Mom Upset By Childrens` Crotchless Panties

Submitted by: floydevans 5 years ago

...crotchless panties for children? Well, they were being sold in a childrens" clothes shop.
There are 72 comments:
Female 2,289
Crotchless panties = laziness.
0
Reply
Female 535
We must acknowledge that teens are sexual animals that phuck. They`ll make it up as they go along anyway.. unless of course they`re scared to death because "YOU" don`t educate them properly. As parents there is very little "you` have to teach children, but i guarantee you most of them will be phucking behind your back because you are all giant pussies afraid of crotchless underwear.
0
Reply
Female 535
People are still infantile and stupid.... way to go ozmose. Someone has to hail the glory of teens sexing up teens. It is underwear. There is no pedo sign on them that says "these are for use by underage girls to phuck adults," But by the way everyone is acting that is exactly what was done. Sorry if you didn`t get laid as a teen (like i did many times) but i think that underwear without a crotch isn`t going to change the world. We were phucking without them in stores marketed for us. But if a parent is going to have a healthier role as a sexual "rolemodel" (someone who`s phucked a lot and lived to tell of it with wisdom) i think perhaps the purchase of such things as toys and sexual apparel along with wise advice as to what it is to be a healthy "sexual animal" is less dangerous than what people here are doing.
0
Reply
Male 448
First of all I doubt they were sized to fit a little girl, just not this lady`s huge ass.
Second, when I was 16 my 15 year old girlfriend had crotchless panties, and it was awesome.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]How do adult men get inside a boardroom, decide what merchandise should be sold, and okays crotchless panties for children?[/quote]

Why are you assuming that happened?


Nobody okayed crotchless panties for children.

The board of directors for a business doesn`t directly do stock control for individual outlets anyway. That would be silly and impossible.
0
Reply
Male 139
I cannot comprehend how this even exists in a kids store, imagine if Toys-R-Us started selling sex toys, after it`s called Toys-R-Us, they did have that jar jar jinks sex doll for kids. The dementia of your Child`s innocent mind. nWo for all.
0
Reply
Female 155
How do adult men get inside a boardroom, decide what merchandise should be sold, and okays crotchless panties for children?
0
Reply
Female 437
OMG.. If i had have walked into a shop named `kids & teens` and seen this i would have started an uproar that would have the shop closed down! Why the hell did the manager/stock orderer(i know not a word)... think this was a good idea?
0
Reply
Male 2,384
people scold pedophiles yet there is this push to become a whore a such a young age, im not saying pedos should get off, but come on poo like this just encourages it
0
Reply
Female 355
If people think that woman is prude, I must be the biggest prude to walk the earth because I was sickened by the fact that they now sell padded bras for pre-teen girls.
0
Reply
Male 1,686
thats some f uhked up shh hit
0
Reply
Female 15
I have young girls and I wouldn`t want to see this walking into a store shopping with them... I have nothing against that kind of thing but it belongs in a different store that doesn`t have "Kids" in the name.
0
Reply
Female 418
*is a
0
Reply
Female 418
"...is so fail."

What the drat does that even mean?

And robosnitz in a perv in every post.
0
Reply
Female 17
i`m guessing the ppl saying this woman is a prude probably don`t have any kids themelves, or are child molesterds and like the pervert panties....
0
Reply
Male 928
"Why are people trying so hard to defend this?"

Mostly because the lady who made the complaint and did this news interview is so fail.
0
Reply
Male 2,737
What a prude.
0
Reply
Male 559
"Young children" is very much in the eye of the beholder. When I hear "young children" I think toddler to 10. Obviously, these are intended for high school kids. This is not a big deal.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
When kids go to a store, they don`t usually check out the underwear. The only way the kid would have even noticed this was if her aunt called it to her attention. So now I`m wondering, how did she explain the purpose of crotchless underwear to her young niece so that it would make her sick.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
mithraela: I agree with you...but there is a difference between educating them about sex and giving them sex toys and other goods for personal use...

why are people trying so hard to defend this? they tried to sell sex goods to minors...shun them like you would a black guy for trying to sell dope to a white kid...
0
Reply
Male 400
@mithraela
Female, 18-29, Western US



Well said
0
Reply
Male 4,902
Facepalm
0
Reply
Male 4,547
"It`s ok, we cater to teens too"

... has anyone informed their legal department that "If there`s grass on the field, play ball", is not genuine application of law.
0
Reply
Female 535
A pedo has sex with children... I don`t do that. I am only making a point about "real world" sexuality. We are in an era where people grow into adults "MENTALLY ILL" about sexuality because we still aren`t educating in a straight non-moralistic animal way. Human sexuality is as basic as the bodies and brains that live it. We can study animals and find their sexual habits to be so natural, but when it comes to humans the older people get the more mentally deficient "frightened" and outright ignorant otherwise healthy adults get. Call me a person who thinks "off" but having studied psychology for fifteen years starting with family counseling and progressing through human sexuality and paradigms. This forum is full of people reacting like ignorant "unhealthy minded" amateurs. There is a physiology and psychology to how sexuality "actually" works, and I "especially" won`t be concerned if you do not agree with me.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Come to think of it, how many teenagers would want to shop at a place called "Kids and Teens" anyway? Wouldn`t that would fall foul of the "I`m not a kid!" thing?
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]I`m still just lolling at how stupid the store owners were and how they possibly could have thought this was a good idea to sell in a kids/teens store. Teens don`t go to children`s stores to buy their thongs, they go to stores meant for women and buy Victoria`s Secret or La Senza[/quote]

Exactly. At that sort of age, people are generally pretty set on rejecting anything connected with childhood. It`s part of growing up, sort of a rite of passage.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
sidewyz8: id like the name of the failure of a life that you dated so i can turn him into proper authorities and have him register as a sex offender...

0
Reply
Male 14,773
Can`t they just pee out of them?
0
Reply
Male 907
The only ones who this would appeal to are pedos. The store owners are real rocket scientists.
0
Reply
Male 1,064
THIS IS A CHILDREN`S STORE!!!

...the stores name is "kids and teen"
they also cater to teens.
like, 18 year olds
0
Reply
Male 725
Do they also sell Ballz-Out Thongs?
0
Reply
Male 335
Heh, watch the dads face at 1:04....
0
Reply
Male 506
Is there actually a point to crotchless panties *other* than for sex?
0
Reply
Female 843
@collegebound, how what? How do teens get sex toys? It`s really not that difficult. When I was 16 I dated an 18-year-old guy who bought all kinds of sex toys for us. As I said before, there are plenty of older people who are low/creepy enough to buy these things for young girls.
(I mentioned this already in my other post, by the way. Helps to read the whole thing before flipping out)
0
Reply
Male 761
Midgets gotta get their panties somewhere too
0
Reply
Male 390
Kids and Teen? They only sell to one teen?
0
Reply
Male 1,311
I`ve been wearing those since I was 6.
0
Reply
Female 3,696
mithraela makes an argument like a creepy pedo "They wanted it, kids are highly sexual, they wanted me to touch them"
¬___¬
Whether or not that`s true, that doesn`t mean you should sell lingerie in a store where 75% of the merchandise is geared mostly to girls under 13. Self discovery is fine and all, but that seems randomly too far.

I`m still just lolling at how stupid the store owners were and how they possibly could have thought this was a good idea to sell in a kids/teens store. Teens don`t go to children`s stores to buy their thongs, they go to stores meant for women and buy Victoria`s Secret or La Senza
0
Reply
Male 411
"parents say they`re glad those panties have been removed."....Tequila works for me ;)
0
Reply
Male 771
wtf
0
Reply
Male 447
lol mithraela. Yeah adults get concerned when they see sexualized children`s cloths because they forgot how to be horny. You`ve hit the nail on the head. Sexy times indeed.
0
Reply
Female 535
So today i am gonna act like it`s my birthday and phuck myself all damn day... and i`ve done that in my own way since i was eight. The stupid stupid adults that get upset over this "panty thing" forget what it was like to be young and horny. More`s the loss for them, the frigid libido destroyers. I think the greatest concern in this is "not" that "children" are sexual, but that adults are "Less Sexual" than children and this makes them "twitchy". Do "you" remember how much sex and romance occupied your mind? EVen if you didn`t understand the mechanics it was built right into you to make tracks like the goddess Kali straight to some cute boy... and trample whoever is in the way. Oh, yeah, it was great being young. Especially when still learning all the potentials of the mouth. Yup. Sexy times.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
Gerry1of1: HA
0
Reply
Male 37,888

Well this is what happens when you let porn stars read to your children!
0
Reply
Female 2,927
trying to figure out what to include as merchandise? really? Id say if your demographic is kids n teens, crotchless panties would be an obvious
no. moron!
0
Reply
Male 3,745
LillianDulci: har har /)_(\
0
Reply
Female 535
Parents are just afraid their children will get laid more than them. Technically, though a person is an adult at onset of puberty. Yes, today`s laws are important because we no longer teach our "children" to be mature. They are actually young adults. We are animals and "all" animals are sexually mature at puberty (which hit me at twelve). So adults need to keep their phucking hands off, but you know what? The more understanding society is of sexuality and further away from non-natural principles the more it`ll be understood that they may be stupid as poo, but young people most def. want to drat like animals. I remember. I was one once, and i phucked like a rabbit. No, sorry, i phucked like a human, because i`m a goddamn animal and had that right.
0
Reply
Female 2,674
@collegebound - If you want people to be drating human beings, you`d sell these and other sex items at any store to anyone of any age :3
0
Reply
Male 3,745
sidewyz8: HOW!? unless there are other stores like this selling them to under age children without checking for ID the only way for them to get those items would be to steal them from their parents. at which point if they DO have them then, hey, they win....

ITS A SEX ITEM! PUT IT IN A SEX STORE WHERE IT BELONGS! CHECK FOR ID! BE A dratING HUMAN BEING
0
Reply
Male 2,416
Gerry1of1,
You`re right, i want to bitchslap parents sometimes when i see a 15 year old girl dressed as a streetwalker, on the other hand.. this is a kids/ teens store, so it shouldn`t be there.. (as i don`t think sextoy`s should be in a milkshop) and even if it`s for teens.. which sick f*cker designed that?
0
Reply
Male 1,526
She didn`t say crothchless panties like she pronounced the other clothes.
If she chooses to sound retarded at least be consistent and say chrotchless pantiiiiiiiiieeeees.
0
Reply
Male 3,061

0
Reply
Female 843
@collegebound, no they shouldn`t but, teens are going to get their hands on them one way or another. Like I said, teens are having sex at young ages now, we can`t just ignore that. This store wasn`t just "seeing what products they should sell", they put them out on purpose to attract today`s teens. Girls are going to get older friends/family/boyfriends, whoever, to buy stuff for them if ID is required.
0
Reply
Male 1,931
The basis of Capitalism is that what people want to buy, they buy. If they don`t want to buy it, don`t buy it. It`s that simple. Are the panties in poor taste for selling? You`re damn right. But it is not the consumers place to tell the business what they can and can not sell.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
Gerry1of1: i agree with you...but why the kcuf would they be sold in a childrens shop anyway? you are supposed to show ID just to buy things like that anyway...
0
Reply
Male 37,888

Don`t like them? Don`t buy them for your kids.
Don`t want your teenager to wear them, throw them out.
Yeah, the idea was stupid, but how about parents take charge and take
responsability for what is in their home and what their children do & wear.

0
Reply
Female 2,674
@wickedsngr - I think it`s dumb to sell them at anything but a sex shop, but this is a new shop and they removed the panties already. I don`t see the point of complaining when the problem`s already been fixed and when it didn`t hurt anyone. My comment about them being intended for teens was because the mother implied they were intended for 7 year olds...
0
Reply
Male 526
only one use?

wouldn`t it be easier to use the bathroom? one less step.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
sidewyz8: they shouldn`t be sold to teens at all...

for those of you who dont seem to know... crotch-less panties are a sex accessory...meaning they are only to be sold to people who are 18 and/or older THAT SHOW ID...
0
Reply
Female 843
Hey, it just makes peeing quicker and easier.

But seriously, they said the panties were meant for teens, and there`s no denying that teens have sex at young ages now, but clothing like that shouldn`t be sold in the same store that sells little kids clothes. Or at least have a warning out front, like Spencer`s
0
Reply
Female 1,652
Did they miss the blowup pedobear dolls?
0
Reply
Male 3,745
LillianDulci: troll on woman...
0
Reply
Female 457
@LillianDulci: Really? You think they`re appropriate to sell even to teens (btw, I really doubt by looking at the store, that anyone over the age of 15 would shop there)? Oh yes, let`s encourage those little skanks to start early! Any parent that would buy this for their daughter, should have their parenting license revoked.
0
Reply
Male 1,268
Pedobear has been busy since the Chris Hanson incident.

This is just capitalism at work, yo.
0
Reply
Male 3,745
even teens shouldn`t wear that poo...wtf is wrong with people...
0
Reply
Female 246
Jesus....
who would even by those for their teenager?
0
Reply
Female 457
This is like 42 different kinds of wrong.
0
Reply
Female 2,674
Outraged even after they removed them? And it`s not called Kids it`s called Kids N Teens. I doubt those were intended for 7 year olds.
0
Reply
Male 6,737
Start `em young.
0
Reply
Male 1,216
Maybe it was for midgets?
0
Reply
Male 19,842
Say `panties` again.
0
Reply
Female 168
Link: Mom Upset By Childrens` Crotchless Panties [Rate Link] - ...crotchless panties for children? Well, they were being sold in a childrens` clothes shop.
0
Reply