Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 37    Average: 3.8/5]
66 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 7800
Rating: 3.8
Category:
Date: 06/09/12 04:00 PM

66 Responses to America`s Health Care System = A Massive Pig

  1. Profile photo of kitteh9lives
    kitteh9lives Female 70 & Over
    8033 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 11:49 am
    Link: America`s Health Care System = A Massive Pig - Is health care a privilege or a right?
  2. Profile photo of Omphaloskept
    Omphaloskept Male 40-49
    181 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:13 pm
    "...and if it is a right, like life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness..."

    life=health care. "Like" doesn`t enter into it. Unless you are in the tiny bracket of people who are born in the woods and die immediately thereafter, you will receive health care during your tenure as a U.S. citizen.
  3. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36208 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    There will not be any significant change in the near future for 2 reasons.

    1: MONEY: Health Care is made up of FOR PROFIT Corporations that spent billions on politicians to get it set up this way an they don`t want any changes. Why do you think George Bush banned US citizens going to Canada for drugs at half the cost?
    &
    B: STUPIDITY: People are stupid. No one wants to sacrifice for it. We want good medical care but no one wants to take it out of THEIR paycheck. The Gov`ment aught to do somthin`! they cry without stopping to think where the gov`ment gets it`s money from.

    In summary, Corporations want their money and it`s not too hard to fool stupid people into not demanding it of their governement.
  4. Profile photo of WeePee
    WeePee Male 18-29
    612 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:15 pm
    health care should be about as much of a right as having a cell phone.
  5. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:20 pm
    1:35 Um, Private Companies are the ones who will RUN Obamacare, the Law forces individual citizens to buy THEIR products or be fined!
    What this guy says is utterly false!

    Non-Partisan? LOLZ! This guy`s socialist dream world is entirely, 100% partisan.

    "Cut down on proceedures" is NOT a death panel? He completely disproves his own rhetoric!

    2:00 this guy lives in a socialist alternate-reality if he truely believes THIS crapola! lolz!
  6. Profile photo of Thdot
    Thdot Male 30-39
    658 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:25 pm
    I wanted to see the piggy.
  7. Profile photo of skine
    skine Male 18-29
    719 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:39 pm
    Why did he decide to record a political rant in a club?
  8. Profile photo of faustsshadow
    faustsshadow Male 30-39
    418 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:40 pm
    I understand that you `think` life = health care, but that is still stretching the definition quite a bit. Argue for it to be redefined if you will, but be honest in your intentions.

    Defining what a `right` is is tricky and important. Inalienable rights are rights that people have that the government can`t (ie shouldn`t) take away. The government does not `give` rights. Health care is something that must be given.

  9. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36208 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:41 pm

    The single most expensive thing in U.S. healthcare is not medical procedures or drugs. It`s administration. Paperwork overhead and double billing. When my hubby had cancer, we had soooooo many "office visits" that were needless and pointless but we had to jump through the hoops so they could bill the insurance company and he could get treatment.

    Here`s an infograph. FancyLad, I`d love it if you made this a seperate post.

    HEALTH CARE EXPENSES
  10. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:48 pm
    Capitalism works on the concept that those who sell you a product try to make the most profit possible. In order to make profit, they charge you as much as they can get away with for the cheapest service or product they can get away with providing.

    The question is, do we want to apply these principles to health care? Do we want the people taking care of us when we`re sick to be trying to weasel out of taking care of us while still getting away with our cash? Is that the mindset we want our care providers to have?

    Sounds like I`m digging for a specific answer there, and I`ll admit that I am, to a degree. If you can explain why selfish motivation is good in an altruistic business, you`re welcome to do so. I`ll listen, and you might even change my mind.
  11. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 4:50 pm
    Health care should be available to everyone.

    Call it Socialism if you want, it just proves you have no concept of the meaning of the word.
  12. Profile photo of Keyh
    Keyh Male 18-29
    226 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 5:06 pm
    "Call it Socialism if you want, it just proves you have no concept of the meaning of the word."

    `An economic system in which the production and distribution of goods are controlled substantially by the government rather than by private enterprise`

    You`re right, a government run system in lieu of a private sector run system isn`t socialism. Oh wait a second, that`s exactly what it is.
  13. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 5:09 pm
    If this video was truely unbiased they wouldn`t fail to mention how egregiously overregulated HEALTHCARE is. That is why healthcare and health insurance is ridiculously overpriced.
  14. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 5:13 pm
    "Cut down on proceedures" is NOT a death panel?

    Cut down on USELESS procedures, which risks lives and gives insurance revenue. Unfortunately, how to do so would be difficult to elaborate on.
  15. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 5:30 pm
    vv @Gerry1 I TOTALLY agree with you! Administration costs have doubled or tripled since the 60`s (as a ratio of spending) here in Canada! ALL the increase in healthcare costs can be pegged to increased administration costs.!

    And WHAT does the government do best of all? Increases... ADMINISTRATION COSTS!!!

    @Cajun: Obama campaigned on that: "Unneccessary tonsilectomies" he said! LMAO! Yeah THAT is the cause of increased healthcare!

    The #2 Cause: LAWYERS! Lawsuits cost insurance companies money, which gets passed on to their customers. Doctors in this case. Who then MUST pass on the costs to the customers, sick folks.

    FIX the lawyer problem and THEN fix the insurance company problem and THAT WILL actually reduce healthcare costs.

    Obama is doing the OPPOSITE!

  16. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5879 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 5:38 pm
    Gerry1of1-"The single most expensive thing in U.S. healthcare is not medical procedures or drugs. It`s administration."

    And you SERIOUSLY believe that the Government can do a BETTER job a administrating?

    Ever visited the DMV?

    The Government is nothing BUT an administration, who`s primary job is to create MORE administration.

    Don`t believe me? Obama stated yesterday that THE PROBLEM with the economy was....***wait for it****....NOT ENOUGH GOVERNMENT JOBS!!!.
  17. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 5:50 pm
    @Gerry: Love that infograph of yours. Should be required reading for every voter.
  18. Profile photo of Toomuchcoffe
    Toomuchcoffe Male 30-39
    43 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 6:12 pm
    Too bad America did`t elect an IAB member, you guys seem to have the answers.
  19. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 6:18 pm
    We spend about 25-30% of all healthcare dollars on the last year of life. And most (nearly 80%) of that is in the last month! And a lot of it is painful care that does almost no good and is paid for almost entirely by the government.

    If we consider who makes all of the rules for healthcare, who determines almost all of the rules (the government, and they do so by being such a huge customer, almost 2 of every 3 healthcare dollrs spent in the country), the fact that we allow any free market capitalism in the system is pure nuts. We need to get things under control and fix the HUGE
  20. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 6:26 pm
    5Cats, lawyers and lawsuits aren`t the problem--well, not to omuch. In states that control damages (TX and CA, for example), even though insurance costs are less, they didn`t decrease nearly as much as the reduced awards. And doctors in those states still order way too many tests and unnecessary procedures to "protect themselves." I guess I can understand why. Even though most docs are sued in their careers, only about 1/3 of all doctors actually deserve it. If malpractice insurance would charge doctors like they charge drivers, based on risk (pay out), about 2/3 of doctors would have to pay very little as they`re almost never successfully sued. Yet, insurance companies will NEVER do this. Again, it`s capitalism. Too, if lawmakers would require costs to be paid for frivolous malpractice suits...

  • Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 6:28 pm
    What in the heck happened to my post?!

    I just tried to provide a source.
  • Profile photo of Keyh
    Keyh Male 18-29
    226 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 6:44 pm
    I have a question. Do the health care expenditure numbers include elective procedures? Also, does it include `retirement` home costs? Psychiatric Hospitals? At home nursing?

    The talk about eliminating "unnecessary procedures" kind of pushes me to thinking that elective procedures are included.

    Also, you have to consider people who die on waiting lists, or give up on procedures all together due to them. If they die/give up before the procedure, they`re not going to spend the money. It`s probably not a huge difference, but it`s a difference.
  • Profile photo of onoffonoffon
    onoffonoffon Male 30-39
    2314 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 7:17 pm
    What if there wasn`t any insurance companies and everyone had to pay cash?
  • Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 7:27 pm
    The public option is a massive government power grab. The government already has too much power over our healthcare system. There will be no negotiated pricing, there will be rationing and older people won`t get the care they need. The `Death Panels` are in the bill, they are the non-nice individuals that will tell you that granny can`t have a heart valve replaced because she`s 70+ years old and should just go home and die instead.

    What is needed is tort reform, get the damn money grubbing lawyers out of the system and allow people to set up health savings accounts for themselves and you`ll see costs and wait times go down.
  • Profile photo of thubanstar
    thubanstar Female 50-59
    815 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 7:33 pm
    Well said, Gerry.
  • Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 7:53 pm
    I`m still amazed that you guys haven`t got this sorted out. Here, our health care is funded by the government. I can walk into my doctor`s office, be seen, walk out and never see a bill. I can go to the hospital and be treated, go home and never see a bill. Everything from stitches to open heart surgery, all fully covered. I can`t imagine what it must be like to have to pay for your health care. A scary thing.
  • Profile photo of KitFox
    KitFox Female 30-39
    595 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 8:10 pm
    People get off-topic when they ask whether healthcare is a privilege or a right. They`re basically just arguing about semantics. The point is that a well-run society would presumably want all of their citizens to have access to good healthcare. To people living outside the US (because I feel that I`d be preaching to an American choir), my theory is that the "powers that be" do not want people to have this access because of greed and control. The "powers that be" are Big Agriculture and Big Pharma. Keeping us sick and addicted to sugary/carby junk food makes us easier to control and turns profit for BigAg, and providing poor healthcare makes people have to keep going back for treatment which funds BigPharma. These two "Big Brothers" are the ones that own the government, and make sure laws and procedures favor them, not the general public. It`s that simple.
  • Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 8:19 pm
    What in the heck happened to my post?!

    Lolz! @SmagBoy! It`s one of those "mysterious IAB things..."
  • Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 8:22 pm
    @patchouly: I`m waiting 4-6 MONTHS to get some treatment, at this very moment. Yeah, our system is great!

    So why do thousands of Canadians travel south for treatments & surgery? Because they don`t want to DIE waiting to see the specialist!@ If the USA`s care was so bad, they would visit US! Never happens though.
  • Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 8:33 pm
    I`m still amazed that you guys haven`t got this sorted out. Here, our health care is funded by the government. I can walk into my doctor`s office, be seen, walk out and never see a bill.
    Right, and you only had to wait, what, 8 weeks to get in? If the Canadian system is so great, then answer these two questions:

    1) Why do you see so many Canadian license plates in the parking logs of American hospitals and clinics near the Canadian border?

    2)If we adopt a Canadian-style socialist health care system, where will those Canadians go to keep from dying on a waiting list?
  • Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14544 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 8:58 pm
    You guys are so funny. So may dying because of others` greed.
  • Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 9:04 pm
    This video is like 3 years old...

    Are you posting it again because the Supreme Court may strike down the mandate and we`ll have this fight all over again? Maybe we`ll actually get a public option next time.
  • Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    Go, KitFox, Go!

    There may be hope for this country after all. Apparently, despite a perpetual tsunami of right-wing think tank propaganda, the younger generation recognizes a FUBAR system in need of reform when they see it.
  • Profile photo of Viking864
    Viking864 Male 40-49
    1444 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:00 pm
    Here is a thought, if we took better care of ourselves the cost of healthcare would drop. It`s called "being responsible".
  • Profile photo of Wowummwow
    Wowummwow Male 18-29
    265 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:06 pm
    "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life..."

    Life... hmm... life...
  • Profile photo of thatjimguy
    thatjimguy Male 30-39
    458 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:07 pm
    Why do so many of these kind of videos think that talking really really fast makes it better?
  • Profile photo of scapegoat7
    scapegoat7 Male 18-29
    210 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:10 pm
    Boo Socialism!!! We don`t need roads, schools, fire departments, or hospitals. God-damn hippies!!!

    And how dare they make us get insurance for health-care for human beings, its not like they make us insure our cars. Yeesh.
  • Profile photo of Tobunshi
    Tobunshi Male 18-29
    678 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:13 pm
    @thatjimguy

    He doesn`t seem to be talking that fast to me. But one reason could be that a lot of people tend to skip long videos. Another reason could be the fact that it says "summarized", so it should be brief.
  • Profile photo of Wowummwow
    Wowummwow Male 18-29
    265 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:16 pm
    "And how dare they make us get insurance for health-care for human beings, its not like they make us insure our cars. Yeesh."

    Many people in urban areas don`t need a car due to that socialist thing called public transportation. How dare they give people a cost efficient option!!!
  • Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 10:38 pm
    In the words of that great Cuban-American philosopher Ricky Ricardo, lemme `splian you sumpthin.

    A right cannot impose an obligation on another person; therefore, health care cannot be a right. Neither is it a privilege, since it is freely accessible to anyone who can afford it, and is usually accessible even to those who can`t.

    Health care is a collection of products and services. Some claim that it is somehow in a different class from other products and services because it is essential to life. However, the same can be said for food, clothing, shelter, and transportation, but we generally don`t call for the government to take over those industries. In fact, where the government has taken them over, as in the old Soviet Union, the result has always been shortages and deprivation such as that which resulted in the starvation of over 10 million Ukrainians. If Obamacare takes hold and you live in a Red state, you`ll be lucky to get band-aids and aspirin.
  • Profile photo of HiEv
    HiEv Male 40-49
    621 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 11:39 pm
    @OldOllie: Just curious, but how exactly do you think that all of the public services you enjoy get paid for? If you think you deserve to be protected from injustice, then you need to help pay for the police, the courts, and the rest to protect you. Paying to make sure we all receive healthcare is no different.

    I honestly do not see how any person can, in good conscience, think that an honest citizen deserves WORSE healthcare than a convicted criminal in our prison system.

    As for the "death panels", please stop listening to conservative nonsense and get a real education in the facts. Repeating the falsehoods of FOX News, Rush Limbaugh, and the rest of those prejudiced liars just makes you look ignorant.
  • Profile photo of stell
    stell Female 40-49
    65 posts
    June 9, 2012 at 11:57 pm
    OldOllie 1)10 mil Ukrainians died from DELIBARATE starvation ordered by Stalin not due to shortages,it`s considered a genocide.
    2)Soviets never took over providing food for their citizens. The shortages were result of fat bastards in top Politburo scheming & stealing money for themselves. Not much different from capitalism today except now it`s corporations doing the stealing.
    3)Of course your lines for healthcare are shorter than those in Canada because...... NOT EVERYONE GETS TO STAND IN LINE in you country!
    4)Those Canadian licence plates you see close to the borders (btw how do you see that in the midwest) are us doing our shopping..
    5)Healthcare is a right. It`s unique from food/shelter. You have alternatives for those. You can grow their own food for ex., whereas healthcare is a service with scarce resources.It creates situations where providers having no competition(witch doctors not as good)can increasingly charge more,refuse cases with little profit, etc.
  • Profile photo of stell
    stell Female 40-49
    65 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 12:26 am
    Old Ollie - That is the biggest problem with your healthcare, they can make so much money, because no one can actually walk away and say, I`ll do without, that they refuse cases they deem not profitable. It will eventually lead to the breakdown of the society. Anyway, would you let your organ donor system be similar to healthcare? Would you let the organs go to the highest bidder instead of the sickest person? That would be immoral wouldn`t it? So why are you doing the same with healthcare?
    Finally, don`t believe the scare stories about our system - it`s simply not true. Our wait lines are not that long, our care is very good there is no such thing as death panels and doctors get paid very well by the government. We simply removed the profit grabbing middle man - the greedy insurance companies.
  • Profile photo of stell
    stell Female 40-49
    65 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 12:33 am
    And finally, in all our cases it`s the doctors who took the hippocratic oath to do the best for the patient, who are making the decisions about the care, not the insurance corporations who have to answer to shareholders regarding their profit. Enough said.
  • Profile photo of Student_Law
    Student_Law Male 30-39
    1010 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 1:32 am
    OldOllie: I don`t know who this Ricardo is, but he is a terrible philosopher - that`s for sure.

    Rights imposes obligations on others. In general legal philosophy rights answer to obligations, just like freedom answer to prohibition. A known example is if you get arrested the police will say "you have the right to an attorney" and if you can`t afford one, you will get one anyway - because of the governments obligation to provide one.

    This "logic" of yours is representative for the rest of your deluded argumentation as well, especially the part where you use the Soviet as an example of public health care.

    You should change your nick to "OldTrollie" ... :-p
  • Profile photo of furrything
    furrything Male 50-59
    1310 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 2:00 am
    ....was there any need for that bloody awful music?
  • Profile photo of Kain1
    Kain1 Male 18-29
    1473 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 3:03 am
    Americans truly are a strange people.. They can look at this chart and still think their system is the best in the world..
  • Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 4:53 am
    Soviets never took over providing food for their citizens. The shortages were result of fat bastards in top Politburo scheming & stealing money for themselves. Not much different from capitalism today except now it`s corporations doing the stealing.

    Right which is what the SOCIALIST SYSTEM gave them the power to do so. You also make yet another failed criticism of capitalism as obviously got it confused with cronysim.

    I can walk into my doctor`s office, be seen, walk out and never see a bill. I can go to the hospital and be treated, go home and never see a bill.

    Your hospital bill:
  • Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 5:08 am
    [quote">It will eventually lead to the breakdown of the society[/quote">

    Please elaborate.

    [quote">Would you let the organs go to the highest bidder instead of the sickest person?[/quote">

    False dichotomy. Charity is possible in a free market system as it`s good PR.

    [quote">Finally, don`t believe the scare stories about our system - it`s simply not true. Our wait lines are not that long, our care is very good there is no such thing as death panels and doctors get paid very well by the government.[/quote">

    One of the 5 Myths of socialized medicine

    [quote">We simply removed the profit grabbing middle man - the greedy insurance companies.[/quote">

    ...and replaced it with another profit grabbing middle man - the Government.
  • Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36208 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 6:12 am

    snicker @ StudentLaw ... "old trollie" haha
    You know that`s coming up again some day
  • Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 8:27 am
    Way to ruin the comments Cajun247.
  • Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 9:18 am
    Way to ruin the comments Cajun247.

    Oooohh I`m so scared by a former moderator`s finger-waiving. Oooohh!
  • Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 9:23 am
    @stell, Stalin cound not have starved the Ukranians without centralized government control, i.e., socialism -- no socialism, no starvation. The very essence of socialism IS "fat bastards" at the top making decisions for everyone else. And yes, they DID control the food supply at evrery step from the collective farm to the government store. They also controlled the supply of everything else, and they had chronic shortages of EVERYTHING. You had go stand in line for bread, and you had to wait for YEARS to get a car. And if you needed major surgery, you likely waited for the rest of your life.

    The problem we have isn`t due to a lack of government control. The US hasn`t had a free-market health care system since WW II. The problem with our health care system is that it`s already about 70% socialist. The bigger problem, though, is idiots like you who think the problem is that it`s ONLY 70% socialist.
  • Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 9:31 am
    HiEv, you obviously have no clue as to what is a legitimate function of government and what is not. The purpose of government should be to protect the rights of individuals. It`s all spelled out in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution. You ought to try reading them sometimes.
  • Profile photo of bloomi
    bloomi Male 18-29
    148 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 9:31 am
    For all the people who complain about it the NHS system in the UK worked well until recently when the population exploded, and still works reasonably well even now (I`m not even going to entertain a conversation on why the population has exploded, as much as I would like to, since it is not relevant to this topic).

    Rather than running hospitals for profit and having the government pay for use, have the government run the hospitals in the first place. Because they are then not run as for profit enterprises, it is cheaper, and make health care for everyone much more affordable.
  • Profile photo of stell
    stell Female 40-49
    65 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 11:33 am
    It will eventually lead to the breakdown of society “elaborate”.
    If you had a gross injustice such as lack of healthcare done to so many people all AT ONCE you’d certainly have social uprisings– riots, etc. You’re getting away w/ it because it’s not at once and people the injustice is done to are mostly dead, but give it couple more decades & there will be enough relatives, children & parents of those who died who`ll pay you back for your greed.

    Your organ donor system is a charity? Wrong - why are the actual transplant operations then not part of charity? If organ donor wasn’t set like this, a kidney would go for couple of mill, a heart for half a billion, etc. It`d be immoral. It`s a scarce resource w/ no alternatives,like health care.

    Your link claims that mortality & infant mortality aren`t good indices of better healthcare but the greater no. of procedures done in US is! LMAO,classic stats manipulation
  • Profile photo of stell
    stell Female 40-49
    65 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 11:36 am
    The supposedly long wait lines in Canada are BS, another scare tactic propagated by big insurance companies. My relative was diagnosed with colon cancer at 83 yrs old, had the surgery to remove half her colon 2.5 weeks later, chemo 2 weeks after. The cancer has spread to lymph nodes, she’s still completely covered at 86 yrs old with no death panels discussing her case. That is an average case in Canada. Oh and she`s still living and thriving despite a myriad of health problems.

    “:...and replaced it with another profit grabbing middle man - the Government” – if your government actually makes profit on you than you got bigger problems than health care, I’m done.

  • Profile photo of stell
    stell Female 40-49
    65 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 11:44 am
    OldOllie- "if you needed surgery, you waited all your life in communism"?? Ha, ha, that`s ridiculous, you don`t know what you`re talking about, but that`s OK I don`t even know what you`re discussing now anyway.
  • Profile photo of Zeegrr60
    Zeegrr60 Male 40-49
    2106 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 12:48 pm
    Healthcare and Oil. my a$$ hurts.
  • Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 1:48 pm
    Your organ donor system is a charity?

    No there would be times hospitals would provide free services people would see the generosity and go to THAT hospital more often, or donate money.

    why are the actual transplant operations then not part of charity

    What says they aren`t?

    If organ donor wasn’t set like this, a kidney would go for couple of mill, a heart for half a billion, etc.

    Ironically banning people from selling their organs has created a scarcity.

    You’re getting away w/ it because it’s not at once and people the injustice is done to are mostly dead, but give it couple more decades & there will be enough relatives, children & parents of those who died who`ll pay you back for your greed.

    ...or we do away with the ridiculous overregulation allowing the markets to provide better healthcare.
  • Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 1:58 pm
    mortality & infant mortality

    Well lets see life expantancy (assuming that`s what you meant) isn`t too different among developed countries so yeah not a good indicator, and infant mortality is because we have a higher birth rate. Meanwhile only a fifth of breast cancer patients die in the US while the fraction is higher in other countries.

    if your government actually makes profit on you than you got bigger problems than health care

    That is THE VERY NATURE of people and thus THE VERY NATURE OF GOVERNMENT not just AMERICAN GOVT but ANY GOVT. Thus, because the govt doesn`t have to deal with those pesky market signals like businesses do, it is slow, inefficient and, if left unchecked, can use force to get results despite the consequences.
  • Profile photo of mcboozerilla
    mcboozerilla Male 30-39
    646 posts
    June 10, 2012 at 2:26 pm
    9 times out of 10 IAB`ers from the "Southern US" don`t know poo from shinola. Why are most of you so incredibly ignorant and stupid?
  • Profile photo of Musuko42
    Musuko42 Male 18-29
    2850 posts
    June 11, 2012 at 5:46 am
    @Cajun247

    "infant mortality is because we have a higher birth rate"

    *facepalm*

    Unless you`re referring, in a roundabout way, to the idea that having more babies means that your system is strained and a greater percentage are dying as a result, it appears that you are DRASTICALLY misunderstanding what the infant mortality RATE actually *is*.

    If that`s the case, you shouldn`t be claiming to have an informed opinion on this subject.
  • Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    June 11, 2012 at 2:52 pm
    to the idea that having more babies means that your system is strained and a greater percentage are dying as a result, it appears that you are DRASTICALLY misunderstanding what the infant mortality RATE actually *is*.


    Actually now that you mention it I decided to delve a little deeper into this anomoly. Turns out how infant mortality is calculated is inconsistent on a global basis. On the other hand considering you haven`t nitpicked at anything else it`s a bit of a stretch to say I`m uninformed.
  • Profile photo of KitFox
    KitFox Female 30-39
    595 posts
    June 11, 2012 at 4:31 pm
    I think we`ve reached maximum troll overdrive here *LOL*
  • Profile photo of HiEv
    HiEv Male 40-49
    621 posts
    June 12, 2012 at 12:23 am
    @OldOllie: You obviously have no idea that the legitimate functions of government are not solely contained in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Furthermore, if *you* had actually read the US Constitution you`d be aware that the *first* of Congress` enumerated powers is to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts AND PROVIDE FOR THE common defence (sic.) and GENERAL WELFARE of the United States" (emphasis mine). This is the same part of the Constitution that gives Congress the right to make laws supporting education and farming.

    If you`re going to chide someone for not reading something, you might want to make sure you`ve read it and understood it yourself first.
  • Leave a Reply