Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

RIAA`s Jonathan Lamy Tweets About SOPA [Pic]


So Jonathan Lamy, senior vice president of the Recording Industry Association of America smugly thinks that Wikipedia”s blackout is a joke? This coming from a person in a very comfy position at a dying company? How long has the RIAA been trying to swat away the Internet? When do you think LamyJ”s position at the RIAA will become totally irrelevant?



If you want to Tweet anything to LamyJ, his account can be found here.

LAMYJ UPDATE: Instead of being a man and standing behind his words, the Lamster pulled his tweet. Unfortunately, the Internet never forgets.

Lamy, Senior VP of the RIAA tweeted about today”s Anti-SOPA blackout, LamyJ just doesn”t get it, does he.

[Total: 20    Average: 3.4/5]
22 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 11985
Rating: 3.4
Category:
Date: 01/18/12 11:30 AM

22 Responses to RIAA`s Jonathan Lamy Tweets About SOPA [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18502 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 11:26 am
    Link: RIAA`s Jonathan Lamy Tweets About SOPA - Lamy, Senior VP of the RIAA tweeted about today`s Anti-SOPA blackout, LamyJ just doesn`t get it, does he.
  2. Profile photo of marcus2
    marcus2 Male 13-17
    677 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 11:39 am
    VP of a major company and he can`t even spell `blackout`. Oh dear.
  3. Profile photo of FoolsPrussia
    FoolsPrussia Male 30-39
    3446 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 11:43 am
    "VP of a major company and he can`t even spell `blackout`."

    He figured he had 140 characters to use, so why not stick an "R" in there.
  4. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 11:45 am

    Someone hold him down...I`ll kick him in the nuts
  5. Profile photo of xiquiripat
    xiquiripat Male 18-29
    2423 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 12:04 pm
    Must be on his way to sue a 12 year old.
  6. Profile photo of PinkRhoid
    PinkRhoid Male 18-29
    1239 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 12:06 pm
    I find it funny that people like this guy and Rupert roostersucker Murdock try and belittle opponents and make moot points. It`s like a rapist pointing out that thanks to them women won`t walk down dark alleys alone anymore so they are good. Not only is it frivolous coming from them but it serves to make them look even guiltier for trying at all.
  7. Profile photo of Yosemine
    Yosemine Male 18-29
    92 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 12:10 pm
    Sure. Because I`m going to support an organization that sues people (both alive and dead) for hundreds of thousands of dollars because they downloaded a few songs.
  8. Profile photo of bunny_knight
    bunny_knight Male 18-29
    352 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 12:13 pm
    @gerry, can i please have a turn after?
  9. Profile photo of HalfSandwich
    HalfSandwich Male 18-29
    145 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 12:14 pm
    haha, i thought that was hilarious.

    i dont listen to much music so i had no idea what riaa was. i guess it`s a bit of a dick move in context, but the tweet is still funny if you ignore who wrote it.
  10. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25408 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 12:45 pm
    Metallica got in trouble suing the fans.. lets see what happens here
  11. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 1:28 pm
    His duchbagery has aparrrently afectted ihs speling.
  12. Profile photo of Neagle
    Neagle Male 30-39
    1407 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 2:00 pm
    If we really want to hurt these self-richest_bastards we need to join together and boycott going to the movies, purchasing music or videos, attending any concerts for a month.
  13. Profile photo of mvangild
    mvangild Male 30-39
    527 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 3:24 pm
    After Wikipedia blackout, somewhere, a recording executive today is shoveling out manure about how a lack of online resources leads to better fact gathering, thereby justifying his stance on censorship. And that thought will cause our freedom to perish.
  14. Profile photo of Ruffiana
    Ruffiana Male 30-39
    506 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 3:25 pm
    Why do people have trouble with the factuality of wikipedia when it`s both 1) peer reviewed by the entire internet and 2) cites sources?

    How are traditional books more trustworthy? There`s no chance there`s bias from the authors or publishers of those? Information that`s out of date or innacurate?

    If not wikipedia, then what`s trustworthy?
  15. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 6:27 pm
    Ruffiana: Wikipedia is pretty awesome, provided you actually do check the cited sources.
  16. Profile photo of skullgrin
    skullgrin Male 18-29
    937 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 6:36 pm
    nope. I just turned javascript off and used wikipedia
  17. Profile photo of SarahofBorg
    SarahofBorg Female 18-29
    3564 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 6:55 pm
    Wikipedia is the only online encyclopedia that references other websites sustaining the facts. Other online encyclopedias reference books. That really isn`t very useful outside of a library.
  18. Profile photo of SarahofBorg
    SarahofBorg Female 18-29
    3564 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 6:57 pm
    "After Wikipedia blackout, somewhere, a recording executive today is shoveling out manure about how a lack of online resources leads to better fact gathering, thereby justifying his stance on censorship. And that thought will cause our freedom to perish."

    That`s like saying the lack of libraries leads to better fact checking because real facts only come from book stores. Libraries, like the internet, are completely full of free information. We all know free information is always inaccurate, just by nature of being free.
  19. Profile photo of cyborg
    cyborg Male 13-17
    2790 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 7:24 pm
    i know i had to put thought into `research` without Wiki
  20. Profile photo of Chaosmaster
    Chaosmaster Male 30-39
    234 posts
    January 18, 2012 at 9:14 pm
    This just proves how stupid he really is. No college professor I ever had allowed wiki as a source. That said, wikipedia is an excellent place to find sources because they are one of very few sites that list them in an easy to find location.
  21. Profile photo of patchgrabber
    patchgrabber Male 30-39
    5812 posts
    January 19, 2012 at 5:59 am
    Why do people have trouble with the factuality of wikipedia when it`s both 1) peer reviewed by the entire internet and 2) cites sources?

    How are traditional books more trustworthy? There`s no chance there`s bias from the authors or publishers of those? Information that`s out of date or innacurate?

    If not wikipedia, then what`s trustworthy?

    This whole comment is fail. Wikipedia is not "peer-reviewed". Peer review (and this also is what makes published books and journals better) is conducted by other PROFESSIONALS in the field, who have sufficient training and credentials to properly review a piece of literature. Although Wikipedia is a good starter resource, fact checking of sources is still required.
  22. Profile photo of Pheeshy5
    Pheeshy5 Male 18-29
    1312 posts
    January 19, 2012 at 7:38 am
    I was never allowed to use wikipedia as a source, I`m assuming that majority of students are still required to site original sources. Jackass

Leave a Reply