The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 28    Average: 3.4/5]
49 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 8608
Rating: 3.4
Category: Weird
Date: 05/23/12 04:00 PM

49 Responses to UFO? National Geographic Crew Films Strange Lights

  1. Profile photo of kitteh9lives
    kitteh9lives Female 70 & Over
    8044 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    Link: UFO? National Geographic Crew Films Strange Lights - What do you think I-A-B, is it a UFO? Where`s Madest when you need him?
  2. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 4:09 pm

    It should be easily identifyable on this chart.


  3. Profile photo of unmercyfuldu
    unmercyfuldu Male 18-29
    762 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 4:25 pm
    Just because you say you are skeptic doesn`t mean you are lady. Getting all giddy over some vague flashing lights in the sky and believing it is a UFO isn`t exactly skepticism.
  4. Profile photo of danagamer
    danagamer Male 30-39
    701 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 4:28 pm
    Is she a f*cking scientist?
  5. Profile photo of Scuzoid
    Scuzoid Male 30-39
    1268 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 4:36 pm
    NatGeo wants to become The MotherF*cking History channel.

    I barely fraking swear that much in two minutes.
  6. Profile photo of pigsnout5
    pigsnout5 Female 18-29
    546 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 4:40 pm
    woah that is weird. go aliens!!
  7. Profile photo of Crabes
    Crabes Male 30-39
    1285 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 5:05 pm
    so is that a show about tracking UFO?? if so i call fake,since when people swear on National geographic
  8. Profile photo of Fancysucksss
    Fancysucksss Male 18-29
    1048 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm
    Jesus coming to check up on the most christian country of em all
  9. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7378 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 5:35 pm
    Oh sure believe NatGeo but not me.
  10. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 5:53 pm
    wow... whos playing with l e d`s ?
  11. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 6:17 pm
    When the aliens land and see these idiots they`re going to think we`re pretty weird for walking around with those camera mounts.
  12. Profile photo of Zeegrr60
    Zeegrr60 Male 40-49
    2106 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 7:01 pm
    Unidentified-Fits that...From another planet? Meh...
  13. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 7:19 pm
    "NatGeo wants to become The MotherF*cking History channel. "

    And Discovery is becoming the Guns and the Rednecks Who Love Them station. NatGeo, History, and Discovery used to be my favorite networks.
  14. Profile photo of swoop408
    swoop408 Male 18-29
    1754 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 7:30 pm
    History Channel, Discovery Channel, and National Geographic are all the same drating thing now.
  15. Profile photo of Neagle
    Neagle Male 30-39
    1405 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 7:58 pm
    She has a dirty mouth. A sexy dirty mouth......
  16. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 8:05 pm
    Why are the camera crew walking around with cameras on sticks, filming themselves?
  17. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 8:32 pm
    And Discovery is becoming the Guns and the Rednecks Who Love Them station.
    Too true, I was bitching about this just today. Discovery Channel used to be great on science and nature content, now it`s all f*cking back-to-back Ice Road Truckers, Licence to Drill, Deadliest Catch, Mythbusters, Sons of Guns, American Guns, Bering Sea Gold etc et f*cking cetera. It`s went from a scientific educational channel to being a f*cking joke, that you can`t watch unless you have testosterone for blood and a pair of testicles where your brain used to be.

    Sad dumbing down of what used to be a great channel.
  18. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    I`ve enhanced the video and discovered the lights were this

  19. Profile photo of propagandi
    propagandi Male 40-49
    726 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 9:53 pm
    Is that Ryder from Destination Truth?
  20. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2345 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 9:59 pm
    so aliens can cross the universe but they cannot turn their damn lights off on their ships?

    I actually do believe there is other life out there...there has to be but the idea that a alien race that advance would give themselves away by forgetting to turn off their lights or being unable to seems silly.
  21. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2345 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 10:00 pm
    Wednesday, May 23, 2012 5:35:31 PM
    Oh sure believe NatGeo but not me.

    I believe you mad, I do.
  22. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 10:37 pm
    National Geographic? Try Destination Truth.

    UFO? Sure. This is one of the few videos I`ve seen where the cause is not immediately apparent.

    Extraterrestrials? Not a chance. Once again, to travel to another star would require more power than that put out by a massive star OR it would require generational ships OR the technology to overcome the power and time requirements in which case they would be Godlike and YOU WOULD NEVER SEE THEM. They certainly would not appear as a circle of lights.

    Come on people, wake up and stop letting yourself get duped.
  23. Profile photo of carmium
    carmium Female 50-59
    6381 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 10:53 pm
    God, she`s annoying.
  24. Profile photo of Squrlz4Sale
    Squrlz4Sale Male 40-49
    6230 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 11:03 pm
    Gerry, I consulted that chart of yours you posted below--and I`m pretty sure it`s a weather balloon. =^.^=
  25. Profile photo of BunnyNaku
    BunnyNaku Female 18-29
    5224 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 11:20 pm
    does anyone know if they went back in the day time to that location, just to see if there was something physical there?
  26. Profile photo of Liquidglass
    Liquidglass Male 18-29
    1111 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 11:44 pm
    @nottaspy

    I`m not giving my support or detracting from the video here.

    But Nottaspy your logic is flawed in the fact that you`re expecting to explain something currently unexplainable by attempting to confine it to our current working knowledge, thus it`s not possible.

    That`s like a 15th century peasant denouncing electronics as impossible simply because it lies outside of their knowledge at the time.
  27. Profile photo of Izaq
    Izaq Male 30-39
    173 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 11:45 pm
    Aliens are smart enough not to show up on radar, radio communication or anything, but for some reason they always have some derp alien at the controls who forgets to turn off the "space landing lights". Not for long - just a sec or two. Perhaps for the giggles. Who knows?
  28. Profile photo of emmettyville
    emmettyville Female 40-49
    4348 posts
    May 23, 2012 at 11:51 pm
    scleiver? lame.
  29. Profile photo of skullgrin
    skullgrin Male 18-29
    937 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 12:07 am
    is it a UFO? of course it is a UFO. Undeniably so. What ever was in that footage was 100% an unidentified flying object.
  30. Profile photo of WhiteGryphyn
    WhiteGryphyn Female 18-29
    97 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 12:40 am
    How can anyone trust anything trust any recording with the CGI we have now, even if it was real?
  31. Profile photo of WhiteGryphyn
    WhiteGryphyn Female 18-29
    97 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 12:43 am
    Probably fake. If you had footage of a ship, would you create a clip which was mostly the crew looking dramatically at the sky in the middle of the night, or would you show your amazing footage?
  32. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 2:11 am
    Looked like a minor cloud to cloud lighting flash partly obscured by another cloud.

    madest: Until you or some other `Alien Believer` shows up with an alien, dead or alive, and said alien is scientifically tested to be real, then maybe others will believe. Right now your kind have even less evidence than the Bigfoot hunters.
  33. Profile photo of tsiemens
    tsiemens Male 30-39
    515 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 3:04 am
    The whole aliens thing is so played out. Frankly its more likely US intelligence technology unreleased to the public if these things exist, so really, yawn.
  34. Profile photo of avail9988
    avail9988 Male 18-29
    700 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 3:10 am
    "Right now your kind have even less evidence than the Bigfoot hunters." Stupidity at its best... Just close your eyes and pretend its not real right?
  35. Profile photo of drawman61
    drawman61 Male 50-59
    7751 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 3:23 am
    Funny that even a tv crew with state of the art equipment can only get a fuzzy image taken in the dark.
  36. Profile photo of fancythat
    fancythat Male 30-39
    1950 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 4:31 am
    I`m convinced. They bang the crap out of her, after drugging her. In the van.
  37. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7378 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 4:35 am
    Extraterrestrials? Not a chance. Once again, to travel to another star would require more power than that put out by a massive star OR it would require generational ships OR the technology to overcome the power and time requirements in which case they would be Godlike and YOU WOULD NEVER SEE THEM. -----
    The problem with statements like this is people apply our scientific knowledge to all life in the universe. When in fact we`ve only been around for a scratch in time. If we survive as long as dinosaurs roamed we will look back at our primitive knowledge and laugh.
  38. Profile photo of irunfast86
    irunfast86 Male 18-29
    404 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 5:37 am
    @fancythat I`m convinced. The drugs do nothing but she lays there and takes it like a slut anyway.
  39. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 6:49 am
    It never surprises me when people see lights in the sky (which should be familiar to people by now) and automatically assume ET. Occam`s razor.
  40. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 8:22 am
    avail9988: ETs aren`t real and neither is Bigfoot.

    You`d be amazed at the number of people claiming to see aliens from just hanging a battery powered Xenon flash bulb(s) from under a weather balloon on a dark cloudless night (on a new moon).

    How do I know? My uncle used to work for the FAA and was a bit of a prankster. One of his balloons even made the local news.
  41. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 8:29 am
    ETs aren`t real and neither is Bigfoot.
    With Bigfoot I tend to agree, but it is entirely feasible that there are ETs out there, but the likelihood of them being here already is pretty slim.
  42. Profile photo of junkaroo
    junkaroo Male 30-39
    234 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 8:53 am
    Green night vision + "look at my reactions" camera rig + Swearing frat boy sounding host = Bullpoo
  43. Profile photo of bentley22
    bentley22 Male 30-39
    244 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 9:12 am
    My 5 year old daughter asked: "daddy, if UFO`s can travel from so far away, why would they need lights on their ships"
  44. Profile photo of LePigeon
    LePigeon Male 30-39
    44 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 11:04 am
    U.F.O = Unidentified flying object.. So unless they know what it is, it is 100% guaranteed a U.F.O. to them. The term U.F.O is not nor has it ever been reserved for alien space crafts / ships.

    Some of you might find this interesting.
  45. Profile photo of ssalty
    ssalty Male 60-69
    228 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 3:06 pm
    Alien or not, Nat. Geo. film crews say `f**k` a lot.
  46. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 5:33 pm
    Liquidglass and madest, you apparently missed the catch-all of "technology to overcome the power and time requirements". The power and time requirements are based on our current understanding. If they have the technology to overcome those limitations, then they are far more advanced than us. Much like in Liquidglass`s example of 15th century peasants comprehending our use of electricity.

    So Liquidglass, you are wrong that I am confining my argument.

    Madest, you are wrong because it is you who is framing UFOs within our current knowledge. You expect UFOs to be circular disks with lights all around the edges because our current implementations of flying vehicles which have lights around the edges. Read my ENTIRE post again.
  47. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 5:35 pm
    So let me ask you, are you making the argument that these aliens expend time and money to come here using their extremely advanced technology that ends up looking like common place trash can lids or remote controlled toys? You are saying that they either don`t mind being seen by us or can`t help it, but don`t want to make public contact? Are you saying that extremely advanced, shy aliens are traveling across trillions of miles repeatedly in widely varying craft with widely varying modes of transportation for widely varying reasons is more probable than some idiot with LEDs on his remote control helicopter?

    Critical thinking, it REALLY is an important skill!
  48. Profile photo of uatme
    uatme Male 18-29
    1074 posts
    May 24, 2012 at 6:58 pm
    what were they there to film?
  49. Profile photo of sbeelz
    sbeelz Male 30-39
    2868 posts
    May 25, 2012 at 11:06 am
    I second what LePigeon said.

Leave a Reply