Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 26    Average: 3.3/5]
18 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 10244
Rating: 3.3
Category: Science
Date: 06/08/12 08:15 AM

18 Responses to Missing Wormhole [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of orange_panty
    orange_panty Female 18-29
    596 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:16 am
    Link: Missing Wormhole - If you find it, leave it alone... Slightly on topic: Can a wormhole really exist beyond theory? Thought, I-A-B.
  2. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:21 am
    Wow I just submitted this a second ago...

    To answer caption: There is no observable evidence as yet, so they remain theoretical constructs.
  3. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:26 am
    I predict that this debate will get no further than this page.
  4. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36200 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:43 am

    I`ll take the religious viewpoint.
    It`s real until you prove it`s not.
  5. Profile photo of 8BitHero
    8BitHero Male 18-29
    5414 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:47 am
    That`s a mighty fine well built wall there...
  6. Profile photo of turdburglar
    turdburglar Male 30-39
    4716 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 9:15 am
    I know where to find one...In yo mommas pants! OHHHH!
  7. Profile photo of nayrbarr
    nayrbarr Male 18-29
    366 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 9:22 am
    In regard to wormholes, it is theoretically possible for them to form but the formation of a stable wormhole (one that last more than an instant) is currently thought to be impossible as the transition of any data through such an anomaly would cause a feedback-loop which would lead to the instantaneous collapse of the wormhole.

    Of course this is all just theory as, by their nature, no one has ever observed such a thing.
  8. Profile photo of blobby5
    blobby5 Male 30-39
    144 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 9:29 am
    Oops, someone doesn`t understand things! You know, if I didn`t understand things, I wouldn`t post my lack of understanding on the internet.
  9. Profile photo of turdburglar
    turdburglar Male 30-39
    4716 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 10:03 am
    The wormhole, like orange-panty, only exists in theory.
  10. Profile photo of insane_ai
    insane_ai Male 30-39
    739 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 10:04 am
    You people seem to forget that science does nothing but discover how the things God created work. Our ignorance of wormholes does not dis-prove their existence, nor does our understanding of things dis-prove God`s existence.


  11. Profile photo of Quik2TheStab
    Quik2TheStab Male 18-29
    661 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 10:31 am
    Insane_ai, the burden of proof is on the believer. You can`t use "prove there is no God" as an argument for god existing.


    Also, you`re a troll.
  12. Profile photo of onoffonoffon
    onoffonoffon Male 30-39
    2310 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 11:06 am
    Yes they can seen it on the lawn many a time.
  13. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3147 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 1:08 pm
    No, Quik, the burden of proof is on the exclaimer.

    If one says "There is no God", then they have to prove it. But it also goes the other way: if one says "There is a God", then they, too, have to prove it.

    Now it becomes entirely moot when one says "I believe there is/isn`t a God." as a belief of a person cannot be disproven, no matter how ignorant one may be.
  14. Profile photo of nayrbarr
    nayrbarr Male 18-29
    366 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 4:51 pm
    @DuckBoy87 That statement is self-defeating. If someone says "There is no god" and you say "It`s not true until you prove it" then it must, by your logic, be true until you can prove that they need to prove it. This is a paradox. Quik is correct.
  15. Profile photo of Genocyde
    Genocyde Male 30-39
    712 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:11 pm
    Yes I just have one question over those arguing the existence/nonexistence bit.













    Have you bunch ...ever...been laid?
  16. Profile photo of buscompany
    buscompany Male 18-29
    106 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 8:53 pm
    @nayrbarr
    No, the burden of proof is always on the one making the claim. It`s one thing to say, "I don`t see any reason to believe that a god exists." It`s another thing to say "There is no god". The latter claim comes with a burden of proof.
  17. Profile photo of buscompany
    buscompany Male 18-29
    106 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 9:02 pm
    As for wormholes, they likely do exist, and they are literally everywhere. They`re just small. Like, quantum small, and they constantly appear and reappear. Nothing is perfectly smooth, not even spacetime. Most of them connect to parallel universes although some reconnect to our own universe. These could connect to the past, present or future.

    It might even be possible to enlarge and stabilize a wormhole for travel, but it would require some exotic form of matter that has a negative total energy. This would almost certainly not work for the wormholes that connect to the past, however, because radiation from the present would be able to travel through them and create an infinitely increasing amount of radiation in our universe (the radiation from the present would add to the amount of radiation in the universe in the past, which will eventually become the present). This is the feedback loop nayrbarr was talking about.
  18. Profile photo of DShephard
    DShephard Male 18-29
    1595 posts
    June 8, 2012 at 9:12 pm
    I`m pretty sure wormholes exist, just not in the way most people think of them.

Leave a Reply