Missing Wormhole [Pic]

Submitted by: orange_panty 4 years ago in Science

If you find it, leave it alone... Slightly on topic: Can a wormhole really exist beyond theory? Thought, I-A-B.
There are 17 comments:
Male 1,595
I`m pretty sure wormholes exist, just not in the way most people think of them.
0
Reply
Male 106
As for wormholes, they likely do exist, and they are literally everywhere. They`re just small. Like, quantum small, and they constantly appear and reappear. Nothing is perfectly smooth, not even spacetime. Most of them connect to parallel universes although some reconnect to our own universe. These could connect to the past, present or future.

It might even be possible to enlarge and stabilize a wormhole for travel, but it would require some exotic form of matter that has a negative total energy. This would almost certainly not work for the wormholes that connect to the past, however, because radiation from the present would be able to travel through them and create an infinitely increasing amount of radiation in our universe (the radiation from the present would add to the amount of radiation in the universe in the past, which will eventually become the present). This is the feedback loop nayrbarr was talking about.
0
Reply
Male 106
@nayrbarr
No, the burden of proof is always on the one making the claim. It`s one thing to say, "I don`t see any reason to believe that a god exists." It`s another thing to say "There is no god". The latter claim comes with a burden of proof.
0
Reply
Male 712
Yes I just have one question over those arguing the existence/nonexistence bit.













Have you bunch ...ever...been laid?
0
Reply
Male 365
@DuckBoy87 That statement is self-defeating. If someone says "There is no god" and you say "It`s not true until you prove it" then it must, by your logic, be true until you can prove that they need to prove it. This is a paradox. Quik is correct.
0
Reply
Male 3,461
No, Quik, the burden of proof is on the exclaimer.

If one says "There is no God", then they have to prove it. But it also goes the other way: if one says "There is a God", then they, too, have to prove it.

Now it becomes entirely moot when one says "I believe there is/isn`t a God." as a belief of a person cannot be disproven, no matter how ignorant one may be.
0
Reply
Male 658
Insane_ai, the burden of proof is on the believer. You can`t use "prove there is no God" as an argument for god existing.


Also, you`re a troll.
0
Reply
Male 1,395
You people seem to forget that science does nothing but discover how the things God created work. Our ignorance of wormholes does not dis-prove their existence, nor does our understanding of things dis-prove God`s existence.


0
Reply
Male 4,893
The wormhole, like orange-panty, only exists in theory.
0
Reply
Male 144
Oops, someone doesn`t understand things! You know, if I didn`t understand things, I wouldn`t post my lack of understanding on the internet.
0
Reply
Male 365
In regard to wormholes, it is theoretically possible for them to form but the formation of a stable wormhole (one that last more than an instant) is currently thought to be impossible as the transition of any data through such an anomaly would cause a feedback-loop which would lead to the instantaneous collapse of the wormhole.

Of course this is all just theory as, by their nature, no one has ever observed such a thing.
0
Reply
Male 4,893
I know where to find one...In yo mommas pants! OHHHH!
0
Reply
Male 5,413
That`s a mighty fine well built wall there...
0
Reply
Male 38,483

I`ll take the religious viewpoint.
It`s real until you prove it`s not.
0
Reply
Male 6,737
I predict that this debate will get no further than this page.
0
Reply
Male 5,811
Wow I just submitted this a second ago...

To answer caption: There is no observable evidence as yet, so they remain theoretical constructs.
0
Reply
Female 596
Link: Missing Wormhole [Pic] [Rate Link] - If you find it, leave it alone... Slightly on topic: Can a wormhole really exist beyond theory? Thought, I-A-B.
0
Reply