Michigan Declares Bullying OK Afterall

Submitted by: emAeye 5 years ago in
http://wonkette.com/455735/michigan-gop-approves-bullying-gay-kids-as-long-as-its-moral

Time to whip out the Prof. Farnsworth images.
There are 33 comments:
Male 39,614

Bullying laws are not needed.
Herassing, hitting people is already condemned behavior. All that was needed was for schools to stop tolerating it. In my day, the Coach turned his back and "didn`t see" when the guys would pick on the sissy kid. It would toughen the kid up! All the Coach has to do is turn around and stop the bullies. We don`t need Gov`ment to waste time and money on bad behavior that is already against law and school policies.
0
Reply
Female 7
Elkingo has a point. GOP is probably concerned that bullying laws will be used to suppress students who aren`t bullying. Like the five kids in california, who were sent home for wearing an american flag. Would he be punishable under the bullying laws? Is he victimizing someone by expressing his beliefs? One judge with a pet special interest could use this law to punish almost any behavior.
0
Reply
Female 2,927
i predict a few columbine incidents to happen in their near future.
0
Reply
Male 4,290
Also note that this exempts neonazi children who sincerely believe Jews to be an inferior race, or white supremacist children who are morally convinced that black people are subhuman.
0
Reply
Male 541
Anyone who `sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction` as the article says would know the bible in no way encourages the bullying of anyone. Jesus showed compassion towards "sinners" while bashing the hell out of religious nutjobs like the pharisees. That`s what these right-wing fundamentalist republicans essentially are; self-righteous, narrow-minded pharisees.
0
Reply
Male 5,189
Seems like humanity is becoming a pussy.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
Gerry -- I work in a elementary school in Kentucky. What I see is there needs to be regulations and laws regarding bullying. The whole point of this law was to try to protect religious groups, not try to protect religious groups from when they bully.

0
Reply
Male 39,614

P.S. I`m not a proponant of anti-bullying legislation. Assault is already illegal, we don`t need these laws. But if you are going to have one, you can`t slip in a clause making it okay to single out one group for bullying.
0
Reply
Male 39,614

elkingo - [quote]"Why do you have to designate it as "gay-bashing"? Why can`t it be simply: making anyone feel inferior deserves the same punishment?" [/quote]
Agreed, it `should` be making anyone feel like that, but Matt`s law makes it a smaller crime to do it to gays. I didn`t single out gays, the conservative republitards did. They didn`t say it`s okay if you hit women, or people of other colors, just the ones they have a religioius agenda against i.e. sinful gays.

I`m a gay republican and I endorse this message.
0
Reply
Male 207
Stop the world. I want to get off.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
I see what is going on here...

If a Christian says to someone, "I believe being gay will send you to Hell." That is within their rights as an American -- which is what the people who voted were trying to say.

It is not the same thing as a Christian saying, "You stupid faggot, your going to burn in hell with all the other faggots." That is bullying.

I think what we are talking about here is semantics.

In other words, if my religious beliefs offend you, authorities should react the same way towards your beliefs on sexuality. We simply have so bonafide morons deciding how to implement interpretations.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
"That gay-bashing would not carry as stiff a penalty as bullying anyone else."

Why do you have to designate it as "gay-bashing"? Why can`t it be simply: making anyone feel inferior deserves the same punishment?

I think what people who voted for this law felt, was that it made it an ultimatum. You are either allowed to bash gays or the religious. I say you shouldn`t be allowed to bully anyone; for any reason.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
Gerry -- You may find this hard to believe, but I am a Christian, and a Republican.

I have no problem with gay people, at all. In fact, one of my closest assistants is a lesbian. She is also one of my close friends.

I am a strong proponent for anti-bullying as well. The problem is that our elected idiots do not know how to use word effectively.

I say, prayer (of any religion, bophus, not just MY faith) is not bullying in the schools; or public for that matter.

I also say, that making someone feel inferior is bullying.

At the same time, voicing your opinion is a constitutional right. I may not agree with the idiots that condemn homosexuality, but I defend their right to condemn it vocally.

When that right goes beyond vocalizing your opinion, to making someone feel like less of a human being, you are nothing more than a bully; and religion has nothing to do with it.


I hope that clears things up a bit.
0
Reply
Male 525
I read the article again, and that paragraph and the end confirms conclusively that there`s MASSIVE context dropping going on here.

Don`t take for granted everything you read, folks.
0
Reply
Male 525
There must be some context that we`re missing here; I have a hard time the people voting said "kids have a right to bully others"--there must be a real reason.

When it comes to any bullying that is not physical or that has the plausible threat of physical violence, it`s completely subjective; anyone can say that they`re a victim of any kind of bullying. Hell, "hurting someone`s feelings" is a kind of bullying.

I guess that if "bullying" was made illegal, the burden of proof would be on the defendant to prove that he didn`t hurt the person`s feelings.

And I don`t buy the "they caused him to commit suicide argument". If you`ve seen the "I can`t get the cap off" scene from that TV movie, you know what I mean.

Hurting someone`s feelings shouldn`t be a crime and I think this is what the guys at Michigan are thinking too. Could be wrong, though.
0
Reply
Male 497
@elkingo

So would that mean since they will allow christians to pray, they will also allow muslims, satanists, jews, etc. the same time to pray without fear of being bullied?

i dont think giving everyone those same rights was the intention here.
0
Reply
Female 27
@ctobin34 "Wonkette has as much credibility as The Onion."

This leads me to believe that you`re inferring that the article posted is somehow not factual...

So, here, from the Michigan Daily:
No Excuses for Bullying
0
Reply
Male 381

0
Reply
Male 39,614

[quote]"praying in school is NOT bullying others." [/quote]
No one said it was. That`s just a smoke screen arguement to distract from the actual issue. That gay-bashing would not carry as stiff a penalty as bullying anyone else. It`s morally okay to gay-bash.

Anyone who cannot comprehend why that is wrong should not be allowed to breed. They can`t be trusted around impressionable children.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
Ah yes.. Democrats misrepresenting the intent of Republicans.

"exempt kids with a “sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction”"

Which means.. praying in school is NOT bullying others. The law is not necessarily saying that saying "being gay is morally wrong because Jesus says so" is right.
0
Reply
Male 15,187
We can now beat Christians in Michigan! Allah be braised.
0
Reply
Male 39,614

I have a deeply held religious belief...that all christians should be pummeled.
Give`m the gift of Martyrdom.
0
Reply
Male 7,817
I f*cking hate the idiots in my state.
0
Reply
Male 66
Wonkette has as much credibility as The Onion.
0
Reply
Male 612
thank god.
my freedom of speech should allow me to call someone who is obviously overweight "fat"
0
Reply
Male 66
lol, whats really funny is that everyone posting about this is sounding like their taking "The Wonkette" to be a legitimate news source. Bahh Bahh
0
Reply
Male 403
This means that anyone not christian is entitled to bully christians too, as long it`s a moral conviction. Open season!
0
Reply
Male 10,440
I thought that bill would be thrown out because of the change.

I was wrong.

Voted down by every democrat, yet still passes 26 to 11. Interesting.

How backward can you get? Apparently, completely backward. This really does look like a 180 degree, perfect step in reverse for social development.

Not to bash all of America here, as that is what 50% of the posts on this site seem to be doing, but don`t move to Michigan, for it is an intolerant sh*thole akin to the middle east.
0
Reply
Male 403
This means that anyone not christian is entitled to bully christians too, as long it`s a moral conviction. Open season!
0
Reply
Male 1,582
That`s my state for you =D
0
Reply
Male 3,369
This doesn`t make sense. Since most conservatives who makes hating gays a big part of their life are closet-gays themselves, why would they do this? So much for "love the neighbor".
0
Reply
Male 260
Agreed.
0
Reply
Female 27
Link: Michigan Declares Bullying OK Afterall [Rate Link] - Time to whip out the Prof. Farnsworth images.
0
Reply