Recent 9/11 Photos Prove WTC Exploded From Inside

Submitted by: someone? 5 years ago

Recent pics are shedding light on September 11th, some say prove that the assault on the US prove a homegrown attack.
There are 110 comments:
Male 506
Why is it so hard to believe that human beings would want to do this or would be capable of doing this simply because they`re from outside the US?

It makes me sad that there are fellow Americans who truly believe this poo and no amount of rational explanation, testimony, evidence, or just goddamn common sense will ever convince them otherwise.
0
Reply
Female 185
people are dumb
0
Reply
Male 526
another non engineer knows it all. dust comes from cement which the building was full of. steel melts and weakens, building fell pretty fast,not an hour. you won`t see much office stuff because much of it was in the hole, and covered with molten slag. the government while not really always truthful had NOTHING to gain from this at all. we made a different excuse to get into afganistan, we don`t need much to start a war.

opium? really? we strip mined the place? i find that hard to believe to cause that much damage for very little pay off. and they set explosives just where the plane happened to hit - well done.
0
Reply
Male 573
RT is not always a reliable source.
0
Reply
Male 267
@highonhuffin, sounds like you have your head shoved up your @ss, keep smokin buddy.
0
Reply
Male 180
Wow, a bunch of ignorant Canadians and Euro-trash posting on this one. Big surprise.
0
Reply
Male 60
The U.S. government is slowly screwing all Americans over, and most of them are too dense to see it happening all around them. Glad to live in CANADA!
0
Reply
Male 259
when will america wake up and realize your government lies to you non stop
0
Reply
Male 5,811
Well I`m sure that either explanation is acceptable for your country to depose governments of other independent countries. Nothin` wrong with that.
0
Reply
Male 4,290
[quote]His was the only testimony that was taken in secret and does not appear in the commissions report.[/quote]
In fact, the overwhelming majority of the 1,200+ witness testimonies and interviews were not made public. Only 160 were. It says this right in the preface of the 9/11 Commission report.

[quote]A smart tactical move by our enemy would have forced an air & ground attack.[/quote]
Debatable. An air attack clearly worked just fine, so committing more troops would have been a waste of resources considering they achieved most of their objectives with a very small number.
0
Reply
Male 4,290
[quote]There was a witness to 9/11.[/quote]
There were hundreds.

[quote]He testified to the 9/11 commission that he was loading an injured person from an explosion into a waiting ambulance when the first plane hit.[/quote]
How do you know that if his testimony was secret?
But anyway, all the quotes I can find of him make no mention of helping injured people BEFORE the plane hit. They all describe his actions immediately AFTER.

[quote]He had a government provided top secret clearance.[/quote]
I very much doubt that janitors are entrusted with Top Secret clearance even in buildings like the Pentagon, never mind a commercial building. Why would they give the guy who cleans the windows and empties the bins access to information that could damage national security?
0
Reply
Male 500
lulz. Here we go again...
0
Reply
Male 187
LOLOLOL
More of this poo. Cracks me up every time I read it.
Also pisses me off how I find these on the history channel.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
There was a witness to 9/11. His name was William Rodriguez. He was a janitor at WTC for 19years. He testified to the 9/11 commission that he was loading an injured person from an explosion into a waiting ambulance when the first plane hit. William Rodriguez was one of only 5 people who held a master key that opened all suites. He had a government provided top secret clearance. His was the only testimony that was taken in secret and does not appear in the commissions report. There are things we don`t know about 9/11. A smart tactical move by our enemy would have forced an air & ground attack. A shame our government doesn`t think we can handle the truth. You can look him up.
0
Reply
Male 646
Cranks.
0
Reply
Male 1,293
PopCap

Most people who are as thick as you are try to hide it. You are doing a lot of good for the low-IQ community by being so open about it. However your claims are also nasty and vicious. Surely there is some more pleasant way of showing how dumb you are, like try to persuade your friends to rearrange their furniture in line with feng shui.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]The WTC collapsed has been studied in multiple countries using multiple different scientific approaches. Very methodical studies by very educated and intelligent people have concluded the collapse would not have happened because of burning fuel.[/quote]

Then you`ll have no trouble providing references, will you?

I`ll be blunt - I think you`re making it up, creating a false appeal to authority.
0
Reply
Male 115
all right cool, so where are the 2000 pictures?
0
Reply
Male 296
New evidence? This video is almost one year old.
0
Reply
Male 7,353
UnoWild-"The empire state building was hit before"

Empire state building is of different construction than the WTC. (google `Steel frame` and `tube frame`)
A 767 weighs over 13 times more than a B-25 and carries 35 times more fuel (Avgas vs. Jet-A) and was traveling much faster.

Do you REALLY thing they are comparible?

UnoWild-"and the hole it made burned for weeks"

Cite please. The report of the B-25/Empire State building states it was put on in 40 minutes (a little less than `for weeks`) In fact, still the only fire at such a height that was ever successfully controlled.
0
Reply
Male 997
Conspiracy theorists like to think they`re special they can see it all clearly. But more importantly they can`t accept how little control they have over they`re lives. Like with religon they have to believe there is some over arching power which can decided if they live or die and protect them. For them it`s comforting to believe you`re government can take as exact a control as this, because otherwise a few maniacs are able to to this much carnage and that scares them. They just can`t accept how chaotic and out of control our lives really are....
0
Reply
Male 792
[quote]...show me where it`s happened before in a similar way...[/quote]

That`s been my argument exactly. Especially for the Pentagon theorists,"ZOMG! Where`s the wreckage?! Planes crashing leave wreckage!"

Well, the vast majority of plane crashes, the pilot was trying to avert a crash, and thus was taking maneuvers to avoid a crash (decreasing speed, pulling up, etc), and thus would have left some trace behind.
0
Reply
Male 729
The WTC collapsed has been studied in multiple countries using multiple different scientific approaches. Very methodical studies by very educated and intelligent people have concluded the collapse would not have happened because of burning fuel. There`s no real point in having videos like this. The people who can understand math and physics come to a conclusion. People who are on the other end of the education spectrum come to a conclusion and, as expected, the conclusions are as polarized as the IQ levels. Reports one way or another are not likely to sway thinkers from thinking or emotion...ers from emoting. Some people absolutely, positively refuse to believe the truth, no matter how obvious the evidence. Really, though, would we want it any other way? Stupid people are great fun to watch.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Immense steel beams, perfectly truncated in the rubble.[/quote]

Which, of course, can`t possibly have anything to do with the photos and video clearly showing workers cutting the steel beams during the clearing of the rubble.

[quote]WTC7? Don`t piss down our backs, and tell us it`s raining![/quote]

I would like the conspiracy "theorists" to stop doing that, I really would.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
And for those who are saying that a steel frame skyscraper has never been brought down by fire before, perhaps you`re correct...

...but as far as I know, a large jet liner has never been deliberately rammed into a steel frame skyscraper before...so exactly what prior event(s) are people comparing this to in order to declare that this event does not have the expected outcome?

Brought down by fire, perhaps not.

Brought down by a jet liner deliberately ramming into it: show me where it`s happened before in a similar way to a similar building and the building has remained standing, then you`ll have a point.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@UnoWild

There are MASSIVE differences between the planes involved in the crash with the Empire State Building, and the ones that hit the buildings on 9/11, not least of which being size, speed and fuel capacity.

Comparing them is like saying a car hitting you at 90mph shouldn`t kill you because a bicycle hitting you at 5mph wouldn`t kill you.
0
Reply
Male 1,293
It`s not the vicious nastiness of the conspiracy theories. It`s not the sheer meanness and unfairness of blaming the blameless while letting a death cult off the hook.

It is the sheer stupidity, the idiocy of the people who really think the official story is not factual. The sheer blind ignorance of people who fail to actualy think about what they suggest, and its further requirements or consequences.
0
Reply
Male 159
Giving publicity to the conspiracy theorists just lowers the collective IQ of humanity, they are like trolls, don`t feed them
0
Reply
Male 1,397
....and the pools of molten `lava` found weeks and months after the event, found in the rubble excavation. They were picking up white hot patches in the rubble, from satellite! Immense steel beams, perfectly truncated in the rubble. WTC7? Don`t piss down our backs, and tell us it`s raining!
0
Reply
Male 1,196
JFK was also shot by aliens.
0
Reply
Male 700
I am a little confused by the statement "there has never been a building fall down in history from a plane crashing into it" that is the biggest load of....
0
Reply
Male 626
Even if the buildings exploded from the inside, why immediately blame the government? Isn`t it possible that the terrorists acquired thermite and planted it into the buildings? If the hijackers had time to take flying lessons, I`m sure there would have been time for a terrorist to plant the thermite.
@UnoWild
You do realize that the Empire State building is larger, the plane that hit it (a B-25 bomber) was smaller, and that two large jets hit the towers? Not everything you find on Google is true.

Lastly, people really need to stop accusing 9/11 of being caused by the government, every time you do it, it just brings up more pain for the victim`s families. If you had a love one die in the attack, would you want people to bring it up over and over again?
0
Reply
Male 275
recent? the vid was posted to youtube almost a year ago
0
Reply
Male 10
@Ajikan - Thank you, for a minute I thought I was alone in a sea of fools. The empire state building was hit before and the hole it made burned for weeks, yet people think a modern structures (3 in fact) can turn to dust. Thermite was found in everything. Google is your friend people, use it.

The WHY, people dont know. The HOW is backed by a ton of evidence.

R.I.P all those that died.
0
Reply
Male 1,526
This is no news to me. People have laughed at me for years. I said it was a false flag operation just a while after it happened.
I don`t understand people holding on to their ignorance like they have. It`s obvious.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
0
Reply
Male 2,143
Ohboy. I see the future is going to be overrun by idiots. It doesn`t suprise me. I think the children doing the reporting need 3 things: Facts,Science and a little (un) common sense.
Oh,wait...God did it.
Morons.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
Oh Geesh, not this truther sh|t again. I can understand the disbelief and not trusting the government, but damn. How thick do you have to be to believe this conspiracy crap. ?
0
Reply
Male 1,444
The smarter we get, nature build better idiots. I wonder exactly how many events where a large airliner filled with fuel has slammed into a sky scraper he has studied?
0
Reply
Male 4,290
[quote]btw, i know a plane can not do it via physics knowledge[/quote]

This is why physics and structural engineering are different degree programmes.
0
Reply
Male 4
I disagree with you Musuko. These past twenty years have been revolutionary, both nationally and scientifically. The world is moving faster than before; stronger weapons are being created, and nations are breaking apart and connecting. When looking at things in this perspective, it is plausible to say that the American government couldn`t have "relaxed" and waited for a chance to strike.
Once again, keep in mind that I`m not supporting this conspiracy in whole, but I`m keeping it in perspective.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
As much as I hate to get into such a stupid debate again, hopefully just saying this will shut up at least one person (but I suspect not):

If you were an evil government who needs a terrorist attack to happen so you can do whatever it is you need to do, would you go through an elaborate, risky and likely to fail/be uncovered plot to cause it yourself...

...or would you simply wait safe in the knowledge that one or other of the massive supply of nutjobs out there will do it for you of their own accord, with no possible trail of evidence leading back to you, and the only thing you may need to do is covertly relax your defences a little, or do a few things to get the right nutjobs angry at you?

This conspiracy fails not only at identifying evidence, but even at painting a plausable REASON why any intelligent plotter would do it in that way in the first place!
0
Reply
Male 250
@skullgrin: trying to hard to troll. be more vague, less emotion.
0
Reply
Male 936
I cant believe how many stupid people there are living in America. Anyone who thinks the three buildings that fell on 9/11 were from a plane hitting them are fools. How about you do some research into the events and see for yourself? The government is covering up something. That`s not even a question. To say otherwise is just idiotic and ignorant.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
*literal headdesk*

I don`t even use my computer at a desk. I went and fetched a desk just now so I could head it.

Can we move on to the next conspiracy please? This one is tired.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]As for "But I heard explosions" claims, There are explosions heard even in regular house fires.[/quote]

As well as that, a storey of a tower being pancaked by the stories above it falling down onto it makes a hell of a bang. Like hearing an explosion.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]explosives can be planted slowly and at sundays for example but it takes more time that they can justify[/quote]

You couldn`t do a *controlled* demolition that way, anyway.

You need to carry out extensive and extremely obvious preparation in advance, including structural weakening and precise placement of the correct amount of explosives in the correct places.

A controlled demolition of these buildings without the people in them noticing the preparation only makes sense if wholly alien technology is involved. Destruction rays. Teleporting parts of the building away. Phasing them into a different plane of existence. Various possibilities, but all requiring alien technology.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]I can`t believe how many of you can be so closed minded. If you believe what the government tells you then you`re nothing other than mindless vessels.[/quote]

You idiot hypocrite.

Some people are looking at the evidence and reasoning and concluding as a result that the buildings were brought down by terrorists using planes - a simple but effective weapon used with explained effects by a group known to exist and with a motive for the attack.


You call these people mindless vessels who just believe what they`re told.


Other people just believe it when they`re told that an unknown conspiracy used unknown technology that works in an unexplainable way to precisely mimic the effects of an attack as described above, mixed in with a scattering of provably false statements about subjects they are clearly utterly ignorant of (metallurgy, civil engineering, etc).

Obviously, it`s them who are the mindless vessels who just believe what t
0
Reply
Male 226
@Mirage6 because filling a building with well 10 tonnes of explosives should be explained somehow. i mean if they said that they moved 10 tonnes (imagine the size they would have) of explosives and planted them in correct spots without being seen u would not trust ur country. now they said that it was a sudden attack that went through airport security and it was a matter of 10 mins. when would u trust them more? explosives can be planted slowly and at sundays for example but it takes more time that they can justify
0
Reply
Male 12,365
The floors above it collapse *straight down under gravity* onto the floors below it, which would of course collapse those floors *straight downwards*.
0
Reply
Male 12,365



While a controlled demolition that will *definitely* bring a building straight down requires extensive preparation by experts, any sensibly designed tower will *probably* collapse straight down if its structural integrity is ruined *because they are expertly designed to do so*. Who the hell would build a tower in a city in any other way?

Nobody, absolutely nobody, is saying that the fire *melted* steel. That statement alone would demonstrate the depth of your lack of knowledge by itself, even without the fact that everything you have said is wrong.

Steel is greatly weakened at far lower temperatures than its melting point. Weaken it enough to stop it holding up thousands of tonnes of building, especially when there are huge holes in that building and critical supporting structure isn`t there any more.

So a large chunk partway up is partly destroyed and the rest is badly damaged and greatly weakened by the heat.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]It was obviously NOT caused by a plane. An airplane can NOT make a building collapse like these buildings did. It is physically impossible. [..] no amount of jet fuel can ever collapse a building built out of steel. it does not burn hot enough to melt steel.[/quote]

You are confidently making absolute statements that are wrong.

It`s that simple.

You are merely demonstrating your own ignorance of the subject.

It`s true that a controlled demolition, particularly of such a large building in such a built-up area, requires expert planning and a great deal of preparation.

That proves that the WTC could not have been destroyed in a controlled demolition - it would have been impossible to conceal the preparation. So your own argument disproves your own conclusions.

Next post - why you`re wrong about the destruction.
0
Reply
Male 4,547
Prove is a word with a meaning.

This does not fit that meaning.
0
Reply
Male 39
Release Date of video: February 11, 2010....
0
Reply
Male 25
If 9/11 was an inside job and there were bombs in the buildings, then why would the US government need to crash airplanes into three different buildings? Why wouldn`t they just plant the bombs and blame it on Al Qaeda? It seems like there are an infinite number of easier ways to pull off this plot. This conspiracy could not possibly work simply by the sheer number of people who would be in on it.
0
Reply
Male 79
I think the plane crashes were authentic but played no part in the collapsing of the twin towers. I believe we allowed the attack to happen as cover for when the micro explosions ignited the thermite within the buildings.
Maybe the crash completely compromised the integrity of the two towers. if thats the case then lets all move our attention to our engineers...
0
Reply
Male 347
What the fu­ck? They didn`t show the photos!
I thought that was the reason I was watching, to see the "proof".
0
Reply
Male 673
"really,, people will always question everything. Its human nature"

Unfortunately that`s not the case in the US. As you can see most people there would gladly eat the sh*t their government feeds them.
0
Reply
Male 7,353
mrbungle-"those of you that say a plane has never hit a building before"

I don`t know of anyone that`s said that. My exact words were `the only instance when jet fuel was introduced in massive quantities into a heavily damaged building...`

But, for comparison:
B-25 Mitchel vs. Boeing 767.
15 tons vs. 200 tons
670 gals AvGas vs. 24,000 gals Jet-A
B-25 going Low & Slow looking for an airfield in the fog vs. 767 hauling butt intentionally rammed into the buildings.
empire state building nothing like the WTC

btw..B-25 is not classified as a `jet`.
0
Reply
Male 15
Watch Zeitgeist on YouTube. Most of our wars are caused by one specific event. Wars are profitable. That is why the U.S. would be interested in doing this to its own people--to gain the public`s backing to go to war.
0
Reply
Male 185
its just convenient that planes happened to hit them when these alleged bombs went off...ppl are so gd stupid...
0
Reply
Male 2,384
i mean i`m not hard core about the conspiracy stuff, but some of it is a little fishy like wtc 7 and how they still cant find alot of the bodies but they somehow managed to find an iraqi passport in nearly pristine condition
0
Reply
Male 37,902

For the sake of arguement, let`s say it is a government inside job and cover up.
Why?
What is there to be gained? I`ve heard rumor of destorying the CIA
offices and evidence but I think a paper shreader would`ve been cheaper
0
Reply
Male 32
I don`t buy into most of the bull but for those of you that say a plane has never hit a building before 9/11 here you go.
link 1link 2
0
Reply
Male 25,416
really,, people will always question everything. Its human nature
0
Reply
Male 35
Russian Television proving how remarkably inept their research team is at finding a story. In other news, this guy clearly skipped every day of Public Speaking he had in college. My current opinion: this clip shows how the 9/11 plot theories seem to be based on thin ice. They start off describing how images have been released to the public, but nowhere in this guys dialogue does he even point to a picture to support his claim. Before we go in search to prove theories, or demand we fix our economy, or even before we plead for an improved education system, can we all just take a step back and remind each other we aren`t the individuals we`ve become without the unity present in the people of this nation (and the remaining world) that was before us? When is the last time you looked at a complete stranger and remembered you both share something absolutely remarkable, your a piece of humanity. Smile more. Be less rash. Love each other. Never cast your perceptions as if they are set in stone
0
Reply
Male 243
The ones questioning what happened are obviously the ones that didn`t watch it live.

I watched it live, and saw the second plane crash into the building. I watched the HOURS it took for the buildings to collapse.

Believe in what you see, so I shall.
0
Reply
Male 63
I don`t have to watch this video to know that i saw planes crash into buildings which subsequently collapsed. You don`t have to be a genius to realize that a building is not going to hold up when a drating plane crashes into it.
0
Reply
Male 3
this is like 2 years old?
0
Reply
Male 2,441
This stuff isn`t necessary to post on here anymore.

@MeGrendel, thank you.
0
Reply
Male 673
Poor americans, still standing behind and defending the legend they were brainwashed to believe. You are going to bring the whole world down you blind fools.
0
Reply
Male 253
TKD I`ve seen people call you a retard before. I guess those people are right.
0
Reply
Male 4
I can`t believe how many of you can be so closed minded. If you believe what the government tells you then you`re nothing other than mindless vessels. It`s good that these conspiracy theories exist to question what the government tells us...Even if it might not be true, you have to keep it in the side of your mind rather than dismissing it as a pure fabrication. The way I see it this theory could be true, just as you can see the simple Cause & Effects: Building destroyed --> American soldiers unconstitutionally deployed.
0
Reply
Male 4,004
Take 1 Boeing 757. Smash it, full of fuel, into a building at a pretty high speed. Let the fuel burn, let the building burn, the weak, burning and damaged structure is holding up the 20ish stories above it...

Anyone with even the slightest understanding of physics, and a sane mind would know that the planes initiated the chain of events sending the skyscrapers to the ground.

As for "But I heard explosions" claims, There are explosions heard even in regular house fires.

If a plane SMASHING into a building didn`t bring it down, I`m pretty sure unnoticeable explosions wouldn`t either.
0
Reply
Male 658
A plane can bring down a building.
0
Reply
Male 7,353
TKD_Master-"no amount of jet fuel can ever collapse a building built out of steel"

Actually, the only instance when jet fuel was introduced in massive quantities into a heavily damaged building was twice, both on 9/11/01. Guess what, they both collapsed.

And sorry, but WTC buildings were not steel frame building. (google `tube frame`)

TKD_Master-"it does not burn hot enough to melt steel."

Again, with the misleading statemnts. No one said it did, but it burned hot enough to WEAKEN steel. Study physics, fool.

TKD_Master-"Oh, so something has to actually happen before we can know whether its possible or not?"

No, BUT IT DOES have to actually happen before you can make stupid statements like `no amount of jet fuel can ever collapse a building built out of steel`.

I`ve changed my mind, you`re not demonstrating ignorance. You`re demonstrating pure stupidity.
0
Reply
Male 7,353
TKD_Master-"It is physically impossible."

Strange, they collapsed in the direction of gravity? What direction does gravity go in your world?

TKD_Master-"Do you have ANY idea how hard it is to get a building to collapse straight down?"

Again, what direction does gravity go in your world?

TKD_Master-"I`m going to say it again, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE that an airplane can make a building COLLAPSE."

And AGIAN, you will demonstrate how ignorant you are on the subject.
0
Reply
Male 49
TKD Master: you don`t have to melt steel in order for it to lose structural integrity. Steel members fail in building fires, that`s a well documented fact. It`s taught to every entry level firefighter.
0
Reply
Male 2,422
Try learning a little something before posting retarded poo.

Conversations with history: Inside Islamic Militancy

Not that any of you idiots will watch it because it has things like facts and logic.
0
Reply
Male 1,284
0
Reply
Male 4
I have seen some of the film, of One or two windows blowing out, If it was a demo, more than one or two windows would blow out, and think of the air pressure have 10-20 stories coming down...
\
0
Reply
Male 4,793
Those of you that believe jet fuel can bring down a building are stupid. Please do not reproduce, your child will be a turd floating in the human gene pool. I`m done arguing with turds now.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
"I think you might be taking a rather ill informed view there regarding building collapses, there has never been a case of a large aircraft hitting a building so to say it is impossible isn`t really correct."

Oh, so something has to actually happen before we can know whether its possible or not? Explain to me how i know that gladd at Zero Kelvin turns to a liquid. It has never happened under record. How do i know this though? Because i`m god. Now shutup and just accept my word as correct. (btw, i know a plane can not do it via physics knowledge).
0
Reply
Male 675
And didn`t you know that Americans were behind Pearl Harbor? Its True! Old Japanese documents have been declassified to show that the Japanese have no record of resources transferred or used to propagate such an attack. In fact, Amelia Earhart actually landed on the islands of Japan and stole plans for Japanese Zeroes that were built and piloted by Japanese Americans! All for the excuse to get into World War II and jump start the American economy from the great depression.

.......

People who will believe this video will probably also believe this crap I just thought up in 10 minutes.
0
Reply
Male 2
Thermite Paint.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
""Collapsing requires strategic destruction and precise timing."

That or a f*ckton of jet fuel."

no amount of jet fuel can ever collapse a building built out of steel. it does not burn hot enough to melt steel.
0
Reply
Male 119
So, the main central column, which these towers had, along with a plane full of jet fuel can`t do the same thing? Jeez! The people just need to get laid. Steady booty takes your mind of stuff like this.
0
Reply
Male 770
Has any one of these jackholes ever read Popular Mechanics? Its a widely distributed magazine that gives the latest in scientific and engineering news. They did an entire issue dedicated to these crackpot theories and gave very detailed reports as well as chemical, and mathematical proof that these claims are bulls#!t.
0
Reply
Male 143
Does everybody remember back on 9-11-11 when I-A-B had that documentary of those french guys who followed the firefighters and one of them had his camera in one of the towers. I don`t remember hearing explosions when one of the towers collapsed. Anyone else remember this, if not you can watch it on IAB.
0
Reply
Male 1,243
TKD, I think you might be taking a rather ill informed view there regarding building collapses, there has never been a case of a large aircraft hitting a building so to say it is impossible isn`t really correct. I do admit that there is reason to suspect that the events of that day have never been fully explained and even that the circumstances of the building collapses may be suspect, but to claim theory as fact like you are doing makes you sound quite ill informed.
0
Reply
Male 914
"Collapsing requires strategic destruction and precise timing."

That or a f*ckton of jet fuel.
0
Reply
Male 49
Dick Cheney is to blame. Do your fcukin homework.
0
Reply
Male 3,894
uuuuuuuuuuughhhhhhhhh.

Shut up.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
Carmium, do you know what makes me angry? In the year 2001, somebody murdered 3000 people. This person has not been brought to justice. That makes me angry.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
It was obviously NOT caused by a plane. An airplane can NOT make a building collapse like these buildings did. It is physically impossible. Do you have ANY idea how hard it is to get a building to collapse straight down? Demolitionists have to plan and calculate FAR in advance before collapsing a building because they would much rather just fall over. I`m going to say it again, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE that an airplane can make a building COLLAPSE. Can an airplane destroy a building? sure, but it can not collapse it. Collapsing requires strategic destruction and precise timing.
0
Reply
Female 6,381
I am so sick of the liars who keep perpetuating myths and distortions about 9/11, repeating allegations, misconceptions, and speculation as if they were facts. Amass enough bullsh*t and you can make yourself a career of writing books, speaking tours, and interviews.
They`re scum. They make me mad. 8-(
0
Reply
Male 49
Steel warps and loses its integrity at 800F. A well ventilated fire started with jetfuel and fed by synthetic office furniture will reach over 1200F. With the fire weakening the supports and the extra weight of the additional floors above, the supports gave way. The momentum of the top half falling, collapsed the bottom half. When all of that downward force got to the ground it had to move parallel to the ground and blasted into the surrounding buildings. This is referred to in firefighting manuals as a "pancake" collapse.

I do not believe the theory of interior explosive demolition. To plant that many explosives after cutting into interior walls, is entirely too much work to go undetected.
0
Reply
Male 244
I despise conspiracy theorists to say that "we the American people need to wake up"... F-U. I`m awake and I can see that you are a nut job.
0
Reply
Male 36,541
I`m a fan of a good conspiracy, but the Towers fell because they were hit by aircraft, period. No extra explosions were neccessary.

Building 7? The Pentagon? That other aircraft? Now THOSE have some conspiracy merit!
0
Reply
Male 42
Once again another bad post..
0
Reply
Male 65
This was uploaded to youtube last February.
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Credibility of Russia Today falling...

falling...

:-( I hate when that happens. This is a sad story.
0
Reply
Male 633
no new....old
0
Reply
Male 7,775
Look for the Susan Lindauer vid. She worked in the very heart of the CIA at the time and says the whole thing was known about for months in advance. Right up to dubya and his cronies. The Bush family have been bending you Americans over for generations.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
Not this sh|t again... 1.0 and move on.
0
Reply
Male 61
Idiot man is idiot.

No photos to prove, and his physics need help.

This is sad, don`t watch it. I`m dumr 4 doeing soe`
0
Reply
Male 613
So I waste 5 minutes watching to see these `NEW` photos and all I see is 2 people yackin and yackin and yackin and yackin......
0
Reply
Male 1,284
isn`t that the same thing they are saying for 10 years? nothing is new or has changed
0
Reply
Female 833
people have been saying this for years.
0
Reply
Male 1,371
Link: Recent 9/11 Photos Prove WTC Exploded From Inside [Rate Link] - Recent pics are shedding light on September 11th, some say prove that the assault on the US prove a homegrown attack.
0
Reply