Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 32    Average: 3.8/5]
18 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 9343
Rating: 3.8
Category: Funny
Date: 10/31/11 08:51 AM

18 Responses to How To Keep Wall Street Occupied

  1. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    October 30, 2011 at 2:41 pm
    Link: How To Keep Wall Street Occupied - How to protest from the comfort of your own home.
  2. Profile photo of Crabes
    Crabes Male 30-39
    1285 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 8:59 am
    ok ill start doing that lol
  3. Profile photo of burbclaver
    burbclaver Male 50-59
    878 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 9:12 am
    Except it doesn`t cost them 20c. It costs us when they raise bank charges to pay for it. I`m thinking of doing it anyway, because I am sick of the tons of junk mail that comes to my mailbox. At least it would mean more revenue for US Mail.
  4. Profile photo of Draculya
    Draculya Male 40-49
    14455 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 9:18 am
    I thought you are meant to send a chicken drumstick.
  5. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 9:26 am
    What do you really think the Banks response will be if their cost to solicit new credit accounts went up?

    A big meeting that to discuss the demand of OWS that their student loans be forgiven or a change in the cost of credit?
  6. Profile photo of M_Archer
    M_Archer Male 18-29
    525 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 9:33 am
    I don`t think it will be easy to occupy from your own home.

    I mean, I GUESS you could pay someone to urinate on, vandalize, and block traffic on the street in your stead--but it`s not the same...
  7. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17516 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 9:37 am
    Having worked at a bank`s lock-box mail room, I can honestly tell you, this will do nothing but aggravate some low-wage employees.

    The job is simple find `the document`, and if it has one, a payment/check. The rest will be tossed in a bin and then re-searched for missing checks and then thrown out.

    No higher-up will see the junk you mailed them, they might notice the higher mailing bill, but that`s about all. In the end all you will do is make a low-wage earners job more difficult, there will be no meeting.
  8. Profile photo of morimacil123
    morimacil123 Male 18-29
    171 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 9:56 am
    It also has another positive side effect:
    You get blacklisted.

    Im pretty sure banks have that system too. At least Im 100% sure it works for phone spam, so theres a good chance it will too for mail spam.

    For phone spam, if a company calls you to offer you some awesome deal, and you start chatting to them about your life, and problems, or tell them to "please hold" and put down the receiver next to your racdio to play them a little music, or anything like that, pretty soon they realize that you are not a customer that they ever want to call again, and so they blacklist you. Incidentally, they share blacklists with other companies, so that once you do that enough, no one is ever calling you again to try to sell you something.
    Pretty sure it would work the same for mail spam, eventually, youd stop gettoing spammed.
  9. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    35676 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 10:25 am

    They have to hire a person to process the mail so you at least kept someone employed.
    Plus the Postal Service is in bad shape so it helps them out as well...more jobs.
  10. Profile photo of Klamz
    Klamz Male 18-29
    689 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 10:32 am
    Roofing shingles LOL!
  11. Profile photo of CaptKangaroo
    CaptKangaroo Male 50-59
    2285 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 11:44 am
    Funny, but flawed logic. Even if news of such goings on made it out of the mail room, the `manipulate mortgages to screw people out of their homes` department would not be affected, nor would the lobbyists.
    And wait and see how fast them thar lobbyists convince the Justice Department that unauthorized `rigid mail` is a threat to national security.
  12. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25350 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 12:39 pm
    Is this going anywhere? is wall street actually responding?
  13. Profile photo of savemejebus
    savemejebus Female 30-39
    143 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 12:52 pm
    Since non violent protesting only gets us arrested, maced, tazed and beaten... this is the way to go. I`ll gladly be put on their blacklist, as I don`t give a $hit.
  14. Profile photo of Arcval
    Arcval Male 18-29
    304 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 1:13 pm
    Any good business keeps a close eye on there expenses, and seeing one of them rise rapidly will always catch there attention as they want to make sure it doesn`t become a problem. Then they`ll ask the mail room guys wtf is making there costs go up suddenly, hence getting there attention on the OWS mail being sent to them at there expense.
  15. Profile photo of cleanergirl
    cleanergirl Female 30-39
    109 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 3:36 pm
    Might be worth it just to get blacklisted, if that`s a possibility - I get SO many of those CC offers, at least three per day.
  16. Profile photo of patticakes
    patticakes Female 18-29
    458 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 7:16 pm
    Stoopid. First of all, the banks were threatened by Janet Reno of the Clinton administration to make loans to people they knew couldn`t pay them back. Secondly, after paying all there postage fees, the banks will just pass the cost on to the customers. What do you think they will do?! OWS is a jacked up pointless temper tantrum from spoiled kids.
  17. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15845 posts
    October 31, 2011 at 10:58 pm
    Of course, one of those banks could simply trash his credit rating, and that would stop ALL of those pesky unwanted credit card offers. Problem solved!
  18. Profile photo of grimfusion
    grimfusion Male 18-29
    73 posts
    November 1, 2011 at 6:39 pm
    This really isn`t a good idea. If the banks who issue the credit card applications refuse to pay postage, it leaves the US Postal Service with the bill. They`re already hurting.

    Replying with a note is dandy, but filling the envelope to capacity just to weight down postage hurts the very system you depend on to ensure the banks "catch your drift".

Leave a Reply