The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 37    Average: 4/5]
74 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 13371
Rating: 4
Category:
Date: 05/15/12 01:31 PM

74 Responses to St. Francis Church: Against Same Sex Marriage [Pic

  1. Profile photo of Zeegrr60
    Zeegrr60 Male 40-49
    2106 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 1:45 pm
    `Nuff Said!
  2. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 1:57 pm
    I find it how just because someone disagrees with a lifestyle choice, it`s instantly labelled as "hate". As a Christian, I don`t agree with Satanism, but I don`t "hate" Satanists; I feel sorry for them.
  3. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:02 pm
    *"I find it FUNNY how just because..."
  4. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:03 pm
    Word.
  5. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:21 pm



    Trutenr- probably because you refer to someone`s sexual orientation as a "lifestyle choice."
  6. Profile photo of uatme
    uatme Male 18-29
    1074 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:24 pm
    I agree, two men are friends (well they can be), two husbands are married.
  7. Profile photo of honkeylips
    honkeylips Male 30-39
    1586 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:25 pm
    Notice they didn`t say anything about two women.
  8. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:32 pm
    TruTenrMan: Satanism is a choice. Homosexuality is not.

    Was it not hateful for interracial couples to be ostracized in the 1950s?
  9. Profile photo of DeanoBoz
    DeanoBoz Male 40-49
    195 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:33 pm
    There is a lot of talk about homophobia in regards to the church. Homophobia is defined as antipathy toward homosexuals. Antipathy is defined as an instinctive opposition in feeling. Homophobia is characterized (especially in IAB posts) as hateful and wrong. However, there is no such characterization of hagiophobia (antipathy toward holy things), theophobia (antipathy toward God), or Christianophobia (antipathy toward Christians). In fact, these three oppositions are celebrated daily here. I don`t feel that any group should hate another with impunity, so why does the pro-gay anti-Christian get free reign? Isn`t Christianity a lifestyle choice too?
  10. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:39 pm
    FoolsPrussia: I know that is the excuse being used. I also know that a man/man couple and a female/female couple is scientifically unnatural. Being that the purpose of a species is to propagate, gay couples do nothing to further that; therefore, as a human species, homosexuality is not natural, and by process of elimination is a psychological choice made by individuals.
  11. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:39 pm
    Well Deano, seeing as I don`t fall under *any* of your above rubrics, (no problems with gods, holy stuff, xians ect) we must needs look elsewhere no?

    Some xians affirm their gay brothers and sisters, ie. heterosexist xians don`t own the whole religion, some xians don`t hide behind religion and blame god for their prejudices, some xians don`t want to run the secular government and generally cause harm to others. Yeah, that`s about the size of it.
  12. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:42 pm
    Tenr you have a simplistic and impoverished view of what is "Natural". Some adaptive things species do have nothing whatsoever to do with reproduction per se. Having another available set of parents to care for kids not specifically their own may have been a huge evolutionary advantage. Then again, having a natural check on population overgrowth would have been enormously adaptive as well.

    Fail.
  13. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:45 pm
    TruTenrMan: Except homosexual acts have been well-documented among many animal species.

    List of animals displaying homosexual traits
  14. Profile photo of diylobotomy
    diylobotomy Male 18-29
    1832 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:46 pm
    @DeanoBoz straight Christian couples can marry.
  15. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36842 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:48 pm

    Here we go again. 1 Corinthians 5:12.

    `nuff said.
  16. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:49 pm
    I`m not arguing that homosexual animals exist. I`m arguing that for species propagation, homosexuality is pointless.

    From a faith-based point of view, I disagree with it from a moral stand-point.
  17. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:49 pm
    FoolsPrussia let`s hope we haven`t run into one of these xians huh?




    (I`m beginning to luv this meme).
  18. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:50 pm
    Gerry1of1: "Expel the wicked person from among you." Isn`t that what Christians are trying to do? And getting bashed for it?
  19. Profile photo of QueenZira
    QueenZira Female 18-29
    2228 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:51 pm
    Tenr- when are you coming for me then? After all, I`m one of those dastardly evil Pagans your holy book mentions killing all the time, yes?
  20. Profile photo of DeanoBoz
    DeanoBoz Male 40-49
    195 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 2:52 pm
    @diylobotomy- The point I`m making is not about homosexuality, it`s about one group hating another. The question at hand is "Why is it okay to hate this group (Christians,) and wrong to hate that group (Homosexuals)?"
  21. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:06 pm
    @DeanoBoz: I don`t think anyone should say things that are hateful to Christians for simply being Christians. But if their views are harmful toward others, they ought to be opposed. What would you think if a slave owner in the 1850s complained that abolitionists were discriminating against them (btw, they could have easily claimed biblical justification too)?

    Oh, and using TruTenrMan`s definition of the debate, Christianity is a lifestyle choice.
  22. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:30 pm
    Of course Christianity is a lifestyle choice.
  23. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:33 pm
    @DeanoBoz- I agree with you that there is a lot of content poking fun at religion and probably a majority of site frequenters that are Atheist or Agnostic, ect. What is your point? You list a couple "soft" definitions of homophobia and antipathy to try to make a point then you go on to compare choosing to be christian to being born homosexual. Who are you to assume that it is a choice? Oh, and by the way, I dont have antipathy towards god. I would need to believe god exists in order to have antipathy towards god. I do not have antipathy towards people of religion. I do however HATE ignorant [email protected] How far down the page of your Google search of homophobia did you have to go to find a definition that used antipathy instead of hatred? If you want a website that celebrates ignorance hang out at GODHATESFAGS.COM. You will be more comfortable there.
  24. Profile photo of soundman655
    soundman655 Male 50-59
    1558 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:33 pm
    Religions DO NOT spread love-EVER
  25. Profile photo of Satkela
    Satkela Female 18-29
    583 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:34 pm
    How is this a hateful message in any way? According to the Bible Homosexuality is wrong and since that is a church I`m not surprised that they have a message like this on their marquee. No one is being viciously attacked, no hate crime is being commited so wtf? If you don`t like what it says ignore it. Christians are being ignored anyway...
  26. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    TruTenrMan looks a little gluttenous. I cant be near a fat person because fat people are sinners. I wonder how many adulterers TruTenrMan has excommunicated from his church. Not the same thing?
  27. Profile photo of Jowsh
    Jowsh Male 18-29
    1237 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    The world is full of ignorance. Get depressed get angry get nonchalant go and live somewhere
  28. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 3:56 pm
    Notice they didn`t say anything about two women.

    Maybe they`ve read their own bibles. There`s only one verse in the Christian bible that *might* be interpreted as condemning homosexuality between women, if you stretch a point or two and ignore the context. The handful of verses that *might* condemn homosexuality (but don`t really seem to do so, in my opinion) are either male-specific or of unknown meaning but possibly male-specific based on what might be the etymology, maybe.

    Sure, many modern language interpretations condemn all homosexuality. That`s because the people who wrote them (or the people who paid for them to be written) wanted their bibles to say that. It`s not what was actually there.
  29. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:00 pm
    How is this a hateful message in any way? According to the Bible Homosexuality is wrong and since that is a church I`m not surprised that they have a message like this on their marquee. No one is being viciously attacked, no hate crime is being commited so wtf? If you don`t like what it says ignore it.

    They`re putting the message on public display, which makes it political and therefore fair game. I agree that there`s no hate in the church`s message, though.

    I disagree with your statement that the Christian bible says that homosexuality is wrong. Some modern copies of interpretations of translations do, but they`re not well grounded in the earliest known texts or the appropriate historical contexts.

    Christians are being ignored anyway...

    Hahahaha.

    You were joking, right?

    If you weren`t, try applying your own argument - Christianity should be ignored outside of churches.
  30. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:03 pm
    Satkela, it is not hateful only if you agree with the sentiment. Also, I doubt that there are hordes of homosexuals beating down the door to join this church so what is the point other than to cause a reaction?
  31. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:10 pm
    Angilion, I cannot verify your points about the condemnation of homosexuals in early texts, but unfortunately, they are irrelevant because nobody is using these copies lol. The New Testament is particularly harsh in its prescribed dealings with homosexual men and demands that they be stoned to death. It is funny how the church overlooks most of the 7 "deadliest" sins on a daily basis.
  32. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:10 pm
    it is not hateful only if you agree with the sentiment.

    No. I disagree with the sentiment and I don`t think that particular message is hateful.

    Perhaps the difference is that I consider hate to be something quite extreme, not merely disagreement or disapproval. The word `hate` is used far outside it`s actual meaning as a political weapon to silence people with and I disagree with that. Or should I say that I hate it?
  33. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:15 pm
    Angilion, I cannot verify your points about the condemnation of homosexuals in early texts, but unfortunately, they are irrelevant because nobody is using these copies lol.

    They`re not irrelevant to anyone who cares what the Christian bible is supposed to say, because they`re obviously much closer (allegedly identical) to the first written copies of it.

    The New Testament is particularly harsh in its prescribed dealings with homosexual men and demands that they be stoned to death.

    No it isn`t and no it doesn`t.


    If you think I`m wrong, tell me what chapter and verse you`re referring to. I`ve read several versions of the whole thing, both testaments, and I`m quite familiar with the handful of verses used (misused, in my opinion) to condemn homosexuality. I am absolutely certain that your statement is wrong.
  34. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33124 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:16 pm
    Well Deano, seeing as I don`t fall under *any* of your above rubrics, (no problems with gods, holy stuff, xians ect)
    @QueenZira: HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! U So Funny!

    Again: @FP: Homosexual ACTS does not make the animal a full-out "homosexual" ok? That is humans projecting their belief systems on wild creatures.

    They`re putting the message on public display, which makes it political and therefore fair game.
    Respectfully @Angilion, so are homosexualists...
  35. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:18 pm
    @Angilion- I can absolutely agree with your point. "hate" is a word used loosely and is a personal experience. My point was simply that it was not put up on a sign to promote peace or tolerance, only to further divide.
  36. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:25 pm
    Angilion, I am not talking about verse that has been dissected and interpreted to agree with your or my sensibilities. I am talking about how it is used in churches around the world. In that sense, the original versions are irrelevant because they are not the versions being used by the followers of the religion. I too have read a myriad of religious texts including the Old and new testaments and there are a lot of chapters that are left up to individual interpretation.
  37. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36842 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:29 pm

    TruTenrMan ""Expel the wicked person from among you."

    Yes, from within their church. That does not mean they can expect the entire world to live by their rules. That`s what radical muslims are doing and we hate them, right.
  38. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:31 pm
    Angilion, I was confused to your objection to my point about prescribed punishments until I realized I typed New Testament instead of Old Testament.
  39. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:39 pm
    What is it with socialists that they don`t understand political opinions contrary to their own? What is it with their bigoted assumption that any opinion different to the favoured socialist idea is hate?
  40. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:41 pm
    This is what`s actually condemned in the new testament:

    People who would not normally have homosexual sex either having homosexual sex as part of ceremonies in temples of another religion or suddenly having homosexual lust imposed on them by the Abrahamic god as a punishment for apostasy (the meaning isn`t clear - this is Paul we`re talking about, after all). The punishment being the unexpected and unwanted change, not homosexuality per se. (Romans 1:26-27).

    Malakoi and arsenokoitai (1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:9-10). Nobody knows what arsenokoitai means. Malakoi has multiple meanings depending on context. Arguably the best modern English translation would be `soft`, in all its contexts. Elsewhere in the Christian bible, `malakoi` is used to mean soft, fine (describing clothing), lazy, cowardly, easily manipulated, etc.

    None of them prescribe any punishment in this world. One says that malakoi and arsenokoitai won`t go to heaven. That`s it.
  41. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:45 pm
    Angilion, I am not talking about verse that has been dissected and interpreted to agree with your or my sensibilities. I am talking about how it is used in churches around the world. In that sense, the original versions are irrelevant because they are not the versions being used by the followers of the religion.

    Fair point.

    My counter, unsurprisingly, is that the churches *should* be looking to the original versions first and foremost. They believe that some parts of those original versions were written by people who were actually there, who knew Jesus personally and heard his teachings first hand, so they should regard the original versions as being of paramount importance.
  42. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:46 pm
    Angilion, I was confused to your objection to my point about prescribed punishments until I realized I typed New Testament instead of Old Testament.

    Ah...so the post I was writing (about what`s actually condemned in the new testament and the lack of prescribed punishments for it) while you wrote the above is obsolete already :)
  43. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:48 pm
    Angilion- you spent so much time Googling that bit of info you missed my reply. I mis-typed New Testament. I meant Old Testament.
  44. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
    Yes, much like your points about the ancient versions of the bible.
  45. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:50 pm
    "They`re putting the message on public display, which makes it political and therefore fair game."

    Respectfully @Angilion, so are homosexualists...

    I agree. Fair game, both sides. Any views deliberately put into the public, political arena are fair game.
  46. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:52 pm
    Angilion, I think we are in an agreement here. lol.
  47. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:54 pm
    Angilion- you spent so much time Googling that bit of info you missed my reply.

    A silly assumption. I was checking chapter and verse numbers, which I don`t keep a certain memory of in my head at all times, and I didn`t use Google.
  48. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 4:58 pm
    Angilion, I think we are in an agreement here. lol.

    I agree that we`re in an agreement. Do you agree with that? :)
  49. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 5:04 pm
    Off to the old testament for a bit...

    I`m not sure if you were saying that the OT harshly condemns homosexual men and demands that they be stone to death or if you were saying that churches tend to interpret that as the meaning of that verse in Leviticus (I don`t remember the numbers without looking them up).

    I argue that the intended meaning of the verse isn`t entirely clear and it appears to be condemning male homosexual sex only (not homosexual men in general, although obviously there`s a huge amount of overlap) *and only in some contexts*. It doesn`t appear to condemn male homosexual sex in general. I`m not so certain on that part because my knowledge of ancient Hebrew is nil and my knowledge of early bronze age Jewish culture is scarcely more than nil. I`m going purely on what I`ve read from other people who have more knowledge of those things.
  50. Profile photo of Viking864
    Viking864 Male 40-49
    1444 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 5:12 pm
    "Two Men are friends, but Two Women are hot!"
  51. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 5:14 pm
    Angilion, My baseline argument and the thing that ultimately drives my opposition to the bible and religion in general is in fact the bastardization of the the very rule book which governs the faith. Words can so easily be twisted, misinterpreted, and mangled into what you want to believe and what you want others to believe. And then the whole thing is backed up by the very definition of the word "faith" and the forced opposition to reason.
  52. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33124 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 5:25 pm
    In general, regarding the Old Testament: Some things in it are "rules" like not sitting on the same chair as a woman who`s menstrating (it`s in there!)
    Other things are Laws, like thou shall not bear false witness.
    The idea is that Jesus`s sacrifice replaces those "rules" but you still have to follow the Laws.
    Jews would know a lot more about OT rules vs laws than I do.

    I just think it`s stupid for Christians to pick & choose from the OT, stick to the Gospels folks!
  53. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 5:41 pm
    5Cats:

    I`ve read that line of argument a few times and it looks to me suspiciously like an excuse for ignoring some but only some of the rules in the OT - an ad hoc backforming.

    Who decides which Jewish orders are rules (that Christians should ignore) and which are laws (that they should obey)? How do they tell the difference?

    For example:

    Christians who use that line of argument and who cite the OT as condemning homosexual sex between men are (a) interpreting the Leviticus verses that way and (b) treating the condemnation as a law, still binding on Christians. The same Christians treat the ban on eating animals that live in water and do not have both fins and scales (e.g. crabs, oysters, etc) as being a rule, not binding on Christians. Why? The OT describes them both as being wrong in the same way - to`ebah.
  54. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33124 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 6:23 pm
    @Angilion: Oh I agree! It`s really hard to figure out "law" from "rule". I`ve read that Jews are much more familiar with this notion than most Christians.
    It`s recent news to me! I`d often wondered why one thing in the OT is taboo but others are now "OK". This R vs L goes a ways to explain it.
    But it`s far from perfect.

    I`d agree that the whole of the OT should be taken as a metaphore, not ruel OR law, but that`s `cause I`m a Deist! lolz!

    I`m a lot more agreeable today than the past several days, my intestines feel better! Phew!
  55. Profile photo of DeanoBoz
    DeanoBoz Male 40-49
    195 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 7:12 pm
    jinxjinx34 said: "How far down the page of your Google search of homophobia did you have to go to find a definition that used antipathy instead of hatred? If you want a website that celebrates ignorance hang out at GODHATESFAGS.COM. You will be more comfortable there."

    I went to dictionary.com. "Unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality." Check it out.
    I attempted to ask a meaningful question, and you responded with hatred. You just lost.
  56. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3926 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 7:27 pm
    "Why is it okay to hate this group (Christians,) and wrong to hate that group (Homosexuals)?"

    Speaking as a gay man I don`t hate Christians as a whole for bigotry like this. I know there are many Christian churches that teach love and acceptance of all. That is what makes churches like this one so hateful. One church sees love and acceptance the other creates an enemy out of a whole section of society, all for the purpose of having something to gather their followers (troops) against. Because there is a war on religion. They`re the victims I tells ya. What a joke.
  57. Profile photo of DeanoBoz
    DeanoBoz Male 40-49
    195 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 7:43 pm
    Markust123- As a Christian man I can tell you that I don`t hate homosexuals as a group either. I don`t even hate any homosexuals singly (except for Colton on Survivor... but it`s mostly because he`s so mean and catty). Why should I, a Canadian Christian, be the object of hatespeak? Same-sex marriages are legal here.
  58. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3926 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 7:47 pm
    What I think is so funny about the anti-gay bigots that are pushing laws against homosexuality is that this opposition is what moved gay marriage along as far as it is and as quickly as it happened. So I guess thank you haters. You have done really well for the gay community.
  59. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3926 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 7:49 pm
    "I don`t even hate any homosexuals singly (except for Colton on Survivor..."

    I don`t know why this made me laugh so hard.
  60. Profile photo of Atrayu4u
    Atrayu4u Female 18-29
    1478 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 8:25 pm
    I should spread love.. so.. become a prostitute? I`ll get right on that. I`ve been looking for some direction in my life. Thanks, equally preachy anti-preachy sign!
  61. Profile photo of intrigid
    intrigid Male 18-29
    914 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 9:04 pm
    "Why should I, a Canadian Christian, be the object of hatespeak?"

    Why not?

    You have the right to hate whoever you want, but you don`t have the right to trample their freedoms.
  62. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2345 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 10:48 pm
    WIN.
  63. Profile photo of jinxjinx34
    jinxjinx34 Male 30-39
    183 posts
    May 15, 2012 at 11:58 pm
    Deanoboz asks "...so why does the pro-gay anti-Christian get free reign? Isn`t Christianity a lifestyle choice too?" and calls it a meaningful question. Let us dissect this question a bit and then determine how meaningful it is. First off, you assume that pro-gay = anti-christian.By design, right off the bat anyone who disagrees with you is now anti-christian. Is there anyone here stopping you from making whatever point you want? Also, you so meaningfully ask "Isn`t Christianity a lifestyle choice too?" and insultingly assume that homosexuality is a choice. How dare you criticize anyone for responding to your painfully obvious attempt at eliciting an emotionally charged response! Meaningful?
  64. Profile photo of TheShgn2
    TheShgn2 Male 13-17
    626 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 12:07 am
    ...so why does the pro-gay anti-Christian get free reign? Isn`t Christianity a lifestyle choice too?

    Because gays don`t take away Christians rights, beat them to death, push them to the point of suicide, or otherwise punish them for being against something they believe in.
  65. Profile photo of tsiemens
    tsiemens Male 30-39
    515 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 2:32 am
    Its not hate to have opposing views, if I said said I dislike eating fish it does not mean I hate fish nor does it mean I am afraid of them in reference to a word ending in phobia
  66. Profile photo of DeanoBoz
    DeanoBoz Male 40-49
    195 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 3:51 am
    Departing words: It`s wrong to hate. It`s even wrong to hate people who hate you. I don`t hate anyone. I`m not taking anyone`s rights away, or even fighting for that. I`ve never beaten anyone to death, or pushed them to suicide. The only people I punish are my children, and only when they disobey. This shall be my last post and visit to IAB. The anti-Christian sentiment that continues daily hurts my feelings. Goodbye.
  67. Profile photo of RandomNoun
    RandomNoun Male 18-29
    707 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 3:53 am
    `Its not hate to have opposing views, if I said said I dislike eating fish it does not mean I hate fish nor does it mean I am afraid of them in reference to a word ending in phobia`

    True, because `fisheatingphobia` would be a passionate insistence that nobody else eat fish either.
  68. Profile photo of incubus_inc
    incubus_inc Male 18-29
    977 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 5:34 am
    Drama queens.
  69. Profile photo of Atrayu4u
    Atrayu4u Female 18-29
    1478 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 5:51 am
    RandomNoun, is that like the non-gluten craze, where a very, very small percentage of people are allergic to gluten, so health-conscience people flip out and say `omg if it`s bad for someone, it`s totally/could be totally bad for me too!!`? Bleh ;)
  70. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 6:56 am

    Charles Xavier is not amused.
  71. Profile photo of lawndartsftw
    lawndartsftw Male 40-49
    1811 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 12:27 pm
    Many people do not consider a union of two people of the same sex to be a "marriage". If that is your opinion, you now are a hate-filled pro-religious idiot.

    Beep boop it must be true...I read it on the internet !!
  72. Profile photo of sutra46
    sutra46 Female 40-49
    2550 posts
    May 16, 2012 at 8:13 pm
    Please my gay lesbo friends make me understand:
    Why waste your time to be part of an instition that is doing everything in it`s power to make your life a misery - by signing up for a tradition ( marriage) it endorse.
    It`s going weak anyway heteros not so keen on marriage now!
    You are giving them power.

    Why not instead put all the focus on changing laws about civil unions of consensual adults? Adoption laws?
    Completely ignore the church?
    I fully support the marriage equality but feel that it `s just delaying the inevitable.
    Whatcha think?
  73. Profile photo of command
    command Male 40-49
    20 posts
    May 17, 2012 at 11:18 am
    And where is the message of hate from the church? Look again (I`ll wait). There isn`t one. OH NOW I GET IT - if people don`t agree with you then they MUST be haters - right? incubus is right - you are a bunch of drama queens. Get back in closet!

Leave a Reply