 1896, but still remained immersed in & part of the Mennonite community in Saskatchewan.
  110. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 11:02 am
    You are so absorbed in the world of opinion media I knew you would flip out if I moved the goal post. You losing your sh*t is the only entertainment that you add to this entertainment site. I`ll go back to ignoring you. Your mind is too brainwashed for an honest political conversation.
  111. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 11:03 am
    If you were starving to death = strawman.
    Weaksauce poured all over it to boot...
  112. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 11:10 am
    ...an honest political conversation.
    THAT is what passes as "honest" in lib-tard land these days? Honestly?
    Trolling?
    Moving Goalposts?
    Lies? (ad hominum attack = lie, fyi)



    Boo hoo hoo! Whatever shall I do? Wherever shall I go?


  113. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 11:21 am
    What did your parents do to you? You behave like a 40-49 year old junior high school girl.
  114. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 11:43 am
    vv Ad hominum = best @markust can do.

    Sad, eh?
  115. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 12:28 pm
    @5cats: So should I have started a new paragraph after that sentence? I gave a list of things that separate people, and the sentence before I was bemoaning how conservatives consider everyone on equal footing in terms of ability to achieve success. I didn`t say in my list that any of those things are exclusive to rich or poor people, many now rich people grew up in poverty. You`re trying to tell me what argument I`m making and you`re just wrong. The reason I mentioned rich people is because that`s what the whole post was about. I didn`t say WHAT the rich have that the poor don`t, you just assumed I meant the rich have no obstacles. I`m not responsible for your improper assumptions, take some responsibility.

    The mennonites I grew up with wore that garb, and I know the difference between hutterites and such, I used to drive past a colony every day. On a whole I don`t care much for mennonites, as most that I`ve known have been racist, ignorant farmer-types.
  116. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 12:29 pm
    That being said I don`t classify all mennonites in that respect, one of my best friends is a mennonite, although not from the traditional stock. So I`ll see your punch and raise you a kick in the junk.
  117. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 1:39 pm
    I didn`t say in my list that any of those things are exclusive to rich or poor people,
    So @patchy? Why list them at all? It leaves the door open to misunderstanding while serving no real purpose. Eh?

    You DID check out the Holodomor Link from before? Yes? Suggesting that my ancestors "just ran away" is like saying the Jews "deserved to burn" in those ovens. While we may have escaped before the Tsar was mean to us, many didn`t make it out and went on to suffer under the Tsar, Lenin and most especially Stalin. FYI: I`m really not happy about that comment.
  118. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 1:50 pm
    @5cats: That link didn`t say anything about mennonites so I hadn`t paid it much mind as it seemed to be affecting more than just your particular group. That doesn`t justify any insincerity on my part, I`ll chalk it up to frustrations concerning the science protest in Ottawa. Inexcusable in any event, my apologies.
  119. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31789 posts
    July 11, 2012 at 10:12 pm
    vv K, all is good!
    Mennonites protested science in Ontario??? Weirdness! Not that I doubt you but is there a link? Now I`m all curious!

    The history lesson of the day:
    Mennonites were asked by the Tsar in the 1800`s to move from Germany to Ukraine because they were EXCELLENT farmers and peaceful too! They were promised many things, including NO military service and keeping their German language.
    Things started to get ugly in the 1890`s (apx) when it looked like the Tsar was trying to change the deal. At the same time Canada began to actively advertise in Europe for people to move to Saskachewan Territory.
    So lots of Mennonites, Hudderites and other Germans, Ukranians and Poles moved to Manitoba, Sask, The Dakotas and other remote places.

    Tah dah! The 0.05 tour of history!
  120. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    July 12, 2012 at 8:40 am
    @5cats: No, mennonites didn`t protest, scientists did. I`m frustrated that they even had to, because with all the specific cuts to environmental programs and institutes it`s blatantly clear they`re willing to trade our environment for the sake of business.

Leave a Reply