The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 23    Average: 3.8/5]
58 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 12799
Rating: 3.8
Category: Misc
Date: 11/22/11 03:45 PM

58 Responses to Nazi-Naming Parents Lose Custody Of Newborn

  1. Profile photo of kitteh9lives
    kitteh9lives Female 70 & Over
    8044 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 2:39 pm
    Link: Nazi-Naming Parents Lose Custody Of Newborn - Their other 3 children were taken 2 years ago. Is it right to take children based on what parents choose to name them?
  2. Profile photo of robosnitz
    robosnitz Male 40-49
    2737 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 3:54 pm
    If the children are in danger then absolutely they should be taken away. But if there`s no clear and present danger, then no. If your gonna take children away because of foolish names their parents gave them, then start with the celebutards first.See how long it lasts then.
  3. Profile photo of Rick_S
    Rick_S Male 40-49
    3291 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 3:58 pm
    It is not uncommon for child services to remove a new born from a family that has other children in foster care. My family took in foster kids when I was a teenager, and we had a set of siblings. Their parents were going to have another baby, and they were told, before she even went to the hospital, that the newborn would be placed in foster care. They lost custody of the child before it was born.

    I don`t know the details of this family, so I can`t say if they deserve to have their children removed or not, but I did want to point out that this situation is not uncommon.
  4. Profile photo of meneado
    meneado Male 18-29
    152 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 3:59 pm
    I REMEMBER THIS FROM A FEW YEARS AGO!!! ADOLF HITLER lol.
  5. Profile photo of Idlerlee2
    Idlerlee2 Male 18-29
    135 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    Naming your children after famous nazis is a sure way to brand them for life. Its active child abuse, and yes it is absolutely right to remove the children from the home
  6. Profile photo of Jaellot
    Jaellot Male 18-29
    95 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 4:16 pm
    Good. They should have gone in and taken out some ovaries and testes while they were removing things from the parents.
  7. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36842 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 4:50 pm

    I am ever amazed at the sheer level of stupidity that parents can sink to. Does it never occur to parents to do what is right for the kid? Not make a political statement out of their name. Not choose their career over the wellbeing of their child. You know...those "sacrifices" we hear rumor of that parents today seem incapable of.
  8. Profile photo of honkeylips
    honkeylips Male 30-39
    1586 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    So it`s alright to name your child Pilot Inspector but it`s not alright to name your child Adolf Hitler? Where is the line?
  9. Profile photo of Tetragramma
    Tetragramma Male 18-29
    65 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    These parents have a First Amendment right to name their children something dumb as political speech. They don`t have the right to create a dangerous environment for children, which they were doing. It`s not their names, it`s the damned domestic abuse of the husband.
  10. Profile photo of biogeek
    biogeek Female 30-39
    57 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:13 pm
    well said Gerry
  11. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:18 pm
    I`m ok with the names, however heinous it may sound, it`s just a name, provided that the kid has the right to change it should they wish it once they come of age. Sure, you`ll make the kid`s life hell going through school, but again, it`s just a name. On the other hand, raising a child in a violent household? Nope. You might be thinking that naming someone something like that would automatically count as "violence" or "abuse" but there is actually no firm connection there.

    Regardless, the two go hand in hand in this case and so there is no moral dilemma. The only case wherein I`d have to question my values, or anyones, would be if they chose to name their son Adolf Hitler, but were otherwise a peaceful and loving family... but what are the chances of that?
  12. Profile photo of skullgrin
    skullgrin Male 18-29
    937 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:21 pm
    A know someone who is in jail for murder and rape. His name is Jose Garcia. No one can name their kid Jose Garcia now.
  13. Profile photo of carlsagan
    carlsagan Male 18-29
    139 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:22 pm
    If the baby grew up as adolf hitler, he would be dead before becoming an adult. Alot of people hate Adolf Hitler because of the holocaust. So in a way it`s to prevent bullying.
  14. Profile photo of CoffeeDiiva
    CoffeeDiiva Female 40-49
    1604 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:27 pm
    If you read more on it they did not get their children taken away for their names. They were taken away for suspicion of neglect and abuse
  15. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:29 pm
    yea that kid is going to be scarred for life with a name like that
  16. Profile photo of mcssls
    mcssls Female 70 & Over
    695 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:31 pm
    my GOD what are they going to do when kids are named OBAMA?
  17. Profile photo of carlsagan
    carlsagan Male 18-29
    139 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 6:33 pm
    It`s not the babies fault the parents are embeciles. You don`t name your kid a name that grabs negative attention, they are just asking for there child to get bullied through school, the teachers, the principle, the students would bully him if his name was Adolf Hitler. No joke!
  18. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 7:09 pm
    "my GOD what are they going to do when kids are named OBAMA?"
    Comparing Hitler and Obama, really?
  19. Profile photo of CaptainPabst
    CaptainPabst Male 18-29
    1250 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 7:13 pm
    @mcssls You are retarded
  20. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3283 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 7:31 pm
    LillianDulci: Comparing Hitler and Obama, really?

    But I bet comparing Hitler with Dubya is perfectly fine, right?
  21. Profile photo of Brassbull
    Brassbull Male 30-39
    1610 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 7:53 pm
    A know someone who is in jail for murder and rape. His name is Jose Garcia. No one can name their kid Jose Garcia now.


    If that name became synonymous with rape and eventually stigmatized to the point where no one was naming their kids that, then I`d be OK with it.
  22. Profile photo of thelonious
    thelonious Male 40-49
    3286 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 8:20 pm
    In reality there is really only like 2 or 3 times in history where you should step in an do anything about the names chosen for children. Just 2 or 3 out of the vast span of human history. It`s the complete exception and not the rule. But in the history of mankind, there are going to be 2 or 3 instances where something really needs to be done.
  23. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 8:37 pm
    "But I bet comparing Hitler with Dubya is perfectly fine, right?"

    Absolutely not.
  24. Profile photo of carmium
    carmium Female 50-59
    6381 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 9:00 pm
    Maybe the authorities can find a clause that negates your parental rights if it can be shown that you`re a complete as*hole. In this instance, case closed.
  25. Profile photo of I-IS-BORED
    I-IS-BORED Male 18-29
    2419 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 9:33 pm
    really? "Aryan Nation"? Why weren`t they castrated on the spot when they named that one?
  26. Profile photo of PoopNoodle
    PoopNoodle Male 40-49
    400 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 9:48 pm
    Why is it that people can`t simply disagree with someone anymore? Instead, people have to try to make the actions of other people illegal if it offends them.
    And to Brassbull, why do your feelings and perceptions have to be considered when these people name their child?
    MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS PEOPLE!!
  27. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 10:01 pm
    @mcssls: people already have named their kids after Obama...

    @DuckBoy87: being stupid and purposefully causing genocide are two different things...i mean really the names dont even sound the same get it together man...
  28. Profile photo of QueenKeika
    QueenKeika Female 18-29
    25 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 10:07 pm
    They really didn`t want their kids. If they did,they would have chose pragmatic names so that they wouldn`t get BULLIED.
    I be wary of a guy named Adolf Hitler,wouldn`t you?Stupid people do stupid things.
  29. Profile photo of TheShgn2
    TheShgn2 Male 13-17
    626 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 10:15 pm
    If I had been the person writing the names on the birth certificate, I would have just laughed and said no, then tell them to chose a new one. I hope the nurses at least said something to the parents about how horrible they are.
  30. Profile photo of Selous
    Selous Male 30-39
    1197 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 11:06 pm
    these guys really hate there children! why would u put them through that? life is hard enough without having a rubbish name!!

    i dont think anyone/the state has the right to take the kids based on what the retard parents named there children, im sure there are other reasons to take the kids thou
  31. Profile photo of madduck
    madduck Female 50-59
    7607 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 11:27 pm
    it did state that the children were removed because of previous violence- and that no reason had been given for this removal...
  32. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 12:44 am
    WHY DO IT AGAIN FFS?

    Idiots. They`re after attention.
  33. Profile photo of TokioKoos
    TokioKoos Female 18-29
    412 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 2:50 am
    Here in Holland there`s laws as to what you can call your children (when you register them at birth). However, it doesn`t stop people from giving their kid the legal name `John` and then naming him Hitler at every other occasion.

    Does the US have laws for that too?
  34. Profile photo of shadowtroop
    shadowtroop Male 13-17
    2 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 2:56 am
    f I had been the person writing the names on the birth certificate, I would have just laughed and said no, then tell them to chose a new one. I hope the nurses at least said something to the parents about how horrible they are.

    The last time my mom had a kid, we wrote the name on the paper ourselves. I don`t think nurses write the names out now.
  35. Profile photo of ChainsawNbud
    ChainsawNbud Male 50-59
    741 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 5:21 am
    Personally I`d rather live next door to a child named Adolph Hitler than have to sit at a table in a restaurant next to somebody`s precious spawn of Satan named Tiffany or Hunter or Madison or Tyler.
  36. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 5:54 am
    I don`t agree with the names, but taking their kids away for it is wrong. They should go to federal court over this.
  37. Profile photo of pompousass7
    pompousass7 Male 40-49
    259 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 5:58 am
    they let kids be named mohammed?? they let them be named jesus..what is the big deal? can list a name from every nationality that shouldn`t be used by that logic, russian, jewish, chinese, and american
  38. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 5:58 am
    They should take away kids from their parents when they get named Orangello; D`nasty; La4sha; etc.
  39. Profile photo of RevWubby
    RevWubby Male 30-39
    64 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 6:34 am
    A good portion of the world is named after a child molester. If Muhammad is an ok name, Adolf Hitler is fine, too.

    The violence in the home, though, is a good reason to take the kids.
  40. Profile photo of Corpsecrank
    Corpsecrank Male 30-39
    930 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 8:02 am
    You won`t hear me complain about someone naming their kid that. I am not offended. I do however think that the parents are morons for naming the kid that. But the minute a parent can not name their child anything they want we have officially lost all freedom.
  41. Profile photo of aliyahg1979
    aliyahg1979 Female 30-39
    254 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 8:31 am
    @TruTenrMan

    The Father has "white Power", "White Pride" and swastikas all over his body. Along with "Heil Hitler" there is no mistake there...
  42. Profile photo of aliyahg1979
    aliyahg1979 Female 30-39
    254 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 8:34 am
    p.s. These parents of the year wanted Publix to put "happy Birthday Adolf Hitler" and swastikas on a birthday cake in a red, black, white and gold fashion.
  43. Profile photo of Satkela
    Satkela Female 18-29
    583 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 8:38 am
    Damn. I feel bad for the kids. Forever victimized because they have bad parents
  44. Profile photo of sidewyz8
    sidewyz8 Female 18-29
    843 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 9:06 am
    At least Adolph and Hans are legitimate names. But "Aryan Nation"? That`s just trying too hard.
  45. Profile photo of Brassbull
    Brassbull Male 30-39
    1610 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 9:33 am
    You can name your kids whatever you want, but there should be consequences if that name is gonna be seriously detrimental to the kid`s future. And before someone mentions Shaniqua or Starchild or something like that, those names are in no way guaranteed to have that effect. Names that obviously represent racist ideologies are, wand that ladies and gentleman, is abuse.
  46. Profile photo of M_Archer
    M_Archer Male 18-29
    525 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 10:07 am
    Being a Nazi isn`t illegal. They shouldn`t have lost custody.

    If the government can conclusively prove that physical harm is coming onto the child by the parents hand, by all means, take them away.

    I imagine the kids wouldn`t have been taken away if they were named "Franklin Delano Roosevelt". Even though I think FDR is one of the most evil presidents in history, as long as no physical harm was coming onto the child, I would fight to my death for their right to name him that.

    Besides, he can always change his name when he turns eighteen, or insist that people refer to him by something that isn`t his legal name.
  47. Profile photo of insane_ai
    insane_ai Male 30-39
    823 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 10:09 am
    I think its time to assasinate the a-holes in childrens` services that took ehte kids. kidnapping deserves no less than death.
  48. Profile photo of LordJim
    LordJim Male 60-69
    7064 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 11:07 am
    How are people missing the fact that the children were removed because of domestic violence? The stupid names just get a mundane case on the news.
  49. Profile photo of chance13
    chance13 Male 40-49
    219 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 11:43 am
    d o m e s t i c v i o l e n c e . . .

    It had nothing to do with the names...good lord. The problem with our culture is that we hear only the parts of something we want to hear...honestly, if you actually listen to the whole thing, it becomes obvious.
  50. Profile photo of RecycleElf
    RecycleElf Male 18-29
    3621 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 12:01 pm
    YEEeaaah those two look like the geneticaly superior race that will protect europe from asia. totaly. not inbred-looking at all.
  51. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33117 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 4:10 pm
    Yes, domestic violence is the excuse used, but Child`s Services OFTEN return kids to unspeakable conditions, so the real reason is: they`re Nazis.

    Pheonix Sinclair
    Warning: Not for the faint of heart, it`s a sickening story of horrific abuse. Even more sickeing is hearing a defense lawyer calling it "horseplay"...

    Anyhow, this precious little girl was returned to her mother, way to go CFS!
  52. Profile photo of carlsagan
    carlsagan Male 18-29
    139 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 4:44 pm
    Naming your kid Mohammad, Gaddafi, Adolph Hitler is just asking for there child to be bullied through life, it`s harder for the kid to excell in education when there is bias judgement based on names, it`s already happening to alot of people who are named after muslims, and other popular negative inconvient names in history. If your last name was kennedy, people would assume you are related to the Kennedys and you have a family curse on you because of that name. But seriously, wake up, if you named your kid Osama Laden / Binladen. People would really be irritated. Don`t name your kid after your terrorist heros. It`s just plain stupid. You want your kid to excell and someday become president and bring true change.
  53. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3431 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 7:03 pm
    We really should just off them dumb asses.
  54. Profile photo of FeelTheRide
    FeelTheRide Female 18-29
    515 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 9:51 pm
    5Cats...that is so horrifying!
  55. Profile photo of xCYBERDYNEx
    xCYBERDYNEx Male 18-29
    4903 posts
    November 24, 2011 at 1:31 am
    Child protective services are a f*cking joke. As are these idiotic people.
  56. Profile photo of icklevamp
    icklevamp Female 18-29
    375 posts
    November 24, 2011 at 3:33 am
    "Naming your kid Mohammad, Gaddafi, Adolph Hitler is just asking for there child to be bullied through life, it`s harder for the kid to excell in education when there is bias judgement based on names"

    Mohammed?? Are you kidding? That`s one of if not the most popular name in the world! It`s like saying we should ban the name John because some dude called John was a bit of an idiot. Your ignorance is astounding.
  57. Profile photo of JetPink
    JetPink Female 18-29
    61 posts
    November 24, 2011 at 7:04 am
    Names are important. So choose wisely. These children may be outcast because of their parents brilliancy. In the end, if you don`t have much, at least you have your good name. ;)
  58. Profile photo of Zed68
    Zed68 Male 40-49
    1015 posts
    November 24, 2011 at 9:35 am
    "How are people missing the fact that the children were removed because of domestic violence? The stupid names just get a mundane case on the news."

    The names ARE a case of domestic violence btw. How do you expect children with such names to have a normal life ????

Leave a Reply