Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 30    Average: 3/5]
37 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 10622
Rating: 3
Category: Weird
Date: 09/12/11 12:02 PM

37 Responses to The Professional Russian Is Back! With A Rifle!

  1. Profile photo of Fwoggie2
    Fwoggie2 Male 30-39
    1803 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 12:03 pm
    Link: The Professional Russian Is Back! With A Rifle! - Professional Russian has ditched his flame thrower and is now using a sniper rifle... Damn, this weapon does damage.
  2. Profile photo of Toider
    Toider Male 18-29
    452 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 12:23 pm
    Jesus, that .338 lapua sounds like a damn tank round.
  3. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 12:32 pm
    It isn`t the rifle causing the explosions. The things he shoots are filled with Tannerite. It is a compound that explodes violently when pierced by a high velocity bullet.

    I still think this guy rules though.
  4. Profile photo of AsdaPrice
    AsdaPrice Male 18-29
    79 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 12:36 pm
    This guy is my hero!
  5. Profile photo of AtomicSkier9
    AtomicSkier9 Male 18-29
    1085 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 12:56 pm
    he was on Epic Meal Time!
  6. Profile photo of Tiredofnicks
    Tiredofnicks Male 30-39
    5101 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 1:16 pm
    You americans scare me. This is very cool and all, but it scares me that a civilian can get hold of the arsenal this guy has.
  7. Profile photo of M_Archer
    M_Archer Male 18-29
    525 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 1:17 pm
    The port-a-potty explosion was fake--there were explosives in there.
  8. Profile photo of donthaveone
    donthaveone Male 30-39
    953 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 1:25 pm
    The exploding stuff is just to keep the COD morons interested.
  9. Profile photo of thirrteen
    thirrteen Male 40-49
    230 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 1:43 pm
    that is a H&K PSG-1. Not a bad piece of kit
  10. Profile photo of xiquiripat
    xiquiripat Male 18-29
    2423 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 2:12 pm
    Dude has more fire arms than a black market bazaar.
  11. Profile photo of sacramantic
    sacramantic Male 30-39
    159 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 2:13 pm
    That guy is badass..
  12. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 2:14 pm
    "You americans scare me. This is very cool and all, but it scares me that a civilian can get hold of the arsenal this guy has."

    then we moan about gun control...
  13. Profile photo of Raizurhk
    Raizurhk Male 18-29
    49 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 2:21 pm
    @thirrteen that isnt a psg-1 the only thing that looks like the psg-1 on that gun is the stock nothing else even looks similar.
  14. Profile photo of Jnic815
    Jnic815 Male 18-29
    71 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 2:26 pm
    @thirrteen its not an H&K PSG-1 its a Noreen "Bad News" AR its an AR platform like the M4 or M16 but its chambered in .338 Lapua not .223 or .308

    www.onlylongrange.com/badnews.asp
  15. Profile photo of cyborg
    cyborg Male 13-17
    2790 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 2:48 pm
    how could it do that much damage to that truck?
  16. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 3:05 pm
    The truck and the sh*thouse were likely filled with propane
  17. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25408 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 3:09 pm
    I really hope that isnt real or explosives are being used as well.. kos thats scary
  18. Profile photo of ajmullan
    ajmullan Male 18-29
    105 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 3:17 pm
    He has explained how he blows stuff up in previous videos. He uses tannerite
  19. Profile photo of Marshmallow_
    Marshmallow_ Male 18-29
    6 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 3:26 pm
    I want to call fake, but I sooooo want it to be real :D
  20. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 3:28 pm
    God, I hate it that it`s true, but, I love the professional Russian! :-)
  21. Profile photo of lemmingboy15
    lemmingboy15 Male 18-29
    635 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 4:20 pm
    ajmullan`s got it right. obviously a bullet wouldn`t do that damage.
    good new is though, tannerite is 100% legal :D
  22. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 6:40 pm
    The thing with fake firearm capabilities that bugs me the most is the use, how ever cool it may be, of a fifty caliber Barret rifle to shoot people. It is an anti-materials weapon (I forget the exact designation) used to disable, say, a TANK. R. Lee Ermy showed how a hardened round could easily punch a perfectly round hole through one inch thick mild steel. As a former structural steel fabricator, I`m impressed. Such a bullet would, abviously, not convey a lot of energy to a squishy human target as it passes through flesh like a bb through a thick fog. If the energy of such a bullet were completely absorbed by the human body it would literally EXPLODE! Also, such eqipment is way too expensive to deploy en masse when even a small inexpensive pistol can fataly wound a person.
  23. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 6:41 pm
    context = VIDEO games, not real life. sorry.
  24. Profile photo of mentott510
    mentott510 Male 60-69
    204 posts
    September 12, 2011 at 8:12 pm
    If I could only get one for Battlefield 2...
  25. Profile photo of Ozmose
    Ozmose Male 30-39
    448 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 6:32 am
    .338 Lapua is an amazing round. I would love to have a gun chambered in it, but I could never afford to shoot the damn thing. The bullets themselves are solid machined copper. Even doing it on the cheap by reloading you`re looking at about $45 every time you pull the trigger.

    @sunday_scour
    The designation for the semi-auto Barret the US military assigned is the M82A1.
  26. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 9:44 am
    sunday_scour, I`m not entirely sure, but I think you just said a .50 cal rifle won`t do much damage to a human? You are a silly, silly man if that is what you said. hit a person with a .50 and seriously whatever you hit, it`s not going to be attached to the person anymore. But yes you make a good point that using a smaller weapon vs. a human is much more cost efficient. But in a pinch, i`m sure using a large weapon wouldn`t be frowned upon.
  27. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 10:03 am
    @sunday_scour

    The .50 cal has been use on people.The worlds longest sniper shot was with a .50 cal not to mention it turns cover like concrete walls into shrapnel.
  28. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 12:37 pm
    @Ozmose Thanks.

    @TDK_Master I was saying that the percentage of the bullet`s total energy transferred to a human is less than a smaller ciliber that doesn`t leave the body, thus all the energy of the bullet goes into the body, or those dum-dum rounds design for hurting as badly as possible. I do agree that it wouldn`t be frowned upon, but under normal circumstances I wouldn`t think it would be depoloyed except, as McGovern said, for long range targets where the bullet needs to have that much energy to go that far or for targets under heavy cover. On R. Lee Ermy`s History channel program I swear I thought they said anti-materials (vs anti-personel)

    @McGovern In gameplay it`s either no bullet can penetrate a suface, or any bullet can with a damage penalty. So, if a cover is thick enough to totally block a pistol shot, a .50 cal won`t do ANY damage either. It`s totaly necessary for fun, balanced gameplay, but still a little silly, especially when the apply it to, say, th
  29. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 12:42 pm
    @sunday_scour

    Oh your talking games LOL didn`t see that.
  30. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 1:09 pm
    @Ozmose Thanks.

    @TDK_Master I was saying that the percentage of the bullet`s total energy transferred to a human is less than a smaller ciliber that doesn`t leave the body, thus all the energy of the bullet goes into the body, or those dum-dum rounds design for hurting as badly as possible. I do agree that it wouldn`t be frowned upon, but under normal circumstances I wouldn`t think it would be depoloyed except, as McGovern said, for long range targets where the bullet needs to have that much energy to go that far or for targets under heavy cover. On R. Lee Ermy`s History channel program I swear I thought they said anti-materials (vs anti-personel)

    @McGovern In gameplay it`s either no bullet can penetrate a suface, or any bullet can with a damage penalty. So, if a cover is thick enough to totally block a pistol shot, a .50 cal won`t do ANY damage either. It`s totaly necessary for fun, balanced gameplay, but still a little silly, especially when the apply it to, say, th
  31. Profile photo of rydel
    rydel Male 30-39
    2 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 2:53 pm
    OMG.
    what a stupid fake... portable loo and a car exploded to small pieces in one shot and a bottle of liquid took three shots to destroy?
    what kind of ammo was it?
    it smells, people.
  32. Profile photo of honkeylips
    honkeylips Male 30-39
    1586 posts
    September 13, 2011 at 4:08 pm
    UM rydel I think he said he was 1000m away from the jug. It looked like maybe 20-30m away from the truck and porta-john. A bullet is gonna lose some force in that distance.
  33. Profile photo of crackyhoss
    crackyhoss Male 18-29
    254 posts
    September 14, 2011 at 1:22 am
    is it just me or does his accent sound super fake?
  34. Profile photo of Kalimata
    Kalimata Male 30-39
    661 posts
    September 14, 2011 at 8:37 am
    Oh come on, it was funny, blowing up the porta-crapper. Of course it was rigged, but still funny.

    @Sunday Other than sniper work, a .50 round is ant-material. In warfare, the optimum effect of a bullet is to wound the enemy, not kill them. For every wounded man, it takes two to carry him from the battlefield, and many M.D.s and material resources to care for him, thus depleting the enemy`s capacity to make war. That is why many of the modern assault weapons use a 5.56 FMJ round, a low caliber-high velocity round. It will enter the body and either exit intact, or ricochet off of bones, causing internal damage, but not necessarily killing. Anti-material, anti-vehicle, yes, but really vs personnel, you are much better off with a 7.62 GPMG. People don`t really realize how bloody slow a Browning .50 HMG really is, about 400rpm as opposed to the upwards of 1000rpm of a C6 GPMG.

  35. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    September 14, 2011 at 9:52 am
    @Kalimata Thanks!
  36. Profile photo of Batmanners
    Batmanners Male 18-29
    4007 posts
    September 15, 2011 at 10:39 pm
    Kalimata: You said C6. Americans, and the rest of the world aren`t familiar with that term. I think the equivalent is the M60 (FN MAG).

    And my memory recalls 700+ rounds per minute from that weapon, not 1000+. Which I think is the same firing rate as an M16/C7.

    To boot, it doesn`t matter how fast your weapon can shoot, no smart person ever just holds down the trigger and empties mag after mag. It`s short bursts, otherwise your barrel could warp and your firing mechanism could jam and your bullets would go off flying all over the place as you don`t aim as well when firing full-auto.

    Anyways, I hate guns, so I`mma shut up about this now.
  37. Profile photo of Kalimata
    Kalimata Male 30-39
    661 posts
    September 16, 2011 at 10:17 am
    @Batmanners The C6 is an "upgrade" to a M60, just as a C7 is to an H-bar M-16. The chrome lined barrel, in addition to the adjustable gas valve can allow for up to 1000rpm, but that is a cyclic rate of fire, and taxing to the gun

    The purpose of machine gun fire from a fixed defensive position is area of effect. The bullets form a beaten zone, or kill zone. Accuracy is not really a factor as you are not aiming at individual targets. This is defensive fire in the "SF" role (anchored tripod with a triangulating sight apparatus.)

    The rule in my day was change barrel after 440 rounds. This is not practical for actual combat, and I have personally put 660 rounds of cyclic fire down a barrel and only had it glow dull red, not hot enough to damage the barrel. Because the gun uses a fixed firing pin, and almost solid bolt, they don`t gum up that badly.

    5 round bursts are best. I used the rate of fire as an example for why .50mg are not norm

Leave a Reply