Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 21    Average: 2.9/5]
72 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 12022
Rating: 2.9
Category:
Date: 11/17/11 11:27 AM

72 Responses to Mom Upset By Childrens` Crotchless Panties

  1. Profile photo of floydevans
    floydevans Female 13-17
    168 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:29 am
    Link: Mom Upset By Childrens` Crotchless Panties - ...crotchless panties for children? Well, they were being sold in a childrens` clothes shop.
  2. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18502 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:32 am
    Say `panties` again.
  3. Profile photo of NNoamfer
    NNoamfer Male 18-29
    1216 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:35 am
    Maybe it was for midgets?
  4. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:35 am
    Start `em young.
  5. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:38 am
    Outraged even after they removed them? And it`s not called Kids it`s called Kids N Teens. I doubt those were intended for 7 year olds.
  6. Profile photo of wickedsngr
    wickedsngr Female 18-29
    457 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:39 am
    This is like 42 different kinds of wrong.
  7. Profile photo of Mizzez2Fresh
    Mizzez2Fresh Female 18-29
    246 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:41 am
    Jesus....
    who would even by those for their teenager?
  8. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:41 am
    even teens shouldn`t wear that poo...wtf is wrong with people...
  9. Profile photo of Scuzoid
    Scuzoid Male 30-39
    1268 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:43 am
    Pedobear has been busy since the Chris Hanson incident.

    This is just capitalism at work, yo.
  10. Profile photo of wickedsngr
    wickedsngr Female 18-29
    457 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:44 am
    @LillianDulci: Really? You think they`re appropriate to sell even to teens (btw, I really doubt by looking at the store, that anyone over the age of 15 would shop there)? Oh yes, let`s encourage those little skanks to start early! Any parent that would buy this for their daughter, should have their parenting license revoked.
  11. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:45 am
    LillianDulci: troll on woman...
  12. Profile photo of Mweebles
    Mweebles Female 18-29
    1653 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:48 am
    Did they miss the blowup pedobear dolls?
  13. Profile photo of sidewyz8
    sidewyz8 Female 18-29
    843 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:51 am
    Hey, it just makes peeing quicker and easier.

    But seriously, they said the panties were meant for teens, and there`s no denying that teens have sex at young ages now, but clothing like that shouldn`t be sold in the same store that sells little kids clothes. Or at least have a warning out front, like Spencer`s
  14. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:54 am
    sidewyz8: they shouldn`t be sold to teens at all...

    for those of you who dont seem to know... crotch-less panties are a sex accessory...meaning they are only to be sold to people who are 18 and/or older THAT SHOW ID...
  15. Profile photo of PhotoKing
    PhotoKing Male 30-39
    526 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:56 am
    only one use?

    wouldn`t it be easier to use the bathroom? one less step.
  16. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:03 pm
    @wickedsngr - I think it`s dumb to sell them at anything but a sex shop, but this is a new shop and they removed the panties already. I don`t see the point of complaining when the problem`s already been fixed and when it didn`t hurt anyone. My comment about them being intended for teens was because the mother implied they were intended for 7 year olds...
  17. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36198 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    Don`t like them? Don`t buy them for your kids.
    Don`t want your teenager to wear them, throw them out.
    Yeah, the idea was stupid, but how about parents take charge and take
    responsability for what is in their home and what their children do & wear.

  18. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:06 pm
    Gerry1of1: i agree with you...but why the kcuf would they be sold in a childrens shop anyway? you are supposed to show ID just to buy things like that anyway...
  19. Profile photo of ggolbez
    ggolbez Male 18-29
    1933 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:07 pm
    The basis of Capitalism is that what people want to buy, they buy. If they don`t want to buy it, don`t buy it. It`s that simple. Are the panties in poor taste for selling? You`re damn right. But it is not the consumers place to tell the business what they can and can not sell.
  20. Profile photo of sidewyz8
    sidewyz8 Female 18-29
    843 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:09 pm
    @collegebound, no they shouldn`t but, teens are going to get their hands on them one way or another. Like I said, teens are having sex at young ages now, we can`t just ignore that. This store wasn`t just "seeing what products they should sell", they put them out on purpose to attract today`s teens. Girls are going to get older friends/family/boyfriends, whoever, to buy stuff for them if ID is required.
  21. Profile photo of bacon_pie
    bacon_pie Male 30-39
    3061 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:15 pm

  22. Profile photo of Ajikan
    Ajikan Male 18-29
    1526 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:25 pm
    She didn`t say crothchless panties like she pronounced the other clothes.
    If she chooses to sound retarded at least be consistent and say chrotchless pantiiiiiiiiieeeees.
  23. Profile photo of MrOrange
    MrOrange Male 30-39
    2398 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:36 pm
    Gerry1of1,
    You`re right, i want to bitchslap parents sometimes when i see a 15 year old girl dressed as a streetwalker, on the other hand.. this is a kids/ teens store, so it shouldn`t be there.. (as i don`t think sextoy`s should be in a milkshop) and even if it`s for teens.. which sick f*cker designed that?
  24. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:37 pm
    sidewyz8: HOW!? unless there are other stores like this selling them to under age children without checking for ID the only way for them to get those items would be to steal them from their parents. at which point if they DO have them then, hey, they win....

    ITS A SEX ITEM! PUT IT IN A SEX STORE WHERE IT BELONGS! CHECK FOR ID! BE A dratING HUMAN BEING
  25. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:39 pm
    @collegebound - If you want people to be drating human beings, you`d sell these and other sex items at any store to anyone of any age :3
  26. Profile photo of mithraela
    mithraela Female 18-29
    535 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:42 pm
    Parents are just afraid their children will get laid more than them. Technically, though a person is an adult at onset of puberty. Yes, today`s laws are important because we no longer teach our "children" to be mature. They are actually young adults. We are animals and "all" animals are sexually mature at puberty (which hit me at twelve). So adults need to keep their phucking hands off, but you know what? The more understanding society is of sexuality and further away from non-natural principles the more it`ll be understood that they may be stupid as poo, but young people most def. want to drat like animals. I remember. I was one once, and i phucked like a rabbit. No, sorry, i phucked like a human, because i`m a goddamn animal and had that right.
  27. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:43 pm
    LillianDulci: har har /)_(\
  28. Profile photo of jinxiejae
    jinxiejae Female 30-39
    2928 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:46 pm
    trying to figure out what to include as merchandise? really? Id say if your demographic is kids n teens, crotchless panties would be an obvious
    no. moron!
  29. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36198 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    Well this is what happens when you let porn stars read to your children!
  30. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:58 pm
    Gerry1of1: HA
  31. Profile photo of mithraela
    mithraela Female 18-29
    535 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 12:58 pm
    So today i am gonna act like it`s my birthday and phuck myself all damn day... and i`ve done that in my own way since i was eight. The stupid stupid adults that get upset over this "panty thing" forget what it was like to be young and horny. More`s the loss for them, the frigid libido destroyers. I think the greatest concern in this is "not" that "children" are sexual, but that adults are "Less Sexual" than children and this makes them "twitchy". Do "you" remember how much sex and romance occupied your mind? EVen if you didn`t understand the mechanics it was built right into you to make tracks like the goddess Kali straight to some cute boy... and trample whoever is in the way. Oh, yeah, it was great being young. Especially when still learning all the potentials of the mouth. Yup. Sexy times.
  32. Profile photo of tvremote
    tvremote Male 18-29
    447 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 1:11 pm
    lol mithraela. Yeah adults get concerned when they see sexualized children`s cloths because they forgot how to be horny. You`ve hit the nail on the head. Sexy times indeed.
  33. Profile photo of YANKmyDOODLE
    YANKmyDOODLE Male 30-39
    771 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 1:14 pm
    wtf
  34. Profile photo of MightyPeanut
    MightyPeanut Male 30-39
    411 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 1:20 pm
    "parents say they`re glad those panties have been removed."....Tequila works for me ;)
  35. Profile photo of Swaywithme
    Swaywithme Female 18-29
    3696 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 1:50 pm
    mithraela makes an argument like a creepy pedo "They wanted it, kids are highly sexual, they wanted me to touch them"
    ¬___¬
    Whether or not that`s true, that doesn`t mean you should sell lingerie in a store where 75% of the merchandise is geared mostly to girls under 13. Self discovery is fine and all, but that seems randomly too far.

    I`m still just lolling at how stupid the store owners were and how they possibly could have thought this was a good idea to sell in a kids/teens store. Teens don`t go to children`s stores to buy their thongs, they go to stores meant for women and buy Victoria`s Secret or La Senza
  36. Profile photo of Ripper398
    Ripper398 Male 18-29
    1310 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 1:52 pm
    I`ve been wearing those since I was 6.
  37. Profile photo of elderban
    elderban Male 30-39
    390 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 2:13 pm
    Kids and Teen? They only sell to one teen?
  38. Profile photo of Ant0n
    Ant0n Male 18-29
    761 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 2:36 pm
    Midgets gotta get their panties somewhere too
  39. Profile photo of sidewyz8
    sidewyz8 Female 18-29
    843 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 2:57 pm
    @collegebound, how what? How do teens get sex toys? It`s really not that difficult. When I was 16 I dated an 18-year-old guy who bought all kinds of sex toys for us. As I said before, there are plenty of older people who are low/creepy enough to buy these things for young girls.
    (I mentioned this already in my other post, by the way. Helps to read the whole thing before flipping out)
  40. Profile photo of Ruffiana
    Ruffiana Male 30-39
    506 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 2:59 pm
    Is there actually a point to crotchless panties *other* than for sex?
  41. Profile photo of InTheNameOf
    InTheNameOf Male 30-39
    335 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 3:13 pm
    Heh, watch the dads face at 1:04....
  42. Profile photo of propagandi
    propagandi Male 40-49
    726 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 3:36 pm
    Do they also sell Ballz-Out Thongs?
  43. Profile photo of PacoP42
    PacoP42 Male 13-17
    1064 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 4:23 pm
    THIS IS A CHILDREN`S STORE!!!

    ...the stores name is "kids and teen"
    they also cater to teens.
    like, 18 year olds
  44. Profile photo of bordo
    bordo Male 50-59
    907 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 4:37 pm
    The only ones who this would appeal to are pedos. The store owners are real rocket scientists.
  45. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14544 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 6:11 pm
    Can`t they just pee out of them?
  46. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 6:17 pm
    sidewyz8: id like the name of the failure of a life that you dated so i can turn him into proper authorities and have him register as a sex offender...

  47. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 6:18 pm
    I`m still just lolling at how stupid the store owners were and how they possibly could have thought this was a good idea to sell in a kids/teens store. Teens don`t go to children`s stores to buy their thongs, they go to stores meant for women and buy Victoria`s Secret or La Senza

    Exactly. At that sort of age, people are generally pretty set on rejecting anything connected with childhood. It`s part of growing up, sort of a rite of passage.
  48. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 6:24 pm
    Come to think of it, how many teenagers would want to shop at a place called "Kids and Teens" anyway? Wouldn`t that would fall foul of the "I`m not a kid!" thing?
  49. Profile photo of mithraela
    mithraela Female 18-29
    535 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 8:48 pm
    A pedo has sex with children... I don`t do that. I am only making a point about "real world" sexuality. We are in an era where people grow into adults "MENTALLY ILL" about sexuality because we still aren`t educating in a straight non-moralistic animal way. Human sexuality is as basic as the bodies and brains that live it. We can study animals and find their sexual habits to be so natural, but when it comes to humans the older people get the more mentally deficient "frightened" and outright ignorant otherwise healthy adults get. Call me a person who thinks "off" but having studied psychology for fifteen years starting with family counseling and progressing through human sexuality and paradigms. This forum is full of people reacting like ignorant "unhealthy minded" amateurs. There is a physiology and psychology to how sexuality "actually" works, and I "especially" won`t be concerned if you do not agree with me.
  50. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 9:32 pm
    "It`s ok, we cater to teens too"

    ... has anyone informed their legal department that "If there`s grass on the field, play ball", is not genuine application of law.
  51. Profile photo of xCYBERDYNEx
    xCYBERDYNEx Male 18-29
    4903 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 10:46 pm
    Facepalm
  52. Profile photo of PoopNoodle
    PoopNoodle Male 40-49
    400 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:46 pm
    @mithraela
    Female, 18-29, Western US



    Well said
  53. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:54 pm
    mithraela: I agree with you...but there is a difference between educating them about sex and giving them sex toys and other goods for personal use...

    why are people trying so hard to defend this? they tried to sell sex goods to minors...shun them like you would a black guy for trying to sell dope to a white kid...
  54. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    November 17, 2011 at 11:57 pm
    When kids go to a store, they don`t usually check out the underwear. The only way the kid would have even noticed this was if her aunt called it to her attention. So now I`m wondering, how did she explain the purpose of crotchless underwear to her young niece so that it would make her sick.
  55. Profile photo of evanbartlett
    evanbartlett Male 30-39
    559 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 12:06 am
    "Young children" is very much in the eye of the beholder. When I hear "young children" I think toddler to 10. Obviously, these are intended for high school kids. This is not a big deal.
  56. Profile photo of robosnitz
    robosnitz Male 40-49
    2737 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 3:00 am
    What a prude.
  57. Profile photo of Corpsecrank
    Corpsecrank Male 30-39
    930 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 6:03 am
    "Why are people trying so hard to defend this?"

    Mostly because the lady who made the complaint and did this news interview is so fail.
  58. Profile photo of savapenne
    savapenne Female 18-29
    17 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 9:41 am
    i`m guessing the ppl saying this woman is a prude probably don`t have any kids themelves, or are child molesterds and like the pervert panties....
  59. Profile photo of sweatpeanis
    sweatpeanis Female 18-29
    418 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 11:44 am
    "...is so fail."

    What the drat does that even mean?

    And robosnitz in a perv in every post.
  60. Profile photo of sweatpeanis
    sweatpeanis Female 18-29
    418 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 11:44 am
    *is a
  61. Profile photo of vaalkyr
    vaalkyr Female 18-29
    15 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 3:01 pm
    I have young girls and I wouldn`t want to see this walking into a store shopping with them... I have nothing against that kind of thing but it belongs in a different store that doesn`t have "Kids" in the name.
  62. Profile photo of earthshone
    earthshone Male 18-29
    1688 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 6:34 pm
    thats some f uhked up shh hit
  63. Profile photo of PinkHomicide
    PinkHomicide Female 18-29
    355 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 8:30 pm
    If people think that woman is prude, I must be the biggest prude to walk the earth because I was sickened by the fact that they now sell padded bras for pre-teen girls.
  64. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 9:51 pm
    people scold pedophiles yet there is this push to become a whore a such a young age, im not saying pedos should get off, but come on poo like this just encourages it
  65. Profile photo of Lauryn
    Lauryn Female 18-29
    437 posts
    November 18, 2011 at 10:41 pm
    OMG.. If i had have walked into a shop named `kids & teens` and seen this i would have started an uproar that would have the shop closed down! Why the hell did the manager/stock orderer(i know not a word)... think this was a good idea?
  66. Profile photo of tacks
    tacks Female 18-29
    155 posts
    November 19, 2011 at 7:43 pm
    How do adult men get inside a boardroom, decide what merchandise should be sold, and okays crotchless panties for children?
  67. Profile photo of carlsagan
    carlsagan Male 18-29
    139 posts
    November 19, 2011 at 9:10 pm
    I cannot comprehend how this even exists in a kids store, imagine if Toys-R-Us started selling sex toys, after it`s called Toys-R-Us, they did have that jar jar jinks sex doll for kids. The dementia of your Child`s innocent mind. nWo for all.
  68. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    November 20, 2011 at 8:42 am
    How do adult men get inside a boardroom, decide what merchandise should be sold, and okays crotchless panties for children?

    Why are you assuming that happened?


    Nobody okayed crotchless panties for children.

    The board of directors for a business doesn`t directly do stock control for individual outlets anyway. That would be silly and impossible.
  69. Profile photo of Ozmose
    Ozmose Male 30-39
    448 posts
    November 20, 2011 at 10:06 am
    First of all I doubt they were sized to fit a little girl, just not this lady`s huge ass.
    Second, when I was 16 my 15 year old girlfriend had crotchless panties, and it was awesome.
  70. Profile photo of mithraela
    mithraela Female 18-29
    535 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 9:04 pm
    People are still infantile and stupid.... way to go ozmose. Someone has to hail the glory of teens sexing up teens. It is underwear. There is no pedo sign on them that says "these are for use by underage girls to phuck adults," But by the way everyone is acting that is exactly what was done. Sorry if you didn`t get laid as a teen (like i did many times) but i think that underwear without a crotch isn`t going to change the world. We were phucking without them in stores marketed for us. But if a parent is going to have a healthier role as a sexual "rolemodel" (someone who`s phucked a lot and lived to tell of it with wisdom) i think perhaps the purchase of such things as toys and sexual apparel along with wise advice as to what it is to be a healthy "sexual animal" is less dangerous than what people here are doing.
  71. Profile photo of mithraela
    mithraela Female 18-29
    535 posts
    November 22, 2011 at 9:05 pm
    We must acknowledge that teens are sexual animals that phuck. They`ll make it up as they go along anyway.. unless of course they`re scared to death because "YOU" don`t educate them properly. As parents there is very little "you` have to teach children, but i guarantee you most of them will be phucking behind your back because you are all giant pussies afraid of crotchless underwear.
  72. Profile photo of britt566
    britt566 Female 18-29
    2291 posts
    November 23, 2011 at 4:07 am
    Crotchless panties = laziness.

Leave a Reply