Gays Apologize For Killing Amy Koch`s Marriage

Submitted by: fancylad 5 years ago in

While cheating on her husband with a campaign staffer, Amy was busy trying to end same-sex marriage. The gays apologize.
There are 41 comments:
Male 12,365
[quote]My opinion, get the government completely out of the marriage/civil-union/friends with tax benefits/incest business altogether. Call them all civil unions for tax and legal purposes [..] [/quote]

Your opinion contradicts itself and is therefore invalid.

If you think there should be any "tax and legal purposes", then you think that the government should be in, not out.
0
Reply
Male 73
Of course, if the bible doesn`t agree with conservatives they can just change it...

http://bit.ly/3evLmk

(Conservapedia`s Conservative Bible Project)
0
Reply
Female 19
Ok, this is awesome. I know they`re lowering themselves to the hateful level of the Christian right but in this case it`s completely deserved and far more effective IMO. If people like Amy could understand kindness then they`d be a different kind of "Christian" in the first place, not a bigot who uses the bible to justify their bigotry! BTW Amy, there`s far more said against adultery AND gluttony (ahem) in the Bible than there is against homosexuals.....


0
Reply
Male 73
... they want. *Character counter is a liar.
0
Reply
Male 73
It could be for religious reasons. Or it could be simple f-ing common sense. Here, let me look up the word "marriage" in my dictionary:

Marriage (n) "the state of being united with a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual or contractual relationship recognized by law"

So it looks like athiests can get "married" but 2 dudes or 2 chicks can`t. No religion involved at all. Just common word definitions.

Reality is I don`t particularly give a horse testicle what they call it. Doesn`t bother me in the least. But to say that there is absolutely no secular argument is idiotic.

My opinion, get the government completely out of the marriage/civil-union/friends with tax benefits/incest business altogether. Call them all civil unions for tax and legal purposes and let the people or churches or wiccan circles or gay communes or athiest clubs or whoever else needs a group identity call them whatever the f
0
Reply
Male 12,365
I`ve just noticed that a previous post of mine fell prey to the invisible character-eating monster that lives in IAB`s server.

"it`s the quickest way to get both th" should read:

It`s the quickest way to get both the rights and the word.

Here in the UK, we have civil marriages (heterosexual only) and civil partnerships (homosexual only), purely as a pragmatic political move to get homosexual marriages into law as quickly as possible with as little fuss as possible (it worked very well). They`re legally defined as being exactly the same in every respect and it`s normal to call them both "marriage" anyway. So even people who care about getting the word "marriage" far more than they care about the legal rights (a position I really don`t understand at all) should at least consider that route, because it works.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Even atheists can get legally married, so obviously it has nothing to do with religion.[/quote]

I`d be prepared to bet that the people who oppose homosexual marriage also oppose atheist marriage and would outlaw it if they could.

[quote]There`s simply no non-religious reason the government can`t just call a gay marriage a gay marriage.[/quote]

Religion and politics aren`t seperate, though. So a religious reason is also a political one. It shouldn`t be, but it is.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]It`s funny, most of what the gay marriage controversy is about is just semantics.[/quote]

True, but it does have some very real effects.

[quote]There`s no point to "civil unions" for gays anymore than there`s a point to have "civil unions" for atheists.[/quote]

I think the easiest way is to have *all* government recognition of formalised personal relationships labelled "civil unions" (or "civil partnerships", as they`re called here). Put all the legal rights and responsibilities in there, everyone gets equal treatment under the law and the contentious word "marriage" is avoided.

But it`s better to have the same legal status with different official names than different legal status. People who accept homosexual marriages call them that anyway, regardless of the official term, and people who don`t won`t call them marriages even if the government forms do, so it`s the quickest way to get both th
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Wtf does this have to do with PETA?[/quote]

I thought that it was obvious that maddux32 was drawing a comparison between the methods used by PETA and the methods used by LGBTetc advocacy groups.

Not a comparison between the twos sets of advocates. A comparison between the methods they use for their advocacy.

I`m surprised at the level of incomprehension and (from other posters, not necessarily you) knee-jerk unsubstantiated accusations against maddux32. Which rather supports his point - the responses he`s getting are extremely PETA-like, especially the irrational and completely unconnected raving from I-IS-BORED.
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Hypocrisy should be punishable by public tazing.
0
Reply
Female 3,562
It`s funny, most of what the gay marriage controversy is about is just semantics. There`s no point to "civil unions" for gays anymore than there`s a point to have "civil unions" for atheists. Even atheists can get legally married, so obviously it has nothing to do with religion. There`s simply no non-religious reason the government can`t just call a gay marriage a gay marriage.
0
Reply
Male 2,737
Damn gays.
0
Reply
Male 1,448
Koch is an idiot for what she did as well has her stance, but that was pretty classless.
0
Reply
Male 3,364
Doesn`t the bible say something about how she should be stoned to death now?
0
Reply
Male 4,902
@Vimto, "Who said the Americans don`t get sarcasm?"

Good question because that`s a pretty f*cking retarded statement.
0
Reply
Male 2,220
@vimto, they certainy have, a nailing for a nailing...
0
Reply
Male 2,860
Who said the Americans don`t get sarcasm? Certainly the gay community have nailed it.
0
Reply
Male 2,419
@LillianDulci
nobody said the trash spewed from maddux32`s mouth had to make sense
0
Reply
Female 2,674
Wtf does this have to do with PETA?
0
Reply
Male 2,419
"Nothing against the Gays, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?"

Nothing against the Blacks, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?
Nothing against the Women, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?
Nothing against the Children, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?
Nothing against the Common Folk, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?

Ya, that sentence is definitely not hate speech or offensive and totally DOESN`T compare fighting for gay rights to fighting for animal rights (and thus call gays animals)
0
Reply
Male 2,419
I think it`s pretty obvious that a woman hearing "Ms Koch?" everyday is eventually going to hear "Ms, Koch?"
0
Reply
Male 3,431
Pure Poetry.
0
Reply
Male 14,867
Religious people can define ceremonial marriages within their own religion as they want, but we shouldn`t try to restrict the definition of civil union or common-law civil union because it denies important legal rights and protections to those that have a need and a right to expect it.

The concept of a legal civil union relates to the status of two people living in a what is equivalent to a state of matrimony. The ability to reproduce is not a prerequisite for such a union, or divorce would be compulsory at menopause.

This is a fundamental human right and is simply beyond the moral jurisdiction of religion.
0
Reply
Male 4,004
""Nothing against the Gays, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?"

PETA fights for the "rights" of animals, the LBGT community is trying to have equal rights (they want to be able to get married...I don`t know how else they are persecuted outside of high school otherwise)
0
Reply
Male 1,471
H.I.larious... i`m drunk..
0
Reply
Male 926
@DiePSPolice

Yeah, good for them, and I`m all for their individual and collective rights, but don`t go PETA over it. Just don`t. It`s not the way to get it done. It unnecessarily breeds more enemies against a group that already has healthy supply. I`m on their side, but sick and tired of their played out, in your face antics. It doesn`t help them. At all.
0
Reply
Male 38,411
Hideous bint! She deserves to lose her career, what a tool.
0
Reply
Male 493
@maddux32: "Nothing against the Gays, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?"

I`m sure they`ll stop it when they don`t have to fight against persecution and for their rights anymore.

If you`re tired of hearing it, make equality happen faster.
0
Reply
Male 233
Lol it`s funny cuz it`s insincere

never got the whole "ruining tha sanctity of marriage" thing. strait people do that plenty

just admit you hate gay people already
0
Reply
Male 926
Nothing against the Gays, but you`re turning into PETA. Would you stop it?
0
Reply
Male 2,422
It`s hilarious when members of the American Taliban turn out to be hypocrites. Delicious.

0
Reply
Male 493
@Gerry1of1:

The Republicans (aside from Paul) haven`t been for small government for decades. If anything, they expand the power and reach of the federal government even faster than the Democrats do.
0
Reply
Male 1,059
That letter was so gay.
0
Reply
Male 38,768

I wish the Republitard Leadership would get off this morals-crucade schtick.
It doesn`t track well and is distracting from the actual republican message of
small government. The current party leaders want a goverment just small enough
to fit in our bedrooms.
0
Reply
Female 1,743
Gross.
0
Reply
Male 4,431
HolyGod, "shadenfreude" doesn`t quite capture the nuance. Given Ms. Koch`s asshattery leading up to the revelations that she`s a hypocritical twat, a much better word would be "karma".
0
Reply
Male 8,303
This should be in the dictionary under "schadenfreude".
0
Reply
Male 12,365
That letter contains more gems than the crown jewels. For the rest of her life, people who have read it will point at her and laugh.
0
Reply
Male 493
l o l

Seriously, too funny. Usually the crazy anti-gay people just turn out to be self-hating gay people themselves, but this is pretty awesome in that she`s just a straight person who happens to be terrible.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
BURN
0
Reply
Male 20,303
Link: Gays Apologize For Killing Amy Koch`s Marriage [Rate Link] - While cheating on her husband with a campaign staffer, Amy was busy trying to end same-sex marriage. The gays apologize.
0
Reply