The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 16    Average: 2.3/5]
24 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 18671
Rating: 2.3
Category: Funny
Date: 12/03/11 08:14 AM

24 Responses to Yep, This Camera Appears To Be Totally Legit [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of Kim...
    Kim... Female 13-17
    539 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 8:16 am
    Link: Yep, This Camera Appears To Be Totally Legit - You shouldn`t have any doubt in your mind that this camera will every every function it appears to have...
  2. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 8:28 am
    Considering the plastic, faceted jewel that is posing as a lens, I can only assume this is a pretend, toy camera.
  3. Profile photo of Tubby12370
    Tubby12370 Male 18-29
    1440 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 8:38 am
    @patchouly, its a real camera, but its not 5.5 Terapixels, (obviously)some research found its equivalent to a disposable camera.


    Gotta love the Chinese advertising companies.
  4. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 8:44 am
    "I can only assume this is a pretend, toy camera."

    If it`s a pretend toy camera does that not make it a real camera?
  5. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 8:49 am
    Speaking of pixels, the best one I`ve heard of, for sale, was a Hasselblad that takes, drool inducing, 200 megapixel shots. Link
  6. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 8:57 am
    @MrPeabody
    LOL! I suppose my double negative slip up, does result in a real camera.
  7. Profile photo of patchouly
    patchouly Male 40-49
    4746 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:00 am
    @ Tubbey12370

    I think it`s fake. The lens is faceted, the flash is a piece of plastic, set in a hole and the viewfinder and sensor are empty. Looking at other images of this camera, it is clearly a pretend camera. The "terapixle" thing is just a funny thing printed on the front, to make it clear that it`s not a real camera.
  8. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36654 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:01 am

    Dumb. So I`ll just hijack this thread.

    How many of you hate the look of YouTube?
    It sucks, right?
    I totally hate it.
  9. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:02 am
    @CrakrJak - Who needs a lame 200 megapixel camera when you can get this super cute 5.5 terapixel camera? :3
  10. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:03 am
    @Gerry1of1 - Haaate it x-x And I don`t like the new changes to google either.
  11. Profile photo of Tubby12370
    Tubby12370 Male 18-29
    1440 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:09 am
    @patchouly, Well, either the information I found was unreliable, or it really is a toy camera, I do not know.
  12. Profile photo of Essersmith
    Essersmith Male 18-29
    275 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:16 am
    @CrakrJak
    At the risk of trolling.
    Why on earth would you want or drool over a 200 mega pixel camera?
  13. Profile photo of jadoig
    jadoig Male 30-39
    434 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:48 am
    re:youtube
    Meh. it`s a website. It changes. Kind of like when facebook changes.
    I AM OUTRAGED THAT THE LUXURY FREE SERVICE I USE DECIDED TO CHANGE IT`S APPEARANCE.
    Camera: I would love a 5 terabyte camera. i wonder how much space the picture would take up on my HD?
  14. Profile photo of minigeko
    minigeko Male 18-29
    149 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:56 am
    jadoig probably 5 terabytes.... oh wait you meant... oh ok
  15. Profile photo of minigeko
    minigeko Male 18-29
    149 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 9:58 am
    Gerry1of1

    i don`t hate it, i just liked seeing 5 or so videos from each subscription more than this
  16. Profile photo of toonces
    toonces Male 18-29
    8 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 10:09 am
    jadoig:
    Depending on the depth of colour (bits per pixel = bbp) your image will probably have around 16-24 bbp (Although I don`t know what modern cameras use). That makes 2-3 bytes per pixel -> around 10-15 Terabyte per image. According to amazon.com a 2 TB external harddrive costs around 120$. So you would be spending 600-900$ per image.
  17. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36654 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 10:58 am

    YouTube sucks now.
    And just because it`s free doesn`t mean we can`t complain about it. YouTube exists to make money. They do that by appealing to US, the viewers. If it doesn`t work for us VIMEO will get more customers.

    MySpace thought they were a permanent thing once too.
  18. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 2:13 pm
    lol. Nice. 2,000,000 x 2,700,000 right?
  19. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 3:45 pm
    Essersmith: You`ve never held a Hasselblad camera in your hands have you ?

    They are the Rolls Royce of cameras, second to none. Take a picture with that particular model and you could theoretically make a print the size of a 4 story building and not loose detail.
  20. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14621 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 6:53 pm
    Gerry, right. YouTube sucks. The layout is crowded and has lost all simplicity, trying to get you to buy stuff you don`t want and share all your activities with your followers and social media. Essentially, it`s becoming like IAB, but in white.

    The main difference is I can use the AdBlock add-in for Firefox to strip IAB back to uncrowded simplicity.
  21. Profile photo of danthew
    danthew Male 18-29
    2122 posts
    December 3, 2011 at 7:51 pm
    About youtube: I never used the subscription or channel stuff, so the front page has always been pretty useless for me. And to be fair to them, they tried to make it more "sticky", and I just spent nearly an hour on there after only going on to remind myself what it looked like now.
  22. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    December 4, 2011 at 12:05 am
    @Draculya Rest easy, for they may have broken youtube, but modders out there are working on solutions at this very moment.

    In retrospect, ABP is the greatest bit of code known to man. ... but there are other tools as well.
  23. Profile photo of Essersmith
    Essersmith Male 18-29
    275 posts
    December 4, 2011 at 5:37 am
    @CrakrJak
    No, not a camera in that price range.
    Im just puzzled why you would want to take pictures in that quality, not people, you.
  24. Profile photo of PhotoKing
    PhotoKing Male 30-39
    526 posts
    December 6, 2011 at 11:57 am
    i`m guessing it`s short for Terrible Pixels. either way, even if it had that many pixels i`m not shooting with a bright blue camera with what looks kind of like a penguin on the front. i would say that a size that large would be around what 400 megs a piece? more?

Leave a Reply