Who Would You Rather See Live? [Pic]

Submitted by: orange_panty 5 years ago in Science

This raises a tough question because I hate children...
There are 46 comments:
Female 71
I dont even know them so idc
0
Reply
Female 1,203
My mom made me go to counseling when I was a kid, after their separation, and the counselor asked me who I would I save a puppy or a kid. I was about 9 or 10 at the time. I told I would save both or die trying. She had a fit. She told me that wasn`t an option. So I told her life is not dichotomous, black and white (in kid terms obviously. I didn`t know that word then). This post reminded me of that. Personally know I don`t care. They can both die.
0
Reply
Male 361
Erh I recently saw that new studies show semen is actually a good way of staying young when digested. How did they conclude this? Testing on rats. Beneficial for saving lives? I think not.

This billboard is wrong, trying to change peoples views by morally making them feel guilty. Let the child die, we have an overpopulation issue on the horizon anyway...
0
Reply
Male 621
Doing certain tests on animals is a hard for me to accept, but I do because of the medical help we get from it. Things for makup and such should be stopped.
0
Reply
Male 44
Funny how they felt the need to point out which answer we should choose... RAT in a dark shade and HER in a nice white shade....
It`s amazing how quick people are to justify tests on animals with "we`re doing it to save lives". I wonder if for whatever reason the rolls were reversed these same individuals would still share the same outlook...
0
Reply
Male 15,832
I think I`d like to see Transatlantic live.
0
Reply
Female 8,045
Cheers MrOrange- one of my fave poets and a good choice...
0
Reply
Male 2,737
Which one has more meat on their bones to feed me?
0
Reply
Male 3,231
goddamn green goblin and his sadistic supervillian games
0
Reply
Male 3,369
I know that a lot of you are being snarky, but you DO realize the question involves more than just choosing one over the other, right?

With that being said, there are advances being made so that eventually we wont need to torture rats to improve our own lives. I am now getting off my soap=box and let the silliness to continue.
0
Reply
Male 197
I`m good with both but before I anwser this question, I will need more information on the child and her parents. Is she a member of any religious groups?
0
Reply
Male 1,197
the rat, all testing should be done on human children
0
Reply
Female 584
The child of course...
0
Reply
Female 412
The rat.
0
Reply
Male 2,419
Me up at does

out of the floor
quietly Stare

a poisoned mouse

still who alive

is asking What
have i done that

You wouldn’t have


e.e. cummings
0
Reply
Male 143
What kind of sick Jigsaw copycat is this?
0
Reply
Male 3,894
SCIENCE.
0
Reply
Male 2,419
the mouse of course! i know for sure that mickey there won`t grow into a pschyco bitch from hell who suffers from munchausen by proxy, or at the age of fourteen walks into school and starts speading death, and when asked why? i don`t like monday`s!

0
Reply
Female 8,045
Animal testing is obscene. Most of it is totally uneccessary and worthless, for the small amount that is deemed essential we need tighter controls.
0
Reply
Male 694
This is stupid. Of course animal testing is okay in cases like these, but most of the time it`s extremely unnecessary
0
Reply
Male 17
Too many people on the planet already, not enough rats.
0
Reply
Male 1,010
Live? As in concert? The rat, of course.
0
Reply
Male 2,841
There are easier ways to say drat you to peta.
0
Reply
Male 259
@lordjim..i didn`t think europeans were that stupid..must be eastern block
@tsiemens..you are embarrassing canada with your stupidity as well
0
Reply
Male 40,728
This is the exact opposite of PETA: It`s reasonable, rational and doesn`t exploit the very thing it`s trying to "save".
If PETA were half this smart we`d have trouble...
0
Reply
Male 1,735
Seeing as there is a decent selection in rat/mouse traps available, I`m going with the second one.
0
Reply
Male 4,593
Can we put Oprah on the billboard and ask the question over again?
0
Reply
Male 514
The argument that there are too many people on the earth is based on what? Plenty of food, if people would share it, plenty of oil, if the price is not manipulated, plenty of trees (a renewable resource) and plenty of carbon dioxide, that thing that gets demonized even though its the building block of LIFE, plants breathe it!
0
Reply
Male 2,855
obviously the mouse, without even counting it is far cuter than the she-thing on the right, research would advance way faster testing on humans
0
Reply
Male 329
"Would have been more questionable if it was a monkey that could juggle"

But "Monkey that could juggleHer" doesn`t make any sense... they should stick with a RatHer.
0
Reply
Female 3,696
I read this as "who would you rather see live` as in Concert...I was disappointed when I had to choose between two annoying things that crawl on the floor =/
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Would have been more questionable if it was a monkey that could juggle
0
Reply
Female 1,386
Test on the rat. They`d make for cuter overlords if they go all "Secret of Nihm". Its hard to be mad at a supersmart rat when their lil nose is all twitchy.
(Sidenote...why the heck hasn`t that movie been remade with CGI yet?)
0
Reply
Male 8,526
Both, actually. I`d say we need to start using lawyers for lab-testing.

There are several good reason:
1) There are more lawyers than rodents in the world.
2) The lab technicians don`t get as attached to lawyers as they do the mice.
3) There`s some things a rat just wont do.

The only downside to testing on lawyers is correlating the testing effects on lawyers with that of a humna.

And I agree with LordJim. Why is it that EVERYone who complains about overpopulation is only willing to let others solve what THEY beleive is a problem.

If you DO believe the world is overpopulated, you don`t seem to want to be committed to solving it. Why id that?
0
Reply
Male 7,123
To anyone who thinks there are to many people on the planet the answer is simple; kill yourself.
0
Reply
Female 2,525
The rat, definitely.
0
Reply
Female 8,045
Rat, sorry, but there you go. That kid looks damn annoying.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
Mouse because 90% of people are fackin retards AND we are overpopulated.
0
Reply
Female 1,380
I see what they did there.
0
Reply
Male 259
there`s already too many people on earth and mice take up less space
0
Reply
Male 61
I agree with comment under me.
0
Reply
Male 718
they should have put a black kid on the billboard. then it would have been VERY clear. but it still comes up as that cute little mouse either way.
0
Reply
Male 355
Are we talking a gladiatorial fight to the death cause my money would be on the rat.
0
Reply
Male 4,902
Oh clever
0
Reply
Male 3,060
I think I would rather see the kid live, only if I can get really good seats for the concert.
0
Reply
Female 596
Link: Who Would You Rather See Live? [Pic] [Rate Link] - This raises a tough question because I hate children...
0
Reply