Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 25    Average: 2.9/5]
87 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 8825
Rating: 2.9
Category: Misc
Date: 07/20/12 12:00 PM

87 Responses to Chick-Fil-Gay Sandwich (The Chick-Fil-A Recipe)

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18499 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:20 am
    Link: Chick-Fil-Gay Sandwich (The Chick-Fil-A Recipe) - Chick-Fil-A is a strongly ant-gay corporation so this chef is giving you the recipe on how to make your own and not pay.
  2. Profile photo of slut_etta
    slut_etta Female 50-59
    3770 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:07 pm
    i like to cook and routinely watch cooking videos but i don`t understand why some people swoon over chick-fil-a; it ain`t that good.
  3. Profile photo of Rick_S
    Rick_S Male 40-49
    3275 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:10 pm
    So many sexual innuendos, so little time!
  4. Profile photo of AvatarJohn
    AvatarJohn Male 30-39
    1059 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:11 pm
    ...because the reason you go to Chick-fil-A is that you can`t figure out how to bread and cook your own chicken. For lunch. Riiiiiggghhhttt...

    Somehow, I don`t think they`re too worried about this.
  5. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:22 pm
    What`s in the wet mixture?
  6. Profile photo of YANKmyDOODLE
    YANKmyDOODLE Male 30-39
    771 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:24 pm
    chick-fil-a is way too overpriced
  7. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36181 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    Add cheese & bacon and you have a Nirvana Sandwich!
  8. Profile photo of Ripper398
    Ripper398 Male 18-29
    1310 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:30 pm
    Oh, the things I`d let her do to my chicken. Pound it baby, pound it!
  9. Profile photo of nubblins
    nubblins Female 18-29
    1743 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:31 pm
    like, like.. and then like.

  10. Profile photo of Andrew155
    Andrew155 Male 18-29
    2579 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:34 pm
    People go to Chick Fil-A because it`s fast food that`s cheap and good. A meal there is cheaper for me than McDonald`s. I don`t care about their politics. To me, it`s nothing compared to what many corporations engage in around the world. If you boycotted every heinous corporation, you would be condemned to a rather austere life. But please, don`t be selective in your outrage.
  11. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:41 pm
    Chick-fil-A is a private company. They can serve whomever they want. Don`t like it? Don`t go.

    Don`t coerce others not to go because your feelings are hurt.
  12. Profile photo of madduck
    madduck Female 50-59
    7421 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:43 pm
    Vile, just like all these chains. Cheap meat from tortured animals. why not get a decent free range chicken and cook it nicely- food that is nourishing and not the guilt. If you can`t afford to pay for decent meat then go veggie...
  13. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5869 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:50 pm
    The owners and operators of Chik-Fil-A can run their business any way they want, with what any views they want.

    If their views bother you, let them know with your wallet, don`t eat there.

    That`s the great thing about this country.

    On the plus side, the Chick-Fil-A in the same mall as the shooting this morning opened up at 4:30am to offer police and emergency personel both free meals and use of their facilities.
  14. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5869 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 12:57 pm
    madduck-"Cheap meat from tortured animals"

    That`s the best kind.

    madduck-"why not get a decent free range chicken "

    Gee, a plump bird who has been pampered and then killed vs. a scrawny chicken that has roughed it and then killed. Either way, they were killed. Don`t know what makes `free-range` more moral?

    I eat oyster while they`re still alive, so spare me the bit where I`m supposed to feel sympathy for my t-bone.
  15. Profile photo of madduck
    madduck Female 50-59
    7421 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 1:27 pm
    McGrendel- I know you are a troll of the first water- but to even suggest that a cage reared chicken is pampered insults the intelligence of frogspawn.
  16. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5869 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 2:23 pm
    madduck-"McGrendel- I know you are a troll of the first water"

    So, stating something against your position = `troll`. Interesting.

    madduck-"to even suggest that a cage reared chicken is pampered"

    I don`t think it`s pampered. I don`t care. No matter how it lives, it will end up butchered, frozen, fried and served as dinner.

    That is its purpose in life.
  17. Profile photo of ScottSerious
    ScottSerious Male 18-29
    5316 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 2:53 pm
    boring
  18. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 3:17 pm

    Chick-fil-A is a private company. They can serve whomever they want. Don`t like it? Don`t go.
    The same dumb argument was used to exclude black people from Augusta golf club right up until 1990. It`s still used to exclude women from there. And in the past it was used to exclude black people from facilities such as higher education, buses and lunch counters in your very own home State.

    The attitude that business owners can do what they like because it`s their business didn`t wash back when blacks were being excluded from Universities, and it doesn`t wash now. Businesses that want to enjoy the privilege of operating within a free society have an obligation to serve everyone equally and without prejudice, or no-one at all. The right to own and run a business isn`t absolute: it`s conditional upon respecting the laws of the society you have the privilege to operate within. That society has laws and expectations concerning discrimination.
  19. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 3:26 pm
    Businesses that want to enjoy the privilege of operating within a free society have an obligation to serve everyone equally and without prejudice, or no-one at all.

    No they don`t, it`s in direct contradiction of the 1st Amendment like it or not. It`s in direct contradiction of basic property rights as well to determine who can enter your property or otherwise.

    Gee, a plump bird who has been pampered and then killed vs. a scrawny chicken that has roughed it and then killed.

    I`d take the former, more meat for my money.
  20. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 3:33 pm
    In the meantime I have alternatives such as KFC, Church`s, Popeye`s, Raising Cane`s etc. Aside from a plethora of regulations there`s nothing stopping African Americans from starting a restaurant chain that exclusively serves fried chicken to African Americans.
  21. Profile photo of Kilgore89
    Kilgore89 Male 18-29
    194 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    I`m outraged! This sort of thing shouldn`t be allowed to happen! Why didn`t she tell us what was in the wet and dry baths?!?
  22. Profile photo of CaptKangaroo
    CaptKangaroo Male 50-59
    2313 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:01 pm
    People seriously need a video to teach them how to bread and fry dead animal parts?
  23. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    >>>No they don`t, it`s in direct contradiction of the 1st Amendment like it or not. It`s in direct contradiction of basic property rights as well to determine who can enter your property or otherwise. <<<

    The American constitution applies to the rights of individuals, not to the rights of business entities. And besides, as previously noted, rights come with responsibilities. That`s why buses can`t segregate seats any more - or did you imagine the Constitution grants them the right to do that because the bus is their property?
  24. Profile photo of turdburglar
    turdburglar Male 30-39
    4710 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:21 pm
    Have to agree with cajun on this one. It may be wrong, but a private company does have the right to exclude anyone they want. That`s where democracy is supposed to kick in. Spread the word, money talks...even gay money.
  25. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:21 pm
    The American constitution applies to the rights of individuals, not to the rights of business entities.

    Irrelevant, business entities are run by individuals.

    or did you imagine the Constitution grants them the right to do that because the bus is their property

    I don`t imagine anything, if it`s a privately operated bus then the operator has every right to discriminate. If it`s publicly funded then no they don`t have the right to discriminate.
  26. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    Have to agree with cajun on this one. It may be wrong, but a private company does have the right to exclude anyone they want. That`s where democracy is supposed to kick in. Spread the word, money talks...even gay money.
    So, I ask again, what is it do you think that stops bus companies segregating buses now, when in the past they were able to?
  27. Profile photo of turdburglar
    turdburglar Male 30-39
    4710 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:27 pm
    @macguffin - I respect the fact that you know quite a lot about American law, (especally for a European) but you are mistaken in this case. Busses are public controlled, but private business and clubs reserve the right to refuse service to anyone they wish. It is up to the general public to patronize business as they see fit. That is why very few business discriminate...they loose money.
  28. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:28 pm
    what is it do you think that stops bus companies segregating buses now

    It`s called market discipline, you vote with your wallet. I love their fried chicken, but I don`t want a single penny of the money I spend going to that bigoted organization WinShape. Likewise if they were to refuse serving homosexuals, or demean them in public I`d stop paying and even troll them hard for a refund (even if it went nowhere).
  29. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    >>> I don`t imagine anything, if it`s a privately operated bus then the operator has every right to discriminate. If it`s publicly funded then no they don`t have the right to discriminate.<<<

    I doubt that`s true. But even if it is, my point is it that businesses that operate within a free society have an obligation not to discriminate. America isn`t "free", despite the fine ideals espoused by the original authors of your constitution.

    ...
  30. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    Any society based on a constitution that allows its government to kill a 16 year old citizen is by definition not "free". And that`s before we even get into issues like the torture of American citizens on American soil, which your courts mysteriously don`t seem to be interested in investigating.

    In a truly free society, your citizens would be free from the risk of murder and torture by your government. And your businesses would be compelled to treat all customers equally, whether or not they "owned the bus".

    Rights come with responsibilities.
  31. Profile photo of MacGuffin
    MacGuffin Female 30-39
    2602 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:35 pm

    @macguffin - I respect the fact that you know quite a lot about American law, (especally for a European) but you are mistaken in this case. Busses are public controlled, but private business and clubs reserve the right to refuse service to anyone they wish. It is up to the general public to patronize business as they see fit. That is why very few business discriminate...they loose money.
    I don`t purport to be any kind of expert in the area of US law, and you may be right that it could be legal (though most other countries do balance the right of the individual to choose, with the obligation not to discriminate).
  32. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:37 pm
    You are all referring to a "place of public accomodation" in the context of Chik-Fil-A.

    It is illegal to disciminate in a place of public accomodation.

    Read and Learn....
  33. Profile photo of turdburglar
    turdburglar Male 30-39
    4710 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:41 pm
    I am not sure why you are changing the subject to a 16 yr olds murder and Americas freedom. You where politely corrected, accept it. No need to argue about another topic, so you can win. I personaly prefer that the goverment stay out of certian situations like this. If the word is spread, I believe that the majority of consumers will not patronize chick-fil-a. I was unaware that they where discriminating, but now they will never see a penny of my cash.
  34. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:42 pm
    While I find those and the recent decision to uphold ObamaCare tragic, you`re shifting the argument MacGuffin. By no stretch have I said our nation is perfect, never has been.

    In a truly free society, your citizens would be free from the risk of murder and torture by your government. And your businesses would be compelled to treat all customers equally, whether or not they "owned the bus".

    A contradiction, society should be free from unwarranted govt intrusion, yet in some cases it is warranted.

    Rights come with responsibilities.

    Responsibilities which stop at not intruding on other people`s rights. Which includes property rights (which includes the businesses one owns) and freedom of speech.
  35. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:44 pm
    Whoop-de-doo nettech, congrats you just mentioned a govt agency which has no authority to speak of under the Constitution.
  36. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:46 pm
    If the word is spread, I believe that the majority of consumers will not patronize chick-fil-a. I was unaware that they where discriminating, but now they will never see a penny of my cash.

    See MacGuffin, turdburglar has the right idea stop giving money to those bigots, they`ll listen.
  37. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:47 pm
    "In a truly free society, your citizens would be free from the risk of murder and torture by your government."

    What`s truly free? Anarchy?

    Here I thought you were actually going to make it through a thread without bringing up murder and torture. Of humans.

    What about the poor chickens? They were murdered! By American Soldiers! After being raped! With Government approval!

    Crawl back in your bagpipe....
  38. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:50 pm
    "Whoop-de-doo nettech, congrats you just mentioned a govt agency which has no authority to speak of under the Constitution."

    What did I miss? What Government agency did I mention? I gave a link explaining Federal law...
  39. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 4:59 pm
    @nettech

    Okay I stretched a little, but the Justice Dept should not be regulating commerce that occurs within a state.
  40. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:05 pm
    "the Justice Dept should not be regulating commerce that occurs within a state."

    Interesting position. It`s actually the Civil rights Act of 1964. It was Congress. And while you might call it `regulating commerce` they called it ending discrimination.

    Still against it??
  41. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:07 pm
    "the Justice Dept should not be regulating commerce that occurs within a state."

    So perhaps you think the states should decide for themselves whether it`s ok to discriminate against people within their borders?

    A black person can walk into Burger King in NJ but not in PA?

    A jew can shop at Target in NY but not in MS?
  42. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:17 pm
    @nettech

    So perhaps you think the states should decide for themselves whether it`s ok to discriminate against people within their borders?

    No it would be in violation of the 14th amendment. But it applies strictly to public institutions and governments.

    A black person can walk into Burger King in NJ but not in PA?

    A jew can shop at Target in NY but not in MS?

    If that was their decisions then they have every right to carry them out because they are PRIVATE institutions.

    And while you might call it `regulating commerce` they called it ending discrimination.

    "Ending discrimination" can take many forms, it`s important to end it in public institutions and government, but wrong to do so in the private sector.
  43. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:23 pm
    "If that was their decisions then they have every right to carry them out because they are PRIVATE institutions."

    They are NOT private institutions. They are open to the public. We`re not talking a private golf club here. We`re not talking Boy Scouts.

    We`re talking restaurants, hotels, malls, movie theaters...

    How would this work? Like the old "whites only and colored" water fountains with signs?

    A big sign at the MS border saying "Public accomodations may be refused to any person for any reason in this state". Followed by signs on the hotel marquee saying "no Jews, no blacks, no gays". Or would you have to walk in and find out?
  44. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:26 pm
    And your "private insitution" argument also fails because the Civil Rights Act also prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. For PRIVATE institutions....
  45. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:33 pm
    "Ending discrimination can take many forms, it`s important to end it in public institutions and government, but wrong to do so in the private sector."

    I think I`m pretty much done with you because you really sound totally bigotted and not willing to see any other view.

    You WANT to be able to discriminate. You WANT to be able to not hire a Jew. You WANT to be able to not serve a chicken sandwich to a gay person. You WANT to be able to keep a black person out of the mall. You WANT someone in a wheelchair to have to walk up the stairs at the theater....

    How can I possibly argue against that?
  46. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:34 pm
    Nettech you obviously don`t understand the difference between a private and public institution. It is irrelevant whether or not a person makes their property "open to the public" it is still THEIR property which means they have FULL say in who gets to enter and who doesn`t.

    How would this work? Like the old "whites only and colored" water fountains with signs?


    Any business nowadays that engaged in such behavoir would lose A LOT of WHITE customers if not limiting themselves to a small consumer base.
  47. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:37 pm
    I think I`m pretty much done with you because you really sound totally bigotted and not willing to see any other view.

    You WANT to be able to discriminate. You WANT to be able to not hire a Jew. You WANT to be able to not serve a chicken sandwich to a gay person. You WANT to be able to keep a black person out of the mall. You WANT someone in a wheelchair to have to walk up the stairs at the theater....

    ...and thus you tacitly concede with the vengeance of a total character assassination.

    How can I possibly argue against that?

    By deliberately misrepresenting your opponent`s stance obviously.
  48. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2346 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:38 pm
    their chicken sucks as much ass as their anti-gay BS.
  49. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:42 pm
    "it is still THEIR property which means they have FULL say in who gets to enter and who doesn`t."

    You couldn`t be more wrong. I can back myself up with the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, etc. Show me one reference where a place of public accomodation can refuse service to someone.

  50. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:44 pm
    And your "private insitution" argument also fails because the Civil Rights Act also prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. For PRIVATE institutions....

    No, you actually prove my point by demonstrating yet again what the Federal Govt has no authority to do so under the Constitution. But, alas you don`t care, all discrimination should be illegal.

    As I`ve already said I`m not giving my money to the bigoted company known as Chick-Fil-A for their support of monster-of-a-non-profit-organization WinShape Foundation. In fact I`d appreciate it if they gave me all my money back.
  51. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:46 pm
    Show me one reference where a place of public accomodation can refuse service to someone


    Every restaurant has their own version.
  52. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:48 pm
    They WOULDN`T have these signs if they didn`t, but they do.
  53. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:50 pm
    As for your example with Mississippi, their govt would be shooting themselves in the foot if they dared put up such a sign.
  54. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:51 pm
    Just so you GET IT, it`s 42 USC 2000A

    (a) Equal access
    All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
  55. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:52 pm
    continued:

    (b) Establishments affecting interstate commerce or supported in their activities by State action as places of public accommodation; lodgings; facilities principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises; gasoline stations; places of exhibition or entertainment; other covered establishments
    Each of the following establishments which serves the public is a place of public accommodation within the meaning of this subchapter if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action:
  56. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:53 pm
    continued:

    (1)any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence;

    (2)any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment; or any gasoline station;

    (3)any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and
  57. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:53 pm
    continued:

    (4)any establishment
    (A)
    (i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or

    (ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment, and

    (B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of such covered establishment.


    etc, etc...
  58. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:55 pm
    You can put up a sign, but that doesn`t mean it`s legal!

    How many stores put up signs saying "No refunds under any circumstances". Well if the merchandise is defective, guess what? That sign doesn`t mean anything. I can`t put up a sign on my lawn saying "Trespassers will be shot" and then shoot anyone that comes on my property can I??
  59. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:56 pm
    Just so YOU GET IT

    USC
    Art I Sec 8 Clause 3
    "The Congress shall have the power...

    ...To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;"

    Amendment X:
    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
  60. Profile photo of bacon_pie
    bacon_pie Male 30-39
    3061 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:57 pm
    I don`t eat there often enough for me to give a crap.
  61. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 5:58 pm
    Keep digging!!!!


  62. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:00 pm
    Establishments affecting interstate commerce or supported in their activities by State action as places of public accommodation

    AHA, the most ANNOYING misinterpretation of the commerce clause. Which means there is no real limit on the Federal Govts power.

    Well if the merchandise is defective, guess what? That sign doesn`t mean anything.

    You bought it you accepted the risks.

    I can`t put up a sign on my lawn saying "Trespassers will be shot" and then shoot anyone that comes on my property can I

    Yes you can you have the right to defend your property.
  63. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:01 pm
    "Just so YOU GET IT "

    Once again, you just come off as a bigotted anarchist that doesnt believe in the laws that Congress has passed based on the power given to it by the Constitution...

    They`re not regulating WHAT THEY SELL or their ABILITY to sell it.

    They`re telling them that they can`t refuse to conduct their business with public based on certain criteria. Is it really THAT hard to grasp??
  64. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:01 pm
    Keep digging

    You too Nettech, nevermind the rule of law. Federal Govt can do WHATEVER THE HELL IT WANTS, so long as it`s for the common good.
  65. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:03 pm
    "Yes you can you have the right to defend your property."

    Texas, as I`m sure you know, is the ONLY state that allows the use of deadly force to protect personal property. Under specific defined circumstances.

    The rest of us actually have to call the police...

  66. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:04 pm
    you just come off as a bigotted anarchist

    You declare yourself a sore loser with character assasinations.

    Is it that hard for YOU to grasp that there are certain things the Federal Government SHOULD NOT DO?
  67. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:07 pm
    The rest of us actually have to call the police...

    Except for:

    Arizona
    Florida
    Illinois
    Kentucky
    Montana
    North Carolina
    Oklahoma
    Utah
    Washington
    West Virginia

    ...and others



    On the other hand you`re really saying you have to WAIT for the police to show while letting an intruder shred, steal your belongings, house, HOME?

    You`ve also shifted the argument.
  68. Profile photo of nettech98
    nettech98 Male 50-59
    1043 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:10 pm
    "You too Nettech, nevermind the rule of law. Federal Govt can do WHATEVER THE HELL IT WANTS, so long as it`s for the common good."

    LOL. You just totally made my argument. "Nevermind the rule of law". LOL. I show you the laws and you tell my why you think they`re not valid. LOL. And no, I don`t think the federal government can do whatever it wants, nor did I ever elude to that. So many LOLs, so little time...

    In fact I never even gave a personal opinion as to whether I agree or not. All I did right from the beginning was reflect what the law actually is. Right, wrong, indifferent.

    It was you that said the law is wrong, unconsitutional, etc.

    Just what a bigot would do. Find any reason why it`s really ok to discriminate against a person for any reason at all.

    You, unfortunately, are what the MacGuffins of the world hate about Americans...

    And with that, I`m out. Time to eat.
  69. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 6:27 pm
    So that`s it Nettech? Your whole point was to make a complete character assassination of me? You`ve proven NOTHING. I`m NOT okay with Chick-Fil-A`s decision to support "traditional marriage" BS, I don`t support Neo-Nazis et al. I said they have EVERY RIGHT to have those positions at their own peril.

    Just what a bigot would do. Find any reason why it`s really ok to discriminate against a person for any reason at all.


    Just what a simpleton would do. Play the race card and claim victory, only in the end to have no point to prove.


    SEE YOU NEXT TIME!
  70. Profile photo of keith2
    keith2 Male 18-29
    2587 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 7:31 pm
    When I first saw one of these places, my first thought was, my.. what a gay name..
  71. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5869 posts
    July 20, 2012 at 7:57 pm
    Amid all the gnashing of teeth in this post about Chick-Fil-A`s `discrimination`, everyone seems to forget the simple fact that Chick-Fil-A is not discriminating.

    There`s been no accusations that they refuse to hire based on race, religion or sexual prefference.

    There`s been no accusations that they refuse to serve people based on race, religion or sexual prefference.

    The President of Chick-Fil-A just simply replied to a question that `“We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit.`

    Is the Gay and Lesbian community so thin-skinned that anyone who does not fall over themselves crowing about how great they are MUST be villified?

    The only lawsuit I can recal over hiring/employment issues was becuase guys weren`t allowed to wear earrings. The guys lost because it is entirely management`s right to set the dress code.

  72. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 3:13 am
    They are not anti-gay. The president opposes gay "rights" agitators` agenda. That is a very different thing.
  73. Profile photo of TheOrigin
    TheOrigin Male 18-29
    500 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 4:47 am
    Ignoring the political dimension of this debate, which evades me due to no prior knowledge nor interest into said corporation and its public presentation I am forced to state this much:

    this recipe is poo.

    Why oh why would you marinate meat in pickle water, full of conservants, chemicals and other delicacies? Make your own marinade, oil based or vinegar based, or whatever. But water from pickles? :/

    From experience, best thing to marinate meat is milk. Tenderize the breast, lay it into a msall bowl of milk with some crushed garlic stirred into the milk. Let rest for the night, fry on a piece of butter (NOT margarine) and top off with herbs or good quality mustard. Fry just a little bit more to let it all set in.

    Or use the good old rezen style, tenderize, dip in flour, egg, breadcrumbs, fry. Crispy and delicious.
  74. Profile photo of robosnitz
    robosnitz Male 40-49
    2737 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 6:43 am
    Yeah,pickle juice replaces MSG.What an ass.

    Anyway, I`d eat that fag sandwich.
  75. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36181 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 7:07 am

    AJ - "(1)Chick-fil-A is a private company. They can serve whomever they want. Don`t like it? Don`t go. . . (2) Don`t coerce others not to go because your feelings are hurt."
    I agree with our 1st point, not the second.

    (1) Isn`t that her point in the video? She doesn`t like the policy so she`s not going there.

    (2)Doesn`t she have the option to inform anyone she wants to and let those people make their choice? We all tell people when we find a good store or a get lousy service at `that` store etc.
  76. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36181 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 7:08 am

    "The American constitution applies to the rights of individuals, not to the rights of business entities"


  77. Profile photo of An-egg
    An-egg Male 30-39
    885 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 7:52 am
    This is hardly an alternative to fast food.
  78. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5869 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 8:32 am
    @Gerry1of1

    The idea, and precedent, that corporations are people is nothing new.

    Look in ANY Code of Federal Regulations and find the difinition of `person`. You`ll find something similar to `Person means an individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company; or a government, Indian tribe, or authority of a government or tribe...`
  79. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 11:36 am
    Sorry, but it is ridiculous to say that the president of Chich-fil-a is anti-gay.

    Gerry1of1

    "The American constitution applies to the rights of individuals, not to the rights of business entities"

    No it doesn`t. It applies limits to the authority of the branches of the US government. Doing so gives certain rights to people, but it does not restrict those rights to people.

    Read the First Amendment for example. It does not say what people may do, but what Congress may not do. It is also clearly implicit that corporations are protected, given that it provides for freedom of the press.
  80. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 11:42 am
    "Is the Gay and Lesbian community so thin-skinned that anyone who does not fall over themselves crowing about how great they are MUST be villified?"

    Of course they must. Otherwise the self-styled leaders of those communities would have nothing to do. The Homosexual population could happily live alongside the remaining 95% or so of the population, most of whom don`t care about sexuality.

    That would, of course, be bad. Not for ordinary gay people of course. Bad for the self-styled leaders. Bad for the socialists who divide society into client groups. Bad for "celebrities" and companies who use the issue to advance their brand. Bad for the cult of victimhood and all its hangers on.
  81. Profile photo of Magickrat
    Magickrat Male 40-49
    535 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 1:28 pm
    Big deal - She made a chicken cutlet sandwich.

    Nowhere near anything like a Chick Fil A, by the way...
  82. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36181 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 5:06 pm

    @ MeGrendel - I wasn`t disputing it. I was countering the other guys comment.
  83. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36181 posts
    July 21, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    @ randomxnp - Quote marks... "s ... do any of you know what those mean?
  84. Profile photo of trippyhippy9
    trippyhippy9 Male 18-29
    559 posts
    July 22, 2012 at 1:27 pm
    I don`t like Chick-fil-a chicken. When I found out about this, I used it as a talking point to keep my friends from making me go there.
  85. Profile photo of rncotton
    rncotton Male 30-39
    417 posts
    July 23, 2012 at 7:41 am
    My summer job during high school was always at Chick-Fil-A. This is *not* a copycat recipe. It`s just a fried chicken breast sandwich.

    Chick-Fil-A uses a milk bath for the marinade. I wish I could remember everything that went into the bath. I remember milk, egg, pepper, and some other spices. There was no pickle juice.

    Then it went into the dry coating ... again, don`t remember what the ladies put in there. Then off to the pressure cooker.

    You want the signature CFA taste? You need a milk bath and a pressure cooker.
  86. Profile photo of dubstepdubst
    dubstepdubst Male 18-29
    63 posts
    July 23, 2012 at 5:17 pm
    I`d like to fully coat her breast =D
  87. Profile photo of cheeseb
    cheeseb Male 30-39
    254 posts
    July 30, 2012 at 2:43 pm
    Chick-fil-a sandwiches so good, they make you want to have sex with someone of the same gender as yourself.

Leave a Reply